The debate and struggle over womens' rights is old.
But like with pretty much every social movement in the west, what started out as being about fair treatment of women, eventually morphed into a twisted, perverted version of its former self with the advent of womens' liberation of the 1970s led by ugly, mentally ill Jewesses, like Gloria Steinem and Betty Friedan.
It seems like womens' rights has become a past time of ugly, mentally wanting, unaccomplished, guilt-ridden women whom men don´t want. So they take their personal failures, shortcomings, and sexual frustrations-or dysfunctions- out on men by engaging in spiteful behavior to undermine not just men, but entire societies with bad theories and peddling dangerous and harmful ideologies, like promoting gay lifestyle.
A woman didn´t care to educate herself in her younger years and now earns a meager salary and can´t make ends meet? It´s all mens' fault.
Years of self-indulgent promiscuity got her feeling ashmed and guilty? It's all mens' fault.
She can´t find a man because she is unattractive and/or mentally unstable? Blame the men, and tell other women that getting married and having kids is bad and a prison sentence; or promote the lesbian lifestyle.
As far as cases of domestic abuse and sexual crimes against women go, these are not womens' rights issues. These are criminal issues, and need to be handled by the police, not womens' rights groups-who have not been successful in preventing this anyway, and never will be.
When a man physically abuses a woman, the man is wrong. But when the same woman gets abused by the same, or another man, then it becomes the woman´s fault. As the saying goes: Fool me once shame on you. Fool me twice, shame on me.
Because when domestic abuse becomes a repeat occurrence, it´s clear that the woman is exercising bad judgment as to her preference of men, especially if she forgives the abuser and fails to walk away.
Also, when a woman acts and dresses as a slut, she is disrespecting herself and invites trouble. So if women don´t like being sexually harassed and treated like sexual objects, then they need to reassess their own behavior and habits. People will not respect those without self-respect.
Modern feminism is not about equality for women. Modern feminism seeks special treatment for women, and wants women to advance based on their gender, not merit.
It is also a biological fact that women cannot do the same jobs as men, because their physiological constitution is different from men.
Women are natural nurturers and care-givers, therefore they gravitate towards occupations that require such a skill-set. This is why women are over-represented in jobs such as nursing, counseling, and human resources. This does not mean that men are being discriminated against. It´s just nature putting people where they naturally belong.
Men gravitate more toward occupations that require more stamina, and complex analysis, like engineering and IT. That´s why men are over-represented in these professions. They are better suited physiologically for them, not because of discrimination against women.
If men and women are equal, why not have them compete together in sports competitions, like the world cup, or in the olympics? But as we see, women and men have their own separate groups, and this is because men and women are built different. If women had to compete against men in sporting events, on equal terms, men would win virtually all awards. Do the feminists want to see this? I bet they don´t.
And whose criteria would be used as the benchmark for winning, anyway? Would womens' standards apply to all, or mens'. Because either way, men would win virtually every competition.
Women are also paid less because of the differences in career choices, and because of the fact that women on average tend to have more absences from the workforce over time due to child birth and other issues men don´t go through. And if all these absences by women are tallied up over time, it looks like women are paid less. But again, it´s not out of discrimination.
Womens´rights are also a distraction to a certain extent by the powers that be, who now, more than ever, love to play one societal group against the other to keep them busy fighting amongst themselves while the governments pick everyones pockets and screws them all over in whatever way it wants.
Governments, especially in the west, are also exploiting womens' rights as a cheap way to please one demographic at the expense of the rest of society. Because it´s easier to lament low pay for women only, rather than to address the much more serious issues of high taxation and generally low wages of everyone, men and women.
But such a problem is expensive to fix, so the focus is on women only. Then the governments and organizations can pretend they won some major battle when women are artificially promoted into positions not earned on merit, and have their pay bumped up a few percent. The same paradigm applies to the government‘s coddling of LGBT freaks.
Setting women against men also erodes society, and leads to it being generally poorer, less cohesive and unstable. A stable family is the best thing for everyone, especially financially.
But decades of mass brainwashing by nefarious individuals and groups with disgusting pro-LGBT propaganda, and promotion of liberal agendas that lead women to mistakenly think that they don´t need husbands and kids, has caused serious problems within societies.
The same is true of more and more men, who have been emasculated by leftist propaganda and corrupted by trivial, materialistic nonsense and who can‘t handle grown-up adult responsibilities, lack initiative, and have become averse to having families of their own.
The same groups that promote womens' hatred of men are also doing all they can to corrupt men in all sorts of ways that makes them bad partners for women. It‘s a vicious cycle.
The financial gangsterism and debt slavery in societies has also made having a stable family environment more difficult. And this is not by accident.
The promotion of LGBT lifestyle, enforced gender reassignment on kids, breaking up of the family, and forced vaccination with experimental drugs, and increasing levels of inflation and debt appear to be a part of efforts to dwindle the world´s population by preventing people from getting married, being able to buy affordable housing, and having children.
Add to this mix the increasing amount of transvestites forcing themselves into areas that were reserved for real men or women only.
Take for example two recent cases where biological men who declared themselves to be women competed against biological women at sporting competitions, and who due to their male physiology easily outperformed the real women, one in swimming, the other in cage fighting.
The recent case of a man who declared himself a woman and competed with a biological woman in a cage match fight has left the woman badly hurt. Is this a fair fight? How is this fair to women? Where are all the feminists, and do they have anything to say about this?
Why do women who declared themselves to be men not compete against biological men?
Why don‘t gay men compete against women, and vice versa?
Could it also be that men who cannot win against other men in a sports competition declare themselves women to then be able to compete against biological women and easily win?
The deafening silence of womens' rights campaigners when it comes to such occurrences is telling, and questions whether womens' rights is really about bettering womens´ lives, or is it about destroying womens´ lives in order to hurt societies.
Womens´rights has never been about equal rights for women. It was always about setting women against men, and giving unqualified women unnatrual and unfair advantages that they do not deserve.
All displays of womens' power-the marches and protests-are an emotionally-driven sham. They have not, and will not lead to anything good for both women and men in the long-term.
In today´s society, equality trumps quality.
But boosting people up due to superficial characteristics instead of merit is having a bad effect on societies, including their politics, education, and economies.
But underneath it all, making women equal to men in all things is simply illogical and unrealistic, no matter what anyone says or does to prove otherwise.
Same goes for homosexuals and transvestites.
No comments:
Post a Comment