Another Gaza Massacre

View the results of Israhell's latest bloodbath in Gaza. This video lays to rest the zionist lies that Israhell is the victim.

Look at how Israhell takes revenge for the holocaust by massacring those who had nothing to do with it, and is in turn aided and abetted by the European countries that did.

Is this the so-called "Jewish morality" at work?

This massacre is NOT about "self-defense." It is about revenge and the ethnic cleansing of Arab Palestinians.

Israhell started this mess with their targeted assassinations in order to deliberately provoke Hamas. It has done this multiple times before. Whenever things get too quiet between Israhell and Hamas, the zionists suddenly provoke a fight.

The problem is not Hamas and their rockets. The problem is the Israhelli occupation which has been going on for 40+ years. The occupation is responsible for this violence. The occupation created Hamas; the occupation is responsible for the rocket fire and the bus bombs.

Make no mistake. This massacre was underwritten by the US. By protecting Israhell, the US is complicit in their crimes. 

Folks, this is what your vote on November 6, 2012 gets you! This is what Obama let happen.

"The Palestinians must be made to understand in the deepest recesses of their consciousness that they are a defeated people." 

--Moshe Yaalon, then the Israeli Defense Forces chief of staff, in 2002 commenting on an earlier massacre of Palestinians

Good Guys vs Bad Guys

Why does the US treat certain countries better than others?

Why are some dictators coddled and aided and abetted by the US and others assassinated, overthrown and then hanged?

I'm not going to waste my time explaining fully how criminally hypocritical US foreign policy is detail by detail. I'm not going to talk about in detail about what morally hopeless cretins the creatures who govern this hapless land of contradictions are. These are both givens, long known to those who are still awake and of at least average intelligence.

Always remember this: US interests start and finish with the dollar in mind. 

No matter what is said on TV by the president and his handlers, no matter what lofty principles and eloquent speeches are made by any politician, and regardless of all the self-righteous fluff and feel-good tripe stuffed into US history books, the number one US aim is the control of the wealth of the globe, by hook or crook or murder.

It basically comes down to one simple premise: whatever means have to be used to attain the wealth of the globe, will be used.

This explains the anomalies in US foreign policy which are very evident when examined closer.

Those who know this simple truth, can very easily discern a lot of things in the everyday events around the globe into which the US decides to stick their bloody fingers.

Whatever the US response, or lack thereof, to any event is no mistake. Whatever reaction follows from the US government is carefully calculated based on economic interests and how the event at hand fits into it. 

But this inadvertently also shows which countries in the world are still truly independent and sovereign and which ones are subservient to the US will.

It is confusing trying to reconcile US government rhetoric versus actions.  

The US may support some leader or movement if it feels that they serve its economic capitalist interests and ally itself against another if it is harmful to US interests.

Whether the person/group supported or opposed is a cold-blooded autocratic butcher or a paragon of virtue and freedom is irrelevant as long as "vital" US interests are concerned. The US supports the side which is more receptive to US interests. 

But one easy way to see which movement/leader/government is friendly to US interests is to simply look at the treatment the US has meted out to it.

99.9% of the time, any movement/leader/government which is unreceptive to US economic and strategic interests (although not a threat to the safety of the US and maybe even generally friendly) will be pilloried, demonized, slandered, sanctioned, accused of all sorts of crimes and threatened on an everyday basis by the US government and the compliant mainstream media propaganda machine.

Also, any leader out there today that is tolerated by the US is subservient to it to some degree, even if they seem to be defiant towards the US on the outside. A few such examples are Egyptian President Morsi and Afghan President Karzai. If they were truly independent, they would get the same treatment as Iran, N. Korea, Syria, Cuba and others who refuse to bend their knee for the evil US empire.

The US does not have friends. To be friends with someone, you first have to acknowledge that this person is an equal. It means treating them with respect and fairness. A true friend helps without demanding anything in return.

By this criteria, the US has zero friends. It only has interests.

The US does not want anyone else to be its equal. Those who try to be so in any way are demonized and slandered and insulted (Russia and China). The US only wants to talk...no, dictate, to people from a position of superiority, not equality. This goes for ally and foe. The US also does not respect other nations. It only treats them nice as long as they give in to every US wish and whim. And the US NEVER helps anyone without demanding something in return; many times wanting back more than it ever gave (Marshall Plan is a good example).

The contradictory US behavior is a result of seeking wealth.

That's why the US condemns Syria for cracking down on protesters and stays quiet when Bahrain calls in S. Arabian troops to put down by force its own people.

That's why it fomented a rebellion in Libya under the cover of “humanitarian aid” to the rebels but stayed quiet for two weeks while Mubarak's regime in Egypt beat protesters mercilessly and ran them over with cars.

That's why it pretends not to notice the savagery in S. Arabia and lack of any semblance of democracy in places like Kuwait but breaks out in a sweat whenever a protester is slapped in Tehran or Moscow.

That's why it interferes in other nations elections and manipulates public opinion in favor of the pro-US candidate, but screams “fraud!” when a candidate/party in another country who is not friendly to US interests wins.

The US will swiftly condemn and promptly act against any act of violence, electoral fraud, genocide, invasion, human rights abuses, corruption, governmental ineptness and other crimes when those who commit these acts are not willing to be loyal subjects of the US government and who do not accept the US neo-liberal capitalist model which seeks to exploit their countries resources and people for cheap.

But the US will swiftly excuse, protect or at the very least ignore any of these above mentioned crimes when the people committing them are 100% friendly to US economic, strategic and military interests.

US actions, whatever they are and whoever or whatever they apply to, always did, currently do, and always will revolve around the dollar, for better or worse.

All the rest is propaganda and lies.

Post-Election Reflections

The election of 2012 is over and the world is stuck with Obummer’s mug for the  next four years.

After all the partisan nonsense, lies, obfuscations and massive amounts of money pumped into the US presidential campaigns, it is time to reflect on some key things, especially on things that have not been said and are being ignored by the political parties and the mainstream media.

First let’s deal with the actual number of voters. The US likes to present itself as a beacon of democracy and its electoral system as a shining example of freedom and self-determination. But when one takes a closer look at the data, it is not hard to see the contradictions and problems with these lofty views.

Let’s do some math:

There are roughly 237,657,645 voting-age adults in the United States.¹

Obama got 62,280,959 of the popular vote, or 50.6%.²

Romney got 58,899,127 of the popular vote, or 47.8%.²

The total number of people that actually voted in 2012 according to these results was 121,180,086.

Now let’s subtract 121,180,086 from 237,657,645 and we get 116,477,559. This is the amount of people who did not vote.

121,180,086 is only 50.98% of all voting-age adults!

Roughly half of the people in the US did not vote. This is an embarrassment for a country claiming to be the beacon of democracy and freedom.

Now let’s calculate how much support Obama really has in the US by comparing the percentage of the total voting-age public (237,657,645) to all of his popular votes (62,280,959)

The result is 26.2%

That’s right. We have a president that is only supported by a quarter of the US populace. This is truly disgraceful.

To be fair, this has been the case for elected US presidents going back decades. No wonder that the country is in such a pathetic state. These presidents only have to get 20% support from their base, plus five or so percent of fools naïve enough to vote for them to make a difference in the numbers.

As an aside, counting the TOTAL number of voting-age people in the US is the most accurate and fairest way to determine the true support for any candidate, since that candidate will make decisions for EVERYONE. Counting just the people who actually voted or even the number of people registered to vote gives an inaccurate and hyped up number.

Right after the election, I wondered how many people actually voted. Every time I heard any post-election analysis on the radio and TV, most of it was a bunch of self-serving self-congratulatory PR fluff. But there was no mention of the total number of people who voted.

Then lo and behold, on Thursday morning,, November 8, I was driving to work and heard an anchor on NPR state that the voter turnout in this election was lower than in 2008. But they conveniently left out any numbers, for the obvious reason that it would be an embarrassment to actually mention them. No other news outlet even mentioned the lower turnout at all.

The God Thing

The US also has a very annoying and bad habit of bringing religion and God into the election-year mix.
It seems that each candidate has to prostate themselves before the religious nuts out there and prove beyond a doubt that they are god-fearing and that religion is important to them. If they do not, then they place their chances of winning in jeopardy.
There is just one problem with this religious litmus test: It is illegal according to the constitution.

Article VI, Paragraph 3, of the US Constitution states:

“...no religious Test shall ever be required as a Qualification to any Office or public Trust under the United States.”

So the next time any candidate for political office is pressured to talk about god and his religion, Article VI needs to be invoked by them, and the topic of religion can be dropped because it is both unnecessary and unconstitutional.

As long as we are at it, let's dispel the whole Pledge of Allegiance which students in US schools are forced to recite everyday.

The oath, written by Francis J. Bellamy,originally read as follows:

"I pledge allegiance to my Flag and to the Republic for which it stands, one nation, indivisible, with liberty and justice for all"

No mention of God anywhere. But judging by Francis Bellamy's background,we can see why.

Bellamy was a Christian Socialist, who “championed 'the rights of working people and the equal distribution of economic resources, which he believed was inherent in the teachings of Jesus.'' In 1891, Bellamy was forced from his Boston pulpit for his socialist sermons, and eventually stopped attending church altogether after moving to Florida, reportedly because of the racism he witnessed there.³

The words “under God” were added in 1954 by President Eisenhower as part of his election campaign and in order to fend off communism. It unfortunately stuck, but the constitutionality of this addition is still in question.

Nevertheless the ignorant religious fundamentalists still mistakenly think that the words God and Christianity are part of the constitution and never cease to pressure candidates with questions concerning their religious beliefs.

This practice needs to stop, as it smears a person who does not show the correct level of fealty to some particular god, and it distracts people from focusing on the candidate's competency and qualifications for public office, which is a secular institution.

What Change?

The saddest part of this election is that neither Obama nor Romney deserved to win. They are both cretins who are supported by a minority of voters. They are bad choices and everyone who voted for them has done themselves, the country, and the world a great disservice.

Nothing will change with Obama still in charge. He will keep on bombing countries, lying, breaking promise after promise while taking good care of Wall St. and the wealthy and screwing the middle class and the poor.

It looks like the country got "Pocket Change" in the first Obama presidency and now he will just move forward over the corpses of the people whose lives he either extinguished or ruined between 2009-2012.

Back during the Bush years, I abhorred the people who were stupid enough to vote for Bush twice. I asked myself how can a people still support such a liar and a murderer? I used to date a girl that considered herself republican and when I told her about the rotten things that Bush has done, her response was that she does not want to think about all that.

Recently, I read an article about an activist confronting an Obama supporter during the 2012 election about Obama's drone killings and the Obama supporter replied that they "don't think about that."

It seems that ignorance and delusion is not limited to the republican side. It is alive and well with democrats also.

And these same democrats who “don't think about” Obummer's killing sprees were very vocal in opposing every single act of violence that GW Bush ordered during his presidency.

Black America is Asleep

The majority of blacks in the US voted for Obama. Traditionally, blacks are concerned about political, social and economic justice.

So why they voted overwhelmingly for Obama a 2nd time is a mystery.

This is a man that left them out to dry after 2008, bombed countries with drones, totally ignored the massacres of blacks in post-regime-change Libya, and sold out his supporters to the Wall St. hyenas.

What is it with black people? Are they truly concerned about justice for everyone, or does the fight for it apply only to their own communities and interests?

What does black America, and especially its leadership, have to say about this? How the hell can blacks in the US expect justice when they ignore the great injustices and war crimes which Obama has committed during the last four years all over the world? What about justice for Afghans, Pakistanis, Iraqis, Palestinians, Libyans, Syrians, Iranians, Africans, and the American citizens whom their idol Obama had killed/assassinated without trial?

Where is the justice in this?

By excusing or ignoring these criminal acts committed by Obama, blacks in America are helping to sow more injustice for the future, for themselves as well as foreigners. Blaming Bush can no longer serve as an excuse, for Obummer has willingly continued the Bush-era atrocities and has even gone beyond them.

In the US, hypocrisy truly knows no bounds.



Sources:

1. https://www.federalregister.gov/articles/2012/01/26/2012-1635/estimates-of-the-voting-age-population-for-2011

2. Obama Elected 2012: President Clinches Electoral Vote Win. Posted: 11/06/2012 11:16 pm EST Updated: 11/07/2012 2:45 am EST)

3. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Francis_Bellamy

Corporate Selection of 2012

 

The disgusting farcical spectacle known as the US election of 2012 will soon come to pass.

During the last few months, the two corporate-approved candidates, Barack Obama and Mitt Romney, have been falling all over each other in trying to demonize, slander, and out-cheap shot each other. Their rhetoric has been heavy on hyperbole, drama and wedge issues but light on substance and any details.

But this is the way the wealthy power-elites want it to be. They want election time to be take up by useless chatter, marketing gloss and hype, emotional diatribes, manipulation and petty distractions. This is so that people will not think about the real issues and ask any hard questions which have not been answered for a very long time.

The American electorate easily fall for this choreographed nonsense due to their general lack of information and very often wilful ignorance. They are like kids, ready to swallow whatever choice is made for them by the corporatocracy.

Just observe the way these two political parties, I'll call them Republi-crats from now on, treat the electorate as little kids. This was on full display during the run up to the Democratic National Convention in September of 2012. Michelle Obama, while on location at the Charlotte, NC convention center was giving an opening speech and used cheap and childish remarks to fire up the crowd; remarks reminiscent of some elementary school pep rally.

One recent event that illustrates this treatment is when a mock election was held at my daughter's elementary school. The choices were between just Obama and Romney. My daughter ended up voting for Romney. When I asked her why, her reply was that she saw him ride a horse, and she likes horses.

This is a very childish reason to vote for any candidate, but sadly this is how most of the US electorate seems to think. Their voting decisions are based on equally childish reasons.They see a picture or hear a sound byte that appeals to them and they immediately vote for the person associated with it. It is psychological manipulation and these campaigns know how to ride it to full effect. Very few voters make an informed choice after doing some research.

That's how this election has been. Lie after lie, obfuscation, hypocrisy, manipulation over and over again. Add to that the influx of private and corporate money into every race, thanks to the citizens United decision, and now we have a putrid and effluvial soup of the most foulest and corrupt junk politics and shameless corruption.

Each political party blames the other for the economic problems plaguing the US, but both of them have been complicit in their making. Take for instance the abomination called NAFTA (North Atlantic free Trade Agreement). It was passed in 1994 during the Clinton administration. It was the first of many corporate give-aways of job off shoring to Mexico and elsewhere which started the decimation of US industry, the middle class and the destitution of US economic life.

Surprisingly, at the time NAFTA was passed, the majority of the Democrats were against it (mainly because it eroded union power, which the Democrats relied on for votes and election funding), most Republicans were for it, and Bill Clinton himself was for it as well. He went against his own party by doing so. NAFTA passed and the Democratic party officially crossed into the corporatocracy's clutches for good.

If one political party was good and the other was bad, then the US would be in better shape than it is today. It took both the Democrats and Republicans to screw things up this bad. Blaming each other for their joint mistakes is a PR cop-out for the dumbed-down masses.

The influx of money cannot be overlooked, as it is the source of most of the problems in the corrupt US electoral system. Lobbying is an illegal and corrupt practice.

Its proponents and defenders argue that they are just interested in access, and having their voices heard. If those were the only aims, then these CEO s and their fellow-travelers can send an email or a letter to their congressman and the President like everyone else.

But of course, lobbying is not about having one's voice heard. It is about buying influence and influencing legislation. It is bribery pure and simple.

The US seems to have a knack for making the illegal and wrong, legal and permissible. In doing so, immoral, illegal and unethical behavior is allowed to fester and thrive without impunity, The patriot Act is one of the most flagrant examples of this demented theory at work.

US politicians whine about Russian President Vladimir Putin being elected as president for the 3rd time and all sorts of accusations of corruption that he supposedly engaged in to “rig and steal” the votes for himself.

But when two parties set themselves up as the masters of the US and prevent any other party and challenger from running against them and taking power, what is the world supposed to think about this!

In this respect, the US is only different from China by the amount of official political parties; China has one and the US has two.

But in reality, as far as the core principles of foreign policy bent on the economic, political, military and strategic domination of the world for US corporate and banking interests is concerned, both the Democrats and Republicans are in full agreement. 

The differences between them are only procedural. They both seek the same aims, albeit in different ways. Winning an election just puts one party and their cronies as the beneficiaries of government largess, and it is this largess which they want access to. That's what the fighting, bickering and mud-slinging is all about. All the rest is just pious PR rhetoric devoid of substance, and offering nothing new.

When it comes to these presidential candidates and US politicians, there is never any in-depth attempt at self-analysis and introspection by any of them. They never admit mistakes, they never doubt themselves and their decisions even after they prove to be disastrous. They do what they want for power and wealth, consequences be damned, and think they are right 100%. If the bad fallout from their decisions turns out to be too much to hide or gloss over, they simply find a scapegoat like Al Qaeda, terrorism, Iran, Russia, China, etc.

This deluded and arrogant way of thinking was on full display during the presidential debates between Obama and Romney. Both candidates have showed themselves to be avowed militarists and expansionists, and unwavering capitalists. They openly discussed the overthrow of foreign leaders in other nations (Syria) and talked casually of starting another war (against Iran).

The entire debate process is corrupt to the core. It is controlled by a private corporation headed by a democrat and a republican. It vets and pre-selects all questions that can be asked, sets rules on what questions and topics are off-limits, prevents 3rd parties from attending debates and people who submit questions for the town-hall debates are screened to make sure they ask “approved” questions. There are no follow-up questions allowed and microphones are immediately cut off after a question is asked. Even the moderator cannot ask follow-up questions.

How sad it is that in the country which touts itself as the greatest democracy that has ever existed, the electoral system is so corrupt, co-opted and censored. How sad it is that in this so-called great democracy people are only given two choices to vote for. This is embarrassing and pathetic. Americans should be ashamed of themselves for going along with this dog and pony show.

The media are also part of the problem. They act as the enablers of this rotten and corrupt electoral system and only give face time and coverage to the Democrat and Republican candidates. 3rd party candidates are not interviewed and ignored. This is evidence of the pro-corporate electoral system hard at work.

Add to this the questionable results from these malfunctioning and rigged electronic voting machines which leave no paper trail, and the final nail in the coffin of US electoral fraud is firmly in place.

Taking into account the farcical debates, the pre-approved topics, the faulty voting machines, the anomaly know as the electoral college, the deliberate mainstream media blackout of 3rd party candidates which challenge the Republicrat monopoly of US political life, and yes, add to this the election fraud fiasco of 2000, the US has absolutely no right whatsoever to criticize any other country's political and electoral systems and the fairness thereof. Doing so while having a corrupt electoral system of it own makes the US a supreme hypocrite and liar and a laughing stock of the world.

The US electorate are being deliberately manipulated and herded into a republican or democratic box by the party and corporate/bankster operatives and their PR marketing machines. Both of the candidates are pre-selected and marked as business and empire friendly. This is why they are being allowed to run at all.

On November 6th, these pre-selected corporate candidates will be presented to the people who naively will shoot themselves in the foot by voting for them. The entire US election cycle has become so money-ridden that it is more like a corporate auction. The whole damn election season has become a huge marketing campaign and the two Republi-crat candidates are the products.

The Democratic and Republican stranglehold on the US election and political system must be broken if there is ever going to be any semblance of normality restored in this country. People must educate themselves about other candidates and do research before casting their votes, instead of being spoon fed corporate pre-approved shills which only perpetuate the mess we are in.

One thing is certain about this election: Things will only get worse regardless of whether Obama or Romney win. The losers will be the American people. The true winners will be the corporate and banking elites.

So vote your lives away for either one of these cheap and glitzy overmarketed products who promise you grand things and grand visions, but the buyer's remorse will set in after the election year consumers realize that the product they purchase says in little letters: BATTERIES NOT INCLUDED and ALL SALES FINAL.

Dangerous Demagogue

Mad Dog Nitwit-Yahoo

The Israeli Prime Minister never fails to shock anyone with his rabid lunacy. 

Today at the UN, he let loose a diatribe of covert anti-Arab racism, looney dooms-day predictions and classic vengeful and mean-spirited rhetoric which is a hallmark of sick Zionist ideology.

He scared the world with tales of imaginary Iranian nuclear capability and a slew of false assumptions and accusations WITH ABSOLUTELY NO CREDIBLE EVIDENCE to back up any of it. 

The only thing he had to show was a pathetic bomb shaped chart which supposedly represented the Iranian nuclear weapon break-out capability. 

When I first saw him holding the chart, I thought that someone just doctored the picture up to make Nitwit-yahoo look cartoonish, but to my shock, the chart was indeed real!

If I was a Jew and an Israeli, I’d be embarrassed as hell to see the leader of my country stand in front of the world and froth at the mouth while uttering insane predictions and hopeless lies.

Nitwit-yahoo is a first-rate con-man and liar. He thrives on dishonesty and hubris. 

But this time even Israel’s long-time slaves are having a bit of a hard time trying to stomach this twit from Tel-Aviv.

Cleary Nitwit-yahoo has gone overboard. His dangerous predictions and arm-twisting countries to set “red lines” on Iran and his arrogant demands have caused people to distance themselves from him.

You know you’re really fucked up in the head when the supreme war criminal Barack Obummer does not want to meet with you! That right there says it all.

Nitwit-yahoo has told spectacular fibs before. Ten years ago, he was warning of a world-wide catastrophe and impending doom if Saddam Hussein was not taken out. 

Now he just dusted off his old diatribes, replaced the word Iraq with Iran, and here he goes again.

This is what he has been/is now saying :

Benjamin Netanyahu, September 12, 2002:

"[I]t is simply not reflecting the reality to assume that Saddam isn’t feverishly working to develop nuclear weapons, as we speak."

Benjamin Netanyahu, April 18, 2012:

"Today, the regime in Iran openly calls and determinedly works for our destruction. And it is feverishlyworking to develop atomic weaponsto achieve that goal."

Benjamin Netanyahu, September 12, 2002:

"How imminent is it [the threat from Iraq]? Look, do you want to wait and find out? The answer is no."

Benjamin Netanyahu, September 11, 2012:

"The world tells Israel, 'Wait, there's still time,' and I say, ' Wait for what, wait until when?'...The fact is that every day that passes, Iran gets closer and closer to nuclear bombs."

Benjamin Netanyahu, September 12, 2002:

"[Iraq] happens to be one of the two - now, as we know, one of the three - regimes that is racing to build nuclear weapons."

Benjamin Netanyahu, September 16, 2012:

"And for me, the issue is, as the prime minister of a country that is threatened with annihilation by a brutal regime in Tehran that is racing to develop nuclear bombs for that and, obviously, we cannot delegate the job of stopping Iran if all else fails to someone else."

Benjamin Netanyahu, September 12, 2002:

"Today the United States must destroy the same regime because a nuclear-armed Saddam will place the security of our entire world at risk."

Benjamin Netanyahu, March 5, 2012:

"For fifteen years, I’ve been warning that a nuclear-armed Iran is a grave danger to my country and to thepeace and security of the world."

Benjamin Netanyahu, September 12, 2002:

"Every indication we have is that he [Saddam] is pursuing, pursuing with abandon, pursuing with every ounce of effort, the establishment of weapons of mass destruction, including nuclear weapons."

Benjamin Netanyahu, September 16, 2012:

"Come on. We know that they're working towards a weapon. We know that. It's not something that we surmise. We have absolutely certainty about that. And they're advancing towards that nuclear program."

Benjamin Netanyahu, September 12, 2002:

"There is no question whatsoever that Saddam is seeking and is working and is advancing towards the development of nuclear weapons— no question whatsoever."

During a March 7, 2012 interview on Fox News, Greta Van Susteren asked Netayahu about the case for illegally attacking Iran in light of what the world now knows about the lies that led to the invasion of Iraq. "Do you have any doubt they [Iran] have a nuclear weapons program?," Van Susteren wondered. The Israeli Prime Minister replied: "I think there is no question."

Van Susteren continued, "[I]n 2003, with weapons ofmass destruction in Iraq, there was so much certainty and it turned out, our intelligence was wrong on that. So I am trying to balance the two."

The response from Netanyahu was immediate. It was also confounding, considering his testimony to Congress ten years ago. 

He told Van Susteren:

"First of all, there is no question. There is no comparison. In the case of Iraq, I was on the Israeli cabinet when we discussed this issue. We didn't know. We couldn't say that they didn't have a nuclear weapons program, we couldn't say if they did. In the case of Iran there is absolutely no question."

That all sixteen US intelligence agencies have come to the unanimous conclusion that Iran does not have nuclear weapons and is not working on them does not matter to Nitwit-yahoo.

He just goes on puking up the same old tired canards and scary stories of Iranian nuclear weapons, without bothering to present any facts to support his assertions…because he does not have any.

What have been the consequences of Nitwit-yahoo’s lies? 

-Thousands of US soldiers dead and injured
-Record number of US military suicide rates

-Over a million Iraqis dead

-Iraq war spending has played a key role in bankrupting the US

-The world is more dangerous

Nitwit-yahoo's apocalyptic tirades are a distraction from the real problems. In his UN speech, this damn idiot said nothing about the Palestinians, nothing about the protests and disillusion happening in Israel, nothing about peace. None of these real and serious problems matter to him; only Iran, Iran, Iran, a manufactured threat being used to distract and mislead people about who the real global troublemakers are!

Compare that with the speech given by Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, who spoke about reforming toe global system to be more cooperative and thoughtful. He talked about the end of arrogance and military threats and a more peaceful world. 

His optimism contrasted greatly with Nitwit-yahoo's morally repugnant, discredited and failed stench of zionist chauvinism, deceit, and an unchecked aggressive paranoia driven by the most selfish of self-interest and by utter contempt and total lack of concern for enemy and ally alike.

How much more lying and threatening will the world tolerate from this dangerous and demented Zionist mad dog of the Middle East? How much more blood and treasure will the rest of the world have to squander by listening to this paranoid leech? Hasn’t he done more than enough damage? How much more death and misery does the world have to endure to satisfy this Zionist subhuman’s blood-lust? How many more have to die for Zionist lies? 

What will happen the next time the world realizes that they've been had by Bibi's bullshit? Will there be anything left of the world?

Any politician anywhere who listens to, and buys Nitwit-yahoo’s Iranian nuclear threat lunacy is a dangerous nutcase and need to be voted out of office or wheeled out of their residence in a wheel-barrow and dumped on the nearest dung hill. 

Dangerous ideologues like Nitwit-yahoo and the morons who support him (Mitt Romney) are the biggest threats to national security. It is people like them that have a "medieval" mindset of war-killing and retribution.

What is more medieval than massacring thousands of Palestinians, chasing them off at gunpoint, stealing large swathes of their land, and then occupying, repressing and holding them hostage and under siege in their own land for 40+ years? If the Arabs are "medieval", then Israel is utterly dark-age!

It is clear that Nitwit-yahoo is emotionally and psychologically unstable. Someone needs to give him a rabies shot, some Prozac and a week off.

Blowback in Benghazi

Because it is a Presidential election year, I was going to write another post about the pathetically corrupt US electoral system and the current crappy crop of candidates it produced.

But due to recent developments in Benghazi, Libya, I decided to postpone another election-year post and devote today’s time to covering the event which has left the US  government, diplomatic corps, EU and NATO with a huge egg on their faces.

On Wednesday, US Ambassador to Libya died of suffocation when the US consulate in the Libyan city of Benghazi was torched. Two marine guards also died with him.

What sparked this incident?

Recently, a film produced by a US Zionist Jew, named Sam Bacile, which insulted the Prophet Mohammed was released. The film caused an angry uproar in Muslim countries, resulting in US embassy compounds in some countries being stormed in protest. 

One of the places where protests were held was at the US consulate in Benghazi, Libya. The protesters denounced the US for the insulting film. 

To avenge the insult, RPGs were fired into the compound, setting it ablaze and killing four people, including the US Ambassador.

This event is blowback for the murderous and criminal war which the US and NATO unleashed on Libya in 2011. The Libyan religious fanatics whom the US and NATO armed and helped to overthrow Gaddafi and put in power ended up turning on their benefactors in Washington.

This is the result of the disgusting scheming and lies which the US used to get rid of a nationalist and patriotic government and replace them with compliant and corrupt puppets.

Col. Gaddafi warned the West last year that the people they are helping are dangerous fanatics, and he was right. But the US did not want to listen. It saw an opportunity to get what it wanted NOW, and it disregarded the consequences.

The fanatics which the US helped arm are now killing US officials, probably with the same weapons that the US gave them! 

Christopher Stevenson and the US government are to blame for this. They helped these rebel fanatics come to power. Christopher Stevens was a fervent supporter of regime change in Libya. By helping to bring these fanatics to power, he signed his own death warrant. 

The blood is on the hands of Obama, Hillary, Cameron, Sarkozy, NATO and every single soldier, spook and airman who took part in the Libyan war crime last year. It was they who set the stage for this event.

The bombing of Libya and the overthrow of Gaddafi is stupidity and callousness on steroids!

And the ironic thing is that the US Ambassador would still be alive if the US/NATO would have left Gaddafi and Libya alone.

If there was any doubt that US policy is totally demented and hypocritical, that doubt has been laid to rest in Benghazi. 

Once again, the US has still not learned its lesson. It supported religious zealots in Afghanistan and is suffering the results there today.

It supported religious fanatics in Iraq and is suffering the results. It supported fanatics in Libya and now is suffering the results. The US is also supporting fanatics in Syria, and the outcome will undoubtedly be the same for them. 

But if the US thought that it would get away with bringing religious fanatics to power in Libya and not suffer any consequences, then they were very naïve and foolish to think so. After all, the warning signs were there for years.

During the last decade when the Iraqi insurgency raged on, a significant amount of Al Qaeda-affiliated fighters and suicide bombers came from Benghazi and other Eastern Libyan cities which were the hotbeds of Ant-Gaddafi forces for a long time.

Earlier in 2012, the Libyan fanatics whom the US helped bring to power stormed a WW2 allied cemetery and vandalized it as revenge for the burning of Korans in Afghanistan by US forces.

A captured Al Qaeda fighter in Iraq with US blood on his hands, who was extradited back to Libya some years ago, now serves as a local militia leader. He was also part of the rebel forces whom the US helped last year.

So the US set itself up for this latest debacle. Making up ridiculous lies and spinning the death of the US State Dept. apparatchik Christopher Stevens as the work of Al Qaeda using the protest as a diversion to attack the embassy is laughable. The US government is trying to hide the truth and their guilt, for they know that the people who did this were the same ones the US helped bring to power.

All this begs the question of what is Al Qaeda? The US seems to blame Al Qaeda when US interests suffer a terrorist attack, but then turns around and calls the Syrian Al Qaeda-affiliated rebels “freedom fighters” and “activists.” US behavior towards Al Qaeda is rife with contradictions and hypocrisy.

Al Qaeda is either a US enemy or asset, it can’t be both; unless the US government has completely lost their mind and are fighting and funding the same enemy for whatever demented reason. 

The US will most likely try to avenge the death of Amb. Stevens by killing those who were responsible. In the process, they will end up killing innocent people once again.

 But even if those who were responsible for the ambassador’s death are killed, it will not do any good. It will only inflame tensions.

By trying to kill those people, instead of bringing them in to face trial, the US is no better than those who it is looking for, and by wanting to avenge one death by killing those whom it aided last year just shows the startling level of US hypocrisy.

But the US cannot kill the Frankenstein monster it created. This monster is now running amok and has turned Libya into a ramshackle, corrupt and failed state with no real authority or stability.

What happened  in Benghazi is payback for the murder and destruction which the US/NATO unleashed in Libya last year. Ambassador Stevens wasn’t killed! He committed suicide by bringing to power his killers. He was a miserable imperial mule from the US State Dept. stable, and got his just desserts. The death and suffering he helped unleash on Libya ended up killing him.

It is also payback for the savage way which the rebels dealt with Gaddafi after he was captured. It was also payback for the inhuman gloating which Hillary Clinton displayed last October after she learned of Gaddafi’s death.

More of these events are sure to come.

Let’s not forget what caused this chaos: the release of the anti-Islamic screed by a wealthy Jew who himself admitted that he hates Islam and made the movie as a provocation. 

It is quite a coincidence that this movie was released on the 11^th anniversary of 9/11 by a Muslim-hating, pro- Zionist Israeli Jew. The timing is very suspect, and I think that this may have been a deliberate Israeli psyops operation in order to provoke Muslims, use any resulting violence to demonize Islam, manipulate public opinion against Muslims and anyone who the Israelis do not like, and hopefully force the US to go along with bombing Iran and anyone else the Zionists want.

This recent violence only benefits Israel and PM Nitwit-yahoo. Was this anti-Islamic movie a desperate propaganda gamble by the Zionists to get out of the corner which they painted themselves into?

This presents many questions about Israel and what their real aims are. It shows how easily they can provoke violent acts and manipulate the public. No wonder there are people who think that the Mossad helped plan the attacks of 9/11. 

As far as the US/NATO Libya misadventure goes, “They went, they bombed, they were wrong.”