The Fake Crisis Continues . . .

The P5+1 negotiations over Iran’s nuclear program are in their final stretch.

After following this issue since it first reared its fake head in 2003, it’s clearly obvious that this has nothing to do with Iran’s nuclear program.

Throughout these negotiations the US has been insisting on unreasonable and excessive demands from Iran, mainly the inspections of their military sites for any evidence of illicit, military-related nuclear work.

Iran has refused to allow this measure, and rightly so. After all, wasn’t the demand for inspections of Iraq’s military sites, under threat of US bombing, that led to the eventual regime change in 2003?

The world knows where the US is going with its demand for surprise, non-announced inspections of Iran’s military sites. This is all about espionage and recon of Iran’s military capabilities so that the Pentagon and Israhell, along with their EU whores, can size up Iran’s military capabilities for the eventual regime change bombing campaign.

Such access would allow US, the Zionist criminal mafia state, and their European vassals to inject spies and agents into the inspection teams to gather information, plant bugs, engage in sabotage, and get precise targeting information.

This is EXACTLY what happened in Iraq, and it’s the reason why in 1998 Saddam Hussein ordered all inspectors out of the country and blocked any further inspections until 2002.

But what if an agreement is signed, and Iran even allows inspections of its military sites? What can we expect from all this? 

1. It must be borne in mind that even if an agreement is signed, it will only end the nuclear-related sanctions. Sanctions that the US/EU passed on Iran based on self-serving politicized reasons such as ‘human rights,’ ‘sponsoring terrorism,’ etc., are still intact, and will continue to be. 

2. Will the US and its vassals, after signing the agreement, keep all the sanctions in place by simply finding other reasons for them such as the ones mentioned above? This will effectively tie Iran’s hands while providing virtually no sanctions relief. 

3. What guarantee does Iran have, if it allows inspections of military sites, that the US and its vassals won’t use Iran’s possession of ballistic missiles as an excuse to find Iran ‘in breach’ of the agreement, and therefore turn on the sanctions switch again? US will most likely argue that because the missiles can technically (although not truly) carry nuclear warheads, that they are illicit and must be scrapped. US will totally ignore evidence that Iran has no nuclear warheads to place on the missiles, though. This will be part of the plot to destroy Iran’s most effective conventional weapon since the US knows Iran has no nukes, and no nuclear weapons program. Without the ballistic missiles, it will be less risky to bomb Iran in the future.

I’m not very hopeful that the west will abide by whatever agreement it signs with Iran. After all, not long after Iran signed up to the interim agreement in 2013, the US and EU still enacted sanctions against Iran. They did so again earlier this year against Iranian banks. Never mind that Iran has faithfully abided by the interim agreement until now, and no evidence of illegal nuclear weapons-related work has been found.

There’s also a fly in the ointment, the pathetic US congress. This bunch of inept failures, willfully-ignorant know-nothings, and simple-minded extremists have insisted that any final deal with Iran be approved by them.

If it comes to that, and congress votes it down for whatever idiotic, zionist-inspired reasons, then the US will shame and embarrass itself. It will have only itself to blame for any and all consequences, and the world will know this. 

Originally, the US planned regime change in Iran not long after Iraq. But Iraq turned into such an embarrassing quagmire that those plans were put on-hold.

So the US trotted out more sanctions against Iran, hoping that this would make life for Iranian people so bad that they'd overthrow their government. US even attempted to use the 2009 Iranian elections to launch a color revolution. That didn't work, either.

After President Rouhani was elected, the negotiations were started. The US then decided to use the process to further regime change by attempting to trick and trap Iran, and giving back very little.

This hasn't worked, either. So now the US is making unreasonable and unfair demands which they know Iran won't agree to. The US plans to push those demands in order to force the Iranians to walk away first.

The US will then use this to show that Iran wasn't being serious, acted dishonestly and refused to cooperate. This Iranian 'non-cooperation' will then be used to scare the world and rally US vassals and other fools into another war against Iran.

If Iran does accept these demands, then the US will simply wait for Iran to be softened up militarily, then find some trivial excuse (real or made-up) to bomb and invade.

These so-called negotiations are just a ploy by the US to get what they want by non-military means: to subjugate Iran politically and economically. But if Iran doesn’t fall for any of the US tricks and refuses to get suckered, the US will most likely try the military route. Whether this will take the form of what was done to Iraq in 2003, or the form of ISIS, or some other CIA-manufactured terror group that will be let loose on Iran is still uncertain.  

Agreement or not, regime change in Iran was, is, and will be the aim of the US.  

The nuclear program was always just a cover.



UPDATE: Just found this tid-bit of news below on rt.com. It backs up perfectly what I stated in point #3!

7 July, 2015

16:06

Iran to face restrictions on missile program even if nuclear deal agreed - US

A senior US official has said Iran will continue to face restrictions on its missile program under an emerging nuclear agreement. Tehran will also be limited in trading conventional arms, the official added, as cited by Reuters. The official, who spoke under the condition of anonymity, said there were still differences between the two parties. The 5+1 group and Iran are still trying to reach a nuclear deal, which would restrict Iran’s nuclear ambitions, but in return Tehran would get relief from Western economic sanctions.

Source: rt.com

No Means No!

Thankfully, the Greek people have issued a resounding NO to the Eurocrat bankster mafia’s latest threats of financial fleecing of the country.

And why would Greeks make any other choice? After five years of depraved thievery by banksters from the EU/IMF/ECB, voting yes for more of the same would’ve been nothing less than collective national suicide.

The yes/no referendum in Greece was an excellent exercise in democracy, something that the rest of the EU is seemingly repelled by, judging from their admonitions and threats.

Now why wasn’t the Greek populace consulted like this back in 2010? It would’ve most likely prevented things from getting as bad as they have for Greece. But back then, Greece’s government didn’t care about the people, but only their wealthy supporters, within and outside Greece.

The decision by Alexis Tsipras to hold the referendum quickly was also a great move. Doing so deprived the Eurocrats from highjacking and manipulating the entire process in their favor.

If this referendum was held a month later, then by the time the polls opened the Eurocrat banksters would’ve had Greeks believing that they will be nuked from space by extra-terrestials if they didn’t vote yes.

But even with the short time the Eurocrats had they did make sleazy attempts at ad hoc disinformation and psy-ops by releasing so-called ‘opinion polls’ done by EU banks and pro-EU institutions and other non-official EU outfits that predicted a majority yes vote.

So there was some manipulation, but thankfully not long enough to brainwash and scare the Greek voters.

So now the ball is in the EU’s court. From the actions they will take the EU bosses will show everyone, once and for all, what the EU is really about, and where their priorities lie: the people or the banks.

This referendum was more than just about Greece. It was about what type of a Europe and world we shall live in. A yes vote would’ve told the EU bankster mafia that threats, pressure, financial fleecing, and rule by decree works, and this would then be applied to other nations.

By voting no, the Greeks nullified the Eurocrats project of perpetual debt servitude.

The Greek government now has a truly popular mandate to reject further economic rape of Greece. It’s now time for the EU to accept reality, and deal with Greece in a respectful manner that helps Greece, not hurts it further.

No more lies, threats, ultimatums and bluffs from Brussels. They have been called and rejected.