Friday, June 24, 2016

Bye-Bye Brussels!






Today is a happy day, indeed!

After much fulmination from the Eurocrats and their useful idiots, and much social tension, the UK has finally voted to leave the hapless and failing EU.

Much has been done by the pro-EU vermin to scare and force the UK public to vote for staying in the EU. From economic threats, to accusing Putin of being behind the Leave campaign, to the mysterious 11th hour shooting of a pro-EU shill, to Obummer’s own not-so-subtle threats of economic and political exclusion if UK leaves, to street protests, everything that the ‘Stay’ campaign had in their arsenal they threw at the other side.

But it didn’t work.

The UK voted for sovereignty and independence. Hopefully, this creates the momentum for other European countries to have their own EU secession referendums.

It was patently obvious that UK’s association with the EU has done much to hurt the country. The UK became a prime destination for unemployed malcontents from E. Europe, as well as for an influx of undocumented migrants feeling US-made wars in the Mideast and N. Africa.

All these factors overwhelmed the British national health care and social programs. The UK became a dumping ground for other nations unwanted masses, especially for Poland.

Now that the UK’s exit is a reality, the morons in Brussels, Warsaw, and especially in aspiring EU serfdoms like Ukraine, are soiling their pants. They don’t know what to make of it.

This is especially worrisome to the degenerate boot-lickers in Warsaw. Poland has offloaded much of its unemployed masses onto the UK, and hoped to have this be the case in the future. Poland will undoubtedly now have to contend with a higher unemployment rate. But this is all the better. Poland needs to roll up its sleeves and start solving its own economic problems instead of relying on foreign investments and other countries opening their borders to its unemployed.

Ukraine is especially in a bad spot right now. It has burned all bridges with Russia as far as its economic well-being is concerned. It staked its future on EU membership and the offloading of its unemployed masses onto the UK and others.

Now with the UK out of the fetid EU pool, the Kiev junta are left to stand there with their limp dicks in their hands, and with a major case of EU blue flag colored balls. But it serves them right! Will they still continue to pitch EU membership as Ukraine’s salvation?

This is all a wake-up call to the rest of Europe-to start being independent and sovereign again, and take matters into their own hands, instead of relying on un-elected bureaucrats far away.

This is also a wake-up call to all aspiring EU applicants. They seriously need to think again, real hard, about their EU aspirations. If BRExit doesn’t shake their confidence in the EU, then may God have mercy on those nations souls, as their future will not be pretty if they still decide to join.

It seems that barely after the vote, the UK is getting the ‘Russia’ treatment. S&P has downgraded UK’s AAA credit rating, the Pound has taken a sudden plunge, and threats of economic destitution are swirling around. Much of this is a self-fulfilling prophecy by angry Euro-ite elites. Being deprived of UK money won’t fare well for Brussels. Who are they gonna bilk now to make up the difference? Ukraine? Croatia, Romania?

Yes, there will be some short-term uncertainty and stumbling along the way, but that is always the case when a major change is made. But in the long-term, the UK will be better off. Once the dust settles, the British government and public will definitely like the regained freedom to spend their money on British priorities, be free to allow or not allow migrants, and to pursue or not pursue treaties.

This is also a wake-up call to all the eurocrats. The EU has gotten way too unbalanced and reckless. The EU needs to put an immediate moratorium on all new membership applications and so-called ‘association agreements’ until it sorts out the serious problems it has created for itself and its existing members.

If EU membership was so beneficial for the UK, then why have economic and social conditions there been getting worse? All these problems that drove the majority of Brits to vote in favor of leaving happened while UK was in the EU, not outside of it. So why would any country want to stay in such a bad situation?

No one would entertain any notion of an EU exit referendum if the EU was truly worth it, and really made things better. It wouldn’t make sense. No one would be that stupid.

As for those who utter dire warnings that UK’s economy will shatter, and that the UK cannot prosper if it leaves the EU, then what about Greece and the other EU member countries who have been bankrupted and are suffering economic doldrums? Was their misery caused because they left the EU? No. Their misery was 100% made in the EU, not outside of it!

So as we can see, these doomsday arguments are just a bunch of bullcrap; and they’re not really arguments; they’re simply veiled threats. Read between the lines: What these Eurocrats are really saying is ‘If the UK leaves the EU, we will make your economy suffer.’

It defies logic and reality for people to say that the UK will be worse off economically if out of the EU when the UK is already in bad shape inside the EU. Do these rotten EU cretins truly buy their own worthless, sense-defying arguments?

Exiting the EU may also open the doors of opportunity between the UK and Russia, as well as Iran. Since it is no longer an EU member, the UK would no longer be bound to the anti-Russian and anti-Iranian sanction. The UK could maintain them on its own, but it would not be under any collective obligation to do so, not to mention it would be stupid for them to do so. If it lifts or annuls them, it could be the only western European country not under Russian counter-sanctions, and it could restore trade with Iran, and this would mean good economic opportunities that the EU member states don't have.

The main problem remains the US. What will it do, and how will respond, and exploit the BRExit for its own evil purposes remains to be seen. Hopefully, with this new-found freedom from the EU the people of the UK will be inspired to step things up and also defy the Washington-controlled Atlantic consensus and formulate an independent foreign policy as well. It’s high time for it.

Will the US roll out some sleazy color revolution in the UK? Will it stir up a war somewhere, maybe even with Russia, to keep its tottering EU slave plantation standing? Don’t ever underestimate a cornered, wounded animal.

So, what is the moral of this BRExit story?

  
It is that countries should not join the EU because they will inevitably create worse problems for themselves than they had before joining. 
   

Friday, June 17, 2016

Alliance Against Peace

The last month has witnessed an increasing amount of bizarre US and NATO prophecies and pronouncements that have no basis in reality, and which only serve to scare the idiots in certain E. European countries into coughing up more money they don’t have on US-made military junk.

Russia has been billed as the main threat facing the US, Europe, and NATO. It has even surpassed the threat posed by ISIS in the warped and deluded minds of certain E. European government officials.

This propaganda has only intensified in the run up to the NATO meeting in Warsaw this July.

Russia is now accused of being behind every problem facing the US and Europe. The BRExit campaign is being seen as the work of the Kremlin to divide the EU and the US. Russia has also been accused of 'weaponizing' the migrant crisis. The existence of ISIS is also now being made to be Russia’s fault. Never mind the fact that Russia has warned the US and Europe for years against supporting the jihadi rebels in Syria and elsewhere, whose barbaric acts served as the catalyst for the migrant crisis and the growth of ISIS.

But no matter how hard Russia tries to dispel the BS NATO propaganda and fear-mongering, and regardless of how nice it acts, NATO just becomes
more paranoid and unhinged.
 
Let's face it: without Russia, NATO has no mission. What real, existential threat is Europe and the US facing today? None, really. NATO failed in Afghanistan against the rag-tag Taliban, and so far against fighting terrorism everywhere it went.

NATO needs a sure, predictable, civilized adversary; one that will justify high military spending and stave off the crumbling of the EU-Atlanticist social cohesion, but with which NATO won't actually have to fight a war. Russia fits the bill perfectly.

So of course NATO and its acolytes will strive to foment tension (but not too much) between Russia and the rest of Europe to justify NATO's existence under the pretext of 'Russian aggression,' and keep that taxpayer money and votes coming. Stirring up the Maidan mess in Ukraine was part of this NATO strategy.

As I said before on this blog, NATO is unable to ‘protect’ its European members. There are serious faults and lack of material, know-how, and money in that organization. NATO leaders know that they can‘t really win a war against Russia, so they posture, bloviate, and put on military exercises and parades for marketing and PR reasons to cover up NATO’s weakness and failures.

NATO protection is only on paper; it isn’t guaranteed. Even if it does try to help, will it be successful? Will that help be enough? What if it’s not? What if it fails?

That is why Europe must move away from this stale, rotted through NATO paradigm, and move forward toward a new, just arrangement for security in Europe. 


This agreement must be fair and considerate, and make Russia a full partner. Such an agreement must be based on consensus, peaceful resolution of all issues, and general disarmament, not on outdated and wasteful military alliances which further their unnecessary existence by manufacturing enemies and provocations which endanger its members and non-members alike.