Tucker Carlson’s interview with Russian President Vladimir Putin has been watched by a record amount of people all over the world.
This has caused much consternation in the western regimes and MSM, which have been abusing the world with their one-sided pro-ukrainian and anti-Russian propaganda and drivel for almost two years.
During the interview, Putin gave detailed historical background to his answers. This is something that has been vitally missing from any discussions pertaining to ukraine and Russia so far. They also provide a context for what eventually happened in ukraine, and why.
Putin’s history lessons are indeed factual, regardless of the whining of the ukrop and western regimes, their MSM, and symapthizers.
Putin's answers and explanations were also meant to provoke people into looking into these historical events and discovering the facts for themselves. This is very dangerous for the western MSM peddlers of disinformation.
However, nothing that Putin said is new, and can be verified with honest research.
Let it be know that the criticism that is being hurled at Tucker Carlson is done by butt-hurt western politicians and their MSM shysters.
And the people who condemn Tucker for not asking the right questions, and not being incisive and more forceful, are not really interested in any questions Tucker asked.
What they wanted Tucker to do is what the western MSM presstitutes usually do when they interview Putin, or any other leader whom the US and EU regimes do not like for whatever reason; and that is to lecture Putin, self-righteously pontificate, to point fingers, to accuse, slander, insinuate, demonize, and hurl at Putin every anti-Russian talking point available in the west. In short, they wanted Carlson Tucker to scold Putin on-air and embarrass him.
So what questions was Tucker Carlson supposed to ask, according to his detractors?
Why 300K Russian soldiers were killed?
Why Russian economy is crumbling?
Why Russia didn’t take Kiev in three days?
Why is the Russian military summarily executing ukrainian POWs?
Why is Russia targeting civilians and killing hundreds of thousands of them?
Of course, these are all loaded questions with no truth to them, but this is exactly what these anti-Russian diaper-wetters wanted him to ask.
But even if Tucker Carlson was foolish and unprofessional enough to ask such questions, Putin would have put him to shame and Tucker would become as discredited as these shitheads in the western MSM, and the interview would most likely have been cut short.
Because the last thing that the western regimes, their MSM, and their vassals and henchmen the world over are interested in are facts. They spent the last 2 years spinning the most infantile and pathetic pro-ukrainian shit into anti-Russian gold, and this one interview undid it all.
To date, the Putin-Carlson interview has garnered 1 billion views worldwide. Never in the history of journalism has there been such an interview that had this many views. It buries the entire legacy media, combined. And the vast majority of these viewers are undoubtedly sympathetic to Russia and Putin, because those who aren’t will not watch it.
The US is very frustrated with Russia, because Russia is not a pushover. And the US has gotten so used to its EU/NATO vassals doing whatever it wants, that any resistance to its dictates short-circuits its ego.
As for the EU vassals, they think that their anti-Russian policies and pandering to the US has brought them benefits. But how are these countries doing today? Each and every one of them is currently experiencing serious socio-economic problems.
This is especially true of its newest vassals, Finland and Sweden, who have already been cut off from Russian-provided economic benefits they had when they were neutral countries.
All the NATO member countries also seem to feel more insecure and scared after joining NATO than they were before.
US will eventually leave NATO, because with the advent of the multi-polar world and eschewing of military alliances, the US will not be able to expand NATO any further and reap any benefits. And when this happens, the US will no longer need NATO around, which will only be a burden once it stops bringing in a return on investment. And when the US leaves NATO, this organization will collapse quickly.
So ukraine, and anyone else who is dreaming of NATO membership, better look at NATO again and decide if this is really a prudent move in the long-term.
As for ukraine, more money from the US and EU will not help it. For over a year, ukraine has received close to $200 billion worth of financial and military aid. And if this did not help it, than less money and weapons certainly won’t.
And less is what ukraine will receive, since NATO arsenals have been pretty much emptied.
Ukraine was supposed to become like the EU, with democracy, rule of law, fighting corruption, and a strong civil society (things the EU has had problems with, as well). But what we have after two years is the ukrainization of the EU: increasing authoritarianism, disregard and contempt for the citizenry, violating its own laws, political and journalistic repression, sabotage of the economy, threatening opposition parties (AfD) and EU members who don’t want to vote for more aid to ukraine (Hungary), and promoting sexual degeneracy of every kind.
Carlson Tucker’s interview with President Putin was a very welcome and needed reprieve from the stale anti-Russia circle jerk that the western regimes and media have subjected the world to for a while.
It undercut the false western narrative, and hopefully woke up enough people so that pressure will increase on the western initiators of this war and compel them to start realizing that it cannot continue, and that they have to talk to Russia and make much needed concessions that will be good for everyone-the neo-cons be damned.
