US regimes past and present have whined, cried, and fear mongered incessantly about North Korea's nukes, Iran's missiles and non-existent nukes, or some other enemy country’s alleged nuclear weapons program.
But whenever anyone proposes a nuclear-free zone agreement in the Mideast, far east, or anywhere else, or any type of nuclear disarmament, the US automatically shoots these ideas down. So what are countries like North Korea and Iran supposed to think when US rhetoric doesn't match its actions?
What is a country like Iran supposed to do when the US allows the zionist entity to possess hundreds of nuclear weapons with impunity, is against a nuclear-free Mideast, then accuses and sanctions Iran for allegedly developing nuclear weapons, without evidence?
These countries can’t help but come to the conclusion that the US means them harm, and they will arm themselves with whatever powerful enough deterrent they can come up with.
And when they do, the US calls these countries ‘threats to national security,’and passes sanctions on them for developing 'WMD.'
From this aberrant and contradictory US behavior, it is quite clear that the US isn’t interested in nuclear disarmament of any kind. The US demands that other countries not possess nuclear weapons, sign the NPT, and agree to intrusive inspections and monitoring of their nuclear plants and military bases (like Iran), while the US keeps its stockpiles of 7000+ nukes, and modernizes and miniaturizes them-thereby violating the terms of its NPT obligations to disarm.
The US is even going so far as prohibiting its vassals to have nukes. The US states that it does this to prevent the proliferation of nuclear weapons by ‘rogue regimes’ in response, but this is just PR and window-dressing.
The US is against the proliferation of nuclear weapons for two main reasons.
First, the US wants to prevent adversaries from having them, because nukes are the only effective deterrent against US aggression and any planned regime changes. That’s why the US is so upset about North Korea’s nuclear weapons.
Second, the US fears that if its vassal states acquire nukes, they will become more confident, self-assertive, and feel more secure. They may come to an agreement with their adversaries. If that were to happen, they wouldn’t need the US anymore, and give the US military the boot out of the region. This will undercut US global power projection.
The US wants to prevent other nations from acquiring nuclear weapons and force them to disarm, and at the same time keep and modernize its own nuclear weapons stockpiles, and threaten their use, even against non-nuclear states and attacks.
This is typical US behavior: create and perpetuate a problem, then demand that other countries do what the US wants to stop it, all the while making it look like someone else is to blame, and has the responsibility to fix it-on US terms, of course.
It is a classic case of extortion. US behavior can be compared to an arsonist who sets a house on fire, then at gun-point prevents anyone from extinguishing it until the arsonist’s demands are met.
In the case of North Korea, from 2005 the US regimes of George W. Bush to the Trump regime today have done everything they could to provoke North Korea and drive it to develop nuclear and thermonuclear weapons. And now the US complains about the results?
The architects of the US policy that drove North Korea into developing nuclear weapons and delivery systems are either reckless and short-sighted imbeciles that have realized they made a mess, and are now trying to find a scapegoat, or are the deliberate acts of charlatans and agent provocateurs who want tension, confrontation and unrest for their own self-serving reasons.
Why does the world even allow the US to pass sanctions and threaten countries that try to develop nuclear energy or weapons when the US possesses thousands of them? And why do Russia and China go along with this, when they themselves have nuclear weapons?
No country that has nuclear weapons has the right to complain that another nuclear-armed country is a threat to it-especially one like the US, which remains the only country in world history so far to have used nuclear weapons, twice, on a civilian population.
That’s why US fears and paranoia about North Korean nuclear-armed ICBMs hitting the US mainland are so hypocritical and empty. The nuclear-armed US has been surrounding North Korea for 60 years, and has threatened it with pre-emptive nuclear strikes on multiple occasions. So the US doesn’t have the right to be scared of a nuclear-armed North Korea, since the US created this situation for itself.
The greatest catalyst for the development and proliferation of nuclear weapons by other states are nations that already have them, maintain them, modernize and improve them, suffer no punishment or legal consequences, demand that no one else have nuclear weapons, and immediately try to punish anyone else who wants to develop them.
Nuclear disarmament in this atmosphere and reality is simply not possible. It is a delusion.
In this regard, the US, Russia, China, and especially the zionist entity, are all guilty. The credibility of these countries suffers each and every time whenever they vote for more sanctions against North Korea, Iran, or any other country that tests ballistic missiles or nuclear bombs.
In any discussion of nuclear weapons and the treatment of countries that possess them, a special mention must separately be given to the zionist entity, namely its suspect denials of having nukes, and the US refusal to support any initiatives that seek to create a nuclear-free Mideast.
Let’s start with what we know.
Officially, the zionist entity denies having nuclear weapons. The US supports this stance.
In the 1950s, France secretly helped the zionists build a nuclear reactor at Dimona. This plant was built without any IAEA knowledge, involvement or oversight whatsoever.
This reactor produces plutonium which can be used to make nuclear warheads.
Support from individuals within the US and some other European countries resulted in the zionists possessing the only nuclear arsenal in the Mideast.
The zionists have refused any outside inspection of the Dimona nuclear plant to outsiders since the early 1970s. Only one inspection has taken place there, and the zionists set up a fake control room for the occasion to hide their illicit nuclear activities.
The zionists refuse to sign the NPT.
Whenever anyone seeks to introduce any type of agreement for a nuclear-free Middle East, an agreement which Iran has welcomed on multiple occasions, the zionist entity and the US immediately refuse to have anything to do with it.
But why is that?
Doesn’t the zionist entity deny having nuclear weapons?
Doesn’t the US want a nuclear weapons-free Iran?
If the zionists and the US are telling the truth, then they should be the most staunchest supporters of such an initiative.
Let’s also not forget that in 1986 Mordechai Vanunu exposed the zionist entity’s nuclear weapons program. He then fled to Rome where he was kindapped by Mossad agents, taken back to zionistan, and placed under house arrest for decades.
Kind of a radical act when the zionists claim not to have nuclear weapons, right?
This behavior, totally at odds with its rhetoric, exposes the zionist entity and the US as liars.
From this behavior, we know for sure that the zionists do have nuclear weapons, despite their repeated denials, and that the US knows it and is protecting the zionists.
By actually refusing to be a part of a Mideast nuclear weapons-free agreement, the zionists unwittingly expose their possession of nuclear weapons.
Because logically, what other reason could there be for someone not agreeing to not do something bad, unless they’re already doing something bad? Think about this for a moment.
So the zionist state denies having nuclear weapons, yet refuses to be a part of a nuclear-free Mideast agreement, the NPT, or any other scheme to prevent the production of nuclear weapons. It refuses any international inspection of the Dimona nuclear plant.
At the same time, Iran is accused by the US and the zionist entity-without any credible evidence-of having nuclear weapons, yet Iran wants to be a part of a nuclear-free Mideast agreement, signed the JCPOA to limit its nuclear energy program, and allowed more intrusive monitoring and regulations of its nuclear plants and uranium enrichment facilities.
What does this tell us about these two countries? Which one of them, by its actions and not just by its rhetoric, is most likely to be the nuclear weapons-free party?
That’s why any zionist and US denials concerning the existence of the zionist state’s nukes, and its refusal to agree to the prevention of the existence of nuclear weapons in the region simply don’t make sense.
The US is just trying to con the world into submitting to its own twisted version of nuclear politics, where countries on the US hit-list are excessively scrutinized without any credible cause, and even falsely accused of having nuclear weapons, while US darlings like the zionist entity are coddled and protected from any kind of accountability for their own quite real nuclear malfeasance. This is just one of the many dishonest and cynical ways that the US tries to gain control of the world by any means possible, no matter how greasy.
But by stooping down to extortion, false accusations, military threats and terrorist tactics, the US is provoking its adversaries into thinking about developing nuclear weapons. Maybe this is the aim, so the US can then have an excuse for invasions and regime change under the guise of 'protecting national security.'
One cannot get more rogue and demented as this.
But the bottom line on nukes is: either everyone is prohibited from having nuclear weapons, or everyone is allowed to have them. There can be no exceptions, special cases, and double-standards when it comes to possessing these weapons.
Maybe every country should have some nukes, and in this way no one would attack each other anymore?
No comments:
Post a Comment