The NATO summit has just ended in Warsaw, and it seems like the US pimp Obummer, together with his European whores, are still stuck on stupid.
The conference was one big PR exercise in covering up internal divisions and serious operational problems that recently came to light after the Anaconda military exercise held in Poland. The knee-jerk communique was also the result of Russian political, diplomatic, and military successes against the US and their terrorist pals in Syria.
The final communique at the end of this anti-Russian circle-jerk was as follows:
‘In its final communique NATO accused Russia of “provocative military activities in the periphery of NATO territory” and “willingness to attain political goals by the threat and use of force”. The alliance said Moscow’s actions “are a source of regional instability, fundamentally challenge the alliance, have damaged Euro-Atlantic security, and threaten our long-standing goal of a Europe whole, free, and at peace.”’ 1
It is a statement of hypocritical proportions. NATO has expanded three times since 1999, up to Russia’s borders and now complains that Russia is ‘threatening’ NATO states that it borders?
And are not NATO’s actions in Afghanistan, Iraq, Libya, Syria and elsewhere a source of instability?
The NATO cabal seems to always be 180 degrees from reality.
NATO also has the conceit and arrogance to criticize Russia of invading countries! Yes, the US and company have no conscience of their own, or a very bad memory. Such an accusation is also a very sick joke, and an insult to all those victims of US invasions, torture, and oppression in Afghanistan, Somalia, Pakistan, Iraq, Syria, Libya, Yemen, and elsewhere.
How many countries has the US attacked, invaded, and occupied in the last 25 years? How many has Russia? Hands down the US is the record holder here for the greatest amount. Russia stands at zero.
What happened in the Caucasus in 2008 was started by ex-Georgian President Shaakashvilli-even according to a EU report on the matter. Crimeans voted in a free referendum to rejoin Russia at a time when Ukraine had no legally-elected government. In both cases, there was no Russian coercion in defiance of the wishes of the populations of those regions, but in harmony with them. Russia didn’t invade those countries and overthrow governments, like the US has done in Ukraine end elsewhere.
Obummer also has the gall to boast that he is the least war-like president, and less interventions happened under his watch than under previous US regimes. Surely, the millions of people made lifeless or miserable by Obama’s criminal interventions feel better about him not destroying as many countries as his predecessors.
By the way, if Obama managed to destroy a few less countries than his rotten predecessors, we can thank Putin’s diplomacy and courage for this. It is he who stared down the US from bloody imperial misadventures in Iran and a total destruction of Syria.
It is NATO that is threatening Russia. It is NATO that is expanding and building bases on Russia’s borders, not vice versa.
Are we to believe that the movement of Russian military forces on Russian territory is a threat, but US military exercises and bases in countries bordering Russia are okay?
NATO is long past its expiration date. It should’ve been mothballed after the fall of the Soviet Union. But it has been artificially kept on life-support; always coming up with some lame excuse to justify its unnecessary and destructive existence.
Wherever NATO goes, it causes mayhem. It looks for enemies, and when it can’t find any, it creates them. This is all done to keep itself alive, and keep taxpayer money going to weapons peddlers.
The fact that this NATO summit was held in Warsaw is no coincidence. It was done deliberately as a reaction to the new Polish government’s earlier criticism of the EU and its changing of the supreme court and media laws that sidelined pro-EU shills.
Worried that Poland may seek an independent course, the nervous EU and US threw the Poles a bone in the form of a small US military base and a reiteration of the US ‘commitment to Poland’s defense' from an imaginary Russian threat.
The Poles, always the cowardly Russia-hating push-overs when it comes to the west, were mollified, and will now shut up. Because as we know, these bases and ‘protection’ most likely came with strings attached, even if the media doesn’t tell us.
Poland has been strangely mute on any further EU criticisms lately. So we can pretty much see what happened behind the scenes.
There is also no doubt that the Polish government, regardless of political party, as well as the Polish military, are staffed with US agents and bought Polish spies. After all, if Germany found US spy cells within its own government in 2014 and 2015, Poland surely has a nest of them.
This also explains the stupid, Russophobic foreign policy of Poland, which has been one of the main losers from the sanctions Russia passed on the EU. A free, independent Poland led by real, courageous patriots who put Polish interests first would not work overtime to keep Russia as an enemy, but would come to some sort of an agreement with it.
It is also a fact that countries like Poland serve only as a NATO frontline and buffer zone to slow down and occupy the enemy in the event of war, and give the US time to organize a defense of Western European states. That is E. Europe's role, as a firewall and sacrificial cow, and as a potential front.
What is also worrying is the official NATO communique in its entirety. It certainly throws a lot of red flags, and if read between the lines, it issues ominous warnings to the world.
Countering imaginary Russian threats is only the tip of the iceberg for the North Atlantic Terrorist Organization.
They plan to go further, with things like natural disasters, famine, human rights violations, discrimination against women and children, as well as internal political unrest in any country as an excuse for NATO’s involvement. Even internal policies of governments that US doesn’t like will be deemed as ‘threats’ ripe for NATO’s involvement, even if those policies don't threaten any other countries.
NATO is the main threat and danger facing Europe and the world, not Russia.
It is an organization that throughout its existence had the goal of keeping Russia and the rest of Europe divided and not at peace.
When it saw that this division was disappearing, it stirred up the Ukraine mess to provoke Russia and scare its European vassals into line with Russophobic paranoia to make them cough up more money for the US military-industrial complex, and pass sanctions on Russia.
This of course was done by the US to hurt the EU as well as Russia. The US wants to keep its bloody boot on Europe’s throat indefinitely, and not allow it to become economically better than the US. After all, the EU is a competitor of the US regardless of the ‘trans-Atlantic unity’ drivel regurgitated by US regime and their European vassals.
But Instances of true US ‘friendship have shown themselves whenever any EU country acts outside of US orders. France, UK, Hungary and others were threatened with law-suits and sanctions themselves if they refuse to follow US orders, or dare to separate themselves from US grip. Such is US friendship.
NATO is an organization which seeks to stifle independence in Europe and keep the continent under US control, despite the damage that this causes to individual European countries, and regardless of the fact that this contradicts European interests. In fact, according to the NATO communique, NATO aims to make its policies the policies of the EU itself. It seeks to basically control the EU, and make itself inseparable.
This hitching of NATO policy to the EU is most likely a face-saving measure caused by the BRExit fallout. This is also a desperate move by NATO keep other countries who are thinking of leaving the sinking EU ship within the union.
But regardless of the PR rhetoric and talking points about NATO ‘unity,’ there are disagreements among NATO members when it comes to Russia and other policies.
Also, some members don’t like and trust others. Greece and Bulgaria don’t trust Turkey; Bulgaria even going as far as rejecting the creation of a NATO Black Sea fleet on its territory.
Certain German politicians, as well as France and Italy disagree with anti-Russian policies and don’t see Russia as an enemy. Most of Germany, and other western European states don’t want their troops to be sent to defend Poland or the Baltic states.
But regardless of NATO’s public rhetoric which is only for the cameras and the useful idiots, NATO in reality knows it must cooperate with Russia, and privately these NATO honchos say the opposite when behind closed doors with Russian officials. Russia seems to understand this, or else it would react in stronger ways to NATO’s bullshit.
Even though Russia isn’t interested in war and confrontation, it seems like NATO wants to create the false perception that Russia is. A Russia that wants war only exists in the warped imaginations of the NATO cabal and their useful idiots in the media and the public.
There are cracks within NATO itself. They can setup their bases, stage color revolutions, and cry wolf against Russia, but NATO is not, and never will be in a state to attack Russia. In such an event, NATO’s performance is at best questionable.
It is quite doubtful that NATO would be able to fulfill its mandate of protecting everyone. That would mean the expansion of limited men and materials which would grind to a halt once member countries start dropping off. At best, NATO may inflict some limited damage on Russia, but it would suffer damage to its European member states, and loss of allies after Russian military moves in.
It is doubtful what would happen within the individual NATO states when faced with a Russian invasion. Studies have shown that most of the NATO troops in those countries would most likely flee, surrender, or be destroyed quickly. The peripheral NATO countries also are poor, and would be unable to afford resupplying themselves indefinitely, especially when supply routes are closed in the event of a war. It must be understood that all these weapons purchases by Poland and other E. European states are for parades and the news media photo-ops.
NATO may start out with some strong moves, but once Russia starts rolling, E. Europe would be left for dead, and the US and their western European allies would most likely roll back and just defend western Europe. It is highly doubtful if US, France, Britain would protect Poland in the event of a Russian onslaught. They failed to do so in 1939.
And in case anyone thinks that Japan and S. Korea would hit Russia from the East, forget it. Russia is watching them close, and then there’s the big elephant in the room named China. North Korea with its nukes is also there, ready to defend itself.
So any war between NATO and Russia would end in a stalemate and some sort of an agreement. Some NATO members would be taken out of NATO, most likely permanently, by any agreement between Russia and NATO after the dust settles.
Such a campaign may even be the end of NATO itself, as the member countries would realize that NATO’s protection is ineffective.
It can be said with a high degree of certainty that in a NATO-Russia confrontation, there would be no victor. Both sides would reach a point where the initial destruction would be too scary, and both sides would move to halt military operations by some agreement. NATO would most likely lose more than Russia, mainly current E. European member states. Russia only stands to lose whatever territory it may gain by its military operations.
And as recent history has shown, the US is always ready to compromise and halt fighting when it starts to suffer setbacks.
Of course, these are scenarios that would most likely come to pass if a hypothetical war between NATO and Russia was strictly conventional. If it goes nuclear, then there’s no point of discussing the results, as there would be nothing left to talk about or salvage.
Russia will use nukes if overran; NATO knows this. Therefore, no victory can be had. In such a scenario, US missile shields would be as useless as bottle rockets.
These NATO honchos most likely know all this in the back of their minds, and it drives then nuts when they go to sleep at night. All these military exercises, PR shows and meetings, and anti-Russian demagoguery just serves to mask the weakness, fear, and helplessness of this useless organization.
It is also a reaction to the frustration of the US inability to run roughshod throughout the world as an unopposed hegemon due to Russian political, diplomatic, and military brilliance.
1. https://www.rt.com/news/350434-nato-war-russia-warsaw/
No comments:
Post a Comment