Another Western War Crime

Recently, the western-sponsored militant terror squads launched a chemical attack upon a part of Damascus.

Right away, the US and western media and government propaganda assigned the blame on Syrian forces. There are calls from the UK FM and rabid war criminal William Hague as well as his French counterparts for immediate intervention.

Let’s remember that the rebels and their foreign benefactors have been whipping up fears of a Syrian government-ordered chemical attack for two years now. The militants also threatened to use chemical weapons in the field, before the first bombs ever went off.

Videos of rebels conducting experiments on animals with nerve gas have surfaced on the internet before the attacks started.

Also, in the spring of 2013, after the first cases of chemical attacks were reported, a UN investigation committee concluded that the gas was most likely launched by the militants fighting the government of Syria. Not surprisingly, the US, UK, France and their henchmen refused to acknowledge this fact and blamed the attacks on the Syrian government.

All the chemical attacks launched in Syria thus far, including the latest one, were committed by the militants, who immediately blamed the Syrian government of ordering the attack. Their aim, as with past chemical weapon attacks, is to cause international outrage which leads to foreign military intervention.

The Syrian government is clearly being setup, and these are the reasons why the Syrian government did not, and would not, use chemical weapons in the field.

1. By ordering the use of chemical weapons, the Syrian government would be shooting themselves in the foot. They know that using chemical weapons would serve as an excuse for armed intervention by the US and its accomplices, leading to regime change, exactly what the rebels and their western sponsors want.

2. The latest chemical attack comes right after UN investigators arrived in Syria, at the invitation of the Syrian government, to investigate the chemical attacks and who was behind them. If the Syrian government and military were to blame, they would certainly not invite anyone to investigate anything. The timing is very suspicious, and meant to embarrass and demonize the Syrian government.

3. The Syrian military has been making significant gains against the militants using conventional means, and using chemical weapons is unnecessary, strategically and technically.

4. Undoubtedly, the Syrians were put on-notice by Russia a while back about the use of chemical weapons and know that Russia will cut off all aid and support if Syria uses these weapons.

5. Iran, an ally of Syria, suffered under chemical attacks launched by Iraq in the Iraq-Iran war in the nineteen-eighties. Syrian government’s use of chemical weapons would be in very bad taste, and would most likely make the Iranians rethink any further support for Syria.

The western-sponsored terror squads in Syria have not been able to make a dent in their fight to remove Assad. They have been suffering setbacks and significant losses at the hands of the Syrian military.

In their desperation to stop further losses or a compete defeat, they decided to take the insane and criminal move to use chemical weapons on anyone, civilian or otherwise.

The latest chemical attack also came during heavy fighting between Syrian forces and the militants, who may have used the chaos to launch a chemical weapon since it would look like Syrian forces launched it.

Of course, the UN has called for investigations of the chemical attacks and access to all areas affected. Right on cue, the rebels refused to cooperate with the investigation while the Syrian government offered all assistance.

Now, from past and present evidence and actions, which side looks guiltier? Who stands to lose and who stands to win by launching chemical attacks? The Syrian government, who is defending the country and trying to preserve itself while making sure not to give any foreign thug an excuse for intervention, or the militants who want to see the current Syrian government overthrown with foreign help and are desperate enough to try any tactic to do so?

This chemical attack was either committed by the rebels who were trained by western personnel on how to handle chemical weapons, and indeed there has been such training according to news reports. Or this attack may have been staged by CIA/Mossad or some other western spook agency.

Hopefully the UN investigations will not degenerate into clandestine operations infested with CIA and western intelligence agents who will seek to use the inspections process for subterfuge and planting fake evidence, just like in Iraq.

If, and when, the UN starts asking for access to Syrian military bases and sensitive government buildings, we will know the name of the game.

Russia needs to keep an eye on all this and ensure that the UN inspectors do their job and not go on errands for US and western governments which end in another illegal war of aggression.

There is hope that after the Iraq and Libya debacles, this will not be allowed to happen.


See this.