Sunday, October 27, 2019

A Tale of Two ASSets

CIA asset Al Baghdadi (left) and CIA asset Osama Bin Laden (right)


The news on the wire is that US special forces have eliminated Al Baghdadi, the leader of the ISIS movement in Syria.

After allowing this nutcase and his followers to roll into Syria in 2014 with his endless truck convoys under clear blue skies, without any harassment from the ‘mighty’ US military terrorist smiters, Trump has decided to fire this hapless asset.

This is indeed the fate of all US-created nutcases, should they not deliver.

Al Baghdadi was a US asset, just like Osama Bin Laden. And like old Osama, the US decided to 'retire' this flop as he is no longer needed. Just don't expect any evidence to back any of this up. You’ll have to 'trust' Don Trumpolino. This 'announcement' may not even be true, and a part of some propaganda campaign.

The Trump regime has not been doing too well in the international and military arena, has suffered a huge embarrassment in Syria, and compromised itself in front of its European NATO vassals.

So it’s always nice to have a handy boogeyman to ‘kill’ at such a challenging time and score some points, right before a re-election. Remember that Obummer also decided to end OBL a year before his re-election.

But the question is, what other boogeyman does the US have stuffed in its pocket? Because let’s remember that right after Bin Laden was done away with, Mr. Baghdadi popped up on the scene.

Can we expect a 3rd, even worse US-created nutcase to come on the scene in the next weeks and months?

The pattern is indeed troubling.

Saturday, October 5, 2019

China vs. US

Trump's tariff and sanctions tantrums on China are starting to bring on stock market falls and worries of a possible recession.

Since all these tariffs are hurting everyone, it should dawn on Trump to stop them. China is not going to give in. It does not matter whether Trump gets re-elected or not. and if he continues to pursue this, he may very well be a one-termer.

Expecting Trump to fix the US economy is a tall order. It's like asking a random person off the street to solve the mystery of life.


Trump can tariff 100% of all Chinese imports 100% and won't be able to bring China to its knees. Yes, it is this hopeless for the US. The scales are tipped too much in China's favor. 


These tariffs would maybe work if China exported most of what it makes to the US, but imports to the US are not even 20% right now. So Trump is just taxing the living f**k out of the average US consumer. 

The US deficit has jumped another 500 billion since the beginning of the year due to Trump's tax cuts for the wealthy, and will reach another trillion more by next year. 

So the tariff war is not helping. If Trump wants to improve the economy, he would have to turn against the best interests of the wealthy and investor class-namely himself.

He would have to punish the real offenders responsible for the colossal trade deficit: the greedy and short-sighted US corporate CEOs who outsourced their manufacturing to other countries. Trump should slap these companies with steep taxes until they bring back manufacturing to the US. Make it more expensive for them to offshore than if they moved production back to the US, hired US workers, and paid them a decent salary with decent benefits.

Up to now, Trump is punishing China for the sins and greed of US CEOs. Trump is acting like an inept coward. He is incapable of making the right and rational decisions that would help the most.

This simply shows that all the new clean service tech economy mumbo jumbo the establishment has been feeding the world since the late 1990s turned out to be bullplop. Manufacturing will always be good and necessary, and is a sound fall-back for any nation's economy. The case of China vs. US is a shining example. A healthy economy must actually make something, not just come up with something, and speculate.



The only big-ticket factory production the US has is the weapons industry, and even they are losing market share to competition from Russia and China. The US, in essence, is a war economy.

Maybe the US is deliberately trying to cause economic problems for the world, and is betting on scared investors running for safety by buying up more US debt in the form of long-term treasury bills.

If there is a recession, or some other world-wide economic melt-down caused by US foibles, all countries need to resist the urge to buy this US debt, and instead go for precious metals. Then the US will suffer even more serious economic blow-back than anyone else, and will be cut down to size.

This is long overdue.

Tuesday, October 1, 2019

The Gathering Clouds of Failure

Over the past months, the US has suffered serious setbacks and humiliations.

The catalyst for all of this was Trump’s terribly misguided decision to withdraw from the JCPOA.

Trump overestimated US power, and underestimated Iran’s, and that was his biggest mistake.

Since then, tanker ships in the gulf have been bombed, and Iran was blamed. The US did not produce any sound evidence for this, and therefore its false accusations fell on deaf ears. The US regime’s call for some half-baked ‘Maritime protection force’ was a total flop. Only the UK sent a ship and some soldiers. Everyone else pretty much stayed away.

Strike one for Trump.

Then, there was the drone incident where a US stealth Global Hawk was shot down by Iran. US tried to lie to the world and accused Iran of shooting down the drone in international waters.

But the US regime was left with lots of egg on its face after Iranians showed proof of the drone wreckage that landed IN IRAN’S TERRITORIAL WATERS.

Strike two for Trump.

The latest US temper tantrum was after the Aramco drone bombings by the Houthi Ansarullah movement in Yemen.

The US, embarrassed that a militia movement from a war-torn, poor nation was able to launch such a successful attack which the US military and billion-dollar US weaponry failed to detect and stop.

The US immediately blamed Iran, without any proof, of course.

But does it really matter whether the Aramco bombing was done by Iran or Yemen? The main point here is that US military ‘might’ proved useless.

By blaming Iran for the attacks, the US is inadvertently acknowledging that Iran has the capability to outsmart US-provided air defenses, and sneak past the US military’s (not so) watchful eye. How does this inspire confidence in the US?


So just how blaming Iran instead of Yemen for these drone bombings makes things somehow okay, or better, or more acceptable from the US regime's point-of-view is difficult to understand. The warped Alice-in-Wonderland logic of the US regime is truly breathtaking.


Why couldn't they just stick to blaming Yemen? The Yemenis quite proudly claimed responsibility for the bombings, and have been using drones to bomb Saudi targets for years. So the precedent is there.

Strike three for Trump.

US weaponry has been exposed as ineffective and unable to withstand what Iran has in store. And no offense to Iran, it has very capable technicians and scientists, and Iran's seadfastness, courage and ingenuity after over 40 years of US economic terrorism from every side is admirable; however, I suspect that Iran has been, and is getting help from certain other nations in quiet, secret ways with its military tech and hardware. And this has been enough to rattle the US. There is more going on here than we know, and Iran’s capabilities will only grow because whoever is aiding Iran will continue to do so.

Recently, the Houthis destroyed three Saudi brigades and took numerous prisoners, including high-ranking Saudi military officers.


US lies, threats and sanctions have alienated more countries away from the US. China, Turkey, and India are showing the US the finger when it comes to purchasing Russian military hardware and Iranian oil. 


The dollar is being dumped, and alternate payment mechanisms are being setup that the US cannot control and which render US sanctions ineffective.


The world-at least the part of the world that counts-is taking a big dump on the US. And the US cannot do anything about it without destroying itself.

Add to this Zionist prime minister Netanyahoo’s fall from power, and Trump’s fake little world he had formed around himself has started to fall apart.

Now, the democrats are after him for trying to pressure the president of Ukraine to launch an investigation into Joe Biden’s and his son’s dealings with a Ukrainian gas company and some deals they made. Trump also threatened to ‘get’ the whistleblower who exposed his conversation. Now, impeachment is being thrown around as an option.

However, the democrats do not care one iota for any truth or justice. Their aim is to protect their party’s Alpha Male Joe Biden as their candidate going into the election of 2020; just like their fake Russiagate fantasy was all about protecting the Clinton crime family.

If something becomes of this entire Trump-Ukraine drama, and Trump ends up paying any sort of price, we can be sure that the democrats will resurrect the entire Russiagate saga and hitch it to this latest Trump scandal, thereby making both true. That Russiagate was disproved by the Mueller report does not matter. The right people will create the right reality.



But Trump has done so many reckless and stupid things up until now, that he deserves to be messed with by the useless, lying democrats. Let these two tear each other apart. Better this than sending poor people to fight some new illegal war.

All this paints a picture of a troubled country with massive, unpayable level of debt,corrupt politicans, a failing electoral system, and a sinister group of people who control the country behind the scenes to their advantage.

The US is ran not by the elected, but by wealthy private special interests and their faceless, unelected career bureaucratic servants in departments throughout the US government.

These obscure people make the decisions. They call the shots. They get to decide what happens to who, when, and how. Trump has very little power.

And if these people decide that Trump needs to go, he will go.

This is not some conspiracy theory.

All these governments come and go, yet their policies, as well as the problems, stay the same. Nothing changes, nothing gets fixed. Nothing new or different is tried. People want one thing, but end up getting jack shit.

That’s what happened to health care, to electoral reform, to Trump’s wall, to his promises to ‘lock her up,’ and to pursuing good relations with all countries.

But all those who fall for this crooked system, along its false promises and illusions deserve to lay on the ground-permanently.

Saturday, September 28, 2019

A Permanent Cure

The US, due to its own failures and ineptness, has been piling on sanctions on Iran in order to pressure it to give in to US demands.

The EU, which has been playing the 'good cop' to the US 'bad cop,' has also violated the terms of the JCPOA by relenting to US sanctions on Iran.

The EU has been trying to cajole Iran into staying in the agreement, without any benefit to Iran, by dangling promises such as the setting up of a trading mechainsm between Iran and the EU that would bypass US sanctions and enable EU companies to do business with Iran. But this mechanism itself would be subject to US approval, control, and would be sanctioned itself.

So the EU, lacking the courage to provide sanctions relief for Iran, has decided to join in with the US by falsely blaming Iran for the Aramco refinery bombings. 


All EU officials know that Iran did not do this. But by falsely blaming Iran, and taking the wrong side of the lying US regime, the EU is trying to turn reality upside-down by making it look like it is Iran that has been the bad actor, and get itself off the hook for the failures and violations of its own obligations under the JCPOA.

There is no longer any point of Iran appealing to the EU, which has unfairly decided to join the US sanctions regime against Iran. It is doubtful that the EU will do the right thing here.

So, what next?

The US and the EU must be forced to do the right thing,and rejoin the JCPOA under current terms and honor their commitments.

How to do this?

Like this: Russia and China should sign a defense pact with Iran, admit it to the SCO, invest in Iran's economy, institute technology-sharing, and sell Iran arms.

In return for this, Iran remains in the JCPOA and complies with all its terms, and suspends all work and research on missile technology.

That way, Iran would be assured full security, the US and EU could not touch it, or use the excuse that Iran is no longer following the JCPOA and is therefore 'building nuclear weapons and delivery systems.' Such a move by Russia and China would cut off the US and EU's legs from under them.

But since there is also the risk of reciprocation by a recalcitrant US regime against Russia-for example in Ukraine or Georgia-Russia and China should make all the terms of the defense agreement temporary in nature until the US regime and the EU rejoin the JCPOA, annull all sanctions, and come to an agreement with Iran's government, as it is.

Although the US could try the same strategy against Russia and China, bear in mind that Russia and China are not aggressive, expansionist powers and do not seek to violently impose their will on others through regime changes and such. So the US enacting the same strategy would not affect either country in any serious way. It would, at worse, lead to a stalemate and actually prevent further wars and unrest. And Russia also has the option of expanding its defense agreement and protection to, for example, Donbass.


China currently has such an agreement with North Korea since the 1960s, and the US is treading very carefully.

And to speed things up, Russia and China can give the US 24 months to come around, or else Iran will be put under the Russian nuclear umbrella. If the US is still defiant, then Russia and China should give the US 12 more months. And if the US still refuses to act in a civilized and responsible manner, then Russia and China should make the entire agreement permanent.

If the US gives in (and it will have to), Russia and China should serve as guarantors of the agreement, and the moment the US or EU violate its terms in any way, the defense agreement will come into full force. With such a sword hanging over the US regime and the feckless, cowardly, and pathetic EU establishment, sanctions and regime change fantasies against Iran would be ended, permanently.

When the US realizes the game is up, it will have to behave itself.

It is time for Russia and China to step up, and put their feet down. Enough is enough. The US is scared of both countries and will not confront them, or any nation they are partnered with militarily. Look at Syria. US got cut down to size there because of Russia's military involvement. This is effective, and will definitely work in regards to Iran.

What do Russia and China have to lose? The US is already sanctioning them for doing business with Iran and for other things, so they might as well get something for it. Such a defense agreement with Iran would work. The US would most likely relent, and the EU would quickly follow.

A Russian/Chinese/Iranian defense agreement is the best option for them, and other nations. It would take any wars against Iran permanently off-the-table, and it would also benefit the US, as well.


Such a scenario isn't some pie-in-the-sky vision. Russia and China have already pledged help to Tehran, and a formal defense pact would just be a formality.
 

The alternative is more anti-Iranian taunting, provocations, threats and false flags that will cause more problems in the future for everyone. It is best to nip this US-led kookery in the bud, ASAP, in a resolute and effective way.

Tuesday, September 17, 2019

Ka-Boom & Bust

The recent bombings by Yemeni drones of two major Saudi Arabian Aramco oil refineries has caused consternation and anger within the Saudi and US regimes.

The US wasted no time falsely putting the blame for the bombings on Iran. US regime’s spokes-vermin, in their typical reptilian logic claim that there is no way that a beleaguered and small militant group as the Houthis could have the ability to carry out such a devastating precision bombing.

But these US regime reptiles seem to be ignoring the fact that the Houthis have been using drones to target the Saudis, their allies, bases and infrastructure for years.

The Yemeni Houthi movement has clearly claimed responsibility for this. Why would they do so, if they did not do it and open themselves up to possible retaliation?

The US is falsely pinning the blame for these refinery bombings on Iran because it is too cowardly to admit that its forces and weaponry have failed to protect its Saudi client-state cash-cow from a militant movement in a war-ravaged country.

But these false accusations will not find a willing audience, except for a few miserable pee-ons in the region and in Europe. No one else believes this US hyped-up tripe anymore.

These refinery bombings were a huge blow to US prestige. The US regime, military, and weapons makers were all greatly embarrassed.

The inability of US military planners and US-made weaponry to counter the Houthi drones is also a sobering wake-up call to all those countries with which the US has any sort of ‘defense’ agreements and partnerships with.

These attacks made the US look unreliable and inept. This realization has not been lost on the US regime’s faithful vassals, especially the ones in Europe that see the US as the lynch pin of NATO and who count on the US for their ‘protection.’

If a small group of Yemeni militants were able to cut through US ‘defenses’ and score a devastating win, then what is a country like Iran, Russia or China capable of? And will the US be able to defend anyone from such adversaries? This question is no longer a resounding YES, but at best a MAYBE.

US VP Mike Pence has been sent out to make the rounds on TV to do damage control by talking tough and threatening everyone. This is standard procedure whenever the US gets a black eye.

This will no doubt be followed up by self-convincing, self-soothing pep-talks by US vassals from London to Warsaw who will heap fawning praise on the US, while convincing themselves that the ‘US is still strong, and that there is no need to ever doubt the US commitments and ability to defend Europe,’ or some similar clap-trap along this line.

When people who think they are the best suddenly get knocked down a few rungs, the absurdities just don’t stop.

The US regime is paranoid about looking weak or losing to anyone. This obsession with always having to appear powerful may not be simply for commercial purposes or even as a means to dominate others.

The US has to do everything it can to at least appear formidable in order to keep at bay all of the victims of its imperial rampages.

If the US becomes weak, its victims will tear it apart.

What the US gained by hook, crook and murder it needs to maintain by hook, crook and murder. This is certainly true of it’s criminal connivance with the evil KSA Wahhabists when it comes to keeping the petro-dollar system alive and oil profits flowing West. We can see this in the demented lengths to which the US is ready to go in falsely blaming Iran for the refinery bombings without any evidence to speak of.

But as with all its misadventures in the Mideast for the past 20 years, the US, with its breaking of treaties, aiding and abetting terror groups, sanctions and economic terrorism, and assisting the House of Saud with bombing and blockading Yemen for 5+ years and causing tens of thousands of civilian deaths, disease and starvation, has no one else to blame but itself.


It says a lot about the moral degradation of the US establishment when the bombing of an oil refinery is more devastating to them than the devastation of civilian lives and infrastructure caused by its own bombs.

The US wanted to sell its overpriced, shoddy weaponry to Saudi Arabia so it could bomb Yemen non-stop, so now it has to pay the price with higher oil prices and domestic economic downturn that will most likely follow after the Aramco bombings.

But that is the price the US will have to be prepared to pay for its stupidity.

If the US wants to bomb, then it will get bombed in return. There is no way around this.

Ask the Saudis.

Sunday, September 1, 2019

80 Years Later

On August 23, 1939, the Soviet Union and Germany signed the Non-aggression Pact. The Soviet Union was compelled to do so by severe necessity, and the difficult decision was made under duress. It had to be made in a very limited time, when the failure of the Anglo-Franco-Soviet trilateral negotiations became obvious, and the possibility of rapprochement between Britain and France with Germany was becoming ever more real. It was necessary to take into account the Japanese factor – the ongoing hostilities at Khalkhin Gol and the military tension in relations with Tokyo that set in for an indefinite time. The Soviet Union could not wage war on two fronts, in the East and the West.
 

By signing the Pact and the secret protocol, the Soviet leadership pursued the following goals:
- prevent being drawn into the war;
- disrupt the emerging Anglo-German deal (second Munich pact);
- retain room for military-strategic and political manoeuvre;
- prevent Nazi occupation of the entire territory of Poland, which would significantly worsen the military-strategic position of the Soviet Union.
 

While the Munich Pact gave the Nazis an entire European country and its population to ravage, including Jews who were subject to mass destruction, the August 23 deal removed vast areas of Western Ukraine and Belarussia from the German sphere of influence, saving them from the “new order” and a Holocaust.




The Nazi occupation of Poland confirmed that the decision adopted by the Soviet leadership was correct. Great Britain and France left the Poles to their fate and, without losing hope of a confrontation between Germany and the Soviet Union, made a choice in favour of the so-called Phoney War, which was waged for more than eight months and significantly facilitated Hitler's aggression against European countries and the Soviet Union.
(1)

Lets us not forget that
by signing the Munich Agreement of 1938, Poland, Hungary, and Great Britain directly took part in the dismemberment of the Czech Republic. After this happened, the Czechs uttered an ominous warning to Poland that they will be Hitler's next victims; a warning that proved all too true.

Poles to this day whine and cry over the Ribbentrop-Molotov pact of 1939 which dismembered their country, yet conveniently forget about Poland's part in dismembering the Czech Republic. 


Although Poland's interest in the Munich Pact was driven by the recovery of the Teschen district-which the Czechs took away in an unfair manner by going back on an earlier deal they made with Poland some years earlier-it was still in very poor taste for Poland to exploit the Hitlerian dismantling of a European state to get that territory back. Poland paid for this scummy deed a year later.

And as for blaming the Soviet Union for invading Poland on September 17, 1939, the Soviets paid for this a year or so later during Operation Barbarossa, and redeemed themselves by the great sacrifice they made to the victory over Nazism.

Poles need to seriously reflect on what would have been the fate of Poland-as well as the rest of Europe-if Nazi Germany succeeded in marching into Moscow and taking control over Russia in 1941. The natural resources of a defeated Russia would multiply Germany's strength, and neither Great Britain and the US would have any appetite for confronting it at that point.

So Poles should consider themselves lucky. They got the least worse option out of the two. Because what Hitler had planned for the Poles, Russians, and other Slav 'subhumans' made Stalinist abuses pale in comparison.


Poland has an unhealthy and fatalistic tendency to view historical events selectively. It cherry-picks German and Soviet crimes and points them out, sometimes to the point of morbid paranoid obsession, but conveniently forgets its own shortcomings. This is most evident when it comes to WW2.


Poland also added fuel to the fire it found itself in on September 1, 1939 when it repeatedly refused to enter into any anti-German pact which included the Soviet Union. Poland's rabid Russophobia proved to be its ultimate undoing. If Poland did join in a pact with the Soviets and other nations, perhaps Hitler would've been too scared to launch any wars and there would be no Molotov-Ribbentrop treaty or a WW2.

And lastly, Poles need to keep in mind the extreme devastation and death visited upon them between 1939-1945, learn from it, and help ensure that this never happens again. 


Poles can do this by shunning confrontation and animosity (along with anyone who promotes it) and work for the peaceful resolution of differences and problems with every country-especially with Russia-instead of taunting, provoking, and insulting it at every turn for shallow political ends at the behest of the US regime and the NATO rabble.

This is the only sane, sensible, and responsible way to go, and
is in Poland's best interest. 

The other path could very well lead to a future that will make Poland's WW2 losses look like a paper cut; and that's only if there is even anything left of Poland after the radioactive dust settles.

Sources:

1. https://sputniknews.com/world/201909011076696900-moscow-reminds-europe-ussr-saved-it-from-nazis-as-poland-snubs-russia-in-wwii-commemoration/


Wednesday, July 24, 2019

Anti-Iranian Delusions

The US, always the loyal zionist shabbos goy, has been provoking and taunting Iran for the last few months with false flags, threats, and increased economic terrorism.

It started some months ago when some tanker ships passing through the Persian gulf were mysteriously bombed.

The US regime immediately accused Iran. The US navy even produced a movie purportedly showing an Iranian speedboat crew removing a limpet mine from the side of one of the tankers.

The US regime presented this ‘footage’ as clear evidence of Iran’s guilt. Also, the US navy, with all its technology and presence, could only see fit to film a short segment of the act? It could not film anything before it?

Those tankers were not attacked by Iran. They were attacked by either the CIA, Mossad, or MI6 and blamed on Iran in order to compel countries into joining in on the US anti-Iranian sanctions.

This ploy did not work, and the entire incident, as well as the US navy’s grainy ‘context-free’ video, were judged as nowhere good enough to implicate Iran.

(whenever the US shows the world a grainy, black and white video of some state-designated enemy supposedly doing something bad, it is a given that the video is fake. A bad-quality video prevents any type of adequate scrutiny, and can be interpreted-or in this case simply passed off-as whatever its creators want it to be)

The rejection of this so-called ‘evidence’ by the EU, Russia and others did not go down well with the B-Team (Bibi Netanyahoo, John Bolton, and Bin Salman), and something else had to be found to stir up an anti-Iranian frenzy.

So literally out of the blue, the US sends in a stealth drone that violates Iranian airspace and is shot down by Iran.

Of course, the US immediately lied and said that Iran did not shoot down a US drone. But then Iran produced actual pieces of it. Another credibility point for Iran here.

Along with the drone, the US regime sent a P-8 reconnaissance aircraft up there as well with a crew of over 30 people on-board.

Iran shot down the drone, but spared the plane. This shows two things:

1. Iran has the capability to shoot down US stealth aircraft using indigenously produced anti-air systems

2. The US, by sending a plane with people on-board, may have been using the plane as bait, and hoped Iran would shoot it down and create the perfect excuse for war; a war into which NATO would be dragged into. Let’s remember that the US won’t go into a fight alone. It needs legions of vassals to do the fighting as well.

Trump then stated that he called off the strike because he was worried about killing about 150 people. But killing people did not matter to him when bombed Syria, twice, under false pretexts. He also gave another excuse that the destruction of an unmanned drone was not worth going to war over.

Most likely what happened was that the foolish Trump and his evil advisers Bolton and Pompeo cooked up this provocation and were hoping that Iran target and destroy the P-8 aircraft, not the drone. The drone was probably there to capture the destruction of the plane.

The neo-cons staged this provocation and had their fingers on the trigger, ready to go.

But after Iranians didn’t take the bait, Trump called everything off.

Those pilots who were on that P-8 plane need to really think about what could’ve happened, and what they were really sent up there for that day, after taking into account the events afterwards.

Those people who failed to see that they were to play the roles of sacrificial lambs are hopeless morons. Those that did should leave their posts ASAP and flee far, far away.

Because as things stand, the US government basically wanted them killed in order to create an excuse to wage a war of aggression against another country by means of a false flag.

The Iranians decided to spare the P-8 knowing what its role was supposed to be, thereby saving a bunch of people, and preventing a conflict.

After this second failed attempt at a false flag that could be blamed on Iran, the US regime ratcheted up sanctions and further economic terrorism.

However, the US could not get the EU to go against Iran, and its sanctions pressure and threats were starting to get a push-back. The IAEA condemned US actions at a meeting called by the US to complain about-get this-Iran’s decision to suspend some of its obligations under the JCPOA (a totally legal step which is allowed under the agreement), an agreement from which the US withdrew from and no longer has a right to either enforce or comment on.

The US was left looking like a chump.

So not knowing where to turn, the US regime’s Iran-obsessed John Bolton recently decided to bring in the UK into the grinder by talking them into seizing an Iranian oil tanker when it passed through the Strait of Gibraltar.

Since this event, we now know that the UK deliberately changed laws on the passage of ships through the area to create an excuse to seize the Iranian tanker. UK did so a mere 36 hours before the seizure.

The UK excuse was that the ship was en-route to Syria, and that the UK was enforcing EU sanctions on supplying oil to Syria. That the tanker was sailing to Syria has not been established as a fact.

But even if it was, Iran is not an EU-member, and EU sanctions do not apply to it.

Therefore, the UK committed an act of piracy by seizing the ship. It also did so in waters that are disputed and claimed by Spain.

Iran warned the UK that there would be consequences, and a week or so later, it seized a UK-flagged tanker in the Strait of Hormuz.

The UK then started whining that Iran seized the ship illegally, and that it wants other countries to now patrol the Persian Gulf to guarantee the safety of ships; all this without any hint of irony regarding its seizure of the Iranian tanker.

This fake crisis was manufactured by the US regime in order to draw the EU into its sick game with Iran. By trying to get EU countries to send military forces into the region, the US, in a roundabout way, is compelling the EU to basically renege on their JCPOA obligations, and could also be setting the stage for a military conflict with Iran.

Because once US and its vassals military forces are adequately built up under the guise of securing shipping routes, all it will take is one false flag against Iran where NATO soldiers die, and the US will have everyone conveniently in place for a full-on assault on Iran.

This is all also being done at the behest of the zionist regime, which is nervous about Iranian presence in Syria, and that it is assisting both Hamas and Hezbollah in becoming more formidable, so they can better defend themselves from future zionist aggression.

Zionistan has still not forgotten about the drubbing it got from Hezbollah in 2006, and it worried that it will not win another war, since zionist forces are in an appalling state of readiness and have been for years.

Couple this with the fact that the ‘Greater Israel’ plan has been killed due to Russian and Iranian involvement in Syria, and we can see why the zionist rabble ruling Palestine is acting so deranged.

They got their US-based allies and feckless EU sympathizers to do the dirty work for them.

The US government has become an extension of the zionist regime. The US congress has become an extension of the knesset. Pro-zionists even have their own caucus to lobby for all things that the zionist regime wants. But this is all to the long-term detriment of the US itself, and only adds to the rot within the country.

Top-level posts in US departments have been stuffed with pro-zionist Jews or their gentile errand-boys. This process is being repeated in other countries as well.

These schizophrenic pro-zionists then go to great lengths to torment and malign any country, group, and individuals who the zionist regime sees as an ‘enemy.’

These zionist Jews and their gentile cohorts are at the forefront of the economic terror against Iran, Syria, and any other country that refuses to bow down to them.

The zionists even got the morally-challenged US congress to make any sort of boycott action against zionistan illegal.

Sigal P. Mandelker is one of the newer pro-zionist Jewish vermin who serves as the Secretary of the Treasury for Terrorism and Financial Intelligence as well as the Acting United States Deputy Secretary of the Treasury. How convenient!

This piece of shit recently warned countries to avoid doing any kind of business and transactions with Iranian air carriers, including ticket booking and processing, or face sanctions.

The zionists have become so paranoid and depraved that they are even forcing people to stop traveling to Iran. It seems the zionists don’t even want anyone going there and seeing the facts that contradict US and zionist anti-Iranian propaganda.

But these are all acts of desperation.

The US and zionistan are losing influence and power, and cannot stand it.

Iran busted up a US spy ring recently, and that has caused serious damage to the CIA’s ability to conspire against Iran. Many CIA agents have been apprehended and eliminated in Iran and other countries with whom Iran shares intelligence.

US intelligence about Iran is now seriously lacking, and therefore the US regime is unable to make decisions that will have the most effect. We can see this with Trump’s and the US military’s bumbling efforts against Iran recently.

This would explain why the US is applying so many sanctions. They can’t get a good grip on Iran, so they are just shooting blind.

But Iran is no push-over. Its capabilities are formidable, and it is capable of inflicting heavy damage on US forces, if it is attacked.

There is no doubt that the shooting down of the US stealth drone, a drone which was deemed untouchable by the US, has rattled the US military. They are now worried about what else Iran may have.

But all this recent drama is the fault of the US. Its withdrawal from the JCPOA and provocations against Iran have made the US look bad.

And into the mix stepped in the UK, and it made itself look foolish after seizing the Iranian tanker.

Everyone can see that the bad guy in all this is not Iran.

It would behoove the EU to refrain from being dragged into any further US-made messes.

The US, and those who go along with its anti-Iranian idiocy are on the wrong side of history.