The Fake Crisis Continues . . .

The P5+1 negotiations over Iran’s nuclear program are in their final stretch.

After following this issue since it first reared its fake head in 2003, it’s clearly obvious that this has nothing to do with Iran’s nuclear program.

Throughout these negotiations the US has been insisting on unreasonable and excessive demands from Iran, mainly the inspections of their military sites for any evidence of illicit, military-related nuclear work.

Iran has refused to allow this measure, and rightly so. After all, wasn’t the demand for inspections of Iraq’s military sites, under threat of US bombing, that led to the eventual regime change in 2003?

The world knows where the US is going with its demand for surprise, non-announced inspections of Iran’s military sites. This is all about espionage and recon of Iran’s military capabilities so that the Pentagon and Israhell, along with their EU whores, can size up Iran’s military capabilities for the eventual regime change bombing campaign.

Such access would allow US, the Zionist criminal mafia state, and their European vassals to inject spies and agents into the inspection teams to gather information, plant bugs, engage in sabotage, and get precise targeting information.

This is EXACTLY what happened in Iraq, and it’s the reason why in 1998 Saddam Hussein ordered all inspectors out of the country and blocked any further inspections until 2002.

But what if an agreement is signed, and Iran even allows inspections of its military sites? What can we expect from all this? 

1. It must be borne in mind that even if an agreement is signed, it will only end the nuclear-related sanctions. Sanctions that the US/EU passed on Iran based on self-serving politicized reasons such as ‘human rights,’ ‘sponsoring terrorism,’ etc., are still intact, and will continue to be. 

2. Will the US and its vassals, after signing the agreement, keep all the sanctions in place by simply finding other reasons for them such as the ones mentioned above? This will effectively tie Iran’s hands while providing virtually no sanctions relief. 

3. What guarantee does Iran have, if it allows inspections of military sites, that the US and its vassals won’t use Iran’s possession of ballistic missiles as an excuse to find Iran ‘in breach’ of the agreement, and therefore turn on the sanctions switch again? US will most likely argue that because the missiles can technically (although not truly) carry nuclear warheads, that they are illicit and must be scrapped. US will totally ignore evidence that Iran has no nuclear warheads to place on the missiles, though. This will be part of the plot to destroy Iran’s most effective conventional weapon since the US knows Iran has no nukes, and no nuclear weapons program. Without the ballistic missiles, it will be less risky to bomb Iran in the future.

I’m not very hopeful that the west will abide by whatever agreement it signs with Iran. After all, not long after Iran signed up to the interim agreement in 2013, the US and EU still enacted sanctions against Iran. They did so again earlier this year against Iranian banks. Never mind that Iran has faithfully abided by the interim agreement until now, and no evidence of illegal nuclear weapons-related work has been found.

There’s also a fly in the ointment, the pathetic US congress. This bunch of inept failures, willfully-ignorant know-nothings, and simple-minded extremists have insisted that any final deal with Iran be approved by them.

If it comes to that, and congress votes it down for whatever idiotic, zionist-inspired reasons, then the US will shame and embarrass itself. It will have only itself to blame for any and all consequences, and the world will know this. 

Originally, the US planned regime change in Iran not long after Iraq. But Iraq turned into such an embarrassing quagmire that those plans were put on-hold.

So the US trotted out more sanctions against Iran, hoping that this would make life for Iranian people so bad that they'd overthrow their government. US even attempted to use the 2009 Iranian elections to launch a color revolution. That didn't work, either.

After President Rouhani was elected, the negotiations were started. The US then decided to use the process to further regime change by attempting to trick and trap Iran, and giving back very little.

This hasn't worked, either. So now the US is making unreasonable and unfair demands which they know Iran won't agree to. The US plans to push those demands in order to force the Iranians to walk away first.

The US will then use this to show that Iran wasn't being serious, acted dishonestly and refused to cooperate. This Iranian 'non-cooperation' will then be used to scare the world and rally US vassals and other fools into another war against Iran.

If Iran does accept these demands, then the US will simply wait for Iran to be softened up militarily, then find some trivial excuse (real or made-up) to bomb and invade.

These so-called negotiations are just a ploy by the US to get what they want by non-military means: to subjugate Iran politically and economically. But if Iran doesn’t fall for any of the US tricks and refuses to get suckered, the US will most likely try the military route. Whether this will take the form of what was done to Iraq in 2003, or the form of ISIS, or some other CIA-manufactured terror group that will be let loose on Iran is still uncertain.  

Agreement or not, regime change in Iran was, is, and will be the aim of the US.  

The nuclear program was always just a cover.



UPDATE: Just found this tid-bit of news below on rt.com. It backs up perfectly what I stated in point #3!

7 July, 2015

16:06

Iran to face restrictions on missile program even if nuclear deal agreed - US

A senior US official has said Iran will continue to face restrictions on its missile program under an emerging nuclear agreement. Tehran will also be limited in trading conventional arms, the official added, as cited by Reuters. The official, who spoke under the condition of anonymity, said there were still differences between the two parties. The 5+1 group and Iran are still trying to reach a nuclear deal, which would restrict Iran’s nuclear ambitions, but in return Tehran would get relief from Western economic sanctions.

Source: rt.com

No Means No!

Thankfully, the Greek people have issued a resounding NO to the Eurocrat bankster mafia’s latest threats of financial fleecing of the country.

And why would Greeks make any other choice? After five years of depraved thievery by banksters from the EU/IMF/ECB, voting yes for more of the same would’ve been nothing less than collective national suicide.

The yes/no referendum in Greece was an excellent exercise in democracy, something that the rest of the EU is seemingly repelled by, judging from their admonitions and threats.

Now why wasn’t the Greek populace consulted like this back in 2010? It would’ve most likely prevented things from getting as bad as they have for Greece. But back then, Greece’s government didn’t care about the people, but only their wealthy supporters, within and outside Greece.

The decision by Alexis Tsipras to hold the referendum quickly was also a great move. Doing so deprived the Eurocrats from highjacking and manipulating the entire process in their favor.

If this referendum was held a month later, then by the time the polls opened the Eurocrat banksters would’ve had Greeks believing that they will be nuked from space by extra-terrestials if they didn’t vote yes.

But even with the short time the Eurocrats had they did make sleazy attempts at ad hoc disinformation and psy-ops by releasing so-called ‘opinion polls’ done by EU banks and pro-EU institutions and other non-official EU outfits that predicted a majority yes vote.

So there was some manipulation, but thankfully not long enough to brainwash and scare the Greek voters.

So now the ball is in the EU’s court. From the actions they will take the EU bosses will show everyone, once and for all, what the EU is really about, and where their priorities lie: the people or the banks.

This referendum was more than just about Greece. It was about what type of a Europe and world we shall live in. A yes vote would’ve told the EU bankster mafia that threats, pressure, financial fleecing, and rule by decree works, and this would then be applied to other nations.

By voting no, the Greeks nullified the Eurocrats project of perpetual debt servitude.

The Greek government now has a truly popular mandate to reject further economic rape of Greece. It’s now time for the EU to accept reality, and deal with Greece in a respectful manner that helps Greece, not hurts it further.

No more lies, threats, ultimatums and bluffs from Brussels. They have been called and rejected.

Confederate Flag Controversy

The Charleston, SC shootings have been the news lately.

As a result of the killings, there are increasing calls for the Confederate flag to be taken down in the state capital of Columbia.

This whole confederate flag/racism controversy is just yet another moldy reminder of how imbecilic US society has become.

If non-whites are so offended by the confederate flag and the negative policies and past that it represents for them, then what do Afghanis , Iraqis, and other victims of US 'regime change' think and feel when they see the US flag, and the evil is represents?

The US flag to date represents more blood, violence, pain, and carnage than the confederate flag ever will. Doesn't anyone see this?

Taking down the confederate flag won’t end racism. It will entrench it. It will only anger those who still support the flag’s display, and cause more divisions. It may even lead to future shootings, so those calling for its removal may want to think twice.

The problem here isn’t the Confederate flag and even what it represents to its opponents.

The problem here is the one that has existed in the US since the beginning, before it was even the US.

It’s the problem inherent in a multi-racial society.

Where there’s a society dominated by one type of race, and attempts are made to ship in people of other races among them, racism and racial tension is the natural and inevitable result.

It doesn't matter whether someone is racist or not; white or black.That's just the plain reality of living a multi-racial society.

No amount of feel-goods speeches, longing and praying for an ‘end to racism’ will change this.

Look what happened in S. Africa and Zimbabwe. Look what is happening in the US, and now Europe. This is the result when people, white or not, are taken out of their homeland and injected somewhere else, whether by force, bad circumstance or by choice. History shows that such experimentations don’t end well in the long-run. 

It’s funny how people in South Carolina are demanding the removal of the Confederate flag. My parents were there on vacation a few years ago and saw a black guy selling confederate flags as souvenirs.

Perhaps covering the whole thing up with money may dampen tempers. This seems to be the classic US fix, even if it doesn’t work.

The 2016 El-auction

We are beginning to see the same old assorted US political class douchebags and their henchmen descend upon the TV screens with their smoke and mirrors once again, all in preparation for that ultimate dog-and-pony show called the US presidential elections.

On the Democratic side we have Hillary Clinton, the truest fake if there ever was one. Every time she opens her mouth lies come out, or nonsense babble meant to cover up her past lies and criminal behavior.

On the Republican side we have odious oddities too numerous to mention. The shit list includes creatures such as Ted Cruz, Marco Rubio, Rick Santorum, and the most perfidious of them all, Jeb Bush, the brother of disgraced failure George W. Bush.

These people have all sold themselves to the devil so many times that I think even he is starting to have buyer’s remorse.

We are hearing the same old crap from these people. Wedge issues like guns, god, and kitschy talking points about ‘American exceptionalism,’ freedom and democracy, saving social security and Medicare, their obsessive fetish with Israel, and lowering taxes are being thrown around like used rubbers.

The same old promises, broken into billions of pieces by their predecessors, are being bandied around by these liars as a carrot over the heads of the naïve retards out there foolish enough to buy this electioneering bullshit.

The Republican side simply depends on the continued willful ignorance of the country bumpkins for their votes, and the dollars of the wealthy elites.

The Democratic side is cleverer. Hillary will talk about ‘helping the average struggling American' and creating jobs, without any hint of irony. It is, after all, filthy politicians like her who plundered the national wealth and gave it to themselves and their wealthy buddies.

So Hillary is going to pull the same trick that Obummer did in 2008. She’ll surround herself with ‘anti-establishment’ campaign advisors. She’ll ally herself with progressive organizations out there that are pro-choice on abortion, organizations that demand a higher minimum wage, for women’s rights, are pro-immigration, etc. And of course, her being a female will also be used to maximum effect.

But let there be no doubt: As happened with Obama, Hillary will exploit all these people to fool the public and drum up votes. If/when she wins the election she’ll quickly shake off all those people like fleas, just like Obummer did.
 
And just like Obummer, she’ll appoint the same old coterie of scumbag neo-cons, and deluded hawkish liberal interventionists like Victoria Nuland, Zbigniew Brzezinski. These people will cause further global chaos. To this fetid mix she'll add an assortment of crooked pro-Wall Street economic gurus who will further fleece the country for their own benefit.

As part of the act, these politicians will travel the country, go into diners, bowling alleys, factories, and surround themselves with people working minimum wage, old people in retirement homes, minority groups, and by anyone else good enough for a photo-op. But these people will be quickly forgotten after the election is over—unless of course they have deep pockets.

There’s nothing good to be gained by voting for any these people. They won’t fix a damn thing. As the pattern has shown, each president that comes along is definitely worse than the last one. So there’s nothing worthwhile to expect from any of them. All these candidates should come with big warning labels.

So we will have more wars, interventions, bombings, austerity, mediocre economic performance, unemployment, and all the rottenness of Washington DC, untouched.

Vote for these vermin at your own risk.

Little Talking Shop of Horrors

The leaders of western regimes are meeting in Germany for their annual elitist self-congratulatory circle-jerk known as the G7.

It used to be called the G8, but Russia was kicked out for failing to be a good little slave.

The G7 conferences are useless to the 99.8% of humanity. The only thing that is discussed at this western mafia get-together is how to fleece the rest of the world on behalf of a miserable gang of filthy rich billionaires who already own more than 60% of the world’s wealth, and most of the world’s governments.

This gang is also charged with deciding who to punish for refusing to submit to their will, and how it will be done.

One thing that is a given is that every time these misfits meet, the world becomes a more violent and dangerous place. So we can expect bad things going forward.

Judging from their past meetings and their consequences, what will these bought-and-paid-for sell-outs be discussing this year?

Some things may be:

-How to further punish Russian President Vladimir Putin for disobeying the will of the western criminal cartel, and daring to stand up to, and successfully shake off, all attempts at bankrupting and destabilizing Russia by the US mafia bosses and their EU henchmen.

-How to provoke more violence and tension in Ukraine by using their newest stable pack mule Poroshenko and his fascist-minded vermin and other incompetents to provoke Russia.

-How to speed-up regime change in Iran, Russia, or Syria by staging a convincing violent false-flag that can be blamed on any these countries (or all three).

-How to pump people full of fear to justify illegal and intrusive spying programs, take away more rights, and crackdown on dissent.

-How to financially fleece more working people for the benefit of their billionaire bosses by passing the Trans-Atlantic Free Trade Agreement.

-How to carve up the Mideast by using their proxy ISIS forces to take over more cities and overthrow governments the US Empire doesn’t like.

-How to spin and exploit the FIFA corruption scandal to punish their adversaries, but in such a way that any corruption leading back to US and its vassal states is omitted, covered up, or excused by employing gratuitous amounts of sleazy and hypocritical PR, propaganda, or broken self-serving logic (this will most likely prove to be one of the hardest tasks for the G7 clowns this year).

-How to destabilize Greece further by refusing to compromise on its debt payments, and make plans for the quick overthrow/disgrace of the Syriza government should Greece have the courage to say ‘No!’ to any further economic and financial rape of the country. This will also be done to stop Greece from working with Russia on the Blue Stream project which would see Russian energy pipelines going through Greek territory.

There‘s no doubt these things or at least some of them will be discussed by the G7 mafia--behind closed doors, of course (transparency is something that the US empire only demands from its adversaries, not itself or its allies).

They certainly don’t have time for unimportant nonsense like cutting down on pollution, addressing economic inequality and rising poverty, raising the minimum wage, fighting and preventing widespread financial corruption in their midst, or disarmament. There’s no money in it for them and their billionaire bankster masters in doing any of that.

Another year, another useless G7. Garbage in, more garbage out.

Football Madness

The revelations about corruption within FIFA have been big news since last week.

Suddenly, everyone is surprised that there’s corruption within one of the world’s major and most profitable sports enterprises.

If anyone thinks that FIFA is the exception rather than the rule, then they’re deluding themselves. Wherever there’s a huge pile of money, there will be corruption to some degree.

There’s definitely corruption within the Olympics, the NFL, NBA, just to name a few. The NFL operates as a non-profit organization. Yes, this is a fact. The NFL makes billions of dollars in profits, yet bilks the taxpayers for billions more. If this isn’t institutionalized corruption, then nothing is.

And which country outed this FIFA corruption?

None other than the 110% Godly and all-holy US-- the land where corruption is not only endemic, but deeply institutionalized and legalized.

Let’s take a look at a few: From allowing the wealthy to buy candidates and elections, illegal torture, secret wiretapping of its own population as well as those of other countries, rendition, lying the country into an illegal and unnecessary wars (Iraq in 2003), massive-scale financial fraud and theft by Wall St. banks where no one saw jail time but only token, symbolic fines, massive theft of taxpayer money by private corporations, and a lot more—see this.

So when taking into account the FACT that the US is thoroughly rotted out by corruption, seeing it try to fight corruption anywhere else is synonymous to using a shit-stained mop to clean a dirty floor. It’s hypocrisy on steroids, with a dose of crack-cocaine.

If the US wants to go after serious corruption, then there’s certainly more than enough of it at home to keep the FBI and district attorneys busy for at least the next fifty years.

There’s no doubt that the whole investigation is politicized.

The reasons are:

1. The US has been angry/jealous with Russia’s selection as the host of the 2018 World Cup, and has been seeking to take this honor away in some way. The US is also frustrated that all the false accusations, sanctions, threats, and other moves to cripple Russia economically and politically have failed.

2. These FIFA corruption revelations also come at a very convenient time for the Zionist shit-pit (Israel), who at the same time was facing expulsion from FIFA and exclusion from all soccer tournaments due to that state’s racist and restrictive treatment against Palestinian players, and the sponsoring of teams which are based on occupied Palestinian territories.

3. US influence, wealth, and power is waning. More countries are turning away from it, and forming their own institutions and partnerships that threaten US hegemony over the globe. The US is desperate to maintain this hegemony and keep its rivals down by whatever means it can find. It definitely seeks to highjack FIFA, staff it with its own compliant creatures, and make the organization a tool of US control. The US is certainly scraping the bottom of the barrel by using FIFA corruption as an imperial life-preserver. If it succeeds, then no World Cup games will ever be allowed in countries which do not bow down to the US. This we can be 100% sure of.

There’s no doubt that this entire FIFA corruption affair has been stirred up by the US for purely political reasons. This corruption has been going on for decades, yet it’s now that this is being exposed? This is not a coincidence, it’s deliberate.

The US is also overstepping its boundaries by demanding extradition of non-US citizens for trial to the US, when those people hadn’t committed any crime on US soil. That they indirectly/remotely used a facility within the US to do so doesn't give the US the right to seize these people and bring them to the US for trial. Present the evidence to the country from which the accused are from, and let the law-enforcement officials there bring those individuals to justice.

But this so-called investigation into FIFA corruption will probably go the way of the MH17 one, because as soon as evidence comes up that implicates the US, a major US corporation, or one of their vassal states, all will get very quiet, and no one will do anything more.

Ultimately it will come to this, and either the US has to watch itself or its slaves get locked up and disgraced, or sweep it all under the rug to save their miserable hides. If the US foolishly thinks it can cherry-pick who to implicate, investigate, and bring in, then it won't get anywhere. If it tries to do just that, the US will end up embarrassing itself, and will cause way more mess within FIFA than any of this corruption did.

So go ahead, team USA. Shoot yourself in the foot, for the umpteenth time!

ISIS - Made in the USA

ISIS has been running amok Syria and Iraq for two years now. The militant group has recently captured the Iraqi city of Ramadi, the capital of Anbar province, and has gained control of thousands of US-provided US military vehicles and other weapons, including M1A2 Abrams tanks.

Yet the US stubbornly refuses to join forces with Syria, Iran, and Russia to fight ISIS. Why is that?

Since the US and its so-called ‘coalition’ got involved in fighting ISIS, that group’s successes have multiplied. Why is that?

Either the US military is ran by totally inept morons who don’t know what they’re doing (which is a tempting conclusion judging from the abysmal failures in Afghanistan, Iraq, Libya), or this was deliberately planned by the US.

Let’s notice some particular developments since the summer of 2013 that support the conclusion that ISIS is a US-sponsored proxy army deployed against US adversaries in the region:

1. In September 2013 the US failed to get the UN and its allies to bomb Syria on the pretext that the Syrian government gassed their own people, even though the evidence for this was highly-questionable. Widespread public opposition to this put enough pressure on the US government to roll back their war talk.

2. Not long after this failed US Syria bombing plot, we see ISIS suddenly pop-up on the scene in Iraq and Syria. The group immediately starts to grow larger and more powerful. It soon overpowers and absorbs other groups, moderate or not.

3. Acts of violence and barbarity by the ISIS militants stir worldwide public outrage, and calls for a military intervention against ISIS are heard. The US immediately steps in as the ring-leader. This ‘coalition’ also gives itself a mandate to bomb Syrian territory without any permission or coordination with the Syrian government (quite convenient!)

4. Right after the US gets involved, strange things start happening. ISIS grows stronger, captures more territory, becomes flush with weapons, and make significant territorial gains.

5. Strange anomalies are witnessed. US/British helicopters are caught by Iraqi army dropping arms and other aid inside ISIS-controlled territory; ISIS supplies being trucked in from Turkey.

6. ISIS also spreads into Yemen right on que as Saudi Arabia starts bombing the country, with US support. ISIS is also spreading in Libya. Other nearby countries start seeing ISIS form within their borders.

It seems like the more the US ‘helps’ to fight ISIS the stronger ISIS gets.

Only an idiot would be unable to put two-and-two together and see what is clearly going on:

Failing to lie the world into another Syrian regime change bombing based on a false-flag gas attack staged by US-allied rebels in Syria, and blamed on the Syrian government, the US decided to create a proxy terrorist super-force, ISIS, to scare and shock the world.

The US then used the group’s atrocities to rally public outrage and disgust and prompted calls for someone to ‘do something.’

Right on que, the US and its puppets take on the role of ‘defenders’ against ISIS and start bombing Syrian territory.

This bombing has only increased the success of ISIS against regional US rivals, Bashar Assad of Syria, the Shiite-dominated pro-Iranian government of Iraq, Yemeni Houthi movement, and in the near future, Iran.

By arming, training and supporting ISIS through deception and subterfuge, the US managed to create a violent proxy force which is fighting US enemies for them, and also serving as a great justification for direct US involvement so they can ‘speed things up,’ unhindered by a skeptical and war-weary public.

Directly or indirectly, ISIS is a US product.