Bye Bye Butcher!

Ariel Sharon, the Butcher of Beirut, is dead.

After years of escaping crimes which have gone unpunished, by hiding behind the US and EU skirt, this filthy sack of excrement finally breathed his last breath.

From him aiding the massacre at Sabra and Shatila refugee camp, to his many war crimes against the Palestinian and Lebanese people, the crimes of this thing are too numerous to count.

The nicest thing I can say about this evil bastard Ariel Sharon is that maybe he wouldn’t have been such a hardened war criminal had he not been aided, encouraged, and protected by the inbred Yankee idiots across the ocean and the misguided weaklings in the EU.

Ariel Sharon was in a coma for the last eight years, and had been brain-dead for that whole time. I say that he was brain-dead long before that, as ALL Zionists are, even when they're still alive and functioning!

It is a historical injustice that this criminal Sharon was never brought to a court of law. After all, some Nazi officials and army personnel at Nuremberg went to jail, or the gallows, for lesser offenses that what Ariel Sharon committed.

All those who backed this miserable creature in Washington, London, Brussels and elsewhere share in the crimes of this waste of a life. All of them should be ashamed of themselves for supporting Ariel Sharon’s bloody rampages throughout the Middle East.

The death of Ariel Sharon, the Butcher of Beirut, is a stark reminder that no matter how well-protected political criminals in the west may currently be, the hand of death will reach them as well. It is only a matter of time.

No amount of NSA snooping, CIA thuggery, political immunity, torture and drone bombings by the US military, will in the end do these criminals any damn good.

At least Ariel Sharon suffered for eight years before the devil finally pulled the plug. Let us hope that all those who aided his crimes over the decades have the same experience, whoever, and wherever they may be in the world.

I end this essay with the following comment:

DIS -agreements

The recent agreement that Iran reached with the P5+1 powers has been both a cause for celebration for some, but a cause for consternation for others.

The primary whiner is Israeli PM Netanyahoo, who has been foaming at the mouth and making dire predictions of an impending Iranian nuclear bomb which will be used to destroy Israel and the west.

On que, the rabid Zionist rabble from AIPAC and other pro-Israeli organizations and fronts, have been in full offensive mode to discredit, ruin and abrogate this agreement that was signed in Geneva on November 24.

The servile congress critters have been falling over themselves to be the first to condemn the agreement and vow to make sure it does not hold.

There is even talk of passing new sanctions on Iran, even though they would not kick in after six months; although it is clear they are doing this to make sure that the agreement does not hold.

Iran has already said that if any new sanctions are passed before the six months are up, Iran will no longer be held to the agreement. This may be precisely what the Zionist-bought congress vermin want. Then they can go on TV and say that Iran broke its word.

It is doubtful congress would pass any agreement-killing sanctions now. If it does, the US will be on the hook for breaking its word in front of the world. This would not look good for Obummer who has been struggling to do something right.

But why would these people not want a peaceful resolution and a thaw in relations with Iran? It seems like this would decrease tension and danger in that volatile region.

As I said in an earlier post, it has to do with entrenched interests in the US which benefit greatly from having Iran as an enemy, the most obvious beneficiary being Israel.

Israel needs a fake Iranian boogeyman with which to scare Jews and keep their ethnic cohesion. It also needs Iran to distract the world from Israel’s occupation and abuse of Palestinians.

If Iran restores relations with the west and is no longer seen as a threat, who else is there that Israel can use as a convenient boogeyman? Syria has shown remarkable restraint, especially after they agreed to scrap their chemical weapons program in good faith, so they can be crossed out as a potential threat to the survival of Israel.

Israel needs an enemy. It needs it to justify abhorrent and illegal activities. After the Geneva agreement was signed, the world saw that the Iranians are a pragmatic and sensible people, and not the mad and destructive fanatics Zionist propaganda has shown them to be.

After Iran signed this agreement, it significantly weakened the effect and appeal of Zionist propaganda and anti-Iranian fear-mongering.

Israel does not fear an Iranian nuclear weapon or an Iranian attack. What it fears most is a peaceful Iran and a restoration of relations between it and the west. This is the greatest Zionist fear.

The Zionists loved Ahmadinejad and his defiance. It justified so much despicable Zionist lies. 

Now, under a new and more moderate Iranian administration, there's not much to fume about, so the Zionists are trying to work overtime to make up the most absurd and nutty claims to discredit and provoke Iran further.

But hopefully Iran check-mates the zionists just as it has check-mated them up to now.

In Debt We Trust

Another interesting and nausea-inducing fiscal fight in congress and the White House is upon us.

This seems to be a yearly ritual around October.

The fight is over how to fund the government and keep it going. It is also about addressing the so-called debt ceiling which is the maximum amount of money the US can borrow. When this amount reaches max, the US government cannot borrow anymore and can no longer carry out its operations.

In a nutshell, it means the US is broke and cannot live without borrowing money from others.

Of course, the truth is even deeper and more complicated than that.

Although this country is broke, and cannot pay its own bills without borrowing, the so-called government shutdown threat is actually artificial and unnecessary. It is a tactic used by political operatives on both sides to wrangle concessions for themselves, their buddies and wealthy corporate campaign donors at the expense of working stiffs out there.

What is going on is this.

The US is financially bankrupt. It’s broke. It cannot pay its bills on its own, regardless of Obama’s PR slogans to the contrary.

Even worse, the US economic system has failed.

Other countries, including the ones who prop up the US with loans, know these facts.

But here’s the rub: those countries cannot stop lending the US money even though they know the US is practically insolvent and has been for a long time.

Why?

Because the US economy has been based on fraud and deceit for such a long time, that the economic house of cards it has built up has gotten too unwieldy. It has also ensnared many other countries in this web of debt and fraud to the point that if they cut off loans to the US, their own economies will collapse as well.

So these countries have two choices.

They can keep on financing the broken and failed US economy and keep theirs limping along, or they can cut off the loans to the US, call in their debts and watch their own economies and societies go to economic hell.

But these countries know the terrible repercussions that would stem from exercising the latter option, so they opt for the former one. It is for this very reason why the so-called debt ceiling will perpetually go up and foreigners will always be there to prop-up the broke US with loans.

That’s why this fiscal cliff fight is BS and why this government shutdown is unnecessary. Foreign countries pretty much HAVE to loan the US money.

This will be the case until countries which loan the US money wise up, cut off the line of credit, take a hit and rearrange the world economy in a more responsible and saner way.

Besides, the US is simply too far down the debt hole anyway. Shutting down some of the government is not going to help.

What this government shut-down is all about is protecting the handouts and subsidies the US government gives to the wealthy and the corporations, both who have been seeing record profits and accumulation of wealth during this depression.

And where do these handouts come from?

They come from whittling away at Social Security, Medicare, Medicaid, food stamps and other vital social safety net programs which keep many afloat and from literally starving. They also come from cuts made to government employment rolls, thereby contributing to higher unemployment at a time when too many are already without jobs.

So when you start hearing any politician talk about how “unaffordable” social programs are, this is just code-speak for taking money out of social programs and giving it to the wealthy and the corporate swine.

This is what is really going on, and has been behind these fiscal cliff fights for some years now. All the rest is smokescreen. Plus, the US military, the biggest financial burden, and one that is already over-funded, will be kept running no matter what, which shows what this is all about.

And when this fiscal cliff circus is all over, and the Democrats and Republicans together with Obummer reach their “agreement,” more money will be stolen from social programs and given over to the millionaires.

It’s all about robbing the middle-class without making it look like it.

And next year, this Kabuki dance will start once again, leading to the same results.

Iran vs. US

Much has been made lately about the diplomatic flirting between the new Iranian president Rohani and his troubled US counterpart Barack Obama.

After their speeches at the UN and the phone-call Obama made to Rohani after the latter was leaving the US, people are starting to envision some great breakthrough and thaw in relations between the US and Iran. Some have even talked of a Nixon moment, where Obama will reopen relations with Iran and start on the way of cooperation and normalized relations.

While such a scenario would be great, and I personally think it is high time for it, I just cannot be optimistic about the future of Iranian-US relations.

Let’s not forget that the US and the west have been tormenting Iran for sixty years now.

First, Operation Ajax, which was a joint effort between Great Britain and the US to overthrow the Iranian Prime Minister Mossadegh in 1953, even though he was a democratically-elected leader.

Mossadegh’s overthrow cleared the way for US/western-supported autocrat Shah Reza Pahlavi to ascend to the leadership of Iran. This ushered in decades of political and social repression, torture, disappearance and hardship for Iranians.

The Shah’s notorious secret police, the SAVAK, whom the US and the zionist regimes trained, were responsible for rounding up and torture of anyone who was seen as a threat to the ruling western-supported dynasty.

In 1979, when the Iranians successfully overthrew the Shah and he was forced to flee, the US and the west started enacting sanctions to make life as hard as possible for Iran. This trend continues to this day. 



The US also convinced Iraq to invade Iran in 1979. Throughout the war, the US and other western countries assisted Iraq with training, intelligence data and weapons sales. They also sold to Iraq chemical weapons which were then used on Iranians, with US knowledge and acquiescence.

Lately, the US and the west, together with their MEK terrorist allies and the zionist shit-pit have been launching cyber attacks against Iranian nuclear installations and hired murderers to kill Iranian nuclear scientists.

Let’s also not forget the broken-record talk from Obama and the rest of the pathetic gaggle of murderers on Capitol Hill about threatening Iran with military action.

So it is not hard to see why Iran may be just a tad bit distrustful of US words and intentions, even when the US establishment regime tries to change its rhetoric to one of peace and conciliation.

Barack Obama said during his first election campaign that if elected, he will talk with Iran and try to bridge their differences in a peaceful way.

But if Obama and the current US administration truly wanted to change their relations with Iran for the better, they would have started doing so on January 22, 2009-the day after Obama was sworn in as president for his first term.

But what Obama did was enact more sanctions, threats, launched computer viruses and assassinated Iranian scientists. These are not the acts of a president and a government that want peace with Iran. The US even enacted more sanctions right after Rohani was sworn in as president, and that was just last month!

What message does this send? I think that this phone call and the “thaw” rhetoric from Obama and his miserable regime are nothing but a ploy to prod Rohani and the new Iranian govt to see if they can be tricked and bought-off cheap into doing what the west and the zionist mafia-state wants.

If Rohani does not fall for the ruse and sticks to Iran's rights, it will be sanctions and threats all over again. There will be no changes in US policy towards Iran.

The US ruling regime is too morally and intellectually decrepit and incapable of acting in a normal, transparent and decent way.

The pro-zionist creatures embedded at all levels of the US government own US policy on the Mideast and Iran and they will do whatever they can to make sure there is no peace.

Too many careers and generous paychecks depend on perpetuating the fake Iranian threat. If Iran is no longer a threat, a lot of peoples’ careers and livelihoods and positions of power and authority will be gone. This is why the ruling US regime will not let this happen.

These freaks NEED Iran as an enemy because this stance justifies so many policies which benefit a lot of establishment figures and their pals.

There are only three options the ruling US fascist establishment will tolerate as far as Iran goes:

1. Keep Iran as it is and make people think it is a threat to be contained

2. Try to buy off its government

3. Overthrow it using subterfuge, fake western-funded and controlled pro-democracy groups, mass protests and/or military means

I personally think that Iran should stop trying to explain itself to the US and the west and build a nuclear deterrent. This is the only way Iran will ever be left alone and respected. It is, ironically, the only way towards any kind of genuine rapprochement with the west, since with nuclear weapons Iran’s strength will be right on par with world powers.

Furthermore, why should Iran listen to hypocritical lecturing and finger-pointing by the US or any other states who demand that Iran suspend its uranium enrichment and stop its nuclear work, when those nations’ arsenals bristle with thousands of nuclear weapons.

No country that currently possesses nuclear weapons has the right to accuse and condemn other nations for pursuing nuclear research and development!

Those nations who have nuclear weapons must first get rid of them, and only then can they lecture others and make demands. It is not surprising that Iran does not want to listen to the whining coming out of Washington and Brussels. It would show a serious lack of common sense for Iran to listen to anything the west demands.

The current animosity between Iran and the US has nothing to do with Iran’s nuclear program or any imaginary nuclear weapons the US says Iran possesses. This has always been a red herring.

It has to do with punishing Iran for the embarrassment, anger and resentment the US and the west feel for having been bested by the Iranians in 1979. It also has to do with the loss of control and profits from Iran’s oil resources.

All the rest is bullshit.

O-Bomber's Hairy Kerry Part 2

It looks like the American population and Russia has put the warmongering creatures Obama and Kerry in their place.

Without proof and popular/international support their hasty plans for another illegal war based on lies went awry.

After Putin’s op-ed article in the NYT, Hairy Kerry, Obummer and other assorted and unrepentant congress critters have been hitting the airwaves trying to clean off some of the mud they were dragged through by Russia by whining and falsely accusing Russia of not pursuing the path to peace like the US wanted.

But if memory serves me correctly (and it does), I recall for two years now it was the US warmongers who were hell-bent on violence.

It was the US which from the beginning called for unilateral, unreasonable and illegal methods to end the Syrian crisis.

US UN ex-representative Susan Rice-now Samantha Power, Obummer, KILLary Clinton and now Kerry have from the beginning called for a UN resolution which puts all the blame for the violence and unrest in Syria on Bashar Al Assad, demanded military action, that Assad step down “immediately” and now accused the Syrian government of gassing its own people, without any evidence to back it up and against plain logic.

Add to that, the US has supported Al Qaeda-linked fanatic militants in Syria, both domestic and foreign, with weapons and training.

On the contrary, it was Russia which from the beginning has called for a negotiated solution to the crisis. It asked the Syrian government, rebels and the US to cease fighting and convene a conference to resolve the unrest through negotiations. 

 It was Russia who more than a year ago announced that it was ready to stop the sale of arms to Damascus, and back a total arms embargo on Syria at the UN, if the US and its allies stopped the flow of arms to the rebels, in order to force both sides to negotiate.

It was Russia who a week ago brokered a deal which would see Syria hand over and eliminate its CW stockpiles, while the rabid White House screamed for war.

So which side has been for peace and which for violence?

Furthermore, the argument that Russia is only looking out for its own interests in Syria as far as weapons sales and its Tartus naval base goes, and does not really care about the Syrian people, is not credible, as any so-called argument coming out of Washington against Syria has been.

Why? Because we are not seeing Russia exploiting the unrest in US-backed autocracies in Saudi Arabia, Bahrain and Qatar to form and arm rebel movements which want to overthrown those governments and end up causing violence and death on a mass scale, in order to further Russian geopolitical interests and kick the US out of the Mideast as the US certainly plans to kick out Russia.

It is clear that those who are calling for an attack on Syria are genetically defective creatures. Such people are the main problem; such people are not capable of peaceful solutions whatsoever.

The US MUST be forced to do the right thing or else it will just keep on doing things the absolute wrong way. It seems that Russia understands this.

The UN investigators are due to present their findings about the August 21st chemical attack in Damascus today. Hopefully the report has not been doctored up to falsely implicate the Syrian government.

But one thing stands out about this chemical attack:

It is very suspect that from the beginning the US has put the blame for the CW attacks on the Syrian government.

The US purports to have "overwhelming" evidence to back up their accusations, but refuses to share it. Then the US turns around and tells the UN that the CW inspectors mandate must be limited only to determining if, and what type of chemical weapons were used, but not investigating WHO used them.

Surely if the US government is telling the truth and their evidence is full-proof, they would be very eager for the UN investigators to find out WHO used them.

But Bashar Al Assad and the Syrian government are to blame for one thing.

A year or more ago, the US decided to use any use of CW by Syria as a “red line,” that if crossed, would invite a military response.

At around the same time, the rebels said they have access to chemical weapons and threatened to use them.

The Syrian government should have immediately seen the writing on the wall and quickly moved to get rid of these chemical weapons with Russian and UN cooperation, before their presence in Syrian arsenals was exploited by the rebels and their sponsors to launch false-flag attacks.

The Syrian authorities should of realized back then that if any chemical weapons went off, Syria would be blamed, and calls for military intervention would follow from the US and their cohorts.

Plus, since the Syrian military has been able to beat back the rebels using conventional means, the chemical weapons were an unnecessary political and strategic liability.

It is therefore imperative that Russia not let the US and its allies use any pending UN resolution as an excuse for war.

Threats of military force must not be allowed in any UN resolutions or else the US and their pals will seek to corrupt and ruin the disarmament process in order to create an excuse to attack Syria.

Syria’s CW disarmament process cannot be turned into another never-ending Iraq inspections fiasco which only serves the interests of the CIA and Mossad and in the end is used as a catalyst for war by the criminal US regime.

O-Bomber's Hairy Kerry

It seems Team Obummer just does not want peace. They keep on coming up with all sorts of absurd reasons for war with Syria. They talk about no boots on the ground, limited and small bombing campaigns, threats to national security, anything to please their swollen and itchy trigger finger.

I swear any minute now Obummer and Company are just going to come out in front of the cameras and state they are going to attack Syria just because they can, or maybe because it will be good for economic recovery.

One of the latest farcical excuses Obomber and Company have concocted to justify military intervention in Syria, is the presence of Islamic extremists in Syria.

Yes, that’s right. The same Islamic extremists the US together with their European and Arab autocrat poodles sent, armed, trained and are supporting against the Syrian government.

This is got to be the most cruel hoax Obomber and his warmongering sycophants could ever give to excuse a war. It is a stab in the back to the very foundation of the concepts of logic and integrity.

This is basically what the US is doing:

1. US foments a fake rebellion in order to overthrow Assad

2. US and its allies train and arm militants who are allied with Al Qaeda, sends them into Syria, where they end up causing mayhem and massacres and launch chemical weapons

3. Then the US uses the presence of these fanatics in Syria as a reason for intervention to prevent these people from someday being a "security threat" to the US (a threat the US created in the first place)

4. But, get this, IF the US attacks Syria, it won’t be attacking those Al Qaeda-linked militants; it will attack the government forces of Bashar Al Assad, the secular leader who is fighting the very same terrorists the US sees as a threat to the US! 
 
Obummer is playing a sick and cruel joke on the world. This can be plainly seen.

The mumbling and stumbling Obummer and his pal Hairy Kerry have been suffering setback after setback in their lie-ridden drive to war. Their so-called evidence is nothing but a feces pile of cherry-picked and hyped-up assumptions and insinuations. Add to this, Syria has called team Obummer’s bluff and agreed to the Russian proposal to mothball its chemical weapons.

This has taken the wind out of Obummer’s sails and he was forced to call off his attack dogs.

But it is evident that Russia has used its power to put the US in its place. Russia’s efforts thwarted a looming illegal war of aggression and have thrown enough wildcards into the mix that prevents Obummer from doing anything stupid, lest he wants to go down in history as worse than Bush, which once was though impossible.

Russia should use this momentum wisely.

A UN resolution is now in the works which will govern the Syrian CW disarmament process. Russia should use this as an opportunity to end this crisis once and for all and prevent the US from sabotaging the inspections process.

Among some things, the resolution must demand that ALL sides stop the stockpiling and use of chemical weapons.

Also, Russia must demand that this resolution is contingent on the US calling off its threats of war and promising to pursue a peaceful path to resolving the Syrian crisis.

And finally, if the US demands that the UN resolution contains a clause that either blames the CW attack of August 21 on the Syrian government or a threat of military action for Syrian non-compliance with its disarmament obligations, Russia must demand that the condition for signing on to this is contingent on US unconditionally handing over ALL evidence it has to back up their accusations that the Syrian government was responsible for launching the CW attacks last month to whoever wants it, including Syria. Russia’s agreement to the two clauses mentioned above must also be contingent on the evidence the US provides being genuine and solid after it is thoroughly fact-checked and all points investigated as true.

Anything less that is unacceptable.



P.S.-Obama’s speech on Tuesday night was filled with hyperbole and hypocrisy. He foolishly compared Assad to Hitler, called anyone using chemical weapons a criminal tyrant and tried to convince people that such tyrants must be stopped.

But Obummer omitted certain unpleasant and embarrassing facts in his speech: The use of Agent Orange in Vietnam which has caused birth defects in children up until today; the US and European sale of chemical weapons material to Iraq which was used by Saddam Hussein against the Iranians and the Kurds in the 1980s, with US help and blessing; Israel’s stockpiling of WMD and use against Palestinians in 2009 during the attack on Gaza Strip; US use of depleted uranium and white phosphorus on the battlefield, and as recent as Iraq, and of course, the biggest omission of all-the US use of the atomic bomb on Japan. The US is the ONLY country to do so to this day; not to mention the use of chemical weapons by dear ally Great Britain throughout history-in fact none other than Winston Churchill praised and encourage the use of chemical weapons on Palestinians and Afghans during Britain’s occupation of those lands.

With his speech, Obama has truly solidified his position as not only a liar but as a hypocrite and as one of the most warmongering neo-cons to have ever slithered out of the sewer.

Obama's War Circus Clowns

Obama , Kerry and the rest of the nutcases in the US government have been falling over themselves to lie and manipulate the public into supporting another war based on false accusations and lies.

After being told by the American people and the world that a military attack is unacceptable, Obama’s scummy handlers trotted out atrocity propaganda videos of the aftermath of the supposed chemical attack on August 21st. The attack showed dead children lying next to each other.

The pictures and videos came out just a few hours after the attack, which begs the question: how could these videos and pictures proliferate so quickly and so soon after the initial attacks? Most likely they were faked beforehand and quickly published. There are other such anomalies if one cares to examine this chemical attack “evidence” carefully. 

The pathetic US mainstream media have on cue been acting as the White House cheerleaders, swallowing whatever garbage is fed to them by Obummer and his cohorts. 

This is the same servile behavior we saw in the run-up to the Iraq debacle. The US media, after what happened in Iraq, still refuses to do their job. They refuse to question, to doubt, to analyze, to investigate. They just take Obama and Kerry's bullshit on faith. 

But once again they are embarrassing themselves by providing a pulpit to degenerate liars and despicable warmongers and they will pay the price sooner or later.


The desperate Obama, isolated and ridiculed with no credible evidence to show, has been scraping the bottom of the barrel for any and all support from anyone to be a part of his coalition of the killing.

Just the other day he boasted that the number of countries support him is in the double digits. But a closer examination shows that these countries are either a)majority NATO members b)Arab states who support the Syrian militants already c)poor nations most likely coerced into this so-called coalition by bribery and/or threats of economic and diplomatic reprisals.

But the reality is that Obama has no true support, as most if not all people in those countries are against any attack on Syria. All that Obama has is a bunch of miserable and cowardly politicians who sell themselves out for cheap. Obama does not have these countries support; he has the subservience of their ruling political class.

With each passing day, the US case for war grows more shaky and ridiculous. To counter this, the Obama team has been screaming out their lies louder and louder, no doubt to cover up the ugly truth as to WHO were the real culprits behind this CW attack.

This has been followed up by discredited and outright lies by Mr. Kerry, such as that the rebels do not have chemical weapons or rockets. There is a lot of documented proof, from the militants themselves, that they have rockets.

Furthermore, what about the FACT that in the spring of 2013 Carla Del Ponte, the UN Human Rights Council chair reached the conclusion that rebels were most likely behind chemical attacks in Syria earlier this spring?

What about the FACT that rebels were arrested by Turkish police inside Turkey, with chemical weapon compounds in their apartment?

What about the FACT that some rebels have accidentally killed themselves inside tunnels by coming into contact with improperly stored barrels of chemical compounds used to make weapons?

Of course, Team Obama has chosen to ignore such evidence.

Obama has stressed that the US government has evidence supporting their view that the Syrian government is responsible for launching.

But the US refuses to share this so-called evidence and will not open this evidence up to closer scrutiny, citing “national security.”

Now, let’s look at this with logic.

If someone has solid and irrefutable evidence of wrongdoing against a criminal, and that person is called a liar and no one believes them, that person would naturally be throwing this evidence in the face of everyone they can find to prove that they are right and honest. They would definitely not keep it secret and make themselves look like lying fools.

But Team Obomber is doing just that. This is the number-one sign that they are lying and that the evidence they have is not worth used toilet paper.

Perhaps they are worried what would happen if the provenance of this so-called intelligence is found: rebel propaganda, made-up CIA fairytales, and Israeli deceptions like we saw regarding Iraq in 2003. I doubt there’s anything more to it than that.

Recently, Russian president Vladimir Putin has thrown a wildcard into the ring by suggesting that Syria scrap its chemical weapons in return for US agreeing to stop all war preparations. Syrian has shown support for this plan and is ready to cooperate.

This is a very shrewd move and it says some important things:



1. Syrian government is innocent of the accusations made against it because they would not allow anyone near their chemical weapons if they were guilty. Those CW could then be matched up with whatever the UN found in Ghouta, if the Syrian military launched them.

2. Syrian government gives a damn about its people since they are ready to give up a powerful deterrent in the name of preventing the loss of more Syrian lives to foreign warmongers

3. By giving up its chemical weapons stockpiles, the Syrians and Russians are also depriving the rebels of these weapons as well. If Syria scraps them, the rebels can no longer use them to stage false flag attacks and the US can no longer blame the Syrian government of using CW they no longer have. This takes a major benefit away from the US side, since all other excuses for intervention have failed and been worn out.

Of course, the US may exploit this agreement to enact never-ending/open-ended intrusive inspections, Iraq-style, with moving goalposts in order to prevent giving Syria a clean bill of health.

There is a lot of opportunity for the US regime to use any inspection process which may follow to torment and undermine Syria and demand that the agreement authorized military action should Syria fail to comply.

Then the US and the Zionist mafia-state would do everything in their power to make sure these inspections fail and never reach a peaceful conclusion.

Thankfully, after more than twenty years of US deception and duplicity in Iraq and elsewhere, Russia will keep a close eye on any future disarmament efforts in Syria and will not allow it to degenerate into one big US-led provocation for another illegal war.

As things stand, Obama and his administration are liars. They have no credible evidence, they have no case. Whether Obama gets his votes or not from congress, he will be committing an illegal act of aggression against Syria if he attacks.

Obama has painted himself into a tight corner with his lies. His rhetoric is becoming more ridiculous and incoherent every the day. He lies to cover up his own responsibility for the chemical attack in Syria and to protect the Al-Qaeda-linked militants the US and some European countries support.

Add to that the fact that the majority of the American public does not support him, the UN has turned its back as has NATO and his so-called allies.

Obama now stands alone.

Putin has just thrown him a lifeline.

Does Obama have enough decency and intelligence to take it?

We shall judge Obama’s true intentions by the choice he makes.

Is he a Nobel Peace Prize winner or a miserable Dubya wannabe warmonger?