The Beginning of the End

The level of tension between Russia and US/NATO has reached its climax.

30 years of western arrogance and stupidity is coming to an end before our eyes. The time of reckoning is at hand.

This was accelerated during the last 5 months due to the US/NATO debacle in Afghanistan, and it was a given that these two loser misfits would try something to shore up their bruised egos.

So we have this timeline:

1. US fails in Afghanistan

2. Increasing discontent and division within the EU between member-states and Brussels

3. Australia signs deal with US for submarines, instead of France, and giving the latter no notice of its decision. This leads to a fallout between US and France

4. US and Ukraine mention Russian troop movements near ukrainian border, but dismiss it as not significant and nothing to worry about

5. CIA chief goes to Moscow for talks

6. Suddenly, Kiev and US change their minds and announce that Russian troops are a serious threat to Ukraine, and that Russia is planning to invade ukraine

It seems like the US didn't get what it wanted in Moscow, and decided to make up the Russian invasion lie to extract concessions.

But If the US regime thinks it will get anything out of this, then it is stupid. They know taking on Russia is a no-no, and ukraine doesn't stand a chance.

The dimwitted US regime and the feckless EU are accusing Russia of wanting to create spheres of influence.

So what the fuck is NATO, then, and the EU, if not spheres of western influence?

Russia has offered both the US and NATO an agreement that addresses Russia’s security concerns, and other problems that it has with them both. One of the main demands is that NATO stop further Eastward expansion, and agree not to admit Ukraine and Georgia into the alliance.

US and NATO refuse to rule out a stop on further NATO expansion. They say that countries have a right to decide independently whether to join NATO or not. They say that NATO has an open door policy. But when Russia asked to join, on multiple occasions in the past, it was always turned down.

But does that door only open one way, or are countries also free to leave, or is it more like joining the mafia-where you can join, but never leave, at least not alive?

Because from what can be seen, if any country freely chooses someone else instead of the US, NATO and EU, that country is immediately sanctioned, robbed, maligned, threatened, and more often than not bombed and invaded by these three.

So contrary to flowery NATO propaganda, there is no free choice. For the US and NATO, only those countries who choose them have rights. Those countries that choose others will be punished.

However, Russia doesn’t need to do much militarily to prevent NATO from expanding. It just needs to do what it did in Kazakhstan, prevent western-led coups within the CSTO framework.

The US in reality drags countries into NATO by hook, crook, regime change or murder. Countries bordering Russia don’t need NATO membership. NATO needs them to be used against Russia. US can only get them to join if a pro-US government is in place, and that is why the US must first orchestrate a color revolution of some kind to install a pro-US government, if there isn’t one there already.

If these color revolutions and regime changes are nipped in the bud at their inception, US will not get new NATO members. So Russia’s task isn’t really that difficult.

After less than a week, Russia, along with other CSTO members, was able to end the mayhem in Kazakhstan.

With the job done, Russia and other foreign troops left Kazakhstan. Compare that with the US military, which tends to stay around indefinitely after helping.

It is unfortunate that Ukrainian President Victor Yanukovich didn’t ask CSTO for help in 2013, and Putin didn’t suggest it. Maidan would’ve been quickly nipped in the bud, since it was just as flimsy at the beginning as the recent coup attempt in Kazakhstan was.

What US and NATO don't seem to understand is that it is not up to them whether they will expand anymore. If they don't agree not to expand East voluntarily and diplomatically, they will be stopped by Russia in some way.

Russia is giving them a chance to correct their errors peacefully. If the US and NATO refuse Russia’s offer, they will be compelled to comply in other ways. Either way, NATO expansion will be stopped, and the process has already started.

The reason why Russia wants all of its demands to be met by both US and NATO this time, is to prevent the US from cheating and finding loopholes for its own benefit.

For example, if Russia agrees to disarm, the US will simply stop arming itself, but will keep on arming its vassals and clients, like Ukraine. That’s why Russia wants no further NATO expansion, and no arming of ex-Soviet states. It is why it wants separate agreements with the US and NATO this time.

Russia has put forward its demands in an open, detailed format. By doing so, it is compelling the US and NATO to come clean about their own true intentions and aims. This has made the US and NATO officials quite nervous, as coming clean about these would expose them as disturbed psychopaths.

Putin has got the US/EU/NATO by the stones, and they have no way to go but backwards. All three have run up against a concrete wall in the East.

They know Russia’s demands are long-over due and reasonable. But fearing for their jobs and mass profits, the military contractors, weapons makers, the dime-a-dozen US and NATO generals, and their army of paid think tanks, NGOs, institutes, bought-off politicians, media outlets and online trolls would be without a job and without profits. NATO is, above all, a weapons-selling racket.

NATO Secretary Stoltenberg the drunk, along with US Secretary of State Blinken the Deluded, have also been going around lately foaming at the mouth that Putin wants to restore the Soviet Union, and keep on repeating their stale false accusation that Russia is planning to invade Ukraine at any moment.

It is the US and NATO that want Russia to invade Ukraine. It is the US and NATO that want the Soviet Union back. Their words and actions hint at this.

Ukraine seems to be virtually begging for Russia to invade it, so it can play victim and extract concessions.

Blinken also said that once Russians come into any country, they btend to stay. But Blinken needs to look himself in the mirror.

What are US troops still doing in Germany, almost 80 years after the end of WW2? What are US troops doing in Syria, uninvited? What are US troops doing in Iraq after being told to leave multiple times?

After the USSR ended, NATO found itself without a mission, and its existence was questionable. It meandered from here to there, trying to find something to justify its unnecessary, and expensive existence. It got itself involved in stirring up war in Yugoslavia in the 1990s, then came in to play hero saviour. But this was all too brief.

Then, it struck the taxpayer-provided jackpot when it crossed paths with the Islamic terrorism boogeyman to justify its existence, and for 20 years it rode the Afghan occupation gravy train.

Then came the inevitable and ingominious end to the Afghan blood orgy, and NATO once again had nothing to do; not to mention its image and credibility were shot to shit.

So what did it do? it decided to stir up the old anti-Russia propaganda, lies, and false accusations to re-create and resurrect its old adversary, which doesn’t even feel like playing its part.

How is it that the only countries that consider Russia as an enemy are those who drank the US/NATO kool-aid? How is it that those central Asian republics and Armenia which used to be part of the USSR don't seem to be threatened by Russia, along with Serbia and Hungary? So obviously, Russia isn't the problem here.

The US and NATO want to force upon countries bordering Russia and beyond the notion that Russia is a dangerous threat and an enemy, and that they must stand with the US and NATO.

Countries which have good relations with Russia are being forced into becoming anti-Russian by the US/NATO cabal, and are being used to malign Russia in all sorts of ways.

This only undermines these countries security in the long-run.

Vicky Nuland, the Jewish neo-con hag behind the Maidan coup in Ukraine, has recently said that Russia should spend its money on internal development instead of sending its soldiers out in the snow to invade others.

What she said about Russia applies perfectly to the US. Instead of spending money on regime changes, invasions, supporting terrorists, arming ukrainian thugs, piracy and theft, and sending US soldiers out in the sand, the US needs to fix its rickety infrastructure, quit dumbing down its educational system, and slap together a healthcare system that is on a civilized level. Oh, and fix its fraudulent and antiquated electoral system.

The entire former NSDAP leadership of Nazi Germany is responsible for not gassing Vicky’s grandparents. Now, the world is stuck with this ugly juden untermenschen hag.

Unlike the US, Russia doesn't seem to be dragging others along into its fights. The US does so because legally, logically, and morally, the US has no legs to stand on anymore, and needs the psychological validation from others to compensate, even if the others have to be bribed and regime-changed to serve as the USA’s cripple crutches.

But the current tensions aren’t really about ukraine.

US has wanted a proxy war in E. Europe for some years now. The first attempt in 2016 was averted thanks to a surprise Chinese delegation's visit to Poland.

US needs a war to wear down Russia and compel it to relent, and go against China. This is geopolitics. US needs China disassembled, or else the US is done, along with all its European vassal states. This is what it's all about.

Ukraine, Belarus and Kazakhstan, even Russia, are simply stepping stones and means to an end for NATO toward that ultimate aim. US won't succeed, though. Because from now on, whatever it tries to do to hurt Russia and China, will boomerang on it.

Ukraine better realize that it is being cynially used by the US.

If, say, tomorrow, Putin wakes up and decides to give in to US demands and do what they want, the US would kick ukraine to the side in half a blink.

Let’s remember that the US and NATO fled Afghanistan in fear, shame, and failure. So the damage is already done. No one will notice, nor care when ukraine is kicked into the geopolitical ditch.

When it comes to US interests, nothing, and no one is sacred. US has no real loyalties to these marginal NATO members and poor client states.

As for ukraine, it wanted independence, but after it got it, it didn't know what to do with it. It couldn’t move on due to internal political gridlock and ineptitude.

After 23 years of mismanagement and inability to get its shit together, ukrainian malcontents blamed Russia for all their problems, and surrendered to the west.

But doing so wasn't the answer. If ukrainians cannot help themselves, then no one else will. If they are counting on someone else to resolve their problems, then they are making a risky gamble because others will always exploit them. Ask the Poles. They are experiencing this sad reality to this day.

Ukraine has got to stand on its own two feet without foreign crutches, and take responsibility for its own decisions and judgment, and learn how to function independently. They have a lot of work to do, and haven't even started.

They've been fumbling around, stalling, and engaging in immature, futile, petty and destructive activities that have done them zero good up to this point.

Ukraine’s anti-Russian temper tantrums also have to do with more local issues.

The euphoria of the Maidan rebellion has fizzled out, and ukraine is in a worse state today than it was 20 years ago.

Ukrainian president Zelensky’s popularity is so low, he has stooped down to bribing government officials with $20K monthly payments for their continued support. He has locked up and arrested any opposition leaders, including members of his own party, and has even threatened ex-president Porky.

Ukraine is also worried that Russia will cut off gas transit to the EU through its territory after 2024, which will result in billions of dollars in losses for Kiev. So ukraine, along with the US, has been trying to stop the Nord Stream 2 pipeline built by Russian company Gazprom and other EU energy companies from commencing operation, since this pipeline would bypass ukraine. US has slapped the project with sanctions to prevent it from operating.

This has helped lead to an acute energy shortage in the EU, for which Russia has been blamed.

Ironically, while EU and US blame Russia for not supplying gas to the EU and causing prices to rise, the US and certain EU countries, along with ukraine, have been blocking the operation of NS2 pipeline, which would’ve brought more gas into the EU, thereby alleviating supply issues and lowering prices. Hypocrisy seems to be the foundation of western culture.

What the US, ukraine, and EU really want is for Russia to sell them gas at long-term contract discount rate prices without the long-term contracts, so these two can then re-sell it on their spot markets for 5x the price.

Russia has said nyet, and if the EU wants a discount it will need to sign long-term contracts. Otherwise it's market price for everyone. The US, EU and UK bankster vultures aren't happy. Poland and ukraine seem to be in on this scam, and were probably promised a cut of the profits since they have been serving as transit countries for Russian gas. So preventing the operation of NS2 is a must for these two, because NS2 would lower gas prices, and make the entire scheme not as valuable.

The looney US regime statements about Russia actually betray their fear and loss of control. They are also saying that US will not help ukraine should Russia invade. What the US is doing here is the equivalent of a snake puffing up when it feels threatened. It is theater, as they know very well Russia will not invade ukraine unless ukraine pulls the trigger first.

NATO Secretary Stoltenberg says that Russian concerns about ukraine are exaggerated because ukraine is not a threat to Russia.

This is partly true. By itself, ukraine is no threat and no match for Russia militarily.

But when ukraine allows US and other NATO troops on its soil, and is being armed by them, then that is a problem. How disingenuous Stoltenberg is!

Without NATO, this pathetic sack of bones Stoltenberg would not have a job. So self-interest has prevailed over sense and pragmatism here. Stoltenberg is justifying his career by engaging in shoddy comparisons and logic. And he cannot say nothing else. He’s under orders to promote NATO propaganda, after all.

The US says it won the cold war, yet things got worse. So it is because of the US backward thinking that we will remain stuck in a crisis not just over Ukraine but about the future of the global order far beyond that country’s borders. The US failed to remake the world into something better. It got arrogant, greedy, and in the end, stupid.

The Russian invasion threat is hyped up sensationalist garbage peddled by the US and British press mainly. They have their own creepy agendas, and want to incite hatred and tension as a cover for their interests. How can so many ukrainians not notice this?

Can't they see that the US and NATO are the ones undermining their security? Ukrainians need to send these maidan morons packing. US and NATO don't care about ukraine. If they did, they'd be encouraging it to act responsibly, carry out Minsk accords, and not instigate anything with Russia.

All Russia wants is for its neighbors to not threaten it, and all foreign armies that don't belong in the area to get out and stay out.

But if anyone thinks a war with Russia is winnable, then they better think again.

Russian military capabilities are serious. Anyone who has the time and courage to delve into the details of what they are, will not want to tango with them. And all the NATO shills and pentagoons know this very well.

So this is all theater designed to wipe off the stink of failure from NATOs uniform after its recent Afghan failure.

No one should buy NATO and US BS statements about Russia, and their acting tough on TV. It's a side-show for the dumbasses, and panacea to mollify the MIC that the money will keep on coming in somehow.

As if the US didn’t cause enough trouble for itself by bothering Russia, it has been maligning China using the same old script it has been using against Russia.

Accusations of genocide in Xinxiang province, and China’s supposed intent to invade Taiwan is a carbon copy of the US and NATO playbook against Russia regarding ukraine.

US has also been trying to cobble together an anti-Chinese coalition of Asian states, but that hasn’t been going well.

India, the crown jewel of that coalition, has recently signed a 30-year military cooperation deal with Russia.

So none of these worthless initiatives, and the billions thrown at them, are going to successfully counter China. These programs are just designed to keep on feeding the MIC after their Afghan gravy train derailed. Part of this is to bribe Asian countries to join an anti-Chinese alliance, just like that European initiative was basically the US bribing European governments into joining an anti-Russia alliance.

That’s why conflating US mentality and behavior with China’s will not do anyone who does so any good. Ignorance of Russia and China is the main cause of why the west is losing out to both of them.

Besides, the only place where the US can win a war against Russia and China these days is in a movie or in a video game.

What we are seeing today is the beginning of the end of US monopolization of financial, military and technological power. So it is not surprising that the US regime, and its EU/NATO dingleberry cling-ons are freaking out. They're scared to death of what will happen to them once their patron saint from across the ocean is crucified for its sins.

If the US fails, it will fail because of its own mistakes, and not because of anything China and Russia did, or did not do.

China is ultimately interested in a win-win situation based on compromise, including with the US.

But the US isn't interested in cooperation, but domination. The Chinese have been watching the US quietly and patiently for a long time, and know the mistakes the US has made, and where and how it made them. So China knows what NOT to do. But China also knows what to do to hit back, should the US cross its red lines.

It is evident by now that the US is the opposite of what it says it is.

The way US propaganda peddlers operate is that they will take 10% fact, and mix it with 90% B.S., and some people will believe it all just because 10% of it is factual.

US and EU don't care about human rights, free speech, freedom of the press, democracy or free elections. The evidence for this is so plentiful you have to be a total and complete retard not to see it.

These same people who are so fond of democracy, also enthusiastically submit to unelected and corrupt hierarchies like the church, and militarist organizations like NATO.

They cheer on Zionist ethnic cleansing of Palestinians, and Saudi massacres of Yemeni civilians.

But the US reign of terror is coming to an end, whether its fanboyz and girlz like it or not.

Russia has put its foot down, finally. US and NATO will have to beat a hasty retreat away from the Russian border eventually.

After years of being lied to, conned, and insulted, Russia has learned all US tricks, and isn’t having any of it anymore.

US and NATO only cause problems. Calling on them is like summoning a demon to help you out.

DUMBocracy

For almost the last two years, the covid19 panic has thrown off the covers off the purported democratic nature of western Europe and the US.

Increasingly, western countries are using covid19 measures as a cover for instituting draconian laws that limit, circumvent, or take away individuals constitutional and civil rights.

Western European countries for the most part and democracies in name only.

They never were true democracies to begin with. The systems in these countries aren't compatible with true democratic practices, and democracy in these countries, or any country, cannot be truly enforced or practiced in its true form.

History, culture, custom, tradition, and historical baggage preclude democracy from functioning in any country.

Those countries that tout themselves as democratic are fooling themselves.

Democracy, in its simplest form, is the carrying out of the will of the majority. And whoever carries out this will is, in essence, democratic.

It doesn’t really matter how the person carrying out the popular will comes to power. Whether they are elected, self-appointed, or part of an oligarchy is irrelevant.

Democracy is more of a governing philosophy than a political system; for even the most authoritarian individuals can be democratic.

Today, people have been brainwashed and cajoled into thinking that democracy just means free elections, and as long as people get to elect their leaders that they have real democracy, and that all is right and well.

But what if that person who was elected by the majority disregards the will of the majority once in office? This is most definitely a problem that democracy hasn’t yet addressed.

So what would people rather have?

A self-appointed strongman - even a dictator - who carries out the will of the majority faithfully, or an elected leader who disregards the will of the majority?

So at best, most countries, including virtually all western ones, are limited electoral democracies.

For almost the last two years, the covid19 panic has thrown off the covers off the purported democratic nature of western Europe and the US.

Increasingly, western countries are using covid19 measures as a cover for instituting draconian laws that limit, circumvent, or take away individuals constitutional and civil rights.

Western European countries for the most part and democracies in name only.

They really never were true democracies to begin with. The systems in these countries aren't compatible with true democratic practices, and democracy in these countries, or any country, cannot be truly enforced or practiced in its true form.

History, culture, custom, tradition, and historical baggage and preclude democracy from functioning in any country.

Those countries that tout themselves as democratic are fooling themselves.

Democracy, in its simplest form, is the carrying out of the will of the majority. And whoever carries out this will is, in essence, democratic.

It doesn’t really matter how the person carrying out the popular will comes to power. Whether they are elected, self-appointed, or part of an oligarchy is irrelevant.

Democracy is more of a governing philosophy than a political system; for even the most authoritarian individuals can be democratic.

Today, people have been brainwashed and cajoled into thinking that democracy just means free elections, and as long as people get to elect their leaders that they have real democracy, and that all is right and well.

But what if that person who was elected by the majority disregards the will of the majority once in office? This is most definitely a problem that democracy hasn’t yet addressed.

So what would people rather have?

A self-appointed strongman - even a dictator - who carries out the will of the majority faithfully, or an elected leader who disregards the will of the majority?

So at best, most countries, including virtually all western ones, are limited electoral democracies.

And if democracy means the will of the majority, and existing laws prohibit this will from being realized, then that country is not democratic, and the government in such a country isn’t a true democracy.

US Desperado

Faced with failures and the inability to impose its own order on the world, the US regime, with their UK and Kievan buddies, have decided to create another Russian invasion scare, and will of course do everything they can to provoke one.

The Ukrainian regime is also on the ropes, and is not getting what it wants out of Russia anymore. The EU has decided that EU membership for Ukraine is not going to happen. Russian gas transit contracts will not be extended.

Add to that, Zelensky’s popularity has gotten so low, that he has also accused certain people of trying to orchestrate a coup against him, with Russian involvement, of course.

So stirring up a crisis to make Ukraine look like a victim in order to extract concessions is a last ditch effort to save a sinking ship. It is also done to speed up Ukraine’s accession into NATO, which is a tall order, anyways.

The nefarious Anglo-Saxon-Zionist axis has been middling and conning Europe. They have been profiting from chaos and war on the continent for centuries. They have positioned themselves as brokers and interlocutors between Poland, Ukraine, and Russia. And this is the main problem. 

The Anglo-Saxon-Zionist axis will not allow any kind of reconciliation and agreement between these countries, but will continue to use and abuse and play one against the other. They know very well that any kind of cooperation between these countries will prevent the Anglo-Saxon-Zionist axis from causing chaos. Russia is the only one who recognizes what is going on. The other ones are asleep with thumbs up their asses.

US regime is pathetic, and it is ruled by a senile mediocrity. They are dimwits who have no specialists and no diplomats, and they are losing out to both China and Russia because they cannot figure them out. US spy networks of NGOs and other local henchmen have been disrupted in both China and Russia, and now the US is flying blind.  But the scaremongering will not work. US will not get what it wants out of any of this.

The US regime seems scared, flustered, anxious and desperate. And these shitheads in Kiev bet their entire future on a country that is experiencing a crisis of confidence, and whose power is waning, and they are now scared shitless about the road ahead. No doubt some in Kiev would like to reconcile with Russia, but they may find themselves disappeared or dead, if they speak their mind.

Blaming Putin, and accusing him of wanting to invade someone has become a sport for inept and failing EU member-state politicians who want to distract the public from their mistakes and bad judgment.

The sanctions, false accusations and anti-Russian delusions are all a pathetic substitute for the US regime's inability to no longer being able to wage war to get what they want. These antics are a sign of weakness.

Most people in the US are deluded and have an exaggerated sense of their own importance to the world. The world is moving on, and it doesn't need the US to tell it what to do. The US doesn't like it, and is lashing out in all sorts of nasty ways right now, but it's just tiring itself out, and will eventually have to come to terms with the limits of its own power and intelligence. All the vassals, treaties, propaganda and lies and military spending won't save it.
Russia should not try to resolve anything with the US, because the US regime is looking for nothing less than major capitulation that will cost Russia much and US nothing.

And as far as Ukraine goes, it has only one value: as a card to play against Russia. US aims to scare Russia with militarizing and using Ukraine as a means to extract concessions from Russia on other fronts that have zero to do with Ukraine, or its well-being.  

NATO is the US regime’s contract killer. NATO also serves to spread the expense and blame for US wars and failures onto others. That’s it main aim.

Although, a new model seems to be adopted by the US, where it is stepping back from the destabilization business directly, and has been delegating that role to its regional vassals.

So today we have Poland maligning Belarus, Ukraine and the Baltic states maligning Russia, and Taiwan in being used to malign China.

These US vassal states are playing a dangerous game, and they need to be mindful of how quickly the US dropped Afghanistan when the going got too tough and expensive. Same will happen with all of them.

Now, Joey is scheduled to meet with Putin remotely to discuss Ukraine and other issues.

The best that Putin can do is forget about these useless meetings, and announce that Russia will be independent and sovereign, it will protect its interests everywhere, and that it will take military action against Ukraine only if Ukraine breaks the Minsk treaty and decides to attack Donbass. He needs to make these things publicly clear, then get in his limo and leave the meeting.

The Russians have learned form their mistakes. The US is starting to learn from its mistakes. Also, it is not a good idea to push onto others a political ideology. This was the Soviet Union's chief burden, above all others.

Abandoning the communist ideology opened up lots of doors worldwide for Russia that were closed before, and allowed for many worthwhile opportunities. This is why the US is failing, because it pushes a US-centric ideology onto others, and ends up taking on more obligations that it can realistically handle. This has resulted in imperial overstretch and the US is certainly showing signs of exhaustion.
 
The US and the west bet against a Russian-Chinese partnership. But once these two countries started working together, it was the beginning of the end of western supremacy. That's why it is too late for any measures. Sanctions and threats no longer work. War is off the table as well.

The job of US vassal governments is first and foremost to ensure that the US goes on unchallenged, and they are to undercut and eliminate anyone or anything within their borders that could pose a challenge to, and compete with, the US in any sphere. These vassals are expected to sacrifice their country’s best interests for the sake of the US.

US and EU have a lot of growing up to do. To think in these shallow and narrow terms is very sad. It's like they've learned nothing from the past couple of centuries of history. Wrapping plain old imperialistic urges into a rainbow flag doesn't make it any better.
One thing is certain out of all this. Donbass is never going to become part of Ukraine again. That ship has sailed.

After all, if the banderites hate Russians so much, why would they want to control Donbass, which has ethnic Russians living there? And also, even if Kiev ever agrees to these Minsk 2 terms, they will violate them as soon as they get what they want out of it. They did the same with violating Crimean autonomy in 1995.

Then we would see a situation in that region akin to occupied Palestine, where the ethnic Russians are constantly repressed and terrorized just like the Palestinians are by the zionuts. Even Ukrainians are saying that the region should just secede. And in the long-run, that would be the best option. Those people do not want to be ruled by thugs who don't like them.

US is leading this nonsense because of ingrained US paranoia about its own security.

This is the main cause of why empires have gotten themselves into these messes, this paranoia that someone else will benefit somewhere instead of them, so they must take control of some area first, and do whatever to keep the others away. The British and others fell victim to this classic imperial fear. And even after the latest US Afghan failure, there are still subhumans in the US regime that are calling for more of the same demented behavior.

All this crying by the western regimes and media about the poor Afghans trapped with the Taliban ignores the fact that most Afghans are glad that the occupiers are gone.

The US has adopted the Jewish thirst for revenge. Doesn't matter who pays, as long as someone dies to gloss over the failures. You don't get more demonic than this. The US is a country with the most Jewish character, outside of the ziopit itself.

How bad and broken the US is. They just don't care about anything anymore. From here on out, everyone who still licks their behinds deserves the worst existence has to offer, and zero sympathy. The hell with  them! The US establishment for years has embarked on a worldwide campaign to detect any and all flouting of the law-whether real or made-up-by other countries in order to get itself off the hook for having to deal with its own scofflaw nature.

The way to prosperity and greater independence for European countries is a good partnership with Russia. The US knows this, and this is why it does everything imaginable to keep all of them apart and at each other's throats.

EU has already lost a lot because of the anti-Russian policies and sanctions, and it will lose a lot more, if it continues this nonsense.

The US promised a lot of people a lot of things, but those people have to pay for all of those things that the US promised them in some way, shape, or form.

Is the price worth it?

Belarussian Border Blues

So it seems like the sum of all US and NATO crimes and blunders is coming back to bite them both in the rear on multiple fronts.

This time, it is Poland that is grappling with migrants on its Eastern border with Belarus.

The manufactured propaganda of the day coming from Warsaw, US, and other NATO vassal states is that Belarusian President Alexander Lukashenko is weaponizing migrants in order to destabilize the EU. He has been accused of flying them in to Minsk, and telling them to head west.
 
The Polish regime has also blamed Russia for colluding with Belarus.

But why are these migrants coming into the EU? And where are they coming from?

These are very inconvenient questions that Poland and other US vassals are afraid to ask, and have been studiously evading.

They have been evading these questions because they are responsible for this migrant predicament.

Years of counter-productive anti-Russia policies, maligning of Belarus with sanctions and threats, sponsoring and encouraging coups, and its willing participation in US-instigated wars and regime is what created these desperate migrants.

And since Poland is a NATO member and participated in US war crimes, it also bears responsibility for the predicament that it finds itself in right now.

Making up stories, and blaming everything on Lukashenko and Putin is just a cheap and easy cop-out. By doing so, Poland is evading responsibility for its rotten role in ruining the countries from which these migrants are coming from.

So if Poland doesn’t like being swamped by illegal migrants, perhaps it should stay out of US-led wars of aggression.

But the Polish regime has also been sensationalizing this migrant issue lately due to its own loss of popularity, as well as to wiggle out of paying heavy fines levied upon it by the EU for disregarding EU laws.

So the Polish regime is trying to capitalize on this theater to get itself off the hook, claim victim status, evade any kind of accountability for everything, and get as much money out of this from the EU coffers as it can to prop up its covid and corruption-ridden economy.

EU sanctions against Belarus ended the country’s border security agreement which kept these migrants away. Now, Belarusian guards simply look the other way when migrants try to cross.

In this way, Lukashenko is getting his revenge for years of being disrespected and maligned by the EU by scaring the Poles and making them, along with the entire EU look like dummies and hypocrites. He is teaching them a lesson about their own bad behavior.

And why is it that when migrants flooding Europe due to US rampages in Libya, Syria, and elsewhere were coddled and welcome, and every EU member country that refused to let them in was threatened and condemned; but when victims of US and NATO rampages try to come in through Belarus they are suddenly seen as a threat, and Belarus is blamed for it?

Why did not the EU blame the US for causing the migrant crisis with its wars, and sanction it?

And what about all the violence and chaos the US and EU unleashed on Syria, with their regime change attempts, sponsoring of terrorist groups, arming and training them, and taking over parts of Syrian territory to use as bases to train anti-government militants and sending them into rest of Syria to cause havoc?

In this way, the US destabilized nearby countries by causing an influx of migrants way worse than anything going on on the border of Belarus. No one dares to condemn the US for this?

Countries like Poland have been getting away with much in the last 20 or so years. Their slavish and unhealthy attachment to everything US and EU has come full circle, and the sum of its stupidity and anti-Russian antics are coming home to roost.

The Poles think that because of their experiences during WW2 and the communist era that they are somehow off the hook for whatever fuck ups they engage in?

The Poles, like many others, seem to think that their membership in the EU and NATO makes them untouchable, and gives them license to say and do anything without fear of any repercussions.

But they are all finding out the hard way that this is not true, never was, and never will be. The Polish WW2 victim card, like the Jews holocaust card, is so worn out its coming apart.

Neither NATO and EU can protect the Poles form their stupidity. There is no protection from this for them.

Poland has to pay the piper for its bad policies and judgment. This was bound to happen eventually.

The only way out of this predicament for Poland and other countries, is to stop provoking Russia, and learn to get along with it. The Poles need to have a sit-down with the Russians and Belarussians and work things out, without western middle-men playing spoilers.

If this isn’t done, Poland will end up causing something it won’t be able to extricate itself from, and there will most likely be no one left to pick up the pieces.

Poland’s consistent and stubborn anti-Russian mania have also consistently brought it serious economic losses, as well as political and diplomatic failures and debacles. Yet, Poland keeps on trying to nail jello to the wall.

The Poles, together with their EU bosses, are scared even though they won’t show it on camera. They know they screwed up.

But this migrant spectacle is just one of the symptoms of the fact that the west is generally failing while Russia and China are rising.

Most people in the US, as well as their European vassals, are deluded and have an exaggerated sense of their own importance to the world. The world is moving on, and it doesn't need the US to tell it what to do.

The US doesn't like this, and is lashing out in all sorts of nasty ways right now, but it's just tiring itself out, and will eventually have to come to terms with the limits of its own power and intelligence. All the vassals, treaties, propaganda, lies, and military spending won't save it.

So it would behoove all those countries which have subordinated themselves to the US to wake up and realize that the world is changing, and change with it.

Provoking and insulting major powers like Russia and China is the epitomy of foolishness and irresponsibility.

They better change their ways on their own now, or else they will be forced to change.

Gas Lighting

The EU has been going through a pretty bad energy crunch lately. Shortages of natural gas have caused gas prices to go through the roof throughout the EU.

This is all very bad news with winter looming.

The Russophobes immediately started to blame Russia for cutting off gas for political reasons to pressure the EU. 

But only the ignorant buy this lie.

The causes for the gas shortage and the resulting spike in price is due first and foremost to bad EU energy policy which eschews sure sources of fuel for green energy of which there is too little produced to satisfy demand.

Second reason is that the EU has moved to buying gas on the open spot market instead of signing long-term contracts for gas with Russia, which ensures lower prices and a stable supply to meet nations energy needs. 

Russia has warned the EU that such a practice will cause problems for them in the future.

 The spot market is basically a place where a limited amount of energy is being auctioned off to the highest bidder. This is how the US sells its LNG.

So the shortage is not being caused by a shortage of gas, or by Russia cutting off gas to raise its price, but by gas being sold on the spot market, which raises its cost so much that countries which didn't get enough reserves due to whatever policies they pursued - or Russophobia - now can't afford to buy gas on the spot market because it is too expensive.

A big part of why these countries now find themselves in trouble is because of the  anti-Russian policies pursued by the EU, with the prodding of the US.

So certain EU-member states, through their bad judgment, short-sightedness and Russophobia, have put their people and their economic well-being in the hands of greasy, miserable energy market speculators from London and New York.

Let's not forget that it was the financial manipulators from London and NYC financial circles that conned the feckless EU into establishing this disastrous energy spot market in the first place, with the lie that it would make energy less expensive.

And now, not only is the EU and US blaming Russia for something that is entirely their fault, but the US recently had the chutzpah to demand that Russia secure EU's energy supplies.

How dare the US regime make such demands when for years it has done everything to prevent Nord Stream 2 from being built by piling up sanctions and engaging in all sorts of dirty tricks to kill this project?

How dare the US make such a demand when some years ago the US congress passed something called Securing Europe's Energy Act, with the very aim of preventing Russia from supplying reliable energy to Europe. You can't get more Orwellian than this.

 If the US and its dimwitted lickspittles in the EU and certain Eastern European countries didn't malign and deliberately delay Russian energy projects, then this EU energy crunch could've very well been avoided, or at the very least much less costly.

And even now, in the midst of these high gas prices - and while still blaming Russia -  these EU idiots are dragging out the Nord Stream 2 certification process, which needs to be completed before gas can be delivered through the pipeline.

How stupid can one get? 

Judging by the EU's own incompetence, it seems like there is a bottomless pit of stupidity to dip into in 'ole Brussels.

And it's not like they weren't given an early chance to avid much of this supply crisis.

The head of Gazprom announced as early as September that the pipeline could be delivering gas as early as the beginning of October. But yet, the EU insisted on a drawn-out certification process. 

And now the EU cries because the gas prices are so high, but at the same time refuse to correct their horrible mistakes.

This aberrant behavior in the EU and US simply doesn't make sense, and there appear to be suspect motives to their actions.

Could it be that there is a conspiracy of some sort that has been brewing for years within western circles that has to do with controlling energy supplies in Europe?

What if there is a plan to purposefully limit Russian gas to the EU and rest of Europe, in order to cause deliberate shortages so the price remains high on the spot market, which will enrich speculators and investors in the US and elsewhere?

In this context, Nord Stream 2 is a problem for them because it would dilute the price of gas and make speculation less worthwhile.

This explains the rampant Russophobia, as well as the false accusations against Russia, as this would make people more hesitant to sign gas contracts with Russian companies.

It is also possible that US vassals like Poland, Ukraine, and the Baltic statelets were promised a slice of the spot market price for gas and nice profits from the resulting high price of gas, if only Russia was prevented from ensuring adequate supplies, and this could be a reason for these countries engaging in acts that seek to prevent the completion and operation of Nord Stream 2. 

But they appear to have shot themselves in the foot, as they now face gas shortages caused by their collusion with the US against Russia, and by not renewing gas supply contracts with Russia, which would assure them the best price and continuous supply. 

Now these same cretins dare to blame Russia for the energy shortage, and are accusing Putin of cutting off gas supplies?

No. Putin did not cut off gas supplies to the rest of Europe. Russia is delivering gas to those countries with which it has contracts with, and it is delivering the right amount at the agreed-upon price. 

How is it that Belarus, Hungary, and Turkey have no problem with Russian gas supplies, and are not facing sky-high gas prices?

The only ones which Russia is not delivering gas to are those who do not have long-term gas supply contracts signed with Russia, those who prefer to buy their gas on the spot market for more, and those who do not pay their gas supply bills, i.e. Ukraine, and now recently Moldova.

Russia is not obligated to deliver gas to anyone with which it doesn't have a contract with, and certainly not for free.

Why do some countries governments feel that they're entitle to free, or cheap below market priced Russian gas, and eternal gas transit fees? After all, didn't they want capitalism? So this is how capitalism works. You pay the going fair market price for goods and services.

If certain countries can empty their coffers, and take up loans they can't afford to buy shoddy and overpriced US military equipment they don't need, then they can certainly afford to pay fair market price for Russian gas!

There is also a strange pattern developing where some countries which have long-term gas contracts with Russia, and where suddenly a pro-US/EU/NATO shill is elected as prime minister or president, suddenly stop paying Russia for gas.

Then, when Russia complains, and warns these countries that the gas supply will be cut off if the bill is not paid, Russia is then immediately accused of playing politics with gas, and of extortion.

This is all manipulation and lies in order to prevent reliable gas supplies throughout Europe, just so some subhumans in London and Wall St. can make money off other peoples' pain.

The Russophobia and anti-Russian sanctions and other foibles are meant to serve this reptilian purpose.

For all the talk about Russia playing politics with energy supplies, the fact is that it is the Russophobes who were, and are playing politics with Russian energy supplies.

And they will in the end lose.

As always, all the misfortune that befalls the US and EU these days due to their own stupidity and ineptness that they blame on Russia, always turns out to be their own fault.

The US and EU are ruled by people who are willfully-ignorant of the outside world, and who don't care to learn and understand anything about it, especially about those they consider adversaries.

All sense, rationality and integrity has left the west, and has been transplanted to the East.

The New European is a bumbling, psychologically-ill, gender-confused syphilitic.

It is doubtful whether these people can be redeemed when looking at the way they're going. 

They stumble from defeat to defeat, and from embarrassment to embarrassment, unabated, and unencumbered by their past failures and damage they cause.

When faced with failure, they double-down and engage in provocations and false accusations against an outsider who serves as a convenient scapegoat.

None of this is doing the New Europe and its US master any good.

They are both waning powers who are trying to hold on to a reality that no longer exists, and this will only guarantee them more failures and a faster decline.

There is no more victory to be had for the west.

Only realizing that they cannot have it all, and engaging with the non-western world on respectful terms will bring the west benefits.

And the west better do this soon in order to cut its losses, which are mounting higher than the price of gas.

The End Of An Error

The Taliban has overran Afghanistan, and on Sunday entered Kabul. For all practical concerns, the 20-year war is over.

Frantic Afghans were caught off-guard and have been swarming the Kabul airport trying to catch any flight out to avoid Taliban rule. Such is the plight of collaborators and quislings. It happens everywhere when the occupier they served tucks tail and leaves.

The US skedaddle from Afghanistan is even worse than the US evacuation from Vietnam in 1975.

This was the most serious failure of US military power and prestige in the 21^st century. US vassals have been left speechless.

But will the correct lessons from this be learned?

The US public will not accept that it was duped, that the US military failed, and that the US was wrong. They will undoubtedly make up-or the US regime will make up-new lies and a never ending stream of self-soothing propaganda talking points to create the illusion that the Afghan war was all good, right, and honorable, just like with Vietnam.

They will also create convenient scapegoats to blame it all on-anti-war activists, some liberal politician, those who doubted the success of this war and were proven right, Russia, China, Iran-anyone but themselves. To scapegoat, accuse, and project their sins, crimes, and failures onto others is an American hobby.

After the dust from this failure settles, new myths and flowery rationalizations will be created to make an ugly and unnecessary war popular and somehow worth fighting, just so the US public won't have their tender egos bruised and look like complete, naive fools.

The US regime has also been in desperate damage control mode, and has gone on to contradict itself about what the mission in Afghanistan was.

They are saying that the US didn’t go into Afghanistan to do nation-building, and yet they were saying the opposite for years, and even their actions prove it.

US Secretary of State Blinkie, whether out of sheer ignorance, embarrassment, or exhaustion, recently stated at a news conference that the US accomplished its mission because it destroyed Al Qaeda and killed Bin Laden, and all those who carried out the attacks of 9/11.

Well, if that’s so, then what is the Taliban doing in charge of Afghanistan again? So either the Taliban wasn’t responsible for 9/11 (as the US has contended since 2001), or the US failed in its mission. Which one is it, Blinkie?

Also, why did the US stay in Afghanistan this long after supposedly accomplishing its stated goals?

These US regime-peddled arguments are dishonest and lack logic.

The truth is that the US lost this war on the first day!

Blinkie also said that the Afghan army is to blame for the Taliban’s takeover; as if the Taliban are some foreign force that fell out of the sky or came from nowhere.

The Taliban ARE Afghans. And none of them are going to accept some foreigner dictating terms on their territory about how they should live, what they should do, and how. The Afghan government security forces have familial connections to Taliban members, and they didn’t want to fight people they knew.

The main reason why the deal between the Taliban and the US supported regime in Kabul fell through was because the US tried to co-opt and trick the Taliban into being junior partners without any real power in a US-controlled Afghan government where pro-US quislings had all the authority, and where the Taliban were supposed to be just for-show.

There was no way that the Taliban would’ve ever gone for this. This insult is why the Taliban finally lost patience and rolled over everyone, agreement or not.

Whatever people think about the Talibs, they at the very least have dignity.

There was never any doubt that the US would lose in Afghanistan. All one had to do was look at history. But that's what being a willfully ignorant country gets you.

And the failure of the US in Afghanistan is a wake-up call to all US and NATO vassals.

They can be assured that if the US is unable to achieve its aims in a conflict, it will eventually desert their allies to fend for themselves.

And who will they turn to then? Who will be their saviour? The only country realistically left is China, but it is highly doubtful whether it will want to play the role of nursery keeper for a bunch of whiny and needy vassal states.

US interventions and wars can either end just like Afghanistan has, or with nuclear annihilation. There is no option of a permanent victory for the US in today’s world. NATO is no longer viable, either.

Finally withdrawing from Afghanistan was the proper thing to do. The US does deserve all the embarrassment and humiliation connected with this. The US made the decisions that it made, and continued to do things it shouldn’t have done.

And all those generals and politicians who insisted on continuing the Afghan debacle and advocated for more time, more troops, more money, and more weaponry have disgraced themselves. All of them need to be relieved of any promotions and medals they received for anything to do with Afghanistan.

The politicians that supported this need to be voted out in the next election.

A lot of western news commentators and politicians have been asking, and worrying about what will the Taliban do now that they are back in power?

The chief concern for the world should not be what the Taliban will do, but what the US will do. The US, reeling from this debacle, could do something truly stupid and dangerous to try to offset its failure and embarrassment. We've seen it before with US forays in Lebanon and Granada. It is a tense time.

All those Afghans trying to leave Afghanistan, crying, and protesting the US withdrawal are fools. They should know better. And they should look at the crimes the US committed in Afghanistan and elsewhere to know that the US isn’t a good guy in any of this.

No amount of pity and emotional dribble can ever change this fact. And for all those talking about a clean, responsible exit are simply fooling themselves. There is, and never was such an option, regardless of who the president was.

This pity party is also meant to gloss over the horrible war crimes the US and its allies committed in Afghanistan, and this cannot be allowed to happen. What the US did cannot ever be forgotten, or swept under the rug; no matter how many people they evacuate.

And these pathetic appeals for Afghan womens' rights are the worst of all. Suddenly, the US and its vassals are so concerned about womens' rights. But the fact is that for the vast majority of women in Afghanistan, life didn't change for the better in the last 20 years. A handful of women in bigger cities whose lives may have become better don't represent the majority; and constitute an exception, not the rule in Afghanistan. 

Besides, where is the western concern for Saudi women, or for the women trapped in Syria's Idlib which remains under the control of Islamist militias? The situation for people living in these two places are just as bad, if not worse than in Afghanistan.

The Taliban was sure to take over regardless of what happened, and how it ended 

So it’s no use analyzing any of this.

Occupations are risky and expensive. Eventually, the native population will create conditions for the occupied that are so unbearable, that a breaking point will be reached. At the end, the occupiers always will throw more money and soldiers and bombs at the situation, but that is just a prelude to their defeat. This has happened everywhere where an occupier squatted.

The US had to withdraw from Afghanistan, and the sooner the better.

It is thankfully over.

Much Ado About Afghanistan

The US regimes’ Afghan misadventure has finally ended, after twenty years of accomplishing nothing.

The Taliban has been on a land-capturing spree for weeks, and poised to retake major cities soon.

But this is no surprise. Afghanistan has been called the graveyard of empires for a reason.

Many have tried to subdue these people, and failed. Greeks, Persians, British, Russians, and now the US.

All the promises about helping Afghan people have been exposed as empty. All the propaganda about how the US was going to ‘remake’ Afghanistan into some sort of a democracy has collapsed on itself. Perhaps because it was never about democracy, but natural resource exploitation.

By 2009 at the latest, it was evident that whatever the US was planning wasn’t going to work.

The Afghans have no interest in US-style democracy or other nonsense. They have their millenia-old traditions and mentality, and the western way simply doesn’t appeal to them. The US refused to understand this, and so now it has to leave with a tail tucked between its shaky legs.

The entire effort was a waste of everything.

Look at how many peoples' lives were ruined by this useless invasion. How many were needlessly killed? How many committed suicide? How many are in jail because they made horrible judgment calls? How many relationships ended badly? How many spouses and kids were abused and subjected to psychological torment by the returning soldiers with untreated PTSD? How many turned to drug addiction, which started in Afghanistan?

The fact is that during Taliban rule from 1996 to 2001, poppy and heroin production was virtually eradicated. After the US invasion, it picked back up and reached records. Why was this allowed? Notice how the opioid epidemic in the US skyrocketed after the US went into Afghanistan.

Some ask if the US learned anything from this failure, and if they will do this again somewhere else. They will do it again because there are still too many countries that aid, abet and benefit from US criminal behavior. Until those countries stop doing so, the US will continue to terrorize and kill many more people for no reason.

Faced with this debacle and embarrassment, the US has turned to projection and petty provocations against Russia and China and others to distract people from its failures.

Even the Olympics weren’t spared by the bitter and vindictive US losers; where certain sore-loser US athletes and whiny US pseudo-journalists went on to disparage and insult Russian and Chinese victories as being the result of cheating by doping in the case of Russia, and a work of government-enslaved automatons trained to win competitions at all costs in the case of China.

All these things are a sign of a nation that is losing confidence and control. Faced with failures, the US will blame and insult others, and cause problems for those it sees as undermining its hegemony. This behavior will continue the more the US slips from its perch. 

And now, how will the US military establishment reconcile itself to the Afghan loss? How will it explain the tremendous waste and sacrifice, only to fail after twenty years of fighting and effort? How will the US political establishment attempt to make all this worthwhile? What propaganda will it spin to justify this failure? Every officer in the US army should be ticked off that they were sent on a fool's errand-a mission impossible-and they all should be resigning their commissions at the earliest opportunity.

The US went into Afghanistan to show Russia that it could succeed where the Soviets failed. It was supposed to be a place where the US could showcase its superiority. But the only thing the US out-did the Soviet Union with was an extra decade of failure.