Finally, the jig is up.
The US, the supposed globally unrivaled economic and military behemoth, is no more.
From its utter and irreversible failure to defeat the Taliban militia for the last 18 years in Afghanistan, to the Iraqi debacle, to its failure to remake the Mideast by employing terrorist proxies to destroy Syria, the US is a poster-child for military and strategic blunders that shall be studied by many nations’ military leaders and students for a long time to come.
The supposed ‘greatness’ of the US has been exposed as a hollow claim, driven by nothing more that absurdly nauseating propaganda and the most perverted of PR.
A profound weakness has been exposed at the core of the failed US experiment, and a powerful, cosmic truth has started to be glimpsed by the world that has for far too long suffered from the malign shadow of US malfeasance.
The weakness and the truth are the same, and this truth must be spoken loudly, and re-spoken from now on anywhere and everywhere at at all times: The US prospers only when other nations suffer.
All of US history is a testament to this hidden truth that too many have been blind to.
If anyone doubts this truth, then just look at Russia and China, or any other country which dares to withstand US abuse and subjugation.
Economic and technological successes of these countries have profoundly weakened the US and taken away a good dose of its power, wealth, and authority.
The best way to weaken the US is to succeed, and succeed in areas which are key.
The key areas of success which will cause the most damage to the US are in the economic, military, and technological spheres.
These three areas were once pillars of US domination. Today, with the advent of Russian military prowess and Chinese economic innovation, the US is faced with two rivals against which it is defenseless.
Russia, China, and certain other countries have surpassed the US in these three spheres, to the point that the US is no longer able to effectively compete, or offer anything better.
In frustration, and in its inability to catch up or successfully counter its adversaries moves and policies, the US has resorted to desperate antics to weaken its rivals through sanctions, tariffs, terrorism, extortion, and armed destabilization.
Those efforts have backfired, and have only strengthened the determinations-and arsenals-of US rivals.
The result has been even more off-the-wall knee-jerk US actions which will result in more problems for the beleaguered US establishment.
By daring to succeed in the key areas, US rivals have committed an act of sacrilege.
They dared to be equal to, and better than the US.
To the imperial US regimes, this is an unpardonable sin.
The greatest US fear is the fear of weakness. Looking weak throws the US establishment and many of the US citizenry into fits of rage. They will seek to exact revenge for their own weaknesses on anyone who dares to stick out from the crowd.
For the US will never tolerate anyone who is better than the US at anything . It does not matter whether the offender is a sworn US foe, or the most benevolent ally and vassal. Motive is also irrelevant. No one can be in any way, shape, or form better at anything than the US. This is very much an unspoken demand that the US expects from all of its vassals, pawns, and client states.
Countries like China, Russia, Iran and North Korea command such hatred and vitriol in US political and media circles not because they are an existential threat to the US or their vassal states, not because they want to ‘kill Americans,’ or terrorize America and anyone who stands with it.
No. The US hates these countries because they dare to be independent and sovereign, and because they defy the US with intelligent, clever, creative, well-thought out and effective solutions which nullify much of any, or all US economic, military, and strategic threats against their existence.
The US hates their steadfastness and ability to survive and thrive no matter how much misery the US flings at them.
Everyday that these countries survive and thrive is a slap in the face to the satanic US establishment which wants nothing less than to control the world for its own selfish purposes.
But the depravity and callousness of the US toward its perceived adversaries has reached such a low point, that the miseries the US throws their way have started to rebound on the US itself, and are now negatively affecting core US interests.
US attempts at destroying its adversaries have started to destroy the US, which is suffering form the ill-effects of its own deranged behavior more so than the former.
It is true that the US has no friends, only interests and clients. And this holds true today.
If anyone wants to see which countries are enslaved to the US and which are free of it, there is a very simple and clear way to check.
Countries which are US vassals, and which the US can bilk and exploit freely, are regularly treated by the US political establishment and MSM in a cute and friendly fashion. The leaders of such countries are invited to the white house, treated to news conferences with the president, patted on the head, and given all sorts of promises that will not be honored, either in whole or in part.
Countries that are truly free and sovereign are also quite free of US control and exploitation. These countries are treated with disdain on a daily basis by the US establishment and MSM. Such countries are ruled by ‘dictators,’ ‘sponsor terrorism,’ ‘violate human rights,’ are ‘undemocratic,’ ‘dangerous,’ and ‘backward.’
Some of these countries, the most sworn and dangerous of US ‘enemies,’ are not allowed to be visited by anyone with a US passport.
But no one has dared to ask, why? Why does a country that supposedly is a beacon of ‘democracy and freedom’ forbids its citizens to travel anywhere? A truly free and democratic country does not do this. Such policy is wholly antithetical to a democratic nation.
At worst, citizens can only be warned and advised against traveling to a country with which the US has no diplomatic relations, but not banned outright from traveling there, and threatened with fines and jail time. Such behavior is unacceptable, and not of a ‘democratic’ nation.
By employing such absurd and contradictory policies, the US regimes simply want to keep US citizens from seeing the truth.
Think of the PR nightmare of Lovecraftian proportions that would ensue for the US establishment, should the average US citizen be allowed to visit places like Iran, Cuba, and North Korea, and see that there are people there too who have families and want to live unmolested, and that no one there is automatically gunning for them, or wants to hack them up into bloody bits in the street as soon as they step off the plane.
The US establishment does not want Americans to interact with the citizens of ‘officially designated enemy’ countries for fear that Americans will learn the truth, the other side of the story, and begin to see that they have been fed lies by the US establishment, and that horrible acts of mass-scale murder and human rights violations have been committed in their names by their government for decades.
There would be hell to pay by the establishment should most Americans learn the facts of how the world really is, and what rotten part the US has played in it.
US actions in the world cannot, and will not succeed because they pursue immoral, illegal, and unethical ends. Nothing good can ever be built on rotten foundations.
And indeed, the foundations of the US-led order have been based on morally-questionable aims since 1945, and are now teetering toward collapse. Flinging more excrement of militarism, arrogance, bribery, threats, and false promises will not save it.
NATO, and all the other alliances the US has corralled nations into since WW2 are not going to save the US, and neither will they win any wars against a powerful adversary, which they have never fought. Nuclear weapons, and advanced ways of delivering them nullify these alliances existence.
The more NATO expands, the more unstable and unwieldy it becomes. It's like endlessly stacking blocks on top of each other. Eventually, the tower loses its stability and falls.
NATO is already too large to be effective. You cannot have so many countries, with varying degrees of national wealth and military ability ranging from decent to virtually non-existent, be able to become in sync when faced with fighting a real war. It won't work; especially with all the different languages that the so-called NATO ‘leadership’ has to contend with. It can’t be simple to manage such a morass at all.
If anyone cares to read a detailed, though allegorical description of how that would go down, read Umberto Eco's book "Baudolino", especially the part where all the different 'races' band together to fight their common enemy. The results of that alliance are startlingly pathetic and depressing.
Faced with failures and shortcomings that the US, with its 22 trillion-and-counting-national debt cannot correct, it tries to pretend that it is still on top, that it is still genuinely liked, rather than feared and loathed.
War is the only thing that can wipe out a lot of US debt and get the US out of its difficulties, at least temporarily. But the only worthy and profitable opponents have thousands of nuclear weapons and the means to hit the US, while the US has no proven and fool-proof ways of stopping them.
So war is not likely to be used as a method by the US to regain its former glory. Regime changes and economic strangulation is another way, but this has not worked, and will only have a limited effect without military action, which the US is afraid to take.
Those pathetic countries that have foolishly tethered themselves to the US also keep this game of pretend going for the sake of the survival of their own decrepit pro-US elites that managed them for 73+ years, but even they are starting to fall away here and there. The worst ones are the nations in E. Europe that seem to be cow-towing to the US, blindly without reservation. They shall suffer the worst in the end.
But the entire US history has been just a cynical and cruel game of pretend from the beginning; pretend freedom; pretend democracy; pretend equality; pretend human rights; pretend peace; pretend enemies; pretend victories; pretend exceptionalism, which is nothing but willful ignorance wrapped in a thick blanket of crass narcissism.
The US, for the first time in history, is vulnerable to annihilation. The US elites go to sleep every night knowing that they are targets without effective protection to speak of.
This situation can only be good for the world. The weaker and more defenseless the US is, the better the world shall be.
There is no turning back for the US. It cannot, and will not regain its former place on the world stage.
The US has only two choices left.
Cut its losses, end the empire, withdraw into itself, mind its own business and salvage whatever it still has left, or confront the world and be destroyed in the ashes.
Those are the only two choices it has. Nothing else will work.
Tuesday, January 1, 2019
Tuesday, November 27, 2018
Thugboat Diplomacy
Ukrainian president Petro Poroshenko (aka Porky), has decided to stage a provocation against Russia in the Crimean Kerch strait using gunboats.
On Sunday, November 25, 2018, small gunboats and a tugboat belonging to the Ukrainian navy entered Russian territorial waters without any prior notice or permission, and tried to cross the strait.
The Ukrainian boats ignored Russian orders to stop and leave the area.
As a result, the Russian FSB border patrol shot at the boats, and seized them.
Right on que, the Russohpobic morons immediately lined up to condemn ‘Russian aggression.’ Porky, Trump, European Council president Tusk, and Polish president Duda and other assorted anti-Russian malcontents in NATO-sponsored think tanks, as always have faithfully made it plain clear that they will always stand 180 degrees from facts and reality when it comes to Russia.
But regardless of the lies and false accusations, all these characters know very well that this latest provocation was Made in Ukraine. Their automatic, scripted ‘blame everything on Russia’ SOP isn’t convincing anyone. They know Ukraine fucked up. But for political self-interest, they dare not call shit shit, as has been their habit for far too long.
Anyone who blames Russia for this latest Ukie brain-fart is a hopeless low-life with no credibility whatsoever.
It is clear that such a foolish and dangerous act could only benefit Porky and his interests.
Let’s not forget that the Ukrainian elections are starting. Porky and his party of inept gargoyles currently have single-digit public support.
They have ruined Ukraine since riding the maidan coup to power. The economy is tail spinning, purchase of expensive LNG and coal from the US has raised energy prices so high that people are freezing, and riots have broken out.
But Porky is desperate to stay in power, and has been itching for some kind of redemption, no matter how absurd, to cling to authority.
So he, together with his depraved advisers (both Ukrainian and foreign) cooked up this gunboat provocation against Russia to create an excuse to declare martial law.
And Porky has threatened to do this for a few years. Now that his chances of being re-elected are practically non-existent, he decided to cash in his chips.
Now, Porky has a free hand to clamp down on the media, and on any type of opposition parties, who by now have more support thanks to Porky’s gross mismanagement of the country. So he’s afraid. A real election will put many maidanists out of service.
But Porky’s western pimps won’t allow this. They like Porky. He does whatever they tell him to do, no matter how depraved, wrong and dishonest it is. They have more work for him to do, and want him to stay, without having to worry about free and fair elections spoiling their plunder of the country.
So Porky gets to stay at the helm as long as he wants, and if the populace gets too annoyed at his one-man rule, he will just stage another provocation against Russia to shut them up.
That’s the way it works today in the criminal enterprise known as Banderite Ukraine.
But the west may try to cash in on this Ukrainian lunacy. Germany is now talking about ‘mediating’ the Kerch issue between Russia and Ukraine.
Mediate for what?
There is nothing to mediate.
Ukrainian military boats illegally crossed into Russian territorial waters without permission, ignored warnings, and got shot up. Russia acted as any country would in such a situation.
Would the US or Germany allow Russian boats to sail in their waters without permission? Heck, NATO gets a fever every time they see a Russian anywhere these days!
So let’s not be naïve.
Why would Porky order such an idiotic maneuver? He is engaging in the politics of desperation, just like his Washington bosses.
It may be because some weeks back Russia announced sweeping sanctions against Ukraine that will affect the profits of corrupt oligarchs like Porky who still have business interests in Russia.
It may be because Ukraine’s days as a Russian gas transport country are numbered once Nord Stream 2 and/or South Stream through Bulgaria go online.
But if Porky and the current crop of Ukrainian political losers want to keep any of this around, then they are going the wrong way about it.
They know that Russia does not listen to threats, pressure and sanctions. This should be clear now after the events of the last 4 years.
Who is advising these Kievan dimwits? Where are they getting their bad ideas from?
And exactly what do the EU and US want from all this? Maybe they want to exploit this latest banderite stupidity to somehow cajole Russia into some sort of a treaty where Russia relinquishes its control of the Kerch Strait, puts the area under some sort of ‘international observation,’ and turn the strait into a ‘neutral’ ground, so NATO vessels can sail through it unhindered and do whatever they want in the Sea of Azov?
It would not at all be surprising if the EU and US pursued such a dim-witted idea. Russia must not engage in any redrawing of borders in the Azov Sea. It is a body of water shared by Russia and Ukraine, and there is already an agreement in existence between the two. No rewriting of it must be allowed whatsoever for the benefit of NATO and EU, no matter how much Kiev screams and stomps its foot.
No mediation is needed. What is needed, and immediately so, is for Kiev’s western backers to tell their puppets to stop doing stupid shit, or else things will not end well for banderastan. NATO cannot protect it.
In his quest to stay in power, Porky has gone from dick to dictator.
On Sunday, November 25, 2018, small gunboats and a tugboat belonging to the Ukrainian navy entered Russian territorial waters without any prior notice or permission, and tried to cross the strait.
The Ukrainian boats ignored Russian orders to stop and leave the area.
As a result, the Russian FSB border patrol shot at the boats, and seized them.
Right on que, the Russohpobic morons immediately lined up to condemn ‘Russian aggression.’ Porky, Trump, European Council president Tusk, and Polish president Duda and other assorted anti-Russian malcontents in NATO-sponsored think tanks, as always have faithfully made it plain clear that they will always stand 180 degrees from facts and reality when it comes to Russia.
But regardless of the lies and false accusations, all these characters know very well that this latest provocation was Made in Ukraine. Their automatic, scripted ‘blame everything on Russia’ SOP isn’t convincing anyone. They know Ukraine fucked up. But for political self-interest, they dare not call shit shit, as has been their habit for far too long.
Anyone who blames Russia for this latest Ukie brain-fart is a hopeless low-life with no credibility whatsoever.
It is clear that such a foolish and dangerous act could only benefit Porky and his interests.
Let’s not forget that the Ukrainian elections are starting. Porky and his party of inept gargoyles currently have single-digit public support.
They have ruined Ukraine since riding the maidan coup to power. The economy is tail spinning, purchase of expensive LNG and coal from the US has raised energy prices so high that people are freezing, and riots have broken out.
But Porky is desperate to stay in power, and has been itching for some kind of redemption, no matter how absurd, to cling to authority.
So he, together with his depraved advisers (both Ukrainian and foreign) cooked up this gunboat provocation against Russia to create an excuse to declare martial law.
And Porky has threatened to do this for a few years. Now that his chances of being re-elected are practically non-existent, he decided to cash in his chips.
Now, Porky has a free hand to clamp down on the media, and on any type of opposition parties, who by now have more support thanks to Porky’s gross mismanagement of the country. So he’s afraid. A real election will put many maidanists out of service.
But Porky’s western pimps won’t allow this. They like Porky. He does whatever they tell him to do, no matter how depraved, wrong and dishonest it is. They have more work for him to do, and want him to stay, without having to worry about free and fair elections spoiling their plunder of the country.
So Porky gets to stay at the helm as long as he wants, and if the populace gets too annoyed at his one-man rule, he will just stage another provocation against Russia to shut them up.
That’s the way it works today in the criminal enterprise known as Banderite Ukraine.
But the west may try to cash in on this Ukrainian lunacy. Germany is now talking about ‘mediating’ the Kerch issue between Russia and Ukraine.
Mediate for what?
There is nothing to mediate.
Ukrainian military boats illegally crossed into Russian territorial waters without permission, ignored warnings, and got shot up. Russia acted as any country would in such a situation.
Would the US or Germany allow Russian boats to sail in their waters without permission? Heck, NATO gets a fever every time they see a Russian anywhere these days!
So let’s not be naïve.
Why would Porky order such an idiotic maneuver? He is engaging in the politics of desperation, just like his Washington bosses.
It may be because some weeks back Russia announced sweeping sanctions against Ukraine that will affect the profits of corrupt oligarchs like Porky who still have business interests in Russia.
It may be because Ukraine’s days as a Russian gas transport country are numbered once Nord Stream 2 and/or South Stream through Bulgaria go online.
But if Porky and the current crop of Ukrainian political losers want to keep any of this around, then they are going the wrong way about it.
They know that Russia does not listen to threats, pressure and sanctions. This should be clear now after the events of the last 4 years.
Who is advising these Kievan dimwits? Where are they getting their bad ideas from?
And exactly what do the EU and US want from all this? Maybe they want to exploit this latest banderite stupidity to somehow cajole Russia into some sort of a treaty where Russia relinquishes its control of the Kerch Strait, puts the area under some sort of ‘international observation,’ and turn the strait into a ‘neutral’ ground, so NATO vessels can sail through it unhindered and do whatever they want in the Sea of Azov?
It would not at all be surprising if the EU and US pursued such a dim-witted idea. Russia must not engage in any redrawing of borders in the Azov Sea. It is a body of water shared by Russia and Ukraine, and there is already an agreement in existence between the two. No rewriting of it must be allowed whatsoever for the benefit of NATO and EU, no matter how much Kiev screams and stomps its foot.
No mediation is needed. What is needed, and immediately so, is for Kiev’s western backers to tell their puppets to stop doing stupid shit, or else things will not end well for banderastan. NATO cannot protect it.
In his quest to stay in power, Porky has gone from dick to dictator.
Thursday, November 1, 2018
Synagogue of Satan
The recent synagogue shooting in Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania has elicited condemnations, and sympathy for the victims from all over the US.
It was, of course, billed as a vile anti-Semitic attack by a Jew-hating bigot.
But was it?
How many of those worshippers were pro-Israeli? How many of them cheered and nodded their heads in approval at zionist crimes against Palestinians and others?
How is it that the country sympathizes with the victims, but ignores the victims of zionist rampages, which are much more numerous.
Right before the shooting took place, the zionist entity begun firing missiles at Gaza.
Those who think that these two events are not related are willfully-ignorant.
The zionist terrorists committed atrocities upon the people they occupied even before 1948.
To date, no nation has put forward any serious effort to stop zionist war crimes against humanity.
But as this recent shooting incident proves, justice always finds a way.
No amount of military aid, holocaust financial shake-downs, pious demagoguery by the US regime and the feckless EU, playing the victim, bombing Gaza, Syria or Lebanon will prevent the zionists and pro-Israeli Jews from getting their just deserts. Neither will using the alleged holocaust as a cover for the zionist entity’s many crimes. Their status, their wealth, influence, their connections and high positions cannot, and will not shield them. They all stand naked, powerless, and friendless against the raw power of justice.
And justice cannot be bribed, threatened, dragged into a court room, poisoned, assassinated or bombed.
There is a price to be paid by those Jews who support zionist crimes. By supporting those crimes, Jews bring violence upon themselves. They are on the wrong side of history, and supporting bad policies cannot lead to anything but bad consequences for them.
Everytime Jews approve of, and defend zionist acts of depravity and give money or any other forms of assistance to the zionist state, they paint a target on their backs.
There is no escape from this as long as zionist crimes go on.
All Jews need to ponder on this.
Either they muster up the courage to help end zionist crimes, or they pay for them.
There are no other choices.
It was, of course, billed as a vile anti-Semitic attack by a Jew-hating bigot.
But was it?
How many of those worshippers were pro-Israeli? How many of them cheered and nodded their heads in approval at zionist crimes against Palestinians and others?
How is it that the country sympathizes with the victims, but ignores the victims of zionist rampages, which are much more numerous.
Right before the shooting took place, the zionist entity begun firing missiles at Gaza.
Those who think that these two events are not related are willfully-ignorant.
The zionist terrorists committed atrocities upon the people they occupied even before 1948.
To date, no nation has put forward any serious effort to stop zionist war crimes against humanity.
But as this recent shooting incident proves, justice always finds a way.
No amount of military aid, holocaust financial shake-downs, pious demagoguery by the US regime and the feckless EU, playing the victim, bombing Gaza, Syria or Lebanon will prevent the zionists and pro-Israeli Jews from getting their just deserts. Neither will using the alleged holocaust as a cover for the zionist entity’s many crimes. Their status, their wealth, influence, their connections and high positions cannot, and will not shield them. They all stand naked, powerless, and friendless against the raw power of justice.
And justice cannot be bribed, threatened, dragged into a court room, poisoned, assassinated or bombed.
There is a price to be paid by those Jews who support zionist crimes. By supporting those crimes, Jews bring violence upon themselves. They are on the wrong side of history, and supporting bad policies cannot lead to anything but bad consequences for them.
Everytime Jews approve of, and defend zionist acts of depravity and give money or any other forms of assistance to the zionist state, they paint a target on their backs.
There is no escape from this as long as zionist crimes go on.
All Jews need to ponder on this.
Either they muster up the courage to help end zionist crimes, or they pay for them.
There are no other choices.
Thursday, October 25, 2018
INF Nightmare
The US regime, reeling from failure after failure, is considering withdrawing from the INF Treaty that was signed with the Soviet Union in 1987, over 30 years ago.
This agreement limited the manufacture and deployment of nuclear medium-range ballistic missiles, and other such systems.
The INF agreement served as a bedrock of nuclear arms control. It was a benefit to the US especially, since the Soviet Union at the time was ahead in the manufacture of medium-range missiles and their deployment.
Since that time, the US has unilaterally withdrawn from the ABM treaty in order to build the anti-missile shield on Russia’s border, expanded NATO multiple times, and has been stationing troops in E. European countries.
The US has has blamed Russia for ‘violating’ the treaty as an excuse to withdraw from it. But like with other recent anti-Russian accusations, the US has failed to show any specific evidence of these ‘violations.’
But this is a lame excuse, as the US has been building its missile defense system around Russia for years, which can be easily and quickly converted into a nuclear cruise missile launching system. The US has also been planning the development of newer nuclear weapons for some years, even during the Obama regime.
Also, China is not a party to the treaty, and the US wants to force it into a new agreement.
But let there be no doubt. Any US demands for a new INF treaty has nothing to do with nuclear disarmament and peace. It is primarily about two things.
These are:
1. To weaken and disarm adversaries like Russia, China and others. Russia and China have missiles which can neutralize US forces from long distances. China has both medium-range missiles, and missiles capable of taking out ships at 4,000km away or farther. This capability prevents US aircraft carriers from coming close enough to enable airstrikes by fighter jets in the event of a conflict.
2. To scare its client states into spending more money on US-made weaponry in order to shore up the sagging US economy. The US military-industrial complex also stands to make billions off the development and manufacture of new nuclear missiles.
So this is not a sudden reaction by the US driven by concerns about peace and law-breaking.
It is a dishonest and cynical ploy by the US to get others to give up their deterrents, so the US can confront them with very little or no losses.
But it’s not hard to see through this US deceit, and neither Russia and China will budge.
What will end up happening is that the US will leave the INF, Russia will quickly start producing medium-range missiles quicker than the US can, and once again the US will whine about the ‘Russian threat.’
The best thing that can happen now is for US client states to muster enough courage to prohibit any deployment of US nuclear weapons in Europe. They can’t whine and cry about US withdrawing from the treaty and endangering European security, and allow these weapons to be deployed.
This situation will show the world what Europe’s priorities are. Is Europe’s priority peace, or self-destruction?
Neither the US, NATO, or any European country has any means of successfully countering Russian missiles. They all know that this is a fact.
Let the west’s deluded demagogues ponder on that.
This agreement limited the manufacture and deployment of nuclear medium-range ballistic missiles, and other such systems.
The INF agreement served as a bedrock of nuclear arms control. It was a benefit to the US especially, since the Soviet Union at the time was ahead in the manufacture of medium-range missiles and their deployment.
Since that time, the US has unilaterally withdrawn from the ABM treaty in order to build the anti-missile shield on Russia’s border, expanded NATO multiple times, and has been stationing troops in E. European countries.
The US has has blamed Russia for ‘violating’ the treaty as an excuse to withdraw from it. But like with other recent anti-Russian accusations, the US has failed to show any specific evidence of these ‘violations.’
But this is a lame excuse, as the US has been building its missile defense system around Russia for years, which can be easily and quickly converted into a nuclear cruise missile launching system. The US has also been planning the development of newer nuclear weapons for some years, even during the Obama regime.
Also, China is not a party to the treaty, and the US wants to force it into a new agreement.
But let there be no doubt. Any US demands for a new INF treaty has nothing to do with nuclear disarmament and peace. It is primarily about two things.
These are:
1. To weaken and disarm adversaries like Russia, China and others. Russia and China have missiles which can neutralize US forces from long distances. China has both medium-range missiles, and missiles capable of taking out ships at 4,000km away or farther. This capability prevents US aircraft carriers from coming close enough to enable airstrikes by fighter jets in the event of a conflict.
2. To scare its client states into spending more money on US-made weaponry in order to shore up the sagging US economy. The US military-industrial complex also stands to make billions off the development and manufacture of new nuclear missiles.
So this is not a sudden reaction by the US driven by concerns about peace and law-breaking.
It is a dishonest and cynical ploy by the US to get others to give up their deterrents, so the US can confront them with very little or no losses.
But it’s not hard to see through this US deceit, and neither Russia and China will budge.
What will end up happening is that the US will leave the INF, Russia will quickly start producing medium-range missiles quicker than the US can, and once again the US will whine about the ‘Russian threat.’
The best thing that can happen now is for US client states to muster enough courage to prohibit any deployment of US nuclear weapons in Europe. They can’t whine and cry about US withdrawing from the treaty and endangering European security, and allow these weapons to be deployed.
This situation will show the world what Europe’s priorities are. Is Europe’s priority peace, or self-destruction?
Neither the US, NATO, or any European country has any means of successfully countering Russian missiles. They all know that this is a fact.
Let the west’s deluded demagogues ponder on that.
Saturday, October 6, 2018
Supreme Kangaroo Court
The Brett Kavanaugh supreme court nomination, and the scandal around it, have been major news in the US MSM for weeks now.
Charges of an immoral and criminal nature against him, including attempted rape, have seen his nomination process mired in controversy. Although how much this rape accusation is a smokescreen for his disdain for the average Joe in favor of the elites in his judicial decisions, remains a serious question.
Like many of the establishment elites ‘movers and shakers,’ whether they be politicians or CEOs, Kavanaugh comes from the same fetid cesspool of privileged and entitled US political and economic culture, corrupt to the core.
Kavanaugh’s lies, arrogance, and fake show of piety is just part and parcel of the psychopathic personalities currently in charge of the US establishment.
The Supreme Court is supposed to be an honest and impartial arbiter. It is supposed to apply constitutional law to cases, blindly, and guard against abuses of power by the government; at least on paper.
But history and facts show that in reality the Supreme Court has traditionally served the interests of the elites since the beginning of the hapless US experiment.
Here is an excerpt from Howard Zinn's book 'A Peoples' History of the United States' which reflects this centuries-old reality:
However, in 1877, a Supreme Court decision (Munn v. Illinois) approved state laws regulating the prices charged to farmers for the use of grain elevators. The grain elevator company argued it was a person being deprived of property, thus violating the fourteenth Amendment's declaration "nor shall any state deprive any person of life, liberty, or property without due process of law.'' The Supreme Court disagreed, saying that grain elevators were not simply private property but were invested with "a public interest" and so could he regulated. One year after that decision, the American Bar Association, organized by lawyers accustomed to serving the wealthy, began a national campaign of education to reverse the Court decision. Its presidents said, at different times: "If trusts are a defensive weapon of property interests against the communistic trend, they are desirable," And: "Monopoly is often a necessity and an advantage."
By 1886, they succeeded. State legislatures, under the pressure of aroused farmers, had passed laws to regulate the rates charged farmers by the railroads. The Supreme Court that year (Wabash v. Illinois) said states could not do this, that this was an intrusion on federal power. That year alone, the Court did away with 230 state laws that had been passed to regulate corporations.
By this time the Supreme Court had accepted the argument that corporations were "persons" and their money was property protected by the due process clause of the Fourteenth Amendment. Supposedly, the Amendment had been passed to protect Negro rights, but of the Fourteenth Amendment cases brought before the Supreme Court between 1890 and 1910, nineteen dealt with the Negro, 288 dealt with corporations.
The justices of the Supreme Court were not simply interpreters of the Constitution. They were men of certain backgrounds, of certain interests. One of them (Justice Samuel Miller) had said in 1875: "It is vain to contend with Judges who have been at the bar the advocates for forty years of railroad companies, and all forms of associated capital. . . ." In 1893, Supreme Court Justice David J. Brewer, addressing the New York State Bar Association, said:
It is the unvarying law that the wealth of the community will be in the hands of the few. . . The great majority of men are unwilling to endure that long self-denial and saving which makes accumulations possible . . . and hence it always has been, and until human nature is remodeled always will he true, that the wealth of a nation is in the hands of a few, while the many subsist upon the proceeds of their daily toil.
This was not just a whim of the 1880s and 1890s-it went back to the Founding Fathers, ho had learned their law in the era of Blackstone's Commentaries, which said: 'So great is the regard of the law for private property, that it will not authorize the least violation of it; no, not even for the common good of the whole community." *
Educational institutions today teach this same regressive philosophy, even at the highest levels.
Instead of applying constitutional law to cases, the creatures on the Supreme Court throughout the ages have used legal gimmickry, trickery, and absurd and questionable explanations and excuses to put their stamp of approval on abhorrent and clearly illegal government acts and abuses of power.
Sadly, it has been like that from day one. Did the Supreme Court’s first chief justices bother explaining how slavery existed in a country with the most lofty constitution, which proclaimed that ‘all men were created equal?’ How about the atrocities committed on the Native American Indians? Did any chief justice at the time criticize this as a violation of the Bill of Rights?
Did the supreme court ever do anything of note to curb the power of wealthy elites and their dangerous machinations, like pushing through the Federal Reserve Act, which has undermined the US financial system, and put it into the hands of private interests?
Did the court stop the imperialist wars against Mexico, Spain, and others based of false flags? What about the more recent wars and acts of US military aggression based on lies and fraud?
The US supreme court today is a rubber stamp agency, a notary public for the US establishment’s abuses of authority for its personal self-enrichment, to the detriment of everyone else.
Each judge on that court is a political animal, and an ‘activist’ judge. The ones appointed by democratic presidents serve the political and financial interests of the democratic clique of gangsters who rule over that sad land, and the ones appointed by a Republican president serve the political and financial interests of the republican clique of gangsters.
These judges allow their personal peculiar political ideology, economic and social views to color their decisions. Because they are appointees of presidents, it can be no other way. There is no independent appointment and vetting process for these people, and therefore we should expect them to do only what their political party masters want.
Detractors may point to instances of the supreme court actually approving enlightened decisions, such as the civil rights act, Roe vs. Wade, etc., but these are blips and rain drops, approved only because they did not upset the elites profit-making apple cart too much. Anything that does, is struck down, rolled back, killed, and made illegal.
This same corrupt US legal system’s disregard for its own laws in favor of the US elites’ interests colors the US regime’s disdain for other laws, international and UN included.
This is clearly demonstrated by such true-blue US absurdities as a New York judge applying multi-billion-dollar judgments against Iran-a sovereign nation- under false pretenses, extra-territorial sanctions, the US regime’s open disregard for the ICC when it comes to Palestinians’ legal action against the zionist entity’s human rights abuses, and against the recent UN court’s judgment that certain anti-Iranian sanctions enacted by Trump are illegal because they violate human rights laws.
And let's not forget the poison cherry on top of this corrupt organization's list of misdeeds: the SELECTION of the president in the election of 2000, which brought the degenerate and discredited George W. Bush to power.
The main consideration in all of this government post appointment rigmarole is whether the candidate for the spot-whether it be presidential, congressional, senatorial, gubernatorial, judicial, or in law enforcement-is faithful to the powers-that-be, public and private.
If that candidate shows the willingness to uphold and empower the status quo, then they are appointed. If not, they wouldn’t even be in their current positions in the first place.
Despite his past transgressions, lapses in judgment, and general low-life attitude, Kavanaugh will be appointed because he is an establishment creature. And just like the military, the police, FBI and intelligence services, they are meant to serve the elites’ interests first and foremost; or are willing to do so faithfully once appointed.
The nomination process is all about making sure they do; constitutional or any other law be damned.
* Sources:
'A Peoples' History of the United States' by Howard Zinn, pp.261-262
Charges of an immoral and criminal nature against him, including attempted rape, have seen his nomination process mired in controversy. Although how much this rape accusation is a smokescreen for his disdain for the average Joe in favor of the elites in his judicial decisions, remains a serious question.
Like many of the establishment elites ‘movers and shakers,’ whether they be politicians or CEOs, Kavanaugh comes from the same fetid cesspool of privileged and entitled US political and economic culture, corrupt to the core.
Kavanaugh’s lies, arrogance, and fake show of piety is just part and parcel of the psychopathic personalities currently in charge of the US establishment.
The Supreme Court is supposed to be an honest and impartial arbiter. It is supposed to apply constitutional law to cases, blindly, and guard against abuses of power by the government; at least on paper.
But history and facts show that in reality the Supreme Court has traditionally served the interests of the elites since the beginning of the hapless US experiment.
Here is an excerpt from Howard Zinn's book 'A Peoples' History of the United States' which reflects this centuries-old reality:
However, in 1877, a Supreme Court decision (Munn v. Illinois) approved state laws regulating the prices charged to farmers for the use of grain elevators. The grain elevator company argued it was a person being deprived of property, thus violating the fourteenth Amendment's declaration "nor shall any state deprive any person of life, liberty, or property without due process of law.'' The Supreme Court disagreed, saying that grain elevators were not simply private property but were invested with "a public interest" and so could he regulated. One year after that decision, the American Bar Association, organized by lawyers accustomed to serving the wealthy, began a national campaign of education to reverse the Court decision. Its presidents said, at different times: "If trusts are a defensive weapon of property interests against the communistic trend, they are desirable," And: "Monopoly is often a necessity and an advantage."
By 1886, they succeeded. State legislatures, under the pressure of aroused farmers, had passed laws to regulate the rates charged farmers by the railroads. The Supreme Court that year (Wabash v. Illinois) said states could not do this, that this was an intrusion on federal power. That year alone, the Court did away with 230 state laws that had been passed to regulate corporations.
By this time the Supreme Court had accepted the argument that corporations were "persons" and their money was property protected by the due process clause of the Fourteenth Amendment. Supposedly, the Amendment had been passed to protect Negro rights, but of the Fourteenth Amendment cases brought before the Supreme Court between 1890 and 1910, nineteen dealt with the Negro, 288 dealt with corporations.
The justices of the Supreme Court were not simply interpreters of the Constitution. They were men of certain backgrounds, of certain interests. One of them (Justice Samuel Miller) had said in 1875: "It is vain to contend with Judges who have been at the bar the advocates for forty years of railroad companies, and all forms of associated capital. . . ." In 1893, Supreme Court Justice David J. Brewer, addressing the New York State Bar Association, said:
It is the unvarying law that the wealth of the community will be in the hands of the few. . . The great majority of men are unwilling to endure that long self-denial and saving which makes accumulations possible . . . and hence it always has been, and until human nature is remodeled always will he true, that the wealth of a nation is in the hands of a few, while the many subsist upon the proceeds of their daily toil.
This was not just a whim of the 1880s and 1890s-it went back to the Founding Fathers, ho had learned their law in the era of Blackstone's Commentaries, which said: 'So great is the regard of the law for private property, that it will not authorize the least violation of it; no, not even for the common good of the whole community." *
Educational institutions today teach this same regressive philosophy, even at the highest levels.
Instead of applying constitutional law to cases, the creatures on the Supreme Court throughout the ages have used legal gimmickry, trickery, and absurd and questionable explanations and excuses to put their stamp of approval on abhorrent and clearly illegal government acts and abuses of power.
Sadly, it has been like that from day one. Did the Supreme Court’s first chief justices bother explaining how slavery existed in a country with the most lofty constitution, which proclaimed that ‘all men were created equal?’ How about the atrocities committed on the Native American Indians? Did any chief justice at the time criticize this as a violation of the Bill of Rights?
Did the supreme court ever do anything of note to curb the power of wealthy elites and their dangerous machinations, like pushing through the Federal Reserve Act, which has undermined the US financial system, and put it into the hands of private interests?
Did the court stop the imperialist wars against Mexico, Spain, and others based of false flags? What about the more recent wars and acts of US military aggression based on lies and fraud?
The US supreme court today is a rubber stamp agency, a notary public for the US establishment’s abuses of authority for its personal self-enrichment, to the detriment of everyone else.
Each judge on that court is a political animal, and an ‘activist’ judge. The ones appointed by democratic presidents serve the political and financial interests of the democratic clique of gangsters who rule over that sad land, and the ones appointed by a Republican president serve the political and financial interests of the republican clique of gangsters.
These judges allow their personal peculiar political ideology, economic and social views to color their decisions. Because they are appointees of presidents, it can be no other way. There is no independent appointment and vetting process for these people, and therefore we should expect them to do only what their political party masters want.
Detractors may point to instances of the supreme court actually approving enlightened decisions, such as the civil rights act, Roe vs. Wade, etc., but these are blips and rain drops, approved only because they did not upset the elites profit-making apple cart too much. Anything that does, is struck down, rolled back, killed, and made illegal.
This same corrupt US legal system’s disregard for its own laws in favor of the US elites’ interests colors the US regime’s disdain for other laws, international and UN included.
This is clearly demonstrated by such true-blue US absurdities as a New York judge applying multi-billion-dollar judgments against Iran-a sovereign nation- under false pretenses, extra-territorial sanctions, the US regime’s open disregard for the ICC when it comes to Palestinians’ legal action against the zionist entity’s human rights abuses, and against the recent UN court’s judgment that certain anti-Iranian sanctions enacted by Trump are illegal because they violate human rights laws.
And let's not forget the poison cherry on top of this corrupt organization's list of misdeeds: the SELECTION of the president in the election of 2000, which brought the degenerate and discredited George W. Bush to power.
The main consideration in all of this government post appointment rigmarole is whether the candidate for the spot-whether it be presidential, congressional, senatorial, gubernatorial, judicial, or in law enforcement-is faithful to the powers-that-be, public and private.
If that candidate shows the willingness to uphold and empower the status quo, then they are appointed. If not, they wouldn’t even be in their current positions in the first place.
Despite his past transgressions, lapses in judgment, and general low-life attitude, Kavanaugh will be appointed because he is an establishment creature. And just like the military, the police, FBI and intelligence services, they are meant to serve the elites’ interests first and foremost; or are willing to do so faithfully once appointed.
The nomination process is all about making sure they do; constitutional or any other law be damned.
* Sources:
'A Peoples' History of the United States' by Howard Zinn, pp.261-262
Saturday, September 15, 2018
17 Years Later...
What a difference 17 years make! Look at what the US regime has degenerated into. 17 years ago, Al Qaeda was enemy#1, along with anyone who aided it.
One of the false charges the US regime of George W. Bush leveled against Saddam Hussein was that he conspired with Al Qaeda and shared responsibility for the 9/11 attacks. This was one of the primary excuses given by the US for attacking and invading Iraq.
Fast-forward to today, and the US is threatening to bomb Syria if it dares to attack Al Qaeda and other terror groups in Idlib.
By its own words and actions, the US and its allies are state-sponsors and practitioners of terrorism.
Let's never forget that the US created Al Qaeda.
Any government that supports these militant Islamist hoodlums in Syria has lost its senses. They are ALL on the wrong side of this conflict.
And then they whine and cry when one of their trained darlings goes on a stabbing spree, or rams a car into pedestrians in some European or N. American city.
This type of contradictory and off-the-wall behavior exposes the entire ‘US war on terror’ as a criminal and bloody farce; a sick joke played upon the world.
It is clear that there was never a ‘war on terror’ to begin with, only a war on the independence of resource-rich countries with governments that did not want to follow the orders and whims of the US regime and its corporate cohorts.
When looking at the about-face by the current US regime, and the previous one with their sponsoring of violent militant Islamist groups in Syria and elsewhere, it is not a surprise why many people suspect that 9/11 was an inside job by the US regime to create the ultimate excuse for regime change and perpetual wars against anyone the US establishment does not like.
Hopefully, with the looming Syrian/Russian operation to liberate Idlib from the last vestiges of western-sponsored terror proxies, Erdogan and the Turkish authorities realize that any and all US attempts at preserving and saving the Idlib nutcases is aimed on a later date at using this force against not only Syria, but also against Turkey, and other nearby countries deemed by the US regime not to be ‘compliant’ with its demands
Except for the zionist shitpit in the middle east, the US regime doesn’t play favorites. One can be a US darling on Monday, and a sworn enemy by Friday afternoon, if they dare to disagree with the US regime in any way.
Erdie has now learned this lesson well after the failed US-engineered coup against him in July of 2016, and it is in his, and all of Turkey's best strategic and security interest to clean out Idlib from the US-sponsored nutcases. If Turkey refuses to do so, it will pay a price, as this western-sponsored Islamist virus will only grow and spread. These dangerous people have a history of biting the hand that feeds them.
Turkey must redeem itself for its past collusion with these groups, and be a part of the solution, not the problem. Its main task at this moment should be to aid Russia and Syria in expelling this western-sponsored Islamist fanatics from Idlib, permanently. If Turkey does not do so, it will live to regret it. It is only a matter of when, not if.
US temper tantrums that an attack on Idlib would be a ‘human rights catastrophe’ is nothing but the same old atrocity propaganda whining. We heard this crap before in Aleppo and Douma.
But when the US chased out ISIS from Raqqa earlier this year by massive and indiscriminate aerial bombing, no one in any western capital batted an eyelash. No MSM outfit bothered to say anything critical about the wide-scale destruction of Raqqa and over a 1,000 dead civilians, whose corpses to this day still rot under the rubble. It was all praised and lauded as a gallant ‘fight against terrorism.’
Unlike Russia and Syria, the US didn’t even bother with humanitarian corridors in Raqqa, or with helping to do anything for the people of that city after it leveled it.
And the results speak for themselves. The residents of the cities liberated by the Syrians and Russians were grateful, and started to rebuild their lives. The same cannot be said for those in Idlib, who are being held hostage by tens of thousands of hardcore Islamists.
The US regime knows full-well that the militants in Idlib are bad news. The US regime officials admitted this on camera. No other than Brett McGurk, the US anti-ISIS envoy had some interesting things to say about Idlib. Just go to you tube and search for the video titled ‘Whoops, US anti-ISIS envoy reveals truth about Idlib,’ if it hasn’t been removed yet.
No matter what crocodile tears and cheap, pathetic, and fake genuflecting about 'human rights' flaky Nikki Haley, Trump or any other member of his criminal coterie engage in on camera, the fact is that these people are lying, and they are totally on the wrong side of the issue, and on the wrong side of history.
None of these deranged misfits seem to give a rat’s ass about Palestinians being killed by the zionists on a daily basis, and about the Yemenis massacred by Saudi Wahhabia.
But Idlib will be liberated. It may be through military action or something else, but it will rejoin Syria once again - terrorist-free.
Someone needs to ask Trump, or any of his regime's officials what they would do, if tens of thousands of anti-government militants took over a US city, and announced that they are now free, and no longer subject to US government authority of any kind.
What would Trump and his demented advisors think and do, if, say, Russia, China, Iran, North Korea along with other countries which are not on good terms with the US started secretly funneling weapons, supplies and covert military and intelligence operatives into the renegade US city to help them fight against the encroachment of the US government forces?
Would the US government have any compunctions, or feel any guilt about attacking the city with whatever force it could to bring it back under US government control?
Would the US regime listen to warnings and cries from Russia and other countries about 'human rights' considerations?
How would the US regime feel when Russians, Iranians and North Koreans sent troops, ships, and planes close to its borders and threaten military action should the US attempt to regain control of the rebellious US city?
It would be quite interesting what Trump and his cohorts would have to say.
But if unhinged Trump, flaky Nikki, and crazy Bolton care so much about those militants’ lives in Idlib, then they should take them all in as refugees into the US.
After all, they’re just brave little freedom fighters who thirst for democracy, right?
One of the false charges the US regime of George W. Bush leveled against Saddam Hussein was that he conspired with Al Qaeda and shared responsibility for the 9/11 attacks. This was one of the primary excuses given by the US for attacking and invading Iraq.
Fast-forward to today, and the US is threatening to bomb Syria if it dares to attack Al Qaeda and other terror groups in Idlib.
By its own words and actions, the US and its allies are state-sponsors and practitioners of terrorism.
Let's never forget that the US created Al Qaeda.
Any government that supports these militant Islamist hoodlums in Syria has lost its senses. They are ALL on the wrong side of this conflict.
And then they whine and cry when one of their trained darlings goes on a stabbing spree, or rams a car into pedestrians in some European or N. American city.
This type of contradictory and off-the-wall behavior exposes the entire ‘US war on terror’ as a criminal and bloody farce; a sick joke played upon the world.
It is clear that there was never a ‘war on terror’ to begin with, only a war on the independence of resource-rich countries with governments that did not want to follow the orders and whims of the US regime and its corporate cohorts.
When looking at the about-face by the current US regime, and the previous one with their sponsoring of violent militant Islamist groups in Syria and elsewhere, it is not a surprise why many people suspect that 9/11 was an inside job by the US regime to create the ultimate excuse for regime change and perpetual wars against anyone the US establishment does not like.
Hopefully, with the looming Syrian/Russian operation to liberate Idlib from the last vestiges of western-sponsored terror proxies, Erdogan and the Turkish authorities realize that any and all US attempts at preserving and saving the Idlib nutcases is aimed on a later date at using this force against not only Syria, but also against Turkey, and other nearby countries deemed by the US regime not to be ‘compliant’ with its demands
Except for the zionist shitpit in the middle east, the US regime doesn’t play favorites. One can be a US darling on Monday, and a sworn enemy by Friday afternoon, if they dare to disagree with the US regime in any way.
Erdie has now learned this lesson well after the failed US-engineered coup against him in July of 2016, and it is in his, and all of Turkey's best strategic and security interest to clean out Idlib from the US-sponsored nutcases. If Turkey refuses to do so, it will pay a price, as this western-sponsored Islamist virus will only grow and spread. These dangerous people have a history of biting the hand that feeds them.
Turkey must redeem itself for its past collusion with these groups, and be a part of the solution, not the problem. Its main task at this moment should be to aid Russia and Syria in expelling this western-sponsored Islamist fanatics from Idlib, permanently. If Turkey does not do so, it will live to regret it. It is only a matter of when, not if.
US temper tantrums that an attack on Idlib would be a ‘human rights catastrophe’ is nothing but the same old atrocity propaganda whining. We heard this crap before in Aleppo and Douma.
But when the US chased out ISIS from Raqqa earlier this year by massive and indiscriminate aerial bombing, no one in any western capital batted an eyelash. No MSM outfit bothered to say anything critical about the wide-scale destruction of Raqqa and over a 1,000 dead civilians, whose corpses to this day still rot under the rubble. It was all praised and lauded as a gallant ‘fight against terrorism.’
Unlike Russia and Syria, the US didn’t even bother with humanitarian corridors in Raqqa, or with helping to do anything for the people of that city after it leveled it.
And the results speak for themselves. The residents of the cities liberated by the Syrians and Russians were grateful, and started to rebuild their lives. The same cannot be said for those in Idlib, who are being held hostage by tens of thousands of hardcore Islamists.
The US regime knows full-well that the militants in Idlib are bad news. The US regime officials admitted this on camera. No other than Brett McGurk, the US anti-ISIS envoy had some interesting things to say about Idlib. Just go to you tube and search for the video titled ‘Whoops, US anti-ISIS envoy reveals truth about Idlib,’ if it hasn’t been removed yet.
No matter what crocodile tears and cheap, pathetic, and fake genuflecting about 'human rights' flaky Nikki Haley, Trump or any other member of his criminal coterie engage in on camera, the fact is that these people are lying, and they are totally on the wrong side of the issue, and on the wrong side of history.
None of these deranged misfits seem to give a rat’s ass about Palestinians being killed by the zionists on a daily basis, and about the Yemenis massacred by Saudi Wahhabia.
But Idlib will be liberated. It may be through military action or something else, but it will rejoin Syria once again - terrorist-free.
Someone needs to ask Trump, or any of his regime's officials what they would do, if tens of thousands of anti-government militants took over a US city, and announced that they are now free, and no longer subject to US government authority of any kind.
What would Trump and his demented advisors think and do, if, say, Russia, China, Iran, North Korea along with other countries which are not on good terms with the US started secretly funneling weapons, supplies and covert military and intelligence operatives into the renegade US city to help them fight against the encroachment of the US government forces?
Would the US government have any compunctions, or feel any guilt about attacking the city with whatever force it could to bring it back under US government control?
Would the US regime listen to warnings and cries from Russia and other countries about 'human rights' considerations?
How would the US regime feel when Russians, Iranians and North Koreans sent troops, ships, and planes close to its borders and threaten military action should the US attempt to regain control of the rebellious US city?
It would be quite interesting what Trump and his cohorts would have to say.
But if unhinged Trump, flaky Nikki, and crazy Bolton care so much about those militants’ lives in Idlib, then they should take them all in as refugees into the US.
After all, they’re just brave little freedom fighters who thirst for democracy, right?
Sunday, August 19, 2018
Tricks and No Treats
The US has tricked the EU. It got it involved in the maidan regime change, ande forced it to enact sanctions on Russia over Ukraine. But lifting them is tied to the implementation of the Minsk agreement by Russia-which isn’t even a party to the agreement, only a sponsor.
At the same time, the US is encouraging the Kiev regime to not implement it, thereby preventing the anti-Russian sanctions from being lifted, thereby causing the EU undue economic problems. Doesn't the EU realize how they're being played by the US?
The Maidan fake revolt was a failed experiment. The US and EU ruined Ukraine. It is now worse than before euro-maidan. Anyone in Ukraine who thinks that their lives will get 'better' under a pro-western regime and diktat, and that their current bad situation is just a temporary 'growing pain,' is a hopelessly deluded moron.
Whatever the outrageous demands and threats the US imposes on the EU, the EU does nothing worthwhile to protect itself.
The sad truth is that the EU is ran by intestinal worms living in the anus of US Empire.
The US also tricked Iran with the JCPOA agreement in 2015. The agreement obligates Iran to put its nuclear power program under stricter International monitoring and places limits on its operations, in return for the lifting of nuclear-related sanctions.
Then Trump withdrew from the JCPOA even though Iran is in full compliance with it, and is threatening the imposition of sanctions unless Iran agrees to the changes US wants.
But the US was never really serious about observing the agreement itself. Even the Obama regime stalled when it came to lifting sanctions and allowing western compabies to do business with Iran.
The JCPOA appears to have been a trick by the US to cajole Iran into signing an agreement limiting its nuclear activities, then promising to lift sanctions while dragging its feet since day one.
Now the US withdraws from the agreement while threatening sanctions on Iran, again. In the end, Iran loses all benefits of the deal while obligated to comply with its terms. It was meant to be this way from the beginning.
Or could it be that the US from day one saw the JCPOA only as a means to eventually gang up on Iran militarily and drag other nations into it by assuming and hoping that Iran would violate the agreement.
This could explain why the US has been reluctant, even under the Obummer regime, to lift all sanctions and pressure on Iran for abiding by the agreement. Then, after a few years or so, the US got report after report from the IAEA stating that Iran is in full compliance with the JCPOA. The US then got tired of the charade, and just walked away, not having gotten the excuse it wanted to go after Iran, with a gang of European fools behind them. It is why the US stalled on lifting sanctions on Iran; it figured this would not happen because Iran would 'break' the agreement.
The same kind of two-faced trickey is currently being employed by the US against North Korea. But this time it is so blatant that there isn’t even an agreement to trick North Korea into signing; not even the classic feel-good false promises by the US regime; just unilateral verbal demands for North Korea to disarm while giving it nothing back in return-until the US is ‘satisfied’ that North Korea has successfully disarmed.
And then what? The US will either come up with more demands, or simply feel it is safe to annihilate North Korea now that all its nukes and ICBMS have been dismantled and no longer pose a threat to a US invasion force
The US is no longer on top, and it ignores this reality. But when it can no longer ignore it, what does it do? It lashes out, violently, blames other for its own crimes and errors, and creates a bigger mess for itself.
Add to this, some ex-communist E. European states are determined to turn back the clock to the post-war period and confront a Soviet Union which no longer exists, but this time from the other side of the ideological veil. It is the west and its new E. European underlings like Poland, Lithuania, Latvia, Romania that need the Soviet Union back, not modern Russia.
This anti-Russian hysteria has reached levels of stupidity yet unseen. It is all so obviously manufactured and fake that you have to wonder about the sanity of the people who come up with this nonsense and those who believe in it. Even though a lot of them do it because they see Russophobia as a way to get rich and famous quickly, there is a line between ambition and stupidity that these idiots crossed more than a year ago.
It seems like the US establishment isn’t serious about any deals and reconciliation with Russia, NK, or anyone else. In the case of NK, Trump’s meeting was just a ploy to stall North Korean missile development, and nothing more.
Trump’s meeting with Putin, and US regime officials’ meetings with their Russian counterparts seem to only be for the the sole purpose of feeling out the Russians about what they think, what is important to them, and what they are interested in.
Then this information is taken back to the US, analyzed, and used to slap more sanctions and restrictions on Russia in areas that will have the most effect.
Neither Putin or any Russian diplomats or government officials should be meeting with US regime representatives as long as this kind of cynical, two-faced behavior goes on.
The US is not Russia’s partner. The US ruling regimes’ main aim is to weaken Russia by any means necessary and bring it down to a subservient level. The US hates to see Russia achieving any kind of success, especially if that success puts it in front of the US in any way.
The US wants a world where it reigns supreme, and where everyone else is a subordinate. Equaling or superseding the US won’t be tolerated by the US ruling regimes.
It does not matter whether the offending country is an ally or enemy, or even if they have no problem with the US whatsoever. Any country seeking to be better than the US at anything, regardless of the motive, is automatically an enemy.
It makes one wonder who really decides policy in the US, Trump or the un-elected spooks in the intelligence agencies.
Trump seems to be saying and wanting one thing, but ends up doing something opposite. Then complains about the results, and punishes the victims. Either Trump is a coward, or he’s just putting on a PR show by meeting Putin and Kim Jong Un. It is highly doubtful whether anything good will come out of these meetings, and things just seem to get worse between the US, Russia, and North Korea after each meeting.
Every time Trump meets Putin, Kim Jong Un, or some other leader of a state the US establishment doesn’t like, sanctions follow and relations get worse; and that’s regardless of whatever happy talk at the meeting.
There are those who say that Trump must be resisted and even impeached. But their suggestion is to ally with the Democratic Party who is making an effort do dump Trump. However, they are doing so in a very dishonest and fake way by accusing Trump of imaginary, and evidence-free collusion with Russia.
So there simply can be no alliance against Trump with people such as the establishment democrats, whose tactics are just as vile as Trump’s reckless actions and policies surely are. Trading in Trumpian horeshit for Democratic dogshit is not a solution, and never will be.
A lot of time is being wasted on this Russiagate nonsense. By now, Trump has commited so many blunders and international crimes-from wars of aggression, violation of other nations sovereignty, and a plethora of human rights abuses that the Democrats should have a field day going after Trump because of these crimes. The Democrats have a quite impressive smorgasbord of Trumpian fuck ups to use to beat him over the head with. But yet, they seem to ignored these and cling to this Russian interference fantasy like flies to shit.
And why is this so? Because underneath it all, the Democrats actually have no problem with Trump’s pro-corporate war and sanctions-mongering against foreign countries using lies, false flags, and false accusations.
It does no good defending Trump. Because whether from sheer egomaniacal arrogance or plain old cowardice, he is enacting dangerous and stupid policies borne out of a sick US exceptionalist ideology.
He seems to be plagued by the age-old US sense of entitlement to whatever he wants, and is not concerned about how much damage is done, and to whom, to achieve it.
The best the world can hope for, at least the part of the world that wants to pursue its own interests and remain sovereign and independent, is that Trump’s deranged foibles will alienate more and more countries away from the US.
This could open the way to distancing themselves from the US and becoming less dependent on it. In the long run, this would do wonders for the safety and security of the world.
At the same time, the US is encouraging the Kiev regime to not implement it, thereby preventing the anti-Russian sanctions from being lifted, thereby causing the EU undue economic problems. Doesn't the EU realize how they're being played by the US?
The Maidan fake revolt was a failed experiment. The US and EU ruined Ukraine. It is now worse than before euro-maidan. Anyone in Ukraine who thinks that their lives will get 'better' under a pro-western regime and diktat, and that their current bad situation is just a temporary 'growing pain,' is a hopelessly deluded moron.
Whatever the outrageous demands and threats the US imposes on the EU, the EU does nothing worthwhile to protect itself.
The sad truth is that the EU is ran by intestinal worms living in the anus of US Empire.
The US also tricked Iran with the JCPOA agreement in 2015. The agreement obligates Iran to put its nuclear power program under stricter International monitoring and places limits on its operations, in return for the lifting of nuclear-related sanctions.
Then Trump withdrew from the JCPOA even though Iran is in full compliance with it, and is threatening the imposition of sanctions unless Iran agrees to the changes US wants.
But the US was never really serious about observing the agreement itself. Even the Obama regime stalled when it came to lifting sanctions and allowing western compabies to do business with Iran.
The JCPOA appears to have been a trick by the US to cajole Iran into signing an agreement limiting its nuclear activities, then promising to lift sanctions while dragging its feet since day one.
Now the US withdraws from the agreement while threatening sanctions on Iran, again. In the end, Iran loses all benefits of the deal while obligated to comply with its terms. It was meant to be this way from the beginning.
Or could it be that the US from day one saw the JCPOA only as a means to eventually gang up on Iran militarily and drag other nations into it by assuming and hoping that Iran would violate the agreement.
This could explain why the US has been reluctant, even under the Obummer regime, to lift all sanctions and pressure on Iran for abiding by the agreement. Then, after a few years or so, the US got report after report from the IAEA stating that Iran is in full compliance with the JCPOA. The US then got tired of the charade, and just walked away, not having gotten the excuse it wanted to go after Iran, with a gang of European fools behind them. It is why the US stalled on lifting sanctions on Iran; it figured this would not happen because Iran would 'break' the agreement.
The same kind of two-faced trickey is currently being employed by the US against North Korea. But this time it is so blatant that there isn’t even an agreement to trick North Korea into signing; not even the classic feel-good false promises by the US regime; just unilateral verbal demands for North Korea to disarm while giving it nothing back in return-until the US is ‘satisfied’ that North Korea has successfully disarmed.
And then what? The US will either come up with more demands, or simply feel it is safe to annihilate North Korea now that all its nukes and ICBMS have been dismantled and no longer pose a threat to a US invasion force
The US is no longer on top, and it ignores this reality. But when it can no longer ignore it, what does it do? It lashes out, violently, blames other for its own crimes and errors, and creates a bigger mess for itself.
Add to this, some ex-communist E. European states are determined to turn back the clock to the post-war period and confront a Soviet Union which no longer exists, but this time from the other side of the ideological veil. It is the west and its new E. European underlings like Poland, Lithuania, Latvia, Romania that need the Soviet Union back, not modern Russia.
This anti-Russian hysteria has reached levels of stupidity yet unseen. It is all so obviously manufactured and fake that you have to wonder about the sanity of the people who come up with this nonsense and those who believe in it. Even though a lot of them do it because they see Russophobia as a way to get rich and famous quickly, there is a line between ambition and stupidity that these idiots crossed more than a year ago.
It seems like the US establishment isn’t serious about any deals and reconciliation with Russia, NK, or anyone else. In the case of NK, Trump’s meeting was just a ploy to stall North Korean missile development, and nothing more.
Trump’s meeting with Putin, and US regime officials’ meetings with their Russian counterparts seem to only be for the the sole purpose of feeling out the Russians about what they think, what is important to them, and what they are interested in.
Then this information is taken back to the US, analyzed, and used to slap more sanctions and restrictions on Russia in areas that will have the most effect.
Neither Putin or any Russian diplomats or government officials should be meeting with US regime representatives as long as this kind of cynical, two-faced behavior goes on.
The US is not Russia’s partner. The US ruling regimes’ main aim is to weaken Russia by any means necessary and bring it down to a subservient level. The US hates to see Russia achieving any kind of success, especially if that success puts it in front of the US in any way.
The US wants a world where it reigns supreme, and where everyone else is a subordinate. Equaling or superseding the US won’t be tolerated by the US ruling regimes.
It does not matter whether the offending country is an ally or enemy, or even if they have no problem with the US whatsoever. Any country seeking to be better than the US at anything, regardless of the motive, is automatically an enemy.
It makes one wonder who really decides policy in the US, Trump or the un-elected spooks in the intelligence agencies.
Trump seems to be saying and wanting one thing, but ends up doing something opposite. Then complains about the results, and punishes the victims. Either Trump is a coward, or he’s just putting on a PR show by meeting Putin and Kim Jong Un. It is highly doubtful whether anything good will come out of these meetings, and things just seem to get worse between the US, Russia, and North Korea after each meeting.
Every time Trump meets Putin, Kim Jong Un, or some other leader of a state the US establishment doesn’t like, sanctions follow and relations get worse; and that’s regardless of whatever happy talk at the meeting.
There are those who say that Trump must be resisted and even impeached. But their suggestion is to ally with the Democratic Party who is making an effort do dump Trump. However, they are doing so in a very dishonest and fake way by accusing Trump of imaginary, and evidence-free collusion with Russia.
So there simply can be no alliance against Trump with people such as the establishment democrats, whose tactics are just as vile as Trump’s reckless actions and policies surely are. Trading in Trumpian horeshit for Democratic dogshit is not a solution, and never will be.
A lot of time is being wasted on this Russiagate nonsense. By now, Trump has commited so many blunders and international crimes-from wars of aggression, violation of other nations sovereignty, and a plethora of human rights abuses that the Democrats should have a field day going after Trump because of these crimes. The Democrats have a quite impressive smorgasbord of Trumpian fuck ups to use to beat him over the head with. But yet, they seem to ignored these and cling to this Russian interference fantasy like flies to shit.
And why is this so? Because underneath it all, the Democrats actually have no problem with Trump’s pro-corporate war and sanctions-mongering against foreign countries using lies, false flags, and false accusations.
It does no good defending Trump. Because whether from sheer egomaniacal arrogance or plain old cowardice, he is enacting dangerous and stupid policies borne out of a sick US exceptionalist ideology.
He seems to be plagued by the age-old US sense of entitlement to whatever he wants, and is not concerned about how much damage is done, and to whom, to achieve it.
The best the world can hope for, at least the part of the world that wants to pursue its own interests and remain sovereign and independent, is that Trump’s deranged foibles will alienate more and more countries away from the US.
This could open the way to distancing themselves from the US and becoming less dependent on it. In the long run, this would do wonders for the safety and security of the world.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)