Ukrainian president Petro Poroshenko (aka Porky), has decided to stage a provocation against Russia in the Crimean Kerch strait using gunboats.
On Sunday, November 25, 2018, small gunboats and a tugboat belonging to the Ukrainian navy entered Russian territorial waters without any prior notice or permission, and tried to cross the strait.
The Ukrainian boats ignored Russian orders to stop and leave the area.
As a result, the Russian FSB border patrol shot at the boats, and seized them.
Right on que, the Russohpobic morons immediately lined up to condemn ‘Russian aggression.’ Porky, Trump, European Council president Tusk, and Polish president Duda and other assorted anti-Russian malcontents in NATO-sponsored think tanks, as always have faithfully made it plain clear that they will always stand 180 degrees from facts and reality when it comes to Russia.
But regardless of the lies and false accusations, all these characters know very well that this latest provocation was Made in Ukraine. Their automatic, scripted ‘blame everything on Russia’ SOP isn’t convincing anyone. They know Ukraine fucked up. But for political self-interest, they dare not call shit shit, as has been their habit for far too long.
Anyone who blames Russia for this latest Ukie brain-fart is a hopeless low-life with no credibility whatsoever.
It is clear that such a foolish and dangerous act could only benefit Porky and his interests.
Let’s not forget that the Ukrainian elections are starting. Porky and his party of inept gargoyles currently have single-digit public support.
They have ruined Ukraine since riding the maidan coup to power. The economy is tail spinning, purchase of expensive LNG and coal from the US has raised energy prices so high that people are freezing, and riots have broken out.
But Porky is desperate to stay in power, and has been itching for some kind of redemption, no matter how absurd, to cling to authority.
So he, together with his depraved advisers (both Ukrainian and foreign) cooked up this gunboat provocation against Russia to create an excuse to declare martial law.
And Porky has threatened to do this for a few years. Now that his chances of being re-elected are practically non-existent, he decided to cash in his chips.
Now, Porky has a free hand to clamp down on the media, and on any type of opposition parties, who by now have more support thanks to Porky’s gross mismanagement of the country. So he’s afraid. A real election will put many maidanists out of service.
But Porky’s western pimps won’t allow this. They like Porky. He does whatever they tell him to do, no matter how depraved, wrong and dishonest it is. They have more work for him to do, and want him to stay, without having to worry about free and fair elections spoiling their plunder of the country.
So Porky gets to stay at the helm as long as he wants, and if the populace gets too annoyed at his one-man rule, he will just stage another provocation against Russia to shut them up.
That’s the way it works today in the criminal enterprise known as Banderite Ukraine.
But the west may try to cash in on this Ukrainian lunacy. Germany is now talking about ‘mediating’ the Kerch issue between Russia and Ukraine.
Mediate for what?
There is nothing to mediate.
Ukrainian military boats illegally crossed into Russian territorial waters without permission, ignored warnings, and got shot up. Russia acted as any country would in such a situation.
Would the US or Germany allow Russian boats to sail in their waters without permission? Heck, NATO gets a fever every time they see a Russian anywhere these days!
So let’s not be naïve.
Why would Porky order such an idiotic maneuver? He is engaging in the politics of desperation, just like his Washington bosses.
It may be because some weeks back Russia announced sweeping sanctions against Ukraine that will affect the profits of corrupt oligarchs like Porky who still have business interests in Russia.
It may be because Ukraine’s days as a Russian gas transport country are numbered once Nord Stream 2 and/or South Stream through Bulgaria go online.
But if Porky and the current crop of Ukrainian political losers want to keep any of this around, then they are going the wrong way about it.
They know that Russia does not listen to threats, pressure and sanctions. This should be clear now after the events of the last 4 years.
Who is advising these Kievan dimwits? Where are they getting their bad ideas from?
And exactly what do the EU and US want from all this? Maybe they want to exploit this latest banderite stupidity to somehow cajole Russia into some sort of a treaty where Russia relinquishes its control of the Kerch Strait, puts the area under some sort of ‘international observation,’ and turn the strait into a ‘neutral’ ground, so NATO vessels can sail through it unhindered and do whatever they want in the Sea of Azov?
It would not at all be surprising if the EU and US pursued such a dim-witted idea. Russia must not engage in any redrawing of borders in the Azov Sea. It is a body of water shared by Russia and Ukraine, and there is already an agreement in existence between the two. No rewriting of it must be allowed whatsoever for the benefit of NATO and EU, no matter how much Kiev screams and stomps its foot.
No mediation is needed. What is needed, and immediately so, is for Kiev’s western backers to tell their puppets to stop doing stupid shit, or else things will not end well for banderastan. NATO cannot protect it.
In his quest to stay in power, Porky has gone from dick to dictator.
Tuesday, November 27, 2018
Thursday, November 1, 2018
Synagogue of Satan
The recent synagogue shooting in Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania has elicited condemnations, and sympathy for the victims from all over the US.
It was, of course, billed as a vile anti-Semitic attack by a Jew-hating bigot.
But was it?
How many of those worshippers were pro-Israeli? How many of them cheered and nodded their heads in approval at zionist crimes against Palestinians and others?
How is it that the country sympathizes with the victims, but ignores the victims of zionist rampages, which are much more numerous.
Right before the shooting took place, the zionist entity begun firing missiles at Gaza.
Those who think that these two events are not related are willfully-ignorant.
The zionist terrorists committed atrocities upon the people they occupied even before 1948.
To date, no nation has put forward any serious effort to stop zionist war crimes against humanity.
But as this recent shooting incident proves, justice always finds a way.
No amount of military aid, holocaust financial shake-downs, pious demagoguery by the US regime and the feckless EU, playing the victim, bombing Gaza, Syria or Lebanon will prevent the zionists and pro-Israeli Jews from getting their just deserts. Neither will using the alleged holocaust as a cover for the zionist entity’s many crimes. Their status, their wealth, influence, their connections and high positions cannot, and will not shield them. They all stand naked, powerless, and friendless against the raw power of justice.
And justice cannot be bribed, threatened, dragged into a court room, poisoned, assassinated or bombed.
There is a price to be paid by those Jews who support zionist crimes. By supporting those crimes, Jews bring violence upon themselves. They are on the wrong side of history, and supporting bad policies cannot lead to anything but bad consequences for them.
Everytime Jews approve of, and defend zionist acts of depravity and give money or any other forms of assistance to the zionist state, they paint a target on their backs.
There is no escape from this as long as zionist crimes go on.
All Jews need to ponder on this.
Either they muster up the courage to help end zionist crimes, or they pay for them.
There are no other choices.
It was, of course, billed as a vile anti-Semitic attack by a Jew-hating bigot.
But was it?
How many of those worshippers were pro-Israeli? How many of them cheered and nodded their heads in approval at zionist crimes against Palestinians and others?
How is it that the country sympathizes with the victims, but ignores the victims of zionist rampages, which are much more numerous.
Right before the shooting took place, the zionist entity begun firing missiles at Gaza.
Those who think that these two events are not related are willfully-ignorant.
The zionist terrorists committed atrocities upon the people they occupied even before 1948.
To date, no nation has put forward any serious effort to stop zionist war crimes against humanity.
But as this recent shooting incident proves, justice always finds a way.
No amount of military aid, holocaust financial shake-downs, pious demagoguery by the US regime and the feckless EU, playing the victim, bombing Gaza, Syria or Lebanon will prevent the zionists and pro-Israeli Jews from getting their just deserts. Neither will using the alleged holocaust as a cover for the zionist entity’s many crimes. Their status, their wealth, influence, their connections and high positions cannot, and will not shield them. They all stand naked, powerless, and friendless against the raw power of justice.
And justice cannot be bribed, threatened, dragged into a court room, poisoned, assassinated or bombed.
There is a price to be paid by those Jews who support zionist crimes. By supporting those crimes, Jews bring violence upon themselves. They are on the wrong side of history, and supporting bad policies cannot lead to anything but bad consequences for them.
Everytime Jews approve of, and defend zionist acts of depravity and give money or any other forms of assistance to the zionist state, they paint a target on their backs.
There is no escape from this as long as zionist crimes go on.
All Jews need to ponder on this.
Either they muster up the courage to help end zionist crimes, or they pay for them.
There are no other choices.
Thursday, October 25, 2018
INF Nightmare
The US regime, reeling from failure after failure, is considering withdrawing from the INF Treaty that was signed with the Soviet Union in 1987, over 30 years ago.
This agreement limited the manufacture and deployment of nuclear medium-range ballistic missiles, and other such systems.
The INF agreement served as a bedrock of nuclear arms control. It was a benefit to the US especially, since the Soviet Union at the time was ahead in the manufacture of medium-range missiles and their deployment.
Since that time, the US has unilaterally withdrawn from the ABM treaty in order to build the anti-missile shield on Russia’s border, expanded NATO multiple times, and has been stationing troops in E. European countries.
The US has has blamed Russia for ‘violating’ the treaty as an excuse to withdraw from it. But like with other recent anti-Russian accusations, the US has failed to show any specific evidence of these ‘violations.’
But this is a lame excuse, as the US has been building its missile defense system around Russia for years, which can be easily and quickly converted into a nuclear cruise missile launching system. The US has also been planning the development of newer nuclear weapons for some years, even during the Obama regime.
Also, China is not a party to the treaty, and the US wants to force it into a new agreement.
But let there be no doubt. Any US demands for a new INF treaty has nothing to do with nuclear disarmament and peace. It is primarily about two things.
These are:
1. To weaken and disarm adversaries like Russia, China and others. Russia and China have missiles which can neutralize US forces from long distances. China has both medium-range missiles, and missiles capable of taking out ships at 4,000km away or farther. This capability prevents US aircraft carriers from coming close enough to enable airstrikes by fighter jets in the event of a conflict.
2. To scare its client states into spending more money on US-made weaponry in order to shore up the sagging US economy. The US military-industrial complex also stands to make billions off the development and manufacture of new nuclear missiles.
So this is not a sudden reaction by the US driven by concerns about peace and law-breaking.
It is a dishonest and cynical ploy by the US to get others to give up their deterrents, so the US can confront them with very little or no losses.
But it’s not hard to see through this US deceit, and neither Russia and China will budge.
What will end up happening is that the US will leave the INF, Russia will quickly start producing medium-range missiles quicker than the US can, and once again the US will whine about the ‘Russian threat.’
The best thing that can happen now is for US client states to muster enough courage to prohibit any deployment of US nuclear weapons in Europe. They can’t whine and cry about US withdrawing from the treaty and endangering European security, and allow these weapons to be deployed.
This situation will show the world what Europe’s priorities are. Is Europe’s priority peace, or self-destruction?
Neither the US, NATO, or any European country has any means of successfully countering Russian missiles. They all know that this is a fact.
Let the west’s deluded demagogues ponder on that.
This agreement limited the manufacture and deployment of nuclear medium-range ballistic missiles, and other such systems.
The INF agreement served as a bedrock of nuclear arms control. It was a benefit to the US especially, since the Soviet Union at the time was ahead in the manufacture of medium-range missiles and their deployment.
Since that time, the US has unilaterally withdrawn from the ABM treaty in order to build the anti-missile shield on Russia’s border, expanded NATO multiple times, and has been stationing troops in E. European countries.
The US has has blamed Russia for ‘violating’ the treaty as an excuse to withdraw from it. But like with other recent anti-Russian accusations, the US has failed to show any specific evidence of these ‘violations.’
But this is a lame excuse, as the US has been building its missile defense system around Russia for years, which can be easily and quickly converted into a nuclear cruise missile launching system. The US has also been planning the development of newer nuclear weapons for some years, even during the Obama regime.
Also, China is not a party to the treaty, and the US wants to force it into a new agreement.
But let there be no doubt. Any US demands for a new INF treaty has nothing to do with nuclear disarmament and peace. It is primarily about two things.
These are:
1. To weaken and disarm adversaries like Russia, China and others. Russia and China have missiles which can neutralize US forces from long distances. China has both medium-range missiles, and missiles capable of taking out ships at 4,000km away or farther. This capability prevents US aircraft carriers from coming close enough to enable airstrikes by fighter jets in the event of a conflict.
2. To scare its client states into spending more money on US-made weaponry in order to shore up the sagging US economy. The US military-industrial complex also stands to make billions off the development and manufacture of new nuclear missiles.
So this is not a sudden reaction by the US driven by concerns about peace and law-breaking.
It is a dishonest and cynical ploy by the US to get others to give up their deterrents, so the US can confront them with very little or no losses.
But it’s not hard to see through this US deceit, and neither Russia and China will budge.
What will end up happening is that the US will leave the INF, Russia will quickly start producing medium-range missiles quicker than the US can, and once again the US will whine about the ‘Russian threat.’
The best thing that can happen now is for US client states to muster enough courage to prohibit any deployment of US nuclear weapons in Europe. They can’t whine and cry about US withdrawing from the treaty and endangering European security, and allow these weapons to be deployed.
This situation will show the world what Europe’s priorities are. Is Europe’s priority peace, or self-destruction?
Neither the US, NATO, or any European country has any means of successfully countering Russian missiles. They all know that this is a fact.
Let the west’s deluded demagogues ponder on that.
Saturday, October 6, 2018
Supreme Kangaroo Court
The Brett Kavanaugh supreme court nomination, and the scandal around it, have been major news in the US MSM for weeks now.
Charges of an immoral and criminal nature against him, including attempted rape, have seen his nomination process mired in controversy. Although how much this rape accusation is a smokescreen for his disdain for the average Joe in favor of the elites in his judicial decisions, remains a serious question.
Like many of the establishment elites ‘movers and shakers,’ whether they be politicians or CEOs, Kavanaugh comes from the same fetid cesspool of privileged and entitled US political and economic culture, corrupt to the core.
Kavanaugh’s lies, arrogance, and fake show of piety is just part and parcel of the psychopathic personalities currently in charge of the US establishment.
The Supreme Court is supposed to be an honest and impartial arbiter. It is supposed to apply constitutional law to cases, blindly, and guard against abuses of power by the government; at least on paper.
But history and facts show that in reality the Supreme Court has traditionally served the interests of the elites since the beginning of the hapless US experiment.
Here is an excerpt from Howard Zinn's book 'A Peoples' History of the United States' which reflects this centuries-old reality:
However, in 1877, a Supreme Court decision (Munn v. Illinois) approved state laws regulating the prices charged to farmers for the use of grain elevators. The grain elevator company argued it was a person being deprived of property, thus violating the fourteenth Amendment's declaration "nor shall any state deprive any person of life, liberty, or property without due process of law.'' The Supreme Court disagreed, saying that grain elevators were not simply private property but were invested with "a public interest" and so could he regulated. One year after that decision, the American Bar Association, organized by lawyers accustomed to serving the wealthy, began a national campaign of education to reverse the Court decision. Its presidents said, at different times: "If trusts are a defensive weapon of property interests against the communistic trend, they are desirable," And: "Monopoly is often a necessity and an advantage."
By 1886, they succeeded. State legislatures, under the pressure of aroused farmers, had passed laws to regulate the rates charged farmers by the railroads. The Supreme Court that year (Wabash v. Illinois) said states could not do this, that this was an intrusion on federal power. That year alone, the Court did away with 230 state laws that had been passed to regulate corporations.
By this time the Supreme Court had accepted the argument that corporations were "persons" and their money was property protected by the due process clause of the Fourteenth Amendment. Supposedly, the Amendment had been passed to protect Negro rights, but of the Fourteenth Amendment cases brought before the Supreme Court between 1890 and 1910, nineteen dealt with the Negro, 288 dealt with corporations.
The justices of the Supreme Court were not simply interpreters of the Constitution. They were men of certain backgrounds, of certain interests. One of them (Justice Samuel Miller) had said in 1875: "It is vain to contend with Judges who have been at the bar the advocates for forty years of railroad companies, and all forms of associated capital. . . ." In 1893, Supreme Court Justice David J. Brewer, addressing the New York State Bar Association, said:
It is the unvarying law that the wealth of the community will be in the hands of the few. . . The great majority of men are unwilling to endure that long self-denial and saving which makes accumulations possible . . . and hence it always has been, and until human nature is remodeled always will he true, that the wealth of a nation is in the hands of a few, while the many subsist upon the proceeds of their daily toil.
This was not just a whim of the 1880s and 1890s-it went back to the Founding Fathers, ho had learned their law in the era of Blackstone's Commentaries, which said: 'So great is the regard of the law for private property, that it will not authorize the least violation of it; no, not even for the common good of the whole community." *
Educational institutions today teach this same regressive philosophy, even at the highest levels.
Instead of applying constitutional law to cases, the creatures on the Supreme Court throughout the ages have used legal gimmickry, trickery, and absurd and questionable explanations and excuses to put their stamp of approval on abhorrent and clearly illegal government acts and abuses of power.
Sadly, it has been like that from day one. Did the Supreme Court’s first chief justices bother explaining how slavery existed in a country with the most lofty constitution, which proclaimed that ‘all men were created equal?’ How about the atrocities committed on the Native American Indians? Did any chief justice at the time criticize this as a violation of the Bill of Rights?
Did the supreme court ever do anything of note to curb the power of wealthy elites and their dangerous machinations, like pushing through the Federal Reserve Act, which has undermined the US financial system, and put it into the hands of private interests?
Did the court stop the imperialist wars against Mexico, Spain, and others based of false flags? What about the more recent wars and acts of US military aggression based on lies and fraud?
The US supreme court today is a rubber stamp agency, a notary public for the US establishment’s abuses of authority for its personal self-enrichment, to the detriment of everyone else.
Each judge on that court is a political animal, and an ‘activist’ judge. The ones appointed by democratic presidents serve the political and financial interests of the democratic clique of gangsters who rule over that sad land, and the ones appointed by a Republican president serve the political and financial interests of the republican clique of gangsters.
These judges allow their personal peculiar political ideology, economic and social views to color their decisions. Because they are appointees of presidents, it can be no other way. There is no independent appointment and vetting process for these people, and therefore we should expect them to do only what their political party masters want.
Detractors may point to instances of the supreme court actually approving enlightened decisions, such as the civil rights act, Roe vs. Wade, etc., but these are blips and rain drops, approved only because they did not upset the elites profit-making apple cart too much. Anything that does, is struck down, rolled back, killed, and made illegal.
This same corrupt US legal system’s disregard for its own laws in favor of the US elites’ interests colors the US regime’s disdain for other laws, international and UN included.
This is clearly demonstrated by such true-blue US absurdities as a New York judge applying multi-billion-dollar judgments against Iran-a sovereign nation- under false pretenses, extra-territorial sanctions, the US regime’s open disregard for the ICC when it comes to Palestinians’ legal action against the zionist entity’s human rights abuses, and against the recent UN court’s judgment that certain anti-Iranian sanctions enacted by Trump are illegal because they violate human rights laws.
And let's not forget the poison cherry on top of this corrupt organization's list of misdeeds: the SELECTION of the president in the election of 2000, which brought the degenerate and discredited George W. Bush to power.
The main consideration in all of this government post appointment rigmarole is whether the candidate for the spot-whether it be presidential, congressional, senatorial, gubernatorial, judicial, or in law enforcement-is faithful to the powers-that-be, public and private.
If that candidate shows the willingness to uphold and empower the status quo, then they are appointed. If not, they wouldn’t even be in their current positions in the first place.
Despite his past transgressions, lapses in judgment, and general low-life attitude, Kavanaugh will be appointed because he is an establishment creature. And just like the military, the police, FBI and intelligence services, they are meant to serve the elites’ interests first and foremost; or are willing to do so faithfully once appointed.
The nomination process is all about making sure they do; constitutional or any other law be damned.
* Sources:
'A Peoples' History of the United States' by Howard Zinn, pp.261-262
Charges of an immoral and criminal nature against him, including attempted rape, have seen his nomination process mired in controversy. Although how much this rape accusation is a smokescreen for his disdain for the average Joe in favor of the elites in his judicial decisions, remains a serious question.
Like many of the establishment elites ‘movers and shakers,’ whether they be politicians or CEOs, Kavanaugh comes from the same fetid cesspool of privileged and entitled US political and economic culture, corrupt to the core.
Kavanaugh’s lies, arrogance, and fake show of piety is just part and parcel of the psychopathic personalities currently in charge of the US establishment.
The Supreme Court is supposed to be an honest and impartial arbiter. It is supposed to apply constitutional law to cases, blindly, and guard against abuses of power by the government; at least on paper.
But history and facts show that in reality the Supreme Court has traditionally served the interests of the elites since the beginning of the hapless US experiment.
Here is an excerpt from Howard Zinn's book 'A Peoples' History of the United States' which reflects this centuries-old reality:
However, in 1877, a Supreme Court decision (Munn v. Illinois) approved state laws regulating the prices charged to farmers for the use of grain elevators. The grain elevator company argued it was a person being deprived of property, thus violating the fourteenth Amendment's declaration "nor shall any state deprive any person of life, liberty, or property without due process of law.'' The Supreme Court disagreed, saying that grain elevators were not simply private property but were invested with "a public interest" and so could he regulated. One year after that decision, the American Bar Association, organized by lawyers accustomed to serving the wealthy, began a national campaign of education to reverse the Court decision. Its presidents said, at different times: "If trusts are a defensive weapon of property interests against the communistic trend, they are desirable," And: "Monopoly is often a necessity and an advantage."
By 1886, they succeeded. State legislatures, under the pressure of aroused farmers, had passed laws to regulate the rates charged farmers by the railroads. The Supreme Court that year (Wabash v. Illinois) said states could not do this, that this was an intrusion on federal power. That year alone, the Court did away with 230 state laws that had been passed to regulate corporations.
By this time the Supreme Court had accepted the argument that corporations were "persons" and their money was property protected by the due process clause of the Fourteenth Amendment. Supposedly, the Amendment had been passed to protect Negro rights, but of the Fourteenth Amendment cases brought before the Supreme Court between 1890 and 1910, nineteen dealt with the Negro, 288 dealt with corporations.
The justices of the Supreme Court were not simply interpreters of the Constitution. They were men of certain backgrounds, of certain interests. One of them (Justice Samuel Miller) had said in 1875: "It is vain to contend with Judges who have been at the bar the advocates for forty years of railroad companies, and all forms of associated capital. . . ." In 1893, Supreme Court Justice David J. Brewer, addressing the New York State Bar Association, said:
It is the unvarying law that the wealth of the community will be in the hands of the few. . . The great majority of men are unwilling to endure that long self-denial and saving which makes accumulations possible . . . and hence it always has been, and until human nature is remodeled always will he true, that the wealth of a nation is in the hands of a few, while the many subsist upon the proceeds of their daily toil.
This was not just a whim of the 1880s and 1890s-it went back to the Founding Fathers, ho had learned their law in the era of Blackstone's Commentaries, which said: 'So great is the regard of the law for private property, that it will not authorize the least violation of it; no, not even for the common good of the whole community." *
Educational institutions today teach this same regressive philosophy, even at the highest levels.
Instead of applying constitutional law to cases, the creatures on the Supreme Court throughout the ages have used legal gimmickry, trickery, and absurd and questionable explanations and excuses to put their stamp of approval on abhorrent and clearly illegal government acts and abuses of power.
Sadly, it has been like that from day one. Did the Supreme Court’s first chief justices bother explaining how slavery existed in a country with the most lofty constitution, which proclaimed that ‘all men were created equal?’ How about the atrocities committed on the Native American Indians? Did any chief justice at the time criticize this as a violation of the Bill of Rights?
Did the supreme court ever do anything of note to curb the power of wealthy elites and their dangerous machinations, like pushing through the Federal Reserve Act, which has undermined the US financial system, and put it into the hands of private interests?
Did the court stop the imperialist wars against Mexico, Spain, and others based of false flags? What about the more recent wars and acts of US military aggression based on lies and fraud?
The US supreme court today is a rubber stamp agency, a notary public for the US establishment’s abuses of authority for its personal self-enrichment, to the detriment of everyone else.
Each judge on that court is a political animal, and an ‘activist’ judge. The ones appointed by democratic presidents serve the political and financial interests of the democratic clique of gangsters who rule over that sad land, and the ones appointed by a Republican president serve the political and financial interests of the republican clique of gangsters.
These judges allow their personal peculiar political ideology, economic and social views to color their decisions. Because they are appointees of presidents, it can be no other way. There is no independent appointment and vetting process for these people, and therefore we should expect them to do only what their political party masters want.
Detractors may point to instances of the supreme court actually approving enlightened decisions, such as the civil rights act, Roe vs. Wade, etc., but these are blips and rain drops, approved only because they did not upset the elites profit-making apple cart too much. Anything that does, is struck down, rolled back, killed, and made illegal.
This same corrupt US legal system’s disregard for its own laws in favor of the US elites’ interests colors the US regime’s disdain for other laws, international and UN included.
This is clearly demonstrated by such true-blue US absurdities as a New York judge applying multi-billion-dollar judgments against Iran-a sovereign nation- under false pretenses, extra-territorial sanctions, the US regime’s open disregard for the ICC when it comes to Palestinians’ legal action against the zionist entity’s human rights abuses, and against the recent UN court’s judgment that certain anti-Iranian sanctions enacted by Trump are illegal because they violate human rights laws.
And let's not forget the poison cherry on top of this corrupt organization's list of misdeeds: the SELECTION of the president in the election of 2000, which brought the degenerate and discredited George W. Bush to power.
The main consideration in all of this government post appointment rigmarole is whether the candidate for the spot-whether it be presidential, congressional, senatorial, gubernatorial, judicial, or in law enforcement-is faithful to the powers-that-be, public and private.
If that candidate shows the willingness to uphold and empower the status quo, then they are appointed. If not, they wouldn’t even be in their current positions in the first place.
Despite his past transgressions, lapses in judgment, and general low-life attitude, Kavanaugh will be appointed because he is an establishment creature. And just like the military, the police, FBI and intelligence services, they are meant to serve the elites’ interests first and foremost; or are willing to do so faithfully once appointed.
The nomination process is all about making sure they do; constitutional or any other law be damned.
* Sources:
'A Peoples' History of the United States' by Howard Zinn, pp.261-262
Saturday, September 15, 2018
17 Years Later...
What a difference 17 years make! Look at what the US regime has degenerated into. 17 years ago, Al Qaeda was enemy#1, along with anyone who aided it.
One of the false charges the US regime of George W. Bush leveled against Saddam Hussein was that he conspired with Al Qaeda and shared responsibility for the 9/11 attacks. This was one of the primary excuses given by the US for attacking and invading Iraq.
Fast-forward to today, and the US is threatening to bomb Syria if it dares to attack Al Qaeda and other terror groups in Idlib.
By its own words and actions, the US and its allies are state-sponsors and practitioners of terrorism.
Let's never forget that the US created Al Qaeda.
Any government that supports these militant Islamist hoodlums in Syria has lost its senses. They are ALL on the wrong side of this conflict.
And then they whine and cry when one of their trained darlings goes on a stabbing spree, or rams a car into pedestrians in some European or N. American city.
This type of contradictory and off-the-wall behavior exposes the entire ‘US war on terror’ as a criminal and bloody farce; a sick joke played upon the world.
It is clear that there was never a ‘war on terror’ to begin with, only a war on the independence of resource-rich countries with governments that did not want to follow the orders and whims of the US regime and its corporate cohorts.
When looking at the about-face by the current US regime, and the previous one with their sponsoring of violent militant Islamist groups in Syria and elsewhere, it is not a surprise why many people suspect that 9/11 was an inside job by the US regime to create the ultimate excuse for regime change and perpetual wars against anyone the US establishment does not like.
Hopefully, with the looming Syrian/Russian operation to liberate Idlib from the last vestiges of western-sponsored terror proxies, Erdogan and the Turkish authorities realize that any and all US attempts at preserving and saving the Idlib nutcases is aimed on a later date at using this force against not only Syria, but also against Turkey, and other nearby countries deemed by the US regime not to be ‘compliant’ with its demands
Except for the zionist shitpit in the middle east, the US regime doesn’t play favorites. One can be a US darling on Monday, and a sworn enemy by Friday afternoon, if they dare to disagree with the US regime in any way.
Erdie has now learned this lesson well after the failed US-engineered coup against him in July of 2016, and it is in his, and all of Turkey's best strategic and security interest to clean out Idlib from the US-sponsored nutcases. If Turkey refuses to do so, it will pay a price, as this western-sponsored Islamist virus will only grow and spread. These dangerous people have a history of biting the hand that feeds them.
Turkey must redeem itself for its past collusion with these groups, and be a part of the solution, not the problem. Its main task at this moment should be to aid Russia and Syria in expelling this western-sponsored Islamist fanatics from Idlib, permanently. If Turkey does not do so, it will live to regret it. It is only a matter of when, not if.
US temper tantrums that an attack on Idlib would be a ‘human rights catastrophe’ is nothing but the same old atrocity propaganda whining. We heard this crap before in Aleppo and Douma.
But when the US chased out ISIS from Raqqa earlier this year by massive and indiscriminate aerial bombing, no one in any western capital batted an eyelash. No MSM outfit bothered to say anything critical about the wide-scale destruction of Raqqa and over a 1,000 dead civilians, whose corpses to this day still rot under the rubble. It was all praised and lauded as a gallant ‘fight against terrorism.’
Unlike Russia and Syria, the US didn’t even bother with humanitarian corridors in Raqqa, or with helping to do anything for the people of that city after it leveled it.
And the results speak for themselves. The residents of the cities liberated by the Syrians and Russians were grateful, and started to rebuild their lives. The same cannot be said for those in Idlib, who are being held hostage by tens of thousands of hardcore Islamists.
The US regime knows full-well that the militants in Idlib are bad news. The US regime officials admitted this on camera. No other than Brett McGurk, the US anti-ISIS envoy had some interesting things to say about Idlib. Just go to you tube and search for the video titled ‘Whoops, US anti-ISIS envoy reveals truth about Idlib,’ if it hasn’t been removed yet.
No matter what crocodile tears and cheap, pathetic, and fake genuflecting about 'human rights' flaky Nikki Haley, Trump or any other member of his criminal coterie engage in on camera, the fact is that these people are lying, and they are totally on the wrong side of the issue, and on the wrong side of history.
None of these deranged misfits seem to give a rat’s ass about Palestinians being killed by the zionists on a daily basis, and about the Yemenis massacred by Saudi Wahhabia.
But Idlib will be liberated. It may be through military action or something else, but it will rejoin Syria once again - terrorist-free.
Someone needs to ask Trump, or any of his regime's officials what they would do, if tens of thousands of anti-government militants took over a US city, and announced that they are now free, and no longer subject to US government authority of any kind.
What would Trump and his demented advisors think and do, if, say, Russia, China, Iran, North Korea along with other countries which are not on good terms with the US started secretly funneling weapons, supplies and covert military and intelligence operatives into the renegade US city to help them fight against the encroachment of the US government forces?
Would the US government have any compunctions, or feel any guilt about attacking the city with whatever force it could to bring it back under US government control?
Would the US regime listen to warnings and cries from Russia and other countries about 'human rights' considerations?
How would the US regime feel when Russians, Iranians and North Koreans sent troops, ships, and planes close to its borders and threaten military action should the US attempt to regain control of the rebellious US city?
It would be quite interesting what Trump and his cohorts would have to say.
But if unhinged Trump, flaky Nikki, and crazy Bolton care so much about those militants’ lives in Idlib, then they should take them all in as refugees into the US.
After all, they’re just brave little freedom fighters who thirst for democracy, right?
One of the false charges the US regime of George W. Bush leveled against Saddam Hussein was that he conspired with Al Qaeda and shared responsibility for the 9/11 attacks. This was one of the primary excuses given by the US for attacking and invading Iraq.
Fast-forward to today, and the US is threatening to bomb Syria if it dares to attack Al Qaeda and other terror groups in Idlib.
By its own words and actions, the US and its allies are state-sponsors and practitioners of terrorism.
Let's never forget that the US created Al Qaeda.
Any government that supports these militant Islamist hoodlums in Syria has lost its senses. They are ALL on the wrong side of this conflict.
And then they whine and cry when one of their trained darlings goes on a stabbing spree, or rams a car into pedestrians in some European or N. American city.
This type of contradictory and off-the-wall behavior exposes the entire ‘US war on terror’ as a criminal and bloody farce; a sick joke played upon the world.
It is clear that there was never a ‘war on terror’ to begin with, only a war on the independence of resource-rich countries with governments that did not want to follow the orders and whims of the US regime and its corporate cohorts.
When looking at the about-face by the current US regime, and the previous one with their sponsoring of violent militant Islamist groups in Syria and elsewhere, it is not a surprise why many people suspect that 9/11 was an inside job by the US regime to create the ultimate excuse for regime change and perpetual wars against anyone the US establishment does not like.
Hopefully, with the looming Syrian/Russian operation to liberate Idlib from the last vestiges of western-sponsored terror proxies, Erdogan and the Turkish authorities realize that any and all US attempts at preserving and saving the Idlib nutcases is aimed on a later date at using this force against not only Syria, but also against Turkey, and other nearby countries deemed by the US regime not to be ‘compliant’ with its demands
Except for the zionist shitpit in the middle east, the US regime doesn’t play favorites. One can be a US darling on Monday, and a sworn enemy by Friday afternoon, if they dare to disagree with the US regime in any way.
Erdie has now learned this lesson well after the failed US-engineered coup against him in July of 2016, and it is in his, and all of Turkey's best strategic and security interest to clean out Idlib from the US-sponsored nutcases. If Turkey refuses to do so, it will pay a price, as this western-sponsored Islamist virus will only grow and spread. These dangerous people have a history of biting the hand that feeds them.
Turkey must redeem itself for its past collusion with these groups, and be a part of the solution, not the problem. Its main task at this moment should be to aid Russia and Syria in expelling this western-sponsored Islamist fanatics from Idlib, permanently. If Turkey does not do so, it will live to regret it. It is only a matter of when, not if.
US temper tantrums that an attack on Idlib would be a ‘human rights catastrophe’ is nothing but the same old atrocity propaganda whining. We heard this crap before in Aleppo and Douma.
But when the US chased out ISIS from Raqqa earlier this year by massive and indiscriminate aerial bombing, no one in any western capital batted an eyelash. No MSM outfit bothered to say anything critical about the wide-scale destruction of Raqqa and over a 1,000 dead civilians, whose corpses to this day still rot under the rubble. It was all praised and lauded as a gallant ‘fight against terrorism.’
Unlike Russia and Syria, the US didn’t even bother with humanitarian corridors in Raqqa, or with helping to do anything for the people of that city after it leveled it.
And the results speak for themselves. The residents of the cities liberated by the Syrians and Russians were grateful, and started to rebuild their lives. The same cannot be said for those in Idlib, who are being held hostage by tens of thousands of hardcore Islamists.
The US regime knows full-well that the militants in Idlib are bad news. The US regime officials admitted this on camera. No other than Brett McGurk, the US anti-ISIS envoy had some interesting things to say about Idlib. Just go to you tube and search for the video titled ‘Whoops, US anti-ISIS envoy reveals truth about Idlib,’ if it hasn’t been removed yet.
No matter what crocodile tears and cheap, pathetic, and fake genuflecting about 'human rights' flaky Nikki Haley, Trump or any other member of his criminal coterie engage in on camera, the fact is that these people are lying, and they are totally on the wrong side of the issue, and on the wrong side of history.
None of these deranged misfits seem to give a rat’s ass about Palestinians being killed by the zionists on a daily basis, and about the Yemenis massacred by Saudi Wahhabia.
But Idlib will be liberated. It may be through military action or something else, but it will rejoin Syria once again - terrorist-free.
Someone needs to ask Trump, or any of his regime's officials what they would do, if tens of thousands of anti-government militants took over a US city, and announced that they are now free, and no longer subject to US government authority of any kind.
What would Trump and his demented advisors think and do, if, say, Russia, China, Iran, North Korea along with other countries which are not on good terms with the US started secretly funneling weapons, supplies and covert military and intelligence operatives into the renegade US city to help them fight against the encroachment of the US government forces?
Would the US government have any compunctions, or feel any guilt about attacking the city with whatever force it could to bring it back under US government control?
Would the US regime listen to warnings and cries from Russia and other countries about 'human rights' considerations?
How would the US regime feel when Russians, Iranians and North Koreans sent troops, ships, and planes close to its borders and threaten military action should the US attempt to regain control of the rebellious US city?
It would be quite interesting what Trump and his cohorts would have to say.
But if unhinged Trump, flaky Nikki, and crazy Bolton care so much about those militants’ lives in Idlib, then they should take them all in as refugees into the US.
After all, they’re just brave little freedom fighters who thirst for democracy, right?
Sunday, August 19, 2018
Tricks and No Treats
The US has tricked the EU. It got it involved in the maidan regime change, ande forced it to enact sanctions on Russia over Ukraine. But lifting them is tied to the implementation of the Minsk agreement by Russia-which isn’t even a party to the agreement, only a sponsor.
At the same time, the US is encouraging the Kiev regime to not implement it, thereby preventing the anti-Russian sanctions from being lifted, thereby causing the EU undue economic problems. Doesn't the EU realize how they're being played by the US?
The Maidan fake revolt was a failed experiment. The US and EU ruined Ukraine. It is now worse than before euro-maidan. Anyone in Ukraine who thinks that their lives will get 'better' under a pro-western regime and diktat, and that their current bad situation is just a temporary 'growing pain,' is a hopelessly deluded moron.
Whatever the outrageous demands and threats the US imposes on the EU, the EU does nothing worthwhile to protect itself.
The sad truth is that the EU is ran by intestinal worms living in the anus of US Empire.
The US also tricked Iran with the JCPOA agreement in 2015. The agreement obligates Iran to put its nuclear power program under stricter International monitoring and places limits on its operations, in return for the lifting of nuclear-related sanctions.
Then Trump withdrew from the JCPOA even though Iran is in full compliance with it, and is threatening the imposition of sanctions unless Iran agrees to the changes US wants.
But the US was never really serious about observing the agreement itself. Even the Obama regime stalled when it came to lifting sanctions and allowing western compabies to do business with Iran.
The JCPOA appears to have been a trick by the US to cajole Iran into signing an agreement limiting its nuclear activities, then promising to lift sanctions while dragging its feet since day one.
Now the US withdraws from the agreement while threatening sanctions on Iran, again. In the end, Iran loses all benefits of the deal while obligated to comply with its terms. It was meant to be this way from the beginning.
Or could it be that the US from day one saw the JCPOA only as a means to eventually gang up on Iran militarily and drag other nations into it by assuming and hoping that Iran would violate the agreement.
This could explain why the US has been reluctant, even under the Obummer regime, to lift all sanctions and pressure on Iran for abiding by the agreement. Then, after a few years or so, the US got report after report from the IAEA stating that Iran is in full compliance with the JCPOA. The US then got tired of the charade, and just walked away, not having gotten the excuse it wanted to go after Iran, with a gang of European fools behind them. It is why the US stalled on lifting sanctions on Iran; it figured this would not happen because Iran would 'break' the agreement.
The same kind of two-faced trickey is currently being employed by the US against North Korea. But this time it is so blatant that there isn’t even an agreement to trick North Korea into signing; not even the classic feel-good false promises by the US regime; just unilateral verbal demands for North Korea to disarm while giving it nothing back in return-until the US is ‘satisfied’ that North Korea has successfully disarmed.
And then what? The US will either come up with more demands, or simply feel it is safe to annihilate North Korea now that all its nukes and ICBMS have been dismantled and no longer pose a threat to a US invasion force
The US is no longer on top, and it ignores this reality. But when it can no longer ignore it, what does it do? It lashes out, violently, blames other for its own crimes and errors, and creates a bigger mess for itself.
Add to this, some ex-communist E. European states are determined to turn back the clock to the post-war period and confront a Soviet Union which no longer exists, but this time from the other side of the ideological veil. It is the west and its new E. European underlings like Poland, Lithuania, Latvia, Romania that need the Soviet Union back, not modern Russia.
This anti-Russian hysteria has reached levels of stupidity yet unseen. It is all so obviously manufactured and fake that you have to wonder about the sanity of the people who come up with this nonsense and those who believe in it. Even though a lot of them do it because they see Russophobia as a way to get rich and famous quickly, there is a line between ambition and stupidity that these idiots crossed more than a year ago.
It seems like the US establishment isn’t serious about any deals and reconciliation with Russia, NK, or anyone else. In the case of NK, Trump’s meeting was just a ploy to stall North Korean missile development, and nothing more.
Trump’s meeting with Putin, and US regime officials’ meetings with their Russian counterparts seem to only be for the the sole purpose of feeling out the Russians about what they think, what is important to them, and what they are interested in.
Then this information is taken back to the US, analyzed, and used to slap more sanctions and restrictions on Russia in areas that will have the most effect.
Neither Putin or any Russian diplomats or government officials should be meeting with US regime representatives as long as this kind of cynical, two-faced behavior goes on.
The US is not Russia’s partner. The US ruling regimes’ main aim is to weaken Russia by any means necessary and bring it down to a subservient level. The US hates to see Russia achieving any kind of success, especially if that success puts it in front of the US in any way.
The US wants a world where it reigns supreme, and where everyone else is a subordinate. Equaling or superseding the US won’t be tolerated by the US ruling regimes.
It does not matter whether the offending country is an ally or enemy, or even if they have no problem with the US whatsoever. Any country seeking to be better than the US at anything, regardless of the motive, is automatically an enemy.
It makes one wonder who really decides policy in the US, Trump or the un-elected spooks in the intelligence agencies.
Trump seems to be saying and wanting one thing, but ends up doing something opposite. Then complains about the results, and punishes the victims. Either Trump is a coward, or he’s just putting on a PR show by meeting Putin and Kim Jong Un. It is highly doubtful whether anything good will come out of these meetings, and things just seem to get worse between the US, Russia, and North Korea after each meeting.
Every time Trump meets Putin, Kim Jong Un, or some other leader of a state the US establishment doesn’t like, sanctions follow and relations get worse; and that’s regardless of whatever happy talk at the meeting.
There are those who say that Trump must be resisted and even impeached. But their suggestion is to ally with the Democratic Party who is making an effort do dump Trump. However, they are doing so in a very dishonest and fake way by accusing Trump of imaginary, and evidence-free collusion with Russia.
So there simply can be no alliance against Trump with people such as the establishment democrats, whose tactics are just as vile as Trump’s reckless actions and policies surely are. Trading in Trumpian horeshit for Democratic dogshit is not a solution, and never will be.
A lot of time is being wasted on this Russiagate nonsense. By now, Trump has commited so many blunders and international crimes-from wars of aggression, violation of other nations sovereignty, and a plethora of human rights abuses that the Democrats should have a field day going after Trump because of these crimes. The Democrats have a quite impressive smorgasbord of Trumpian fuck ups to use to beat him over the head with. But yet, they seem to ignored these and cling to this Russian interference fantasy like flies to shit.
And why is this so? Because underneath it all, the Democrats actually have no problem with Trump’s pro-corporate war and sanctions-mongering against foreign countries using lies, false flags, and false accusations.
It does no good defending Trump. Because whether from sheer egomaniacal arrogance or plain old cowardice, he is enacting dangerous and stupid policies borne out of a sick US exceptionalist ideology.
He seems to be plagued by the age-old US sense of entitlement to whatever he wants, and is not concerned about how much damage is done, and to whom, to achieve it.
The best the world can hope for, at least the part of the world that wants to pursue its own interests and remain sovereign and independent, is that Trump’s deranged foibles will alienate more and more countries away from the US.
This could open the way to distancing themselves from the US and becoming less dependent on it. In the long run, this would do wonders for the safety and security of the world.
At the same time, the US is encouraging the Kiev regime to not implement it, thereby preventing the anti-Russian sanctions from being lifted, thereby causing the EU undue economic problems. Doesn't the EU realize how they're being played by the US?
The Maidan fake revolt was a failed experiment. The US and EU ruined Ukraine. It is now worse than before euro-maidan. Anyone in Ukraine who thinks that their lives will get 'better' under a pro-western regime and diktat, and that their current bad situation is just a temporary 'growing pain,' is a hopelessly deluded moron.
Whatever the outrageous demands and threats the US imposes on the EU, the EU does nothing worthwhile to protect itself.
The sad truth is that the EU is ran by intestinal worms living in the anus of US Empire.
The US also tricked Iran with the JCPOA agreement in 2015. The agreement obligates Iran to put its nuclear power program under stricter International monitoring and places limits on its operations, in return for the lifting of nuclear-related sanctions.
Then Trump withdrew from the JCPOA even though Iran is in full compliance with it, and is threatening the imposition of sanctions unless Iran agrees to the changes US wants.
But the US was never really serious about observing the agreement itself. Even the Obama regime stalled when it came to lifting sanctions and allowing western compabies to do business with Iran.
The JCPOA appears to have been a trick by the US to cajole Iran into signing an agreement limiting its nuclear activities, then promising to lift sanctions while dragging its feet since day one.
Now the US withdraws from the agreement while threatening sanctions on Iran, again. In the end, Iran loses all benefits of the deal while obligated to comply with its terms. It was meant to be this way from the beginning.
Or could it be that the US from day one saw the JCPOA only as a means to eventually gang up on Iran militarily and drag other nations into it by assuming and hoping that Iran would violate the agreement.
This could explain why the US has been reluctant, even under the Obummer regime, to lift all sanctions and pressure on Iran for abiding by the agreement. Then, after a few years or so, the US got report after report from the IAEA stating that Iran is in full compliance with the JCPOA. The US then got tired of the charade, and just walked away, not having gotten the excuse it wanted to go after Iran, with a gang of European fools behind them. It is why the US stalled on lifting sanctions on Iran; it figured this would not happen because Iran would 'break' the agreement.
The same kind of two-faced trickey is currently being employed by the US against North Korea. But this time it is so blatant that there isn’t even an agreement to trick North Korea into signing; not even the classic feel-good false promises by the US regime; just unilateral verbal demands for North Korea to disarm while giving it nothing back in return-until the US is ‘satisfied’ that North Korea has successfully disarmed.
And then what? The US will either come up with more demands, or simply feel it is safe to annihilate North Korea now that all its nukes and ICBMS have been dismantled and no longer pose a threat to a US invasion force
The US is no longer on top, and it ignores this reality. But when it can no longer ignore it, what does it do? It lashes out, violently, blames other for its own crimes and errors, and creates a bigger mess for itself.
Add to this, some ex-communist E. European states are determined to turn back the clock to the post-war period and confront a Soviet Union which no longer exists, but this time from the other side of the ideological veil. It is the west and its new E. European underlings like Poland, Lithuania, Latvia, Romania that need the Soviet Union back, not modern Russia.
This anti-Russian hysteria has reached levels of stupidity yet unseen. It is all so obviously manufactured and fake that you have to wonder about the sanity of the people who come up with this nonsense and those who believe in it. Even though a lot of them do it because they see Russophobia as a way to get rich and famous quickly, there is a line between ambition and stupidity that these idiots crossed more than a year ago.
It seems like the US establishment isn’t serious about any deals and reconciliation with Russia, NK, or anyone else. In the case of NK, Trump’s meeting was just a ploy to stall North Korean missile development, and nothing more.
Trump’s meeting with Putin, and US regime officials’ meetings with their Russian counterparts seem to only be for the the sole purpose of feeling out the Russians about what they think, what is important to them, and what they are interested in.
Then this information is taken back to the US, analyzed, and used to slap more sanctions and restrictions on Russia in areas that will have the most effect.
Neither Putin or any Russian diplomats or government officials should be meeting with US regime representatives as long as this kind of cynical, two-faced behavior goes on.
The US is not Russia’s partner. The US ruling regimes’ main aim is to weaken Russia by any means necessary and bring it down to a subservient level. The US hates to see Russia achieving any kind of success, especially if that success puts it in front of the US in any way.
The US wants a world where it reigns supreme, and where everyone else is a subordinate. Equaling or superseding the US won’t be tolerated by the US ruling regimes.
It does not matter whether the offending country is an ally or enemy, or even if they have no problem with the US whatsoever. Any country seeking to be better than the US at anything, regardless of the motive, is automatically an enemy.
It makes one wonder who really decides policy in the US, Trump or the un-elected spooks in the intelligence agencies.
Trump seems to be saying and wanting one thing, but ends up doing something opposite. Then complains about the results, and punishes the victims. Either Trump is a coward, or he’s just putting on a PR show by meeting Putin and Kim Jong Un. It is highly doubtful whether anything good will come out of these meetings, and things just seem to get worse between the US, Russia, and North Korea after each meeting.
Every time Trump meets Putin, Kim Jong Un, or some other leader of a state the US establishment doesn’t like, sanctions follow and relations get worse; and that’s regardless of whatever happy talk at the meeting.
There are those who say that Trump must be resisted and even impeached. But their suggestion is to ally with the Democratic Party who is making an effort do dump Trump. However, they are doing so in a very dishonest and fake way by accusing Trump of imaginary, and evidence-free collusion with Russia.
So there simply can be no alliance against Trump with people such as the establishment democrats, whose tactics are just as vile as Trump’s reckless actions and policies surely are. Trading in Trumpian horeshit for Democratic dogshit is not a solution, and never will be.
A lot of time is being wasted on this Russiagate nonsense. By now, Trump has commited so many blunders and international crimes-from wars of aggression, violation of other nations sovereignty, and a plethora of human rights abuses that the Democrats should have a field day going after Trump because of these crimes. The Democrats have a quite impressive smorgasbord of Trumpian fuck ups to use to beat him over the head with. But yet, they seem to ignored these and cling to this Russian interference fantasy like flies to shit.
And why is this so? Because underneath it all, the Democrats actually have no problem with Trump’s pro-corporate war and sanctions-mongering against foreign countries using lies, false flags, and false accusations.
It does no good defending Trump. Because whether from sheer egomaniacal arrogance or plain old cowardice, he is enacting dangerous and stupid policies borne out of a sick US exceptionalist ideology.
He seems to be plagued by the age-old US sense of entitlement to whatever he wants, and is not concerned about how much damage is done, and to whom, to achieve it.
The best the world can hope for, at least the part of the world that wants to pursue its own interests and remain sovereign and independent, is that Trump’s deranged foibles will alienate more and more countries away from the US.
This could open the way to distancing themselves from the US and becoming less dependent on it. In the long run, this would do wonders for the safety and security of the world.
Thursday, July 12, 2018
Deranged Messianism
The criminals who run the organized criminal enterprise known as the ‘State of Israel’ have on numerous occasions accused Iran’s conservative religious government of having ‘messianic’ aspirations which include the destruction of Israel and the subjugation to all people of the region and beyond to their religious Islamic diktat.
But a careful look into the inner philosophy and workings of the Jewish state exposes it as a prime purveyor of messianic, dogmatic, dominionist worldview.
From the ‘chosen people’ myth, to the ‘promised land’ fantasy, the Jewish state is built upon religious delusions which have up until now resulted in violence, repression and wholesale murder of Palestinians and people in surrounding countries.
The Jewish Zionist religious view is that all the land from the Nile to the Euphrates belongs to the Jews.
This is not an anti-semitic view. This is fact.
The Zionist entity has tried to subdue nearby countries, and continues to harass and steal their land up to this day in pursuit of the ‘Greater Israel’ delusion.
It is a religious, holy duty for them to gain control of these lands.
But unlike Islamic fundamentalist sects who seek to Islamize the people under their rule, the Jewish fundamentalists do not seek to Judaize the people they rule over. The fundamentalist Jewish zealots want to keep non-Jews around as servants, for they would not be able to live if they had to do everything for themselves.
And not only is this warped 'Greater Israel' view being peddled by Jewish zealots, but it is also being promoted by end-times fundamentalist Christian cults within the US.
The result has been a mad rampage by the US and the zionist entity throughout the Mideast that continues to this day. Millions of Arabs and other non-Jews have been killed and murdered, and countries destroyed because of Jewish messianic delusions.
The Zionists entity even put the map on their coins.
The Jewish Zionists even conspired with Nazi Germany in the 1930s to create their modern-day monstrosity, and celebrated that collaboration with another coin.
So who is the messianic madman? Iran or Israel?
But a careful look into the inner philosophy and workings of the Jewish state exposes it as a prime purveyor of messianic, dogmatic, dominionist worldview.
From the ‘chosen people’ myth, to the ‘promised land’ fantasy, the Jewish state is built upon religious delusions which have up until now resulted in violence, repression and wholesale murder of Palestinians and people in surrounding countries.
The Jewish Zionist religious view is that all the land from the Nile to the Euphrates belongs to the Jews.
This is not an anti-semitic view. This is fact.
The Zionist entity has tried to subdue nearby countries, and continues to harass and steal their land up to this day in pursuit of the ‘Greater Israel’ delusion.
It is a religious, holy duty for them to gain control of these lands.
But unlike Islamic fundamentalist sects who seek to Islamize the people under their rule, the Jewish fundamentalists do not seek to Judaize the people they rule over. The fundamentalist Jewish zealots want to keep non-Jews around as servants, for they would not be able to live if they had to do everything for themselves.
And not only is this warped 'Greater Israel' view being peddled by Jewish zealots, but it is also being promoted by end-times fundamentalist Christian cults within the US.
The result has been a mad rampage by the US and the zionist entity throughout the Mideast that continues to this day. Millions of Arabs and other non-Jews have been killed and murdered, and countries destroyed because of Jewish messianic delusions.
The Zionists entity even put the map on their coins.
The Jewish Zionists even conspired with Nazi Germany in the 1930s to create their modern-day monstrosity, and celebrated that collaboration with another coin.
So who is the messianic madman? Iran or Israel?
Thursday, June 14, 2018
Pimps and Whores
The stale trans-Atlantic relationship is starting to show frays. It seems like Trump’s ‘America First’ policy is really all about ‘America over all.’
Adversaries and client states are being threatened with sanctions, tariffs and trade wars in an effort by the US regime to deal with economic troubles and record foreign trade deficits
European vassal states of the US are getting increasingly more angered by the US impositions of economic and political diktat, and are starting to talk about going on their own.
But doing so is proving difficult, and the EU has very little options to exercise.
But blaming the US for this development 70+ years in the making is not good enough. Western European countries have put themselves in this box by accepting whatever bribes, inducements, orders and demands that the US has thrown their way for decades.
What did these countries think? That the US gave them all this aid and protection out of the kindness of its black, rotten heart?
Absolutely not.
The US saw a golden opportunity to gain control a Europe weakened by the destruction of war to itself. It made promises left and right, and the desperate, tired Europeans bought it.
Did they think that the US military did all the fighting and killing during WW2 for free?
It started with the Marshall Plan, which was an aid program ran by the US after the war. Officially, it was designed to help Europe rebuild and get back on its feet.
But the real intention of the Marshall Plan aid was to subordinate and co-opt Western Europe.
In reality, Europe didn’t even need the Marshall Plan. It would’ve recovered on its own, and was already on its way when the Marshall Plan was announced.
Time went on, and the longer European countries like the UK, Germany and Italy, among others stayed in this US-created political, economic and military box, the less choices and sovereignty they had. They also became joined at the hip to such a degree that any separation will be painful and cause damage.
NATO was the first and most powerful means of exercising control over Europe. It was designed not simply to protect Western Europe from the ‘communist threat,’ it was designed to keep Europe under US military tutelage. This is something that European members of NATO must realize.
What also must be made clear is the type of relationship the US and Europe have had for the last 73 years.
This relationship can best be compared to that between a pimp and his whores.
Just like a pimp, the US protects its whores in return for their loyalty and payments. But it also feels that it can beat up on them, if they get out of line.
Now that the whores are trying to do their own thing, the US pimp is threatening them with an economic and financial slap-down; and the whores are scared.
But this is what one gets by blindly taking the side of someone for years without asking themselves, what’s the catch?
By kow-towing to the US for the past 73 years, Western European countries have gotten themselves into a bad predicament. Driven by US demands, they have already lost over a hundred billion dollars worth of trade with Russia due to the anti-Russian sanctions the US demanded that the EU pass.
Europe is now losing even more after the US regime withdrew from the JCPOA and reimposed sanctions on Iran. It has threatened Europe with economic punishment, if it doesn’t follow suit.
Now the US regime is forcing Europe to buy energy from the US for two-three times the price, or else.
The US is conducting a mafia-style shakedown of Europe, and this would not be possible if European leaders after the war would’ve been more intelligent and courageous, and kept the US at arm’s length.
Now they are trapped in a box of their own making.
The entire NATO trans-Atlantic paradigm has gotten old and stale. It’s ran by a bunch of opportunistic, lazy officials who use this rickety creation to escape accountability and personal responsibility.
For example, Germany has been doing US bidding for decades in return for US military protection. This freed up a lot of money that Germany used for economic development, making it one of the most successful countries in Europe.
Other European governments have been doing the same. But now, the US is no longer willing to cover their defense tab, and in addition is demanding that Europe pay more tribute for US ‘protection’ than Europe is comfortable with.
However, by forcing the European NATO member-states to cough up more money to cover the aging allianece's tab, the US is creating conditions where the European NATO members will want more say, and will want a place in the top leadership.
How will the US respond when this happens? It will most likely be quite bad. De-fanging a psychotic bully used to having their own way is very dangerous.
This growing rift between Europe and the US is a sign that Europe must end the ‘special relationship’ it has had with the US. Europe must finally go its own way.
Continuing to stay in this abusive, dependent relationship has already cost Europe serious losses, and these losses will only mount the longer it stays under the US boot.
Adversaries and client states are being threatened with sanctions, tariffs and trade wars in an effort by the US regime to deal with economic troubles and record foreign trade deficits
European vassal states of the US are getting increasingly more angered by the US impositions of economic and political diktat, and are starting to talk about going on their own.
But doing so is proving difficult, and the EU has very little options to exercise.
But blaming the US for this development 70+ years in the making is not good enough. Western European countries have put themselves in this box by accepting whatever bribes, inducements, orders and demands that the US has thrown their way for decades.
What did these countries think? That the US gave them all this aid and protection out of the kindness of its black, rotten heart?
Absolutely not.
The US saw a golden opportunity to gain control a Europe weakened by the destruction of war to itself. It made promises left and right, and the desperate, tired Europeans bought it.
Did they think that the US military did all the fighting and killing during WW2 for free?
It started with the Marshall Plan, which was an aid program ran by the US after the war. Officially, it was designed to help Europe rebuild and get back on its feet.
But the real intention of the Marshall Plan aid was to subordinate and co-opt Western Europe.
In reality, Europe didn’t even need the Marshall Plan. It would’ve recovered on its own, and was already on its way when the Marshall Plan was announced.
Time went on, and the longer European countries like the UK, Germany and Italy, among others stayed in this US-created political, economic and military box, the less choices and sovereignty they had. They also became joined at the hip to such a degree that any separation will be painful and cause damage.
NATO was the first and most powerful means of exercising control over Europe. It was designed not simply to protect Western Europe from the ‘communist threat,’ it was designed to keep Europe under US military tutelage. This is something that European members of NATO must realize.
What also must be made clear is the type of relationship the US and Europe have had for the last 73 years.
This relationship can best be compared to that between a pimp and his whores.
Just like a pimp, the US protects its whores in return for their loyalty and payments. But it also feels that it can beat up on them, if they get out of line.
Now that the whores are trying to do their own thing, the US pimp is threatening them with an economic and financial slap-down; and the whores are scared.
But this is what one gets by blindly taking the side of someone for years without asking themselves, what’s the catch?
By kow-towing to the US for the past 73 years, Western European countries have gotten themselves into a bad predicament. Driven by US demands, they have already lost over a hundred billion dollars worth of trade with Russia due to the anti-Russian sanctions the US demanded that the EU pass.
Europe is now losing even more after the US regime withdrew from the JCPOA and reimposed sanctions on Iran. It has threatened Europe with economic punishment, if it doesn’t follow suit.
Now the US regime is forcing Europe to buy energy from the US for two-three times the price, or else.
The US is conducting a mafia-style shakedown of Europe, and this would not be possible if European leaders after the war would’ve been more intelligent and courageous, and kept the US at arm’s length.
Now they are trapped in a box of their own making.
The entire NATO trans-Atlantic paradigm has gotten old and stale. It’s ran by a bunch of opportunistic, lazy officials who use this rickety creation to escape accountability and personal responsibility.
For example, Germany has been doing US bidding for decades in return for US military protection. This freed up a lot of money that Germany used for economic development, making it one of the most successful countries in Europe.
Other European governments have been doing the same. But now, the US is no longer willing to cover their defense tab, and in addition is demanding that Europe pay more tribute for US ‘protection’ than Europe is comfortable with.
However, by forcing the European NATO member-states to cough up more money to cover the aging allianece's tab, the US is creating conditions where the European NATO members will want more say, and will want a place in the top leadership.
How will the US respond when this happens? It will most likely be quite bad. De-fanging a psychotic bully used to having their own way is very dangerous.
This growing rift between Europe and the US is a sign that Europe must end the ‘special relationship’ it has had with the US. Europe must finally go its own way.
Continuing to stay in this abusive, dependent relationship has already cost Europe serious losses, and these losses will only mount the longer it stays under the US boot.
Saturday, June 2, 2018
US Diplomatic Pretense
The US regime has been acting in blatantly illegal, dishonest, and undiplomatic ways because the US is losing. The US is no longer getting its way, and cannot do what it wants in the world anymore. So it kicks law, international obligations, and diplomatic civility to the curb in a desperate bid to hold on to its waning power.
All propaganda and rhetoric aside, the US establishment knows that it is in a weakened state. It knows that it cannot afford anymore major, protracted military operations. The US establishment will claim the opposite, but this is just turd-shining and self-aggrandizement to assuage their dumbed-down citizenry and cowardly vassals whose tired, shaky hands are forever outstretched for a few crumbs off of Uncle Scam’s table.
That’s why the US establishment has turned to other means of warfare, mainly sanctions, embargoes, and more recently, withdrawing from international agreements, such as the JCPOA. These are the acts of a loser, not a winner.
It has employed proxies and other dupes to do its dirty work, and has even started provoking unrest and tension between countries for its own interests, like between Iran and Saudi Wahhabia.
If the US establishment cannot get its way, it will try to keep others from getting theirs, even if there is no gain in it at all for the US regime from this grade-school strategy. Unable to stay on top, the US will try to keep everyone else at the bottom as well, whether they be a client state or foe.
The only difference is in the strategy employed. Client states get tariffs and ‘fines,’ while enemies get sanctions and bombs.
That’s why Trump will fail in his endeavor to “Make American Great Again.’ He will fail, because the entire idea is based on faulty and failed ideas and reckless actions. Trump won’t make the lives of the average American materially better. Only the wealthy will benefit.
Trump had a choice: warmongering or economic revival. He chose the former, so whatever he does is not going to work. He will finish his next two years surrounded by messes, old and new ones.
Trump, along with the US establishment, are not serious about any détente and agreement with North Korea. The US up to now has not offered anything substantial to NK in return for denuclearization, and has been doing everything to provoke NK so Trump can have an excuse, even a lame one, not to meet with Kim Jong Un.
The US establishment doesn’t want peace on the Korean peninsula. Too many of the US establishment’s members made their careers and fortunes off of having North Korea as a boogeyman, and they want to keep it that way. So it’s either the status quo or regime change for them.
But the problem is, that Kim Jong Un just won’t play along anymore. Kim seems to be becoming too hard for the US establishment to provoke these days, and he keeps on upsetting the US regime’s attempts to nix the talks by frequent peaceful overtures.
As stated in a previous post, the reason for Kim Jong Un’s political cooling off is not that the US and Trump have scared NK and Kim, or weakened NK with sanctions. If that were true, NK would have already been subdued long ago.
China and Russia may have come to some agreement with NK for economic and/or strategic partnership, should NK get rid of its nukes and sanctions are lifted. The deal is too good for Kim to pass up, so he has relaxed his hand and rhetoric knowing that the reward will be worth it.
There is also a cunning psychological-strategic dimension at work here, which the US most likely is finding hard to grapple with, and one which it can’t do much about in the long-term.
This has to do with indirect, secondary results of NK denuclearization and a peace treaty with NK.
Let’s say that NK agrees to fully and immediately give up its nuclear weapons, agrees to a robust monitoring mechanism, signs a permanent peace treaty with US/SK, and in return doesn’t even demand the withdrawal of US troops and missile systems from SK.
On the outside, this may seem like a foolish give-away by NK. However, in the long-term, this will actually diminish US military necessity and weapons sales to its client states in SK and Japan.
For if NK gets rid of its nukes and signs a peace treaty, sanctions will have to be lifted on NK. Tension and the threat of war will subside. The public in regional US client states will then realize that all these US troops, military exercises, and weapons are no longer necessary. The governments in those client states will also come to the same conclusion, and continuing to treat NK as an imminent military threat, and as an excuse to arm, will become quite awkward and unnecessary.
These countries will then decrease their participation in military exercises, and spending on US weapons systems. This won’t bode well for the US military-industrial complex and the psychopaths within the US establishment whose careers, positions, and paychecks depend on having NK as an overhyped on-going existential threat.
So for this reason, Trump and the US establishment nutcases that control him won’t allow for an agreement.
Sure, the US establishment may get China to take NK’s spot as the prime regional boogeyman so the US can have an excuse to keep its troops there, and its client states subdued and buying weapons, but people would see through the charade. The US would not look good in this case.
But even if the US moved on to China as a boogeyman, it would still to some degree lead to a diminished interest in further militarization by US client states. Antagonizing China, and treating it like NK, would not be worth it for them, or even for the US.
So this is why the only options for the US are to keep things as they are, or pursue regime change in Pyongyang.
The latter is a no-go.
Although, regime change would allow the US to declare a victory, call the shots in the former NK, and still have an excuse to harass China, without any agreement to gum up the works. Trump would look good, and the neo-cons would go into orgasms.
But the US will most likely either create an excuse to nix the talks, blame NK for it, and keep things the way they are, or play along with NK, sign a treaty, wait for NK to disarm, and then attack it; just like the US did with Iraq and Libya.
You don't have to be a political scientist or some expert strategist to see that the US has suspect motives. That's why NK cannot trust the US with any agreement that ends up being signed.
But there is an easy litmus test to gauge true US intentions toward NK, and it involves Russia and China.
What NK should do is announce its intent for a total and immediate de-nuclearization and a permanent peace treaty, in return for security guarantees backed up by Russian and Chinese military force, by treaty.
Then we shall see what the US aims really are by its reaction.
If the US reacts calmly, and accepts it as long as NK gets rid of its nukes, then the US is serious about peace on the Korean peninsula.
But if the US throws a hissy fit, refuses to meet Kim, and starts threatening NK, Russia and China with sanctions and other nonsense, then we will know for sure that the US aim is illegal regime change regardless of what happens.
What would be a good idea for NK to do is to tell the US that in return for full and immediate denuclearization and permanent peace treaty, the US must either withdraw all its troops and THAAD systems from SK, or accept irreversible Russian and Chinese military protection for NK as guarantee of NK’s security. This would nullify any and all future US attempts at regime change, and attempts to wiggle out of an agreement by falsely accusing NK of not complying with it (as the US has done with Syria and Iran).
If the US has no ulterior motives, and is truly interested in peace on the Korean peninsula, then accepting either choice should not be a problem.
But it is doubtful whether the US will accept anything that hinders its continued military presence and occupation of SK and Japan, weapons sales, or opportunity for future regime change in NK.
That’s why an agreement that will be honored by the US is highly unlikely, and any ‘security guarantees’ given by the US to NK that are not backed up by anything other than words and paper are worthless. The US never sings treaties that it can’t go around, or wiggle out of.
If Kim Jong Un agrees to such empty paper promises, then he deserves to be overthrown.
All propaganda and rhetoric aside, the US establishment knows that it is in a weakened state. It knows that it cannot afford anymore major, protracted military operations. The US establishment will claim the opposite, but this is just turd-shining and self-aggrandizement to assuage their dumbed-down citizenry and cowardly vassals whose tired, shaky hands are forever outstretched for a few crumbs off of Uncle Scam’s table.
That’s why the US establishment has turned to other means of warfare, mainly sanctions, embargoes, and more recently, withdrawing from international agreements, such as the JCPOA. These are the acts of a loser, not a winner.
It has employed proxies and other dupes to do its dirty work, and has even started provoking unrest and tension between countries for its own interests, like between Iran and Saudi Wahhabia.
If the US establishment cannot get its way, it will try to keep others from getting theirs, even if there is no gain in it at all for the US regime from this grade-school strategy. Unable to stay on top, the US will try to keep everyone else at the bottom as well, whether they be a client state or foe.
The only difference is in the strategy employed. Client states get tariffs and ‘fines,’ while enemies get sanctions and bombs.
That’s why Trump will fail in his endeavor to “Make American Great Again.’ He will fail, because the entire idea is based on faulty and failed ideas and reckless actions. Trump won’t make the lives of the average American materially better. Only the wealthy will benefit.
Trump had a choice: warmongering or economic revival. He chose the former, so whatever he does is not going to work. He will finish his next two years surrounded by messes, old and new ones.
Trump, along with the US establishment, are not serious about any détente and agreement with North Korea. The US up to now has not offered anything substantial to NK in return for denuclearization, and has been doing everything to provoke NK so Trump can have an excuse, even a lame one, not to meet with Kim Jong Un.
The US establishment doesn’t want peace on the Korean peninsula. Too many of the US establishment’s members made their careers and fortunes off of having North Korea as a boogeyman, and they want to keep it that way. So it’s either the status quo or regime change for them.
But the problem is, that Kim Jong Un just won’t play along anymore. Kim seems to be becoming too hard for the US establishment to provoke these days, and he keeps on upsetting the US regime’s attempts to nix the talks by frequent peaceful overtures.
As stated in a previous post, the reason for Kim Jong Un’s political cooling off is not that the US and Trump have scared NK and Kim, or weakened NK with sanctions. If that were true, NK would have already been subdued long ago.
China and Russia may have come to some agreement with NK for economic and/or strategic partnership, should NK get rid of its nukes and sanctions are lifted. The deal is too good for Kim to pass up, so he has relaxed his hand and rhetoric knowing that the reward will be worth it.
There is also a cunning psychological-strategic dimension at work here, which the US most likely is finding hard to grapple with, and one which it can’t do much about in the long-term.
This has to do with indirect, secondary results of NK denuclearization and a peace treaty with NK.
Let’s say that NK agrees to fully and immediately give up its nuclear weapons, agrees to a robust monitoring mechanism, signs a permanent peace treaty with US/SK, and in return doesn’t even demand the withdrawal of US troops and missile systems from SK.
On the outside, this may seem like a foolish give-away by NK. However, in the long-term, this will actually diminish US military necessity and weapons sales to its client states in SK and Japan.
For if NK gets rid of its nukes and signs a peace treaty, sanctions will have to be lifted on NK. Tension and the threat of war will subside. The public in regional US client states will then realize that all these US troops, military exercises, and weapons are no longer necessary. The governments in those client states will also come to the same conclusion, and continuing to treat NK as an imminent military threat, and as an excuse to arm, will become quite awkward and unnecessary.
These countries will then decrease their participation in military exercises, and spending on US weapons systems. This won’t bode well for the US military-industrial complex and the psychopaths within the US establishment whose careers, positions, and paychecks depend on having NK as an overhyped on-going existential threat.
So for this reason, Trump and the US establishment nutcases that control him won’t allow for an agreement.
Sure, the US establishment may get China to take NK’s spot as the prime regional boogeyman so the US can have an excuse to keep its troops there, and its client states subdued and buying weapons, but people would see through the charade. The US would not look good in this case.
But even if the US moved on to China as a boogeyman, it would still to some degree lead to a diminished interest in further militarization by US client states. Antagonizing China, and treating it like NK, would not be worth it for them, or even for the US.
So this is why the only options for the US are to keep things as they are, or pursue regime change in Pyongyang.
The latter is a no-go.
Although, regime change would allow the US to declare a victory, call the shots in the former NK, and still have an excuse to harass China, without any agreement to gum up the works. Trump would look good, and the neo-cons would go into orgasms.
But the US will most likely either create an excuse to nix the talks, blame NK for it, and keep things the way they are, or play along with NK, sign a treaty, wait for NK to disarm, and then attack it; just like the US did with Iraq and Libya.
You don't have to be a political scientist or some expert strategist to see that the US has suspect motives. That's why NK cannot trust the US with any agreement that ends up being signed.
But there is an easy litmus test to gauge true US intentions toward NK, and it involves Russia and China.
What NK should do is announce its intent for a total and immediate de-nuclearization and a permanent peace treaty, in return for security guarantees backed up by Russian and Chinese military force, by treaty.
Then we shall see what the US aims really are by its reaction.
If the US reacts calmly, and accepts it as long as NK gets rid of its nukes, then the US is serious about peace on the Korean peninsula.
But if the US throws a hissy fit, refuses to meet Kim, and starts threatening NK, Russia and China with sanctions and other nonsense, then we will know for sure that the US aim is illegal regime change regardless of what happens.
What would be a good idea for NK to do is to tell the US that in return for full and immediate denuclearization and permanent peace treaty, the US must either withdraw all its troops and THAAD systems from SK, or accept irreversible Russian and Chinese military protection for NK as guarantee of NK’s security. This would nullify any and all future US attempts at regime change, and attempts to wiggle out of an agreement by falsely accusing NK of not complying with it (as the US has done with Syria and Iran).
If the US has no ulterior motives, and is truly interested in peace on the Korean peninsula, then accepting either choice should not be a problem.
But it is doubtful whether the US will accept anything that hinders its continued military presence and occupation of SK and Japan, weapons sales, or opportunity for future regime change in NK.
That’s why an agreement that will be honored by the US is highly unlikely, and any ‘security guarantees’ given by the US to NK that are not backed up by anything other than words and paper are worthless. The US never sings treaties that it can’t go around, or wiggle out of.
If Kim Jong Un agrees to such empty paper promises, then he deserves to be overthrown.
Sunday, May 20, 2018
An Early Eulogy
The word on the street, and on the internet, is that Senator John ‘Insane’ McCain is very near death due to his cancerous brain.
Neo-con filth from every corner of the US is eulogizing him to the skies about his great service for the US, even before he’s gone. But they’re also wearing out their keyboards trying to silence everyone who dares to say anything negative and critical about Insane McCain, to the point of communicating a nationwide, blanket threat to all detractors.
John McCain was a pilot during the Vietnam War. He was shot down over N. Vietnam and spent 7 years in a Vietnamese prison. During that time, he gave up a lot of information to his Vietnamese captors. For this, he was nicknamed the ‘Songbird.’
After that, he ran for the US senate and spent many terms there.
Judging by his abnormal behavior while in office, it is abundantly clear that McCain suffered some type of brain and/or psychological damage in Vietnam (of his own fault since he willingly served in the military) that went untreated. This resulted in aberrant and off-the-wall behavior. From being a part of the ‘Keating Five’ S&L scandal, to supporting jihadists and Ukrainian fascists, to passing on fake, slanderous information, this man is a walking garbage can of dirty Washington politics and international war-mongering. He is the poster-boy for all that is wrong with the US establishment.
McCain was a staunch hawk on Capitol Hill. He never met a war and armed intervention he didn’t like. The war party and the military-industrial complex could always count on him to deliver the votes and propaganda for any and all aggression that the establishment wanted, anywhere in the world.
McCain’s public demeanor reminds one of a demented, unapologetic, remorseless serial killer who calmly and nonchalantly explains and justifies his acts of murder as if they were somehow right and just.
McCain, through his support, votes, and advocacy for US interventions worldwide, is responsible for the death and oppression of hundreds of millions of people throughout his sorry life.
John McCain is a disgusting ghoul, and his impending death cannot be used to make him look like any kind of a hero or saint. He is neither. Even after he’s dead and buried, his corpse must be continuously exposed to daylight for all the war crimes and acts of murder he has helped commit while alive. Such a monster can never, ever be let off the hook.
Thursday, May 10, 2018
A Trump Presidency Post-Mortem
Now that Trump is politically dead, it is a good time to consolidate the sum of all his actions from January of 2017 to now.
When it comes to things being too good to be true, Trump certainly fits the bill.
The Trump we saw and heard two years ago is gone. No more 'getting along with other nations', with Russia, or North Korea. No more anti-war talk from Trump the candidate.
In reality, Trump's act of caring about working people and wanting to get along with other nations never really seemed genuine. It sounded nice, but under the surface it just didn't look right coming from him.
With the exception of his family and the zionut state, Trump simply doesn’t care about anyone, friend or foe. He doesn’t take anyone’s concerns seriously, and ignores the facts. His foes get sanctions and live bombings, while his vassals are bombarded with political and economic threats.
I doubt Trump is serious about making a deal with NK. If he was, he wouldn’t withdraw from the JCPOA. Maybe by doing so, Trump is trying to show NK not to expect anything, or maybe even to provoke NK into nixing any and all talks, thereby giving the US war mongers an excuse to enact more sanctions, and relieve them of having to worry about any kind of peace that may mean decreased US military involvement-and spending-on the Korean peninsula.
The US establishment has gone as far as daring to complain and whine that any peace agreement would lead to the lifting of sanctions on NK, and prevent the US from conducting military strikes on NK in the future,-as if these were bad things. You really have to wonder about the mental state of people who employ such deranged, Caligulan reasoning.
What is it that these sick US creatures want? For North Korea to unconditionally surrender, and be bombed? And maybe at the same time, too.
Seems far-fetched?
Let’s not forget that these are the same people who just withdrew from the JCPOA, will re-impose sanctions on Iran (even though Iran has complied with the terms of the agreement), while demanding that Iran keep to the agreement , or else.
We even have the congress critter Robert Menendez complain that by withdrawing from the JCPOA Trump is ‘endangering Israel,’ even though everyone knows that the zionist entity has been against this deal and wanted it killed even before it was signed three years ago! What planet are these congressional retards from?
So now their reasoning will go something like this: Ignoring the fact that Iran has complied with the deal, Trump withdrew from it. Congress will argue that by doing so, Trump has endangered the Zionist entity, and that now the US must take action against Iran to protect the Zionist entity, regardless of whether Iran leaves the agreement or not.
They will turn the Iranian victim into the criminal, and the US and Zionist criminals into victims.
The scenario which I mentioned in a past essay after the JCPOA was signed, was that the US will try to get itself off the hook of complying with the agreement and will reinstate sanctions, while forcing Iran to comply with the agreement. In the end, Iran does all the giving while US ends up having not to give anything. This scenario is coming to pass.
There is no knowing what the world can expect from these mentally sick people within the US government.
Trump is a shallow strategist who has surrounded himself with mentally unstable neo-cons and failed military men whose worldview is twisted and wrong, and who are responsible for past US military and strategic failures.
These people won’t help Trump. They will march him into another failed debacle that will make America hated again. Even his vassals will end up distancing themselves from him.
If Trump continues with his present irresponsible and regressive policies and actions, he will be disgraced just like Bush was, if not worse. And when that day comes, all the neo-cons he surrounded himself with that gave him terrible advice, will scurry away into the safety of dark and fetid corners of their neo-con think tanks and newspapers, and leave the Dotard alone to pick up the pieces. Society will turn on him, including many of his supporters.
His enemies on the Democratic Party side will have a field day bashing him every minute of every day for his failures. All the establishment creatures who hated him from day one, and brow-beat him into submission, will say to everyone ‘We told you so!’
He may even end up impeached.
His rotten, subhuman Zionist pals like PM Bibi and Sheldon Adelson won’t save him. They will just move on to their next faithful Shabbos goy president who will continue doing their bidding.
Whatever Trump does or doesn’t do, he will fail. An array of forces has lined up against the US in the military and economic domains that the US cannot defeat.
What we are seeing is desperation by the US establishment to shore up its dwindling power and authority. But their acts will only speed up their loss of power.
As I have stated in a past essay, the US is losing its power and influence, and Trump will choose how much, and how fast of that power and influence will be lost-slowly by pursuing peaceful policies and retaining something, or quickly by warmongering and losing it all.
And Trump better not try to excuse any of his failures away later on by blaming someone else, or that he was pressured. Pleading cowardice cannot, and will not save him.
When it comes to things being too good to be true, Trump certainly fits the bill.
The Trump we saw and heard two years ago is gone. No more 'getting along with other nations', with Russia, or North Korea. No more anti-war talk from Trump the candidate.
In reality, Trump's act of caring about working people and wanting to get along with other nations never really seemed genuine. It sounded nice, but under the surface it just didn't look right coming from him.
With the exception of his family and the zionut state, Trump simply doesn’t care about anyone, friend or foe. He doesn’t take anyone’s concerns seriously, and ignores the facts. His foes get sanctions and live bombings, while his vassals are bombarded with political and economic threats.
I doubt Trump is serious about making a deal with NK. If he was, he wouldn’t withdraw from the JCPOA. Maybe by doing so, Trump is trying to show NK not to expect anything, or maybe even to provoke NK into nixing any and all talks, thereby giving the US war mongers an excuse to enact more sanctions, and relieve them of having to worry about any kind of peace that may mean decreased US military involvement-and spending-on the Korean peninsula.
The US establishment has gone as far as daring to complain and whine that any peace agreement would lead to the lifting of sanctions on NK, and prevent the US from conducting military strikes on NK in the future,-as if these were bad things. You really have to wonder about the mental state of people who employ such deranged, Caligulan reasoning.
What is it that these sick US creatures want? For North Korea to unconditionally surrender, and be bombed? And maybe at the same time, too.
Seems far-fetched?
Let’s not forget that these are the same people who just withdrew from the JCPOA, will re-impose sanctions on Iran (even though Iran has complied with the terms of the agreement), while demanding that Iran keep to the agreement , or else.
We even have the congress critter Robert Menendez complain that by withdrawing from the JCPOA Trump is ‘endangering Israel,’ even though everyone knows that the zionist entity has been against this deal and wanted it killed even before it was signed three years ago! What planet are these congressional retards from?
So now their reasoning will go something like this: Ignoring the fact that Iran has complied with the deal, Trump withdrew from it. Congress will argue that by doing so, Trump has endangered the Zionist entity, and that now the US must take action against Iran to protect the Zionist entity, regardless of whether Iran leaves the agreement or not.
They will turn the Iranian victim into the criminal, and the US and Zionist criminals into victims.
The scenario which I mentioned in a past essay after the JCPOA was signed, was that the US will try to get itself off the hook of complying with the agreement and will reinstate sanctions, while forcing Iran to comply with the agreement. In the end, Iran does all the giving while US ends up having not to give anything. This scenario is coming to pass.
There is no knowing what the world can expect from these mentally sick people within the US government.
Trump is a shallow strategist who has surrounded himself with mentally unstable neo-cons and failed military men whose worldview is twisted and wrong, and who are responsible for past US military and strategic failures.
These people won’t help Trump. They will march him into another failed debacle that will make America hated again. Even his vassals will end up distancing themselves from him.
If Trump continues with his present irresponsible and regressive policies and actions, he will be disgraced just like Bush was, if not worse. And when that day comes, all the neo-cons he surrounded himself with that gave him terrible advice, will scurry away into the safety of dark and fetid corners of their neo-con think tanks and newspapers, and leave the Dotard alone to pick up the pieces. Society will turn on him, including many of his supporters.
His enemies on the Democratic Party side will have a field day bashing him every minute of every day for his failures. All the establishment creatures who hated him from day one, and brow-beat him into submission, will say to everyone ‘We told you so!’
He may even end up impeached.
His rotten, subhuman Zionist pals like PM Bibi and Sheldon Adelson won’t save him. They will just move on to their next faithful Shabbos goy president who will continue doing their bidding.
Whatever Trump does or doesn’t do, he will fail. An array of forces has lined up against the US in the military and economic domains that the US cannot defeat.
What we are seeing is desperation by the US establishment to shore up its dwindling power and authority. But their acts will only speed up their loss of power.
As I have stated in a past essay, the US is losing its power and influence, and Trump will choose how much, and how fast of that power and influence will be lost-slowly by pursuing peaceful policies and retaining something, or quickly by warmongering and losing it all.
And Trump better not try to excuse any of his failures away later on by blaming someone else, or that he was pressured. Pleading cowardice cannot, and will not save him.
Wednesday, May 2, 2018
Trump The Dealbreaker
Because of the malign influence of the US, more and more countries are having trouble thinking for themselves and making independent, rational decisions.
Those who welcomed the illegal airstrikes on Syria based on hear-say and unverified evidence-or no evidence at all-are US vassals and client states who have blood on their hands, so they have to toe the Washington line, or else. Many wrongs don't make a right, no matter how many fools support it.
The US will push the envelope, if they see no strong reaction. So Russia must do something other than condemn and talk facts, as these criminal western morons are immune to it.
Trump, May, Macron. These three stooges of the west are facing failures and debacles at home. They needed a distraction to shore up their dwindling political fortunes. So the Skripal and Syria poison gas attack canards were manufactured to do just that.
But those efforts won't succeed. Policies based on lies cannot succeed because they contradict reality and facts, and as much as the deluded US regime thinks it can change reality, it can’t; hence why all their regime change efforts have brought nothing but misery, and growth of the very terrorism the US says it is fighting. And for this reason, the US remains the world’s main purveyor of terrorism, whether it likes it or not.
The US attack on Syria was a desperate face-saving measure done after the US already lost its regime change war there. Its Trump’s 15 minutes of fame which will recede as next week comes and all his private foibles come to light.
Trump no longer deserves any sympathy from anyone. Let the deep state have his way with him. He is a used-up whore at this point, and is toxic to the touch. He became a war criminal last year after he ordered a missile strike on Syria after another staged chemical gas attack launched by rebels and blamed on the Syrian forces.
Trump has betrayed his supporters, and many will turn his back on him. His only ‘allies’ at the moment are the neo-cons and Bush-era failures with whom he has foolishy surrounded himself with.
Trump announced ‘Mission accomplished’ in Syria, reminiscent of Bush’s rhetoric in 2003. But what happened after Bush made that statement? He lost, big time. His whole regime change fantasy became a nightmare.
There was no long-term value to Trump’s latest temper tantrum. The US regime has no proxies on the ground to do its dirty work, and antagonizing the Russians by pushing anymore fake atrocity propaganda will not end well for The Dotard.
Trump has squandered a golden opportunity to truly improve the state of the world. He allowed himself to be co-opted by the deep state by being a coward and not standing up for himself and his allies after the deep state falsely accused him of being a Russian plant.
Then he sought poisonous advice from Zionist and neo-con animals and started taking the easy but wrong way forward, hoping that this will make his problems go away. But it won’t.
Trump is now alone, surrounded by demented neo-cons, and by stale old compliant European client state pawns who’ve stuck to the US like flies to shit, no matter how harmful it is to them.
What a poor company he keeps!
Maybe the reason why the US and zionistan constantly bring up Hitler in movies, documentaries and books, even though he’s been dead for almost 80 years, is that they’re diverting attention from their own crimes. The US pushes the line that it defeated Hitler, without mentioning Russia’s much greater commitment to that effort, and also omitting the fact that the US elites sympathized with, and worked with Nazi Germany up until, and after hostilities between the US and Germany began.
So there is a lot to cover up; not atone for, though. The US never atones or apologizes for the evil it does. It just excuses it away, dresses it up in a false mantle of benevolence and ‘concern for humanity,’ or blames other for it.
US, NATO, and the western-controlled financial institutions comprise the world's premier and most powerful terror network. Al Qaeda, ISIS, Al Nusra et al are just dusty little subsidiaries and contract fighters.
In order for the US to get its regime change in Syria, it would have to go to war with Syria, Iran, and Russia all at the same time, and win; and I'm not talking about the US engaging in pot-shots at the periphery, dirty tricks, false flags, staged gas attacks, and the CIA playing footsy with terror groups. That's just a waste of time. It would have to be an all-out physical war and open attack. Obviously that is not going to happen, so the US has lost.
The Skripal and Syria frauds are starting to show holes. The emotional reactions caused by the frauds are winding down, and there are still enough intelligent people in the world to ask uncomfortable questions. As expected, holes are starting to show in the whole gas attack. People who were there have come forward stating that there was no gas attack and that the whole thing was an act, with them being unwittingly caught up in the fraud.
And while this is welcome, it is also dangerous.
The pattern so far has been that whenever the US gets caught in a lie, it does something worse to cover it up.
The scary thing is what will the US stoop to in Syria now that their gassing myth is being exposed as a fraud and the air strikes were a failure? Will the US continue to fire missiles at Syria that will get shot down? If this keeps on happening, the US, out of frustration, may target Russian bases in Syria. They’ll say it was an ‘accident’ and ‘unintentional’ in order to get themselves off the hook and keep the Russians from retaliating. But if Russia retaliates, the US will accuse Russia of an act of aggression for an ‘honest mistake.’
This is the kind of psychopathic behavior we can expect from the US.
US TARIFF WAR
The EU is considering enacting tariffs on Chinese-made imports in cooperation with the US in order to be exempt from US tariffs.
This is a bad idea with will backfire on the EU.
The US will end up taking the EU for a very rough ride. Also, why is the EU willing to ruin relations with an emerging world power for the sake of a fading one? Doesn't the EU see that all these sanctions, embargoes, and tariffs against China, Russia, Iran and others are aimed at weakening the EU along with everyone else for the sake of the US? And why isn't the EU threatening its own tariffs on US made stuff? It would make more sense for the EU to join forces with China against the US.
EU will definitely suffer, if it goes after China, which will undoubtedly slap EU imports with tariffs as well.
The sum of all these US-made problems, from Skripal, Syria, tariffs, will be a weakened US, and an angry and alienated world. The US will achieve zero in doing all this, and as always will blame others when things go south.
The fact is that the US industrial base has been gutted and it isn’t coming back, no matter what Trump does. He is just there temporarily.
Neither will US corporations disengage from China. The US would have to change drastically in order for a real ‘America First’ policy to be realized. The US would have to produce its own things, impose tariffs on imports, and pay people better so they will be able to afford US-made products.
This won’t happen, as greed has rotted out the US from top to bottom.
All that this is about is that China represents a multilateral economic model which is opposed to the US unilateral one. China is making alliances and arrangements all over the world and benefitting from them. It is using its profits to modernize and advance. It is also starting to dump the dollar and buy/sell oil in Yuan, not dollars. It is doing this with Russia, Iran and others.
This is why the US is upset with all three. They are undermining US military and economic supremacy, not ‘security.’
IRAN
When the US wants to break its treaty commitments, or nullify them for whatever reason, it does so by falsely accusing the other side of breaking it. This is usually accompanied by some form of a false flag or disinformation campaign that is meant to demonize the other party, and scare/shock everyone else into nullifying it as well.
This was visible in Syria with multiple unproven accusations of chemical weapons use by Syrian forces, even though Syria gave up its chemical and biological weapons in 2013.
The US is currently trying to come up with an excuse to walk away from the JCPOA by falsely accusing Iran of secretly trying to build nuclear weapons. The US also used Iran's missile program as an excuse to walk away from the ABM treaty in 2002 and build a missile shield aimed at Russia, even though Iran's missiles pose no threat to Europe.
After the US signed the JCPOA, the missile defense project lost its justification, but very quickly North Korean missiles were named as an excuse for its existence.
The US has built up many layers of lies and false justifications, and it is absurd that it hasn't yet been seriously called out for it.
The US has played these games before with Iraq between 1991-2003. Whenever they demanded something of Iraq, and Iraq relented, the US moved on to demand something more. The US was always moving the goalposts further and further away with each Iraqi concession. It will be the same with Iran if Russia, China and the EU cave in to the US pressure and make changes to the JCPOA. The US will demand that Iran scrap its missile program. If Iran does this, then the US will demand something else, and on and on. Everything that Iran does to comply will never be enough for the US. This will eventually lead to the Iraq and Libya scenarios: disarm and destroy.
US and zionistan have no case against Iran, just a bunch of hype and false accusations. Iran has stuck to the JCPOA faithfully, and this-more than any looney slideshows by nitwityahoo-will decide the agreement's future.
As for Trump's whining that this deal is 'terrible,' why is it terrible? Has he given any solid, valid reasons why the deal is bad for the US?
Just because the US didn't get everything it wanted from it and couldn't saddle Iran with ALL the giving, doesn't mean its a bad deal. No one got everything they wanted from it. It was a compromise. Doesn't Trump realize that in a normal world you don't always get what you want?
Trump is acting like a baby, and needs a diaper change.
Those who welcomed the illegal airstrikes on Syria based on hear-say and unverified evidence-or no evidence at all-are US vassals and client states who have blood on their hands, so they have to toe the Washington line, or else. Many wrongs don't make a right, no matter how many fools support it.
The US will push the envelope, if they see no strong reaction. So Russia must do something other than condemn and talk facts, as these criminal western morons are immune to it.
Trump, May, Macron. These three stooges of the west are facing failures and debacles at home. They needed a distraction to shore up their dwindling political fortunes. So the Skripal and Syria poison gas attack canards were manufactured to do just that.
But those efforts won't succeed. Policies based on lies cannot succeed because they contradict reality and facts, and as much as the deluded US regime thinks it can change reality, it can’t; hence why all their regime change efforts have brought nothing but misery, and growth of the very terrorism the US says it is fighting. And for this reason, the US remains the world’s main purveyor of terrorism, whether it likes it or not.
The US attack on Syria was a desperate face-saving measure done after the US already lost its regime change war there. Its Trump’s 15 minutes of fame which will recede as next week comes and all his private foibles come to light.
Trump no longer deserves any sympathy from anyone. Let the deep state have his way with him. He is a used-up whore at this point, and is toxic to the touch. He became a war criminal last year after he ordered a missile strike on Syria after another staged chemical gas attack launched by rebels and blamed on the Syrian forces.
Trump has betrayed his supporters, and many will turn his back on him. His only ‘allies’ at the moment are the neo-cons and Bush-era failures with whom he has foolishy surrounded himself with.
Trump announced ‘Mission accomplished’ in Syria, reminiscent of Bush’s rhetoric in 2003. But what happened after Bush made that statement? He lost, big time. His whole regime change fantasy became a nightmare.
There was no long-term value to Trump’s latest temper tantrum. The US regime has no proxies on the ground to do its dirty work, and antagonizing the Russians by pushing anymore fake atrocity propaganda will not end well for The Dotard.
Trump has squandered a golden opportunity to truly improve the state of the world. He allowed himself to be co-opted by the deep state by being a coward and not standing up for himself and his allies after the deep state falsely accused him of being a Russian plant.
Then he sought poisonous advice from Zionist and neo-con animals and started taking the easy but wrong way forward, hoping that this will make his problems go away. But it won’t.
Trump is now alone, surrounded by demented neo-cons, and by stale old compliant European client state pawns who’ve stuck to the US like flies to shit, no matter how harmful it is to them.
What a poor company he keeps!
Maybe the reason why the US and zionistan constantly bring up Hitler in movies, documentaries and books, even though he’s been dead for almost 80 years, is that they’re diverting attention from their own crimes. The US pushes the line that it defeated Hitler, without mentioning Russia’s much greater commitment to that effort, and also omitting the fact that the US elites sympathized with, and worked with Nazi Germany up until, and after hostilities between the US and Germany began.
So there is a lot to cover up; not atone for, though. The US never atones or apologizes for the evil it does. It just excuses it away, dresses it up in a false mantle of benevolence and ‘concern for humanity,’ or blames other for it.
US, NATO, and the western-controlled financial institutions comprise the world's premier and most powerful terror network. Al Qaeda, ISIS, Al Nusra et al are just dusty little subsidiaries and contract fighters.
In order for the US to get its regime change in Syria, it would have to go to war with Syria, Iran, and Russia all at the same time, and win; and I'm not talking about the US engaging in pot-shots at the periphery, dirty tricks, false flags, staged gas attacks, and the CIA playing footsy with terror groups. That's just a waste of time. It would have to be an all-out physical war and open attack. Obviously that is not going to happen, so the US has lost.
The Skripal and Syria frauds are starting to show holes. The emotional reactions caused by the frauds are winding down, and there are still enough intelligent people in the world to ask uncomfortable questions. As expected, holes are starting to show in the whole gas attack. People who were there have come forward stating that there was no gas attack and that the whole thing was an act, with them being unwittingly caught up in the fraud.
And while this is welcome, it is also dangerous.
The pattern so far has been that whenever the US gets caught in a lie, it does something worse to cover it up.
The scary thing is what will the US stoop to in Syria now that their gassing myth is being exposed as a fraud and the air strikes were a failure? Will the US continue to fire missiles at Syria that will get shot down? If this keeps on happening, the US, out of frustration, may target Russian bases in Syria. They’ll say it was an ‘accident’ and ‘unintentional’ in order to get themselves off the hook and keep the Russians from retaliating. But if Russia retaliates, the US will accuse Russia of an act of aggression for an ‘honest mistake.’
This is the kind of psychopathic behavior we can expect from the US.
US TARIFF WAR
The EU is considering enacting tariffs on Chinese-made imports in cooperation with the US in order to be exempt from US tariffs.
This is a bad idea with will backfire on the EU.
The US will end up taking the EU for a very rough ride. Also, why is the EU willing to ruin relations with an emerging world power for the sake of a fading one? Doesn't the EU see that all these sanctions, embargoes, and tariffs against China, Russia, Iran and others are aimed at weakening the EU along with everyone else for the sake of the US? And why isn't the EU threatening its own tariffs on US made stuff? It would make more sense for the EU to join forces with China against the US.
EU will definitely suffer, if it goes after China, which will undoubtedly slap EU imports with tariffs as well.
The sum of all these US-made problems, from Skripal, Syria, tariffs, will be a weakened US, and an angry and alienated world. The US will achieve zero in doing all this, and as always will blame others when things go south.
The fact is that the US industrial base has been gutted and it isn’t coming back, no matter what Trump does. He is just there temporarily.
Neither will US corporations disengage from China. The US would have to change drastically in order for a real ‘America First’ policy to be realized. The US would have to produce its own things, impose tariffs on imports, and pay people better so they will be able to afford US-made products.
This won’t happen, as greed has rotted out the US from top to bottom.
All that this is about is that China represents a multilateral economic model which is opposed to the US unilateral one. China is making alliances and arrangements all over the world and benefitting from them. It is using its profits to modernize and advance. It is also starting to dump the dollar and buy/sell oil in Yuan, not dollars. It is doing this with Russia, Iran and others.
This is why the US is upset with all three. They are undermining US military and economic supremacy, not ‘security.’
IRAN
When the US wants to break its treaty commitments, or nullify them for whatever reason, it does so by falsely accusing the other side of breaking it. This is usually accompanied by some form of a false flag or disinformation campaign that is meant to demonize the other party, and scare/shock everyone else into nullifying it as well.
This was visible in Syria with multiple unproven accusations of chemical weapons use by Syrian forces, even though Syria gave up its chemical and biological weapons in 2013.
The US is currently trying to come up with an excuse to walk away from the JCPOA by falsely accusing Iran of secretly trying to build nuclear weapons. The US also used Iran's missile program as an excuse to walk away from the ABM treaty in 2002 and build a missile shield aimed at Russia, even though Iran's missiles pose no threat to Europe.
After the US signed the JCPOA, the missile defense project lost its justification, but very quickly North Korean missiles were named as an excuse for its existence.
The US has built up many layers of lies and false justifications, and it is absurd that it hasn't yet been seriously called out for it.
The US has played these games before with Iraq between 1991-2003. Whenever they demanded something of Iraq, and Iraq relented, the US moved on to demand something more. The US was always moving the goalposts further and further away with each Iraqi concession. It will be the same with Iran if Russia, China and the EU cave in to the US pressure and make changes to the JCPOA. The US will demand that Iran scrap its missile program. If Iran does this, then the US will demand something else, and on and on. Everything that Iran does to comply will never be enough for the US. This will eventually lead to the Iraq and Libya scenarios: disarm and destroy.
US and zionistan have no case against Iran, just a bunch of hype and false accusations. Iran has stuck to the JCPOA faithfully, and this-more than any looney slideshows by nitwityahoo-will decide the agreement's future.
As for Trump's whining that this deal is 'terrible,' why is it terrible? Has he given any solid, valid reasons why the deal is bad for the US?
Just because the US didn't get everything it wanted from it and couldn't saddle Iran with ALL the giving, doesn't mean its a bad deal. No one got everything they wanted from it. It was a compromise. Doesn't Trump realize that in a normal world you don't always get what you want?
Trump is acting like a baby, and needs a diaper change.
Sunday, April 29, 2018
A Peace that Won't Be
The thaw between South and North Korea and a possible, planned meeting between Trump and Kim Jong Un has been big news lately.
South Korea's President Moon and Kim have met, and promises were made to improve relations, and end North Korea's nuclear testing.
To the starry-eyed, it looks like the two Koreas, along with the US, will finally make peace and stop threatening each other.
But let's not forget that the South Korean regime, regardless of its smiles, is descended from the right-wing dictatorship of Syngman Rhee, the ex-Japanese collaborator-turned-puppet of the US military occupation forces. People with the same mentality are still in power in South Korea, and it is doubtful that they will allow any improvement in relations. Like their US counterparts, these right-wing South Korean Rhee acolytes have made their fortunes and careers on having North Korea as an enemy.
It’s difficult to believe that there will be any reconciliation/peace/unity breaking out. These things go against US interests of countering China. The US wants a permanent military presence in Korea to serve as a base of operations against whoever the US deems an enemy for whatever reason.
Trump's eagerness for peace is not serious, regardless of how many Tweets to the contrary he sends. Let's not forget that this is the same guy who a month ago bombed a country based on false pretexts, and has recently appointed John Bolton and Mike Pompeo to important posts. These two misfits were behind the illegal and criminal war on Iraq and the torture scandals. There is nothing good to expect from the Trump regime at all.
History by now has shown us that once the US occupies an area, they don’t leave. It’s been 73 years since WW2 ended, yet the US military is still occupying Germany. This occupation has now spread to Eastern Europe under the guise of ‘countering Russian aggression.’ It’s been 15 years since the Iraq invasion, yet US is still there, with no signs it will ever leave.
The US has gotten too entrenched in South Korea to just get up and leave, regardless of what NK will do. It serves US interests to be there, and the interests of the military-industrial complex, not to mention the career prospects of all the US generals, officers, and CIA spooks. Too many careers and paychecks are riding on the US remaining on the Korean peninsula, and everywhere else they’re squatting.
Even if Kim Jong Un ends up meeting Trump, it will go down something like this, or close to it:
1. Kim and Trump sit down to talk
2. Trump makes outrageous demands that he knows NK won’t accept, while he offers nothing worthwhile in return
3. Kim says NO. Then he counters that US must sign a permanent peace treaty and end all acts of aggression, end to sanctions, including military exercises close to NK’s borders and/or removal of US troops from SK in return for complete NK nuclear and missile disarmament
4. SK president sits there like a quiet little vassal with no say-so, and acquiesces to whatever the US says
5. The entire meeting turns into a fiasco, everyone walks out, and tensions not only stay but go up
6. US regime and all western media go into ‘Blame it all on Kim’ overdrive for the failure of the meeting
7. Kim restarts nuke and missile testing and Trump threatens military action
This is what we can expect. And the blame for any failures will rest on the US, which will refuse to give up an inch, but will demand a mile from NK.
The US establishment doesn’t want peace on the Korean peninsula. They most likely want a Libya-type scenario.
The meeting will be used to cajole NK into giving up its main deterrent, disarming, letting in ‘inspectors’ who will most likely feature spies from every god-damn US intelligence agency in existence. These people will look under every rock, identify any and all important targets for bombing, report back to their US regime bosses, who will then make up some false flag implicating NK, then attack NK-which at that point will be defenseless.
What the US ultimately wants is to get rid of Kim Jong Un, annex NK by force to SK, then move up US troops all the way to the Chinese border.
The US doesn’t honor its treaty commitment. The examples of Iraq, Libya, and Trump’s present threat to walk away from the JCPOA are clear signs that North Korea cannot trust the US.
The stench of future US betrayal of
NK will be thick in the air at whatever venue these two will meet.
South Korea's President Moon and Kim have met, and promises were made to improve relations, and end North Korea's nuclear testing.
To the starry-eyed, it looks like the two Koreas, along with the US, will finally make peace and stop threatening each other.
But let's not forget that the South Korean regime, regardless of its smiles, is descended from the right-wing dictatorship of Syngman Rhee, the ex-Japanese collaborator-turned-puppet of the US military occupation forces. People with the same mentality are still in power in South Korea, and it is doubtful that they will allow any improvement in relations. Like their US counterparts, these right-wing South Korean Rhee acolytes have made their fortunes and careers on having North Korea as an enemy.
It’s difficult to believe that there will be any reconciliation/peace/unity breaking out. These things go against US interests of countering China. The US wants a permanent military presence in Korea to serve as a base of operations against whoever the US deems an enemy for whatever reason.
Trump's eagerness for peace is not serious, regardless of how many Tweets to the contrary he sends. Let's not forget that this is the same guy who a month ago bombed a country based on false pretexts, and has recently appointed John Bolton and Mike Pompeo to important posts. These two misfits were behind the illegal and criminal war on Iraq and the torture scandals. There is nothing good to expect from the Trump regime at all.
History by now has shown us that once the US occupies an area, they don’t leave. It’s been 73 years since WW2 ended, yet the US military is still occupying Germany. This occupation has now spread to Eastern Europe under the guise of ‘countering Russian aggression.’ It’s been 15 years since the Iraq invasion, yet US is still there, with no signs it will ever leave.
The US has gotten too entrenched in South Korea to just get up and leave, regardless of what NK will do. It serves US interests to be there, and the interests of the military-industrial complex, not to mention the career prospects of all the US generals, officers, and CIA spooks. Too many careers and paychecks are riding on the US remaining on the Korean peninsula, and everywhere else they’re squatting.
Even if Kim Jong Un ends up meeting Trump, it will go down something like this, or close to it:
1. Kim and Trump sit down to talk
2. Trump makes outrageous demands that he knows NK won’t accept, while he offers nothing worthwhile in return
3. Kim says NO. Then he counters that US must sign a permanent peace treaty and end all acts of aggression, end to sanctions, including military exercises close to NK’s borders and/or removal of US troops from SK in return for complete NK nuclear and missile disarmament
4. SK president sits there like a quiet little vassal with no say-so, and acquiesces to whatever the US says
5. The entire meeting turns into a fiasco, everyone walks out, and tensions not only stay but go up
6. US regime and all western media go into ‘Blame it all on Kim’ overdrive for the failure of the meeting
7. Kim restarts nuke and missile testing and Trump threatens military action
This is what we can expect. And the blame for any failures will rest on the US, which will refuse to give up an inch, but will demand a mile from NK.
The US establishment doesn’t want peace on the Korean peninsula. They most likely want a Libya-type scenario.
The meeting will be used to cajole NK into giving up its main deterrent, disarming, letting in ‘inspectors’ who will most likely feature spies from every god-damn US intelligence agency in existence. These people will look under every rock, identify any and all important targets for bombing, report back to their US regime bosses, who will then make up some false flag implicating NK, then attack NK-which at that point will be defenseless.
What the US ultimately wants is to get rid of Kim Jong Un, annex NK by force to SK, then move up US troops all the way to the Chinese border.
The US doesn’t honor its treaty commitment. The examples of Iraq, Libya, and Trump’s present threat to walk away from the JCPOA are clear signs that North Korea cannot trust the US.
Kim Jong Un
seems to be quite involved in a peaceful solution, and has stopped issuing
insults toward the Dotard.
But it is
most likely not because sanctions and US threats have worked.
What may be
going on here is that China’s Premier Xi had a talk with Kim, and NK was
promised very beneficial economic opportunities and OBOR/Silk Road integration
in return for doing something to shut the US up, so that sanctions are lifted
and the two can get back to business.
The US
regime, Trump, and his deranged walrus mustache advisor won't get anything for
free from North Korea. The problem on the Korean peninsula was, is, and will be
the US, not NK or Kim. The US doesn’t honor its agreements, so that's one thing
that will definitely be a stumbling block.
Even IF the US agrees to make some major concessions that NK could accept, it will most likely be a ruse. What the US may do is make promises to NK, but require that NK first disarm and do whatever the US wants, and only after that the US will deliver on its part. This may take years. But a short while from the deadline, the US will stir up some false flags, and claim that NK is not living up to the agreement-even if NK does-and use that as an excuse to walk away from the agreement, and take military action against NK.
This type of scenario is very likely, and if there actually is an agreement with NK like this, and the US demands that the UN approve it under Chapter 7 of the UN charter, then the regime change scenario will be guaranteed.
A prophetic warning of this very possibility has already come from none other than John Bolton, Trump's rabid neo-con national security advisor. He has already stated that a disarmament agreement with North Korea could be based on the disarmament agreement with Libya. And we all know what happened to Libya and its leader Muammar Ghaddafi after he 'disarmed.'
Even IF the US agrees to make some major concessions that NK could accept, it will most likely be a ruse. What the US may do is make promises to NK, but require that NK first disarm and do whatever the US wants, and only after that the US will deliver on its part. This may take years. But a short while from the deadline, the US will stir up some false flags, and claim that NK is not living up to the agreement-even if NK does-and use that as an excuse to walk away from the agreement, and take military action against NK.
This type of scenario is very likely, and if there actually is an agreement with NK like this, and the US demands that the UN approve it under Chapter 7 of the UN charter, then the regime change scenario will be guaranteed.
A prophetic warning of this very possibility has already come from none other than John Bolton, Trump's rabid neo-con national security advisor. He has already stated that a disarmament agreement with North Korea could be based on the disarmament agreement with Libya. And we all know what happened to Libya and its leader Muammar Ghaddafi after he 'disarmed.'
The US
establishment is intellectually and morally incapable of making a genuine peace
with North Korea without any evil ulterior motives.