Russian involvement has been
denounced as ‘unprofessional, ‘destabilizing,’ and ‘ineffective.’ (Such descriptions don't seem to apply to the year-long-plus US bombing of ISIS in Syria and Iraq, which has done nothing to blunt ISIS, stop its spread, and end their on-going control of Mosul, Iraq's second biggest city)
Russia has also been accused
of targeting civilians, dropping ‘dumb’ bombs, and targeting ‘US sponsored
opposition.’
In the litany of lies,
contradictions, and hypocrisy, the US terror-supporting racket has been
exposed.
Check this out from Barry the
Bomber’s recent speech:
“The moderate opposition in
Syria is one that, if we ever going to have a political transition, we need.
And the Russian policy is driving those folks underground or creating a
situation in which they are decapacitated and it is only strengthening ISIL,” said Obama.
“The training and equip program was a specific initiative by the Defense Department to see if we could get some of that moderate opposition to focus attention of ISIL in the eastern portion of the country,” Obama said. “And I’m the first one to acknowledge it has not worked the way it was supposed to, and I think that the Department of Defense would say the same thing.”
But right after this, Obama was quoted as saying:
“The problem here is Assad and the brutality
he’s inflicted on the Syrian people,”
Obama stated, adding that the US will continue to support moderate opposition
groups to ensure an eventual transition to “democracy. (1)
Obama
also lays down his final prophetic vision of the future:
“It was in our interest to make sure that we
were engaged with[the] moderate opposition inside of Syria because eventually
Syria will fall. The Assad regime will fall, and we have to have somebody who
are working with, that we can help pick up the pieces and stitch back together
a cohesive, coherent country.”(1)
Wow!
All that’s missing from the picture is for Barry to beat himself over the head with
a shoe while screaming ‘Assad will fall! His regime will fall!’
It’s
clear that Barry is becoming unhinged, and is having some sort of a nervous
breakdown. He’s visibly unable to cope with the mess he helped create. Maybe he
just needs to take some vacation and clear his head.
Does Obama really expect the world to believe that his
priority isn’t to overthrow the Syrian government? The entire US involvement
there is for that specific purpose. He’s just basically throwing his rebel
creatures under the bus by saying that they’re interested in regime change, but
the US isn’t.
So
which is it, Barry? Regime change or just fighting terrorism? You can’t do
both; they’re mutually exclusive.
Syria already has, and had a
legitimate national opposition, but since this opposition didn’t want to be
bribed and high-jacked by the US, and refused to support the violence that the
US-sponsored foreign fighters unleashed on Syria, the US totally ignores them.
Further evidence of on-going
US support for rebel groups in Syria which are linked to Al Qaeda, Al Nusra,
and ISIS has been forthcoming, much of it from the US regime’s spokes-creatures
themselves. Check out Mr. Hairy Kerry’s answer to a question about terrorism
posed by Russia’s foreign minister Sergey Lavrov recently:
Asked if he
agreed with Lavrov, U.S. Secretary of State John Kerry said: "Well, in concept."
"What
is important is Russia has to not be engaged in any activities against anybody
but ISIL," Kerry said. "That's clear. We have made that very
clear."(2)
Even former CIA director and retire general David Petraeus has spilled the beans about what US policy ought to be, and probably already is:
“To achieve victory in the Middle East, the US needs to establish and protect rebel enclaves in Syria, and launch another “surge” in Iraq, former CIA director and retired US Army general David Petraeus told a Senate panel.” (4)
From their own words, we can ascertain the following facts:
1. US government has been
sponsoring ISIS, Al Qaeda, Al Nusra, and affiliated rebel groups either directly,
or through their Arab sheikh proxies
2 US priority in Syria is not
fighting terrorism, but regime change for the USA’s own political,
economic, and strategic reasons; no matter how much they try to hide, or dress
it up as something else
3. US doesn’t really care
about what rebel groups in Syria it supports, and what their ideology or
motives are, as long as they can be used to fight the Syrian government.
This whole PR about ‘secular’ or ‘moderate’ rebels is bullshit. There never
were such groups, and the US doesn’t really care whether they’re moderate or
not. Also, the astonishment and disappointment of US officials that their
‘moderate’ rebels changed sides to the Islamic extremists is also suspect. The US knows those rebels were extremists from the get-go; there was no ‘changing sides.'
Russian airstrikes in Syria have exposed these things,
and the US is so unhappy with the fact that Russia is bombing their monsters,
that the US regime is practically admitting its supporting these religious
extremist freaks. This whole thing has caught the US in a PR nightmare. Their
criminal policies have been exposed.
Look at what the US regime’s wonderful Free Syrian
Army has been up to for four years.
Since 2012, Syrian president Bashar Al Assad has been
ready and willing to sit down and bring this chaos to a peaceful end. Putin has
also offered to help. But the US has slapped away the hand of cooperation,
while talking about ‘peaceful transition to democracy.’
If the US wants a peaceful, negotiated solution to
Syrian war, why does it even support any rebels there at all?
The truth is that the US doesn’t want a peaceful
resolution to the Syrian crisis. It wants to aid its rebel proxies to overthrow Assad, so the US can
then step in and have everything its own way in Syria. The US knows that they'll get more by using violence than by negotiations.
Even the US regime’s rotten ally, Saudi Arabia, is
exposing what it’s really all about:
“Analysts are concerned about the apparent escalation, which
many fear could further exasperate the already bloody four-and-a-half-year
civil war. An independent analyst told the Guardian that Qatar –
acting with the agreement of Saudi Arabia – may already have started sending
planeloads of weapons to Turkish airbases.
“I would expect a
huge influx of weapons into the north to try to blunt any ground assault by
the regime,” the analyst said. “The stakes are very high.” (5)
How much things have changed
since 9/11.
What happened to "Either you are with us, or you are
with the terrorists” tough-talk of George W. Bush?
It seems that today the US
just cannot live up to its own expectations, because it has decided to side
with Islamic fundamentalist terrorists in Syria.
Hillary
Clinton said on September 13, 2001: "Every nation has to either be with us, or against us. Those who
harbor terrorists, or who finance them, are going to pay a price."
Sadly, Hillary defied herself
when in 2011 she and her boss enthusiastically sent US warplanes to Libya
to aid ISIS-type Islamic fanatics and overthrow the secular regime of Muammar
Gaddafi. After Gaddafi’s murder-execution, she bragged about it in front of the
cameras, all smiles.
But at least the last part of
her quote is coming true: the US is paying the price for supporting violent
extremists in Syria.
There have also been accusations of Russia killing civilians.
Overnight, actually before any Russian airstrikes even started, photos of
maimed and killed Syrian ‘civilian’ victims of perfidious Russian bombings were
immediately posted on You Tube and social media. These images were either fake
or were made days or weeks before, as we’ve seen with similar atrocity
propaganda in the past.
For example:
Where the FUCK were these US/western
media pricks in the last fifteen years during which the US and its allies, and
Israel, have bombed, burned, and massacred country after country from the air, including
wedding parties and funerals? There was no talk of innocent civilians back
then; no! There was only ‘collateral damage,’ ‘enemy combatants,’ ‘terrorists,’
or ‘suspected militants;’ toddlers and infants included.
Why is the US regime and its controlled media
apparatus suddenly concerned about civilian casualties and bombing of
residential areas when Russia is conducting airstrikes? The US doesn’t have the
right to condemn anyone of bombing civilians after its own sordid and criminal
history.
The bloody and autocratic Saudi regime has been
bombing Yemen for months, and has killed thousands of civilians. Just the other
day a US ‘collision’ airstrike hit a hospital In Kunduz, Afghanistan and killed
civilians. But there’s no US regime and
media outrage about it. It’s being presented as just an honest, unfortunate
mistake; It’s all apologetics; it was simply unintended ‘collateral’ damage,
and everyone is just supposed to hug, say sorry, and let the US regime move on
to its next atrocity.
“Lt. Gen. Robert Otto, deputy
chief of staff for intelligence and surveillance for the Air Force, said the Russians
have been dropping "dumb bombs" — munitions that are not
precision-guided. The use of such indiscriminate targeting could lead to the
deaths of innocent civilians, he said, and create more terrorists than they
kill.”(3)
No one in the world has
dropped more ‘dumb’ bombs than the US
military, whether it was from their planes or their mouths.
And why are barrel bombs
which end up killing civilians suddenly worse than a laser-guided US missile
which kills civilians?
After all, the use of barrel bombs
was pioneered by the Israelis during their war in 1948. The US army used them
in Vietnam as well.
And who the fuck gave the US
the authority to decide which governments to overthrow, and which leader stays
or goes? This is blatantly illegal in international affairs, and the US should
be condemned for this, by the UN and by everyone else.
Deciding another country’s
government and leaders for them without bothering to even consult its citizens
is the antithesis of democracy, which the US professes to care so much about.
The US and its allies better be
careful, because they all have quite spotty, if not nasty records of war
crimes, human rights abuses, bombing civilians, and colluding with terrorists.
They better look over their shoulder so their regimes don’t get changed by
anyone else.
The fascist-infested,
war-criminal regime ruling Ukraine today is a marvelous example of US and
western double-standards.
"We
can all agree that when any US regime official opens their mouth about the
Russian airstrikes in Syria, the world is left more and more confused, and/or
disgusted about what exactly the US wants, and what it’s doing. US rhetoric seems
to change every few hours.
The bottom line going forward is that the US and its regional and European allies are going to have to decide whether they want to be on the right side of history here or not, and as we’ve been careful to explain, no one is arguing that Bashar al-Assad is the most benevolent leader in the history of statecraft but it has now gotten to the point where Western media outlets are describing al-Qaeda as “moderate” in a last ditch effort to explain away Washington’s unwillingness to join Russia in stabilizing Syria.
This is a foreign policy mistake of epic proportions on the part of the US and the sooner the West concedes that and moves to correct it by admitting that none of the groups the CIA, the Pentagon, and Washington’s Mid-East allies have trained and supported represent a viable alternative to the Assad regime, the sooner Syria will cease to be the chessboard du jour for a global proxy war that’s left hundreds of thousands of innocent people dead." (6)
Sources:
No comments:
Post a Comment