It is the Kiev regime and its western benefactors that had the most to gain from shooting down this plane. They blamed it on their two chief enemies, Russia and the rebels, who had nothing to gain and much to lose. When trying to find the guilty, the question 'who benefits' must be asked first and last.
The MH17 crash has primarily benefited US geopolitical interests by forcing the EU to pass sanctions against Russia, freeze its assets, cancel the Mistral ship sale, as well as the South Stream gas pipeline project. Why would Russia deliberately do anything to cause such things to happen, and shoot itself in the foot? It's not in its interest.
Why was the plane rerouted over Donbass when on previous routes it flew near the Black Sea in S. Ukraine? Who made the decision to reroute the plane? Why did the Kiev regime allow non-military planes to fly over an active conflict zone? (bad weather is absolutely no excuse here)
These questions must be answered, and those who made these stupid and reckless decisions must be held accountable. The 'what' and 'who' brought the plane down is secondary at this point.
Why is the investigation taking so long? To date, it's been over a year. If Russia and/or the rebels were guilty, the US would've surely came out with all evidence proving this immediately. So what's the hold-up?
So far, the west has piled on heaps of accusations against Russia with no trace of credible evidence to back up any of it. Are they hiding something, or protecting someone?
No comments:
Post a Comment