US regimes past and present have whined, cried, and fear mongered incessantly about North Korea's nukes, Iran's missiles and non-existent nukes, or some other enemy country’s alleged nuclear weapons program.
But whenever anyone proposes a nuclear-free zone agreement in the Mideast, far east, or anywhere else, or any type of nuclear disarmament, the US automatically shoots these ideas down. So what are countries like North Korea and Iran supposed to think when US rhetoric doesn't match its actions?
What is a country like Iran supposed to do when the US allows the zionist entity to possess hundreds of nuclear weapons with impunity, is against a nuclear-free Mideast, then accuses and sanctions Iran for allegedly developing nuclear weapons, without evidence?
These countries can’t help but come to the conclusion that the US means them harm, and they will arm themselves with whatever powerful enough deterrent they can come up with.
And when they do, the US calls these countries ‘threats to national security,’and passes sanctions on them for developing 'WMD.'
From this aberrant and contradictory US behavior, it is quite clear that the US isn’t interested in nuclear disarmament of any kind. The US demands that other countries not possess nuclear weapons, sign the NPT, and agree to intrusive inspections and monitoring of their nuclear plants and military bases (like Iran), while the US keeps its stockpiles of 7000+ nukes, and modernizes and miniaturizes them-thereby violating the terms of its NPT obligations to disarm.
The US is even going so far as prohibiting its vassals to have nukes. The US states that it does this to prevent the proliferation of nuclear weapons by ‘rogue regimes’ in response, but this is just PR and window-dressing.
The US is against the proliferation of nuclear weapons for two main reasons.
First, the US wants to prevent adversaries from having them, because nukes are the only effective deterrent against US aggression and any planned regime changes. That’s why the US is so upset about North Korea’s nuclear weapons.
Second, the US fears that if its vassal states acquire nukes, they will become more confident, self-assertive, and feel more secure. They may come to an agreement with their adversaries. If that were to happen, they wouldn’t need the US anymore, and give the US military the boot out of the region. This will undercut US global power projection.
The US wants to prevent other nations from acquiring nuclear weapons and force them to disarm, and at the same time keep and modernize its own nuclear weapons stockpiles, and threaten their use, even against non-nuclear states and attacks.
This is typical US behavior: create and perpetuate a problem, then demand that other countries do what the US wants to stop it, all the while making it look like someone else is to blame, and has the responsibility to fix it-on US terms, of course.
It is a classic case of extortion. US behavior can be compared to an arsonist who sets a house on fire, then at gun-point prevents anyone from extinguishing it until the arsonist’s demands are met.
In the case of North Korea, from 2005 the US regimes of George W. Bush to the Trump regime today have done everything they could to provoke North Korea and drive it to develop nuclear and thermonuclear weapons. And now the US complains about the results?
The architects of the US policy that drove North Korea into developing nuclear weapons and delivery systems are either reckless and short-sighted imbeciles that have realized they made a mess, and are now trying to find a scapegoat, or are the deliberate acts of charlatans and agent provocateurs who want tension, confrontation and unrest for their own self-serving reasons.
Why does the world even allow the US to pass sanctions and threaten countries that try to develop nuclear energy or weapons when the US possesses thousands of them? And why do Russia and China go along with this, when they themselves have nuclear weapons?
No country that has nuclear weapons has the right to complain that another nuclear-armed country is a threat to it-especially one like the US, which remains the only country in world history so far to have used nuclear weapons, twice, on a civilian population.
That’s why US fears and paranoia about North Korean nuclear-armed ICBMs hitting the US mainland are so hypocritical and empty. The nuclear-armed US has been surrounding North Korea for 60 years, and has threatened it with pre-emptive nuclear strikes on multiple occasions. So the US doesn’t have the right to be scared of a nuclear-armed North Korea, since the US created this situation for itself.
The greatest catalyst for the development and proliferation of nuclear weapons by other states are nations that already have them, maintain them, modernize and improve them, suffer no punishment or legal consequences, demand that no one else have nuclear weapons, and immediately try to punish anyone else who wants to develop them.
Nuclear disarmament in this atmosphere and reality is simply not possible. It is a delusion.
In this regard, the US, Russia, China, and especially the zionist entity, are all guilty. The credibility of these countries suffers each and every time whenever they vote for more sanctions against North Korea, Iran, or any other country that tests ballistic missiles or nuclear bombs.
In any discussion of nuclear weapons and the treatment of countries that possess them, a special mention must separately be given to the zionist entity, namely its suspect denials of having nukes, and the US refusal to support any initiatives that seek to create a nuclear-free Mideast.
Let’s start with what we know.
Officially, the zionist entity denies having nuclear weapons. The US supports this stance.
In the 1950s, France secretly helped the zionists build a nuclear reactor at Dimona. This plant was built without any IAEA knowledge, involvement or oversight whatsoever.
This reactor produces plutonium which can be used to make nuclear warheads.
Support from individuals within the US and some other European countries resulted in the zionists possessing the only nuclear arsenal in the Mideast.
The zionists have refused any outside inspection of the Dimona nuclear plant to outsiders since the early 1970s. Only one inspection has taken place there, and the zionists set up a fake control room for the occasion to hide their illicit nuclear activities.
The zionists refuse to sign the NPT.
Whenever anyone seeks to introduce any type of agreement for a nuclear-free Middle East, an agreement which Iran has welcomed on multiple occasions, the zionist entity and the US immediately refuse to have anything to do with it.
But why is that?
Doesn’t the zionist entity deny having nuclear weapons?
Doesn’t the US want a nuclear weapons-free Iran?
If the zionists and the US are telling the truth, then they should be the most staunchest supporters of such an initiative.
Let’s also not forget that in 1986 Mordechai Vanunu exposed the zionist entity’s nuclear weapons program. He then fled to Rome where he was kindapped by Mossad agents, taken back to zionistan, and placed under house arrest for decades.
Kind of a radical act when the zionists claim not to have nuclear weapons, right?
This behavior, totally at odds with its rhetoric, exposes the zionist entity and the US as liars.
From this behavior, we know for sure that the zionists do have nuclear weapons, despite their repeated denials, and that the US knows it and is protecting the zionists.
By actually refusing to be a part of a Mideast nuclear weapons-free agreement, the zionists unwittingly expose their possession of nuclear weapons.
Because logically, what other reason could there be for someone not agreeing to not do something bad, unless they’re already doing something bad? Think about this for a moment.
So the zionist state denies having nuclear weapons, yet refuses to be a part of a nuclear-free Mideast agreement, the NPT, or any other scheme to prevent the production of nuclear weapons. It refuses any international inspection of the Dimona nuclear plant.
At the same time, Iran is accused by the US and the zionist entity-without any credible evidence-of having nuclear weapons, yet Iran wants to be a part of a nuclear-free Mideast agreement, signed the JCPOA to limit its nuclear energy program, and allowed more intrusive monitoring and regulations of its nuclear plants and uranium enrichment facilities.
What does this tell us about these two countries? Which one of them, by its actions and not just by its rhetoric, is most likely to be the nuclear weapons-free party?
That’s why any zionist and US denials concerning the existence of the zionist state’s nukes, and its refusal to agree to the prevention of the existence of nuclear weapons in the region simply don’t make sense.
The US is just trying to con the world into submitting to its own twisted version of nuclear politics, where countries on the US hit-list are excessively scrutinized without any credible cause, and even falsely accused of having nuclear weapons, while US darlings like the zionist entity are coddled and protected from any kind of accountability for their own quite real nuclear malfeasance. This is just one of the many dishonest and cynical ways that the US tries to gain control of the world by any means possible, no matter how greasy.
But by stooping down to extortion, false accusations, military threats and terrorist tactics, the US is provoking its adversaries into thinking about developing nuclear weapons. Maybe this is the aim, so the US can then have an excuse for invasions and regime change under the guise of 'protecting national security.'
One cannot get more rogue and demented as this.
But the bottom line on nukes is: either everyone is prohibited from having nuclear weapons, or everyone is allowed to have them. There can be no exceptions, special cases, and double-standards when it comes to possessing these weapons.
Maybe every country should have some nukes, and in this way no one would attack each other anymore?
Thursday, January 18, 2018
Monday, January 15, 2018
Road Rage
The way roads and communities are planned in the US is deliberate and criminal. It's not about making things better for the people, but about fattening the pockets of corporations, from the engineering companies, builders, car makers, car parts manufacturers and, of course, oil companies.
They get more say about transportation policy than the average citizen or someone who knows anything about it.
It's not an accident that in the US people have multiple cars just to get things done. The American obsession with cars and bigger highways is not a result of Americans' 'love for the open road,' or some 'freedom.' That's just kitschy corporate propaganda, and always was.
It is all about trapping people on suburban islands and making them dependent on private means of transport which eats up incomes, tremendous amounts of time, and health.
US is a prime example of terrible urban planning. What is sorely needed is less cars, and more mass transit, especially light rail. For a country that prides itself on innovation and imagination, the US is downright primitive in its thinking when it comes to the theory of urban design and transportation.
So what if there are impressive roads and highway systems in the US? Has anyone ever for once thought about whether it is all necessary, and about how to maybe make things humbler, but more functional and economical? Only a fool will not see that this road misery is all planned.
Notice the absence of sidewalks where they should be. In other countries, you can get to wherever you're going by using a sidewalk, or bike path. Even in Canada sidewalks take you farther.
In the US, a suburban development is cut off from the town, even if the town is half a mile down the road. It can't be reached over such a short distance because a sidewalk between the two either doesn't exist, or cuts off after 20 feet of the development entrance.
The US public transportation policy is made to cater to the exclusive needs of private corporations, who in one way or another reap large profits from enslaving people in cars and suburban islands.
This is how private interests feed off of the lack of efficient public transportation system:
-Houses are deliberately built away from towns and cities, and inaccessible without a car
-Shopping centers are concentrated away from convenient walking distance
-Lack of sidewalks prevents people from walking
-No trolley or bus service runs beyond city limits
-Highways need to be constantly improved and built, sucking away tax payer money which should be spent on the public transportation system
-Cars use gas which profits the oil companies
-Cars need to be insured which profits insurance companies
-Cars break down and must be fixed. Repair shops and car parts manufacturers profit
-Eventually, cars wear out, and new ones have to be bought. Car manufacturers profit
The more driving is done in a car, the faster it wears out. This process has accelerated in the US, where a car is needed to get virtually anything done, if one doesn't live in a big city. The quality of cars has also taken a nosedive, guaranteeing that the car will now fail even quicker.
The American public has been deliberately conned and inconvenienced to trap them into perpetual car usage.
This has been done by corrupt urban planners and governments, from Washington to the local city council.
The demise of small mom n' pop stores in favor of big-box retailers has also forced people to go ever greater distances to do their shopping.
This over-dependence on cars and less walking has also negatively affected peoples' health, and will continue to do so.
Traffic delays for whatever reason lead to a lot of wasted time, stress, and frustration that is not good for anyone's physical and mental well-being.
None of this is an accident. It cannot be chalked up to simple stupidity, a blunder, or lack of foresight in the past. If this was the case, then cities and towns throughout the US would've moved to correct these mistakes years ago. But they haven't.
So this is 100% deliberate urban planning to trap the public into a never-ending cycle of gouging and profiteering by private interests who make billions of dollars per year off making sure that a person must have a car, and no efficient and economical public transportation.
They get more say about transportation policy than the average citizen or someone who knows anything about it.
It's not an accident that in the US people have multiple cars just to get things done. The American obsession with cars and bigger highways is not a result of Americans' 'love for the open road,' or some 'freedom.' That's just kitschy corporate propaganda, and always was.
It is all about trapping people on suburban islands and making them dependent on private means of transport which eats up incomes, tremendous amounts of time, and health.
US is a prime example of terrible urban planning. What is sorely needed is less cars, and more mass transit, especially light rail. For a country that prides itself on innovation and imagination, the US is downright primitive in its thinking when it comes to the theory of urban design and transportation.
So what if there are impressive roads and highway systems in the US? Has anyone ever for once thought about whether it is all necessary, and about how to maybe make things humbler, but more functional and economical? Only a fool will not see that this road misery is all planned.
Notice the absence of sidewalks where they should be. In other countries, you can get to wherever you're going by using a sidewalk, or bike path. Even in Canada sidewalks take you farther.
In the US, a suburban development is cut off from the town, even if the town is half a mile down the road. It can't be reached over such a short distance because a sidewalk between the two either doesn't exist, or cuts off after 20 feet of the development entrance.
The US public transportation policy is made to cater to the exclusive needs of private corporations, who in one way or another reap large profits from enslaving people in cars and suburban islands.
This is how private interests feed off of the lack of efficient public transportation system:
-Houses are deliberately built away from towns and cities, and inaccessible without a car
-Shopping centers are concentrated away from convenient walking distance
-Lack of sidewalks prevents people from walking
-No trolley or bus service runs beyond city limits
-Highways need to be constantly improved and built, sucking away tax payer money which should be spent on the public transportation system
-Cars use gas which profits the oil companies
-Cars need to be insured which profits insurance companies
-Cars break down and must be fixed. Repair shops and car parts manufacturers profit
-Eventually, cars wear out, and new ones have to be bought. Car manufacturers profit
The more driving is done in a car, the faster it wears out. This process has accelerated in the US, where a car is needed to get virtually anything done, if one doesn't live in a big city. The quality of cars has also taken a nosedive, guaranteeing that the car will now fail even quicker.
The American public has been deliberately conned and inconvenienced to trap them into perpetual car usage.
This has been done by corrupt urban planners and governments, from Washington to the local city council.
The demise of small mom n' pop stores in favor of big-box retailers has also forced people to go ever greater distances to do their shopping.
This over-dependence on cars and less walking has also negatively affected peoples' health, and will continue to do so.
Traffic delays for whatever reason lead to a lot of wasted time, stress, and frustration that is not good for anyone's physical and mental well-being.
None of this is an accident. It cannot be chalked up to simple stupidity, a blunder, or lack of foresight in the past. If this was the case, then cities and towns throughout the US would've moved to correct these mistakes years ago. But they haven't.
So this is 100% deliberate urban planning to trap the public into a never-ending cycle of gouging and profiteering by private interests who make billions of dollars per year off making sure that a person must have a car, and no efficient and economical public transportation.
Thursday, January 4, 2018
Trump the Shabbos Goy
Not one for settling on setting the lone highest record for atrocious, inhuman, and cynical behavior on the world stage, the US regime of Dotard Trump has decided to outdo itself in its self-serving and hypocritical behavior by threatening to withdraw $300 million of annual aid to Palestinians.
Dotard Trump has also announced that with the US recognition of Jerusalem as the capital of Zionistan, that Jerusalem has been taken ‘off the table’ when it comes to the peace process.
The Palestinian authority has rejected Trump’s bribes and threats, and announced that Jerusalem is not for sale, and that it will not be bought off with money.
But what has all this US financial ‘aid’ done for the Palestinians? It has done zero to end the occupation. It has done zero to end illegal settlement construction. It has done zero for any kind of final peace. It has done zero to curb zionist killing of Palestinians.
That money is nothing more than a hand-out to keep the Palestinians’ mouths shut, and the Palestinian Authority docile and compliant with its zionist occupiers.
Any and all US ‘aid’ money given to Palestinians serves as a dual US/zionist straight jacket upon the Palestinians and the peace process itself. It doesn’t further the resolution of the conflict, it arrests it.
The entire ‘peace process’ has become a cruel joke waged by the US and the zionist entity upon the Palestinians.
After the latest kookery of Trump and his zionist controllers at the UN and elsewhere, no one can seriously see the US as an honest broker in this entire peace process anymore.
The US never was an honest broker. It has been on the zionists’ side from day one.
The US, for over 50 years, with all its supposed unmatched clout and power, has been unable to resolve this conflict over a small sliver of land.
Doesn’t that seem strange? What is the problem? What is going on? The US incapability to resolve this conflict after over half-a-century has got to be one of the most spectacular failures of US diplomacy in its sordid 200+-year history.
There are only two possible explanations for this. Either the US doesn’t care about the Palestinian side, or it’s weak and incompetent.
Most likely it is the former. The US has taken the side of the zionists. US regimes, past and present, have totally failed in reigning in zionist war crimes and atrocities, thereby emboldening them to commit further crimes and violations of international law.
When it comes to the conflict in Palestine, the zionists have been the recipients of all the US carrots so far, and the Palestinians have been the recipients of all the sticks.
The US feigns concern for the Palestinians. But it doesn’t care about them. The US is 100% on the side of the zionist entity, period.
Everything it does benefits the zionists. There is no US concern, criticism, or questioning of anything the zionists do whatsoever.
The US regime and its institutions have been so thoroughly diseased by zionist propaganda and malign influence, that it is mind-boggling how anyone, especially any Palestinian official, can actually take anything the US says or does seriously.
Trump, because of his familial and business connections to pro-zionist Jews, has become their staunch Shabbos Goy. He seems to be listening to every piece of bad advice that the sub-human Netanyahoo, and his beedy-eyed son-in-law whisper in his ear.
Trump is making the situation much worse by listening only to the demands of the zionists and organized Jewry when it comes to Palestine.
The zionist tactic seems to be to arbitrarily take as much away from the Palestinians now in order to scare and force them into giving in to all zionist demands ASAP, or the zionists will take away even more later, leaving Palestinians with even less. This is tantamount to a mafia-style shakedown.
But what the zionists are unwittingly doing is shooting themselves in the foot. By prolonging the misery of the Palestinians, they are endangering their own lives due to Palestinian reprisal attacks.
But it seems that Trump doesn’t care. His understanding of the conflict and its cruel realities on the Palestinians and their land is so twisted and ignorant that there’s no way he can ever serve as an ‘honest broker.’
He is under the delusion that the resolution to this conflict lies in giving the zionists what they want, first and foremost.
For the US to be an honest broker in this situation, the US president must know the facts and realities of what is really going on from independent advisors not emotionally connected to either side of the conflicting parties. It must know what each side is doing and not doing. It must not take sides, and apply a system of carrots and sticks equally to both. Currently, this is not the case. The US is on the side of the zionist entity and its interests.
The US isn’t interested in a peaceful resolution of this conflict that is fair. This would require holding the zionists to account by cutting aid, and possibly enacting UN sanctions on the zionist entity, if it fails to comply with the law and end the occupation.
What the US and the zionists want is a resolution where they get everything they want, and where the Palestinians have to settle for only what the US and the zionists give them, no matter how flagrantly illegal, unfair, and insulting.
There is no peace process led by the US. What there is, is a US/zionist tag-team gang-up on the Palestinians, where criminal and disgusting demands and threats are delivered to the Palestinians from grinning US and zionist faces in an atmosphere of suffocating intimidation.
The US/zionist entity seek not a resolution to the conflict, but a permanent internationally rubber-stamped and mandated subjugation of the Palestinians to zionist whims and interests.
The zionists and the US aren’t interested in what the Palestinians want. They are not interested in ending the occupation until they get everything they want, and nothing less.
They aren’t interested in withdrawing to the pre-June 1967 borders. They aren’t interested in giving E. Jerusalem back to the Palestinians, or the fertile, arable land they stole. They don't want to dismantle the apartheid wall, which has been acting as the new de-facto border.
What the zionists, with full US backing, want is for the Palestinians to give up all of Jerusalem, and all of the West Bank land of worth that has been illegally occupied by the zionists up until today.
They will leave the Palestinians a bunch of parched scrub and desert, which may not even be contiguous territory. The Palestinian state will become a land-locked Bantustan, free of zionist terrorist armed forces on the inside, but surrounded by the zionist terrorist armed forces on the outside.
The Palestinians will not be allowed to have their own army, air force, and weaponry other than basic rifles. Zionistan will inspect and block any and all weapons shipment into the Palestinian state.
All points into the Palestinian state will be controlled by the zionist military, and they will still be able to say who and what is allowed to pass or not.
The airspace and territorial waters of the Palestinian state will still be under zionist surveillance, and they will reserve the right to enact a blockade for whatever reason.
The Palestinian foreign policy will be subject to US and zionist scrutiny and approval. The Palestinians will be prohibited, or at least punished, for having relations with countries that the zionists and US don’t like, i.e. Iran, North Korea, Cuba.
All goods coming into the Palestinian state will have to come through the zionist entity, which will charge high transit fees.
Palestinians will be kept dependent on zionist services in banking, telecommunications, and utilities to a large degree, whether they like it or not-under the excuse of ‘preventing Islamic terrorism.’
The zionists will want the authority to vet any and all Palestinian government officials to ensure that they are 'friendly' to the zionists.
Anything that the Palestinians do that the zionists and the US don't like, will be punishable by sanctions, huge fines, blockades, or worse.
The zionist goons will no longer patrol the streets, and the zionist entity may no longer be able to kill Palestinians with airstrikes whenever it likes, but the freedom and independence of a future Palestinian state will be, at best, severely limited. It will no longer be directly occupied, but will be dependent on, and subservient to the zionist entity for its existence. It will be limited in carrying on economic and political relations with the rest of the world.
The Palestinians will go from being occupied slaves to indentured servants and share-croppers.
The zionists and the US regime will seek to codify this new Palestinian State free-in-name-only with a binding UN resolution, to prevent anyone from demanding real independence for Palestinians later on.
This outcome, or something very close to it, is what the zionists no doubt desire and demand. This is not an outcome that the Palestinians should ever settle for, no matter what, and no one within the international community must ever allow such a fraud to be perpetrated upon the Palestinians.
The zionists, with US help, will certainly try to cajole, con, bribe and threaten the world into giving them what they want in Palestine. This must not be allowed.
After the shame the US and the zionist entity suffered in the UN a few weeks ago, it seems like there are still enough decent-minded people out there with the courage to do the right thing.
They have to stick to their conscience, and continue to deny the US and the zionists all that is unfair and illegal.
What every nation doesn't realize, is that they would be better off without the US (except for the zionist entity). The problem right now is that too many nations have been locked inside a US ideological cage of fear and dependence for so long, that they have grown used to the cage. Many at this point are actually afraid of being let out. It's sort of a twisted version of the Stockholm syndrome at work.
IRAN
The US is also at work to exploit some limited protests inside Iran for its own nefarious aims. The US wants to call an ‘emergency meeting’ at the UN to address the Iranian protests.
This is undoubtedly a tit-for-tat to punish the UN for rejecting the US recognition of Jerusalem as the capital of zionistan, and to create hype regarding these protests to force the Europeans to abandon the JCPOA and enact sanctions on Iran.
It is quite clear what the US regime is trying to do. It is trying to make much more of these protests what they really are, totally ignoring what they are about, twist the facts, feign ‘concern’ for the Iranian people, and manipulate public opinion to enact more sanctions to punish Iran (and by extent the very same people the US professes to be concerned about), all to further a regime change scenario.
It is a sick US side-show, and anyone who doesn’t see through the deception and the bullshit is either dumb, or a freak with no conscience in on the fraud.
The result of all this will be a loss for the US. No one will go along with them, at the UN or elsewhere.
These protests inside Iran are against certain economic problems, which ironically have been caused by US sanctions.
The vast majority of Iranians, whether they are protesting or not, don’t like the US and Trump. They realize that US sanctions are a major cause of Iran’s economic problems.
The protests seek to address poverty, unemployment, and price increases. These are bread-and-butter issues, and internal Iranian matters. But if the US thinks that such problems warrant violent protests and regime change, then the same should happen within the US, and certain other US vassal states. After all, the US is a land of 42 million people living in poverty, thousands of deaths per year due to lack of health insurance, police violence, random shootings, crumbling infrastructure, corruption, price increases, and much more.
And what about all the protests in the zionist entity lately against Trump’s buddy Netanyahoo, who has been accused of corruption?
Trump seems to only be concerned about problems in countries that don’t kiss US ass, but not those of his own country and his cohorts. He also seems to be fine with fake news, as long as it’s not directed at him.
Trump's anti-Iranian fetish is driven to a large extent by Netanyahoo's and zionist interests. Iran has been instrumental in defeating US and zionist-sponsored terrorists in Syria. Iran has helped prevent zionists' plans for Syria and the middle east from coming to fruition. Iran has established itself on Syrian soil, and is now better able to watch zionist activities and aid Hezbollah.
The zionists are furious at this, and are using their ever so faithful Shabbos Goy Trump to 'punish' Iran. The pathetic US wailing about the Iranian protests is part of that effort at punishment. But it will not work.
After the reckless and arrogant US behavior in front of the world a few weeks ago, the US has outed itself as a charlatan, and shed what remained of its credibility.
Trump’s knee-jerk behavior, and his ‘what I say goes’ attitude may have worked inside his company’s boardroom where he was king, but it won’t work in the public sphere.
He’s a part of an institution where people are chosen by popular consensus, not a corporate hierarchy where people are selected by him.
Trump must realize that he’s not part of a reality show where everything he says goes, and where he can treat people with disdain and be loved for it.
Arbitrarily deciding on something because he thinks it’s right, or just because he wants to do it, is junk diplomacy. It is ignorant. It is an act of a tyrant, not a responsible politician. Making up lies, and threatening people to get what he wants, no matter how ill-advised and disastrous, isn’t going to win him any victories.
With his behavior, Trump is exposing himself as the dotard that Kim Jong Un said he is.
Dotard Trump has also announced that with the US recognition of Jerusalem as the capital of Zionistan, that Jerusalem has been taken ‘off the table’ when it comes to the peace process.
The Palestinian authority has rejected Trump’s bribes and threats, and announced that Jerusalem is not for sale, and that it will not be bought off with money.
But what has all this US financial ‘aid’ done for the Palestinians? It has done zero to end the occupation. It has done zero to end illegal settlement construction. It has done zero for any kind of final peace. It has done zero to curb zionist killing of Palestinians.
That money is nothing more than a hand-out to keep the Palestinians’ mouths shut, and the Palestinian Authority docile and compliant with its zionist occupiers.
Any and all US ‘aid’ money given to Palestinians serves as a dual US/zionist straight jacket upon the Palestinians and the peace process itself. It doesn’t further the resolution of the conflict, it arrests it.
The entire ‘peace process’ has become a cruel joke waged by the US and the zionist entity upon the Palestinians.
After the latest kookery of Trump and his zionist controllers at the UN and elsewhere, no one can seriously see the US as an honest broker in this entire peace process anymore.
The US never was an honest broker. It has been on the zionists’ side from day one.
The US, for over 50 years, with all its supposed unmatched clout and power, has been unable to resolve this conflict over a small sliver of land.
Doesn’t that seem strange? What is the problem? What is going on? The US incapability to resolve this conflict after over half-a-century has got to be one of the most spectacular failures of US diplomacy in its sordid 200+-year history.
There are only two possible explanations for this. Either the US doesn’t care about the Palestinian side, or it’s weak and incompetent.
Most likely it is the former. The US has taken the side of the zionists. US regimes, past and present, have totally failed in reigning in zionist war crimes and atrocities, thereby emboldening them to commit further crimes and violations of international law.
When it comes to the conflict in Palestine, the zionists have been the recipients of all the US carrots so far, and the Palestinians have been the recipients of all the sticks.
The US feigns concern for the Palestinians. But it doesn’t care about them. The US is 100% on the side of the zionist entity, period.
Everything it does benefits the zionists. There is no US concern, criticism, or questioning of anything the zionists do whatsoever.
The US regime and its institutions have been so thoroughly diseased by zionist propaganda and malign influence, that it is mind-boggling how anyone, especially any Palestinian official, can actually take anything the US says or does seriously.
Trump, because of his familial and business connections to pro-zionist Jews, has become their staunch Shabbos Goy. He seems to be listening to every piece of bad advice that the sub-human Netanyahoo, and his beedy-eyed son-in-law whisper in his ear.
Trump is making the situation much worse by listening only to the demands of the zionists and organized Jewry when it comes to Palestine.
The zionist tactic seems to be to arbitrarily take as much away from the Palestinians now in order to scare and force them into giving in to all zionist demands ASAP, or the zionists will take away even more later, leaving Palestinians with even less. This is tantamount to a mafia-style shakedown.
But what the zionists are unwittingly doing is shooting themselves in the foot. By prolonging the misery of the Palestinians, they are endangering their own lives due to Palestinian reprisal attacks.
But it seems that Trump doesn’t care. His understanding of the conflict and its cruel realities on the Palestinians and their land is so twisted and ignorant that there’s no way he can ever serve as an ‘honest broker.’
He is under the delusion that the resolution to this conflict lies in giving the zionists what they want, first and foremost.
For the US to be an honest broker in this situation, the US president must know the facts and realities of what is really going on from independent advisors not emotionally connected to either side of the conflicting parties. It must know what each side is doing and not doing. It must not take sides, and apply a system of carrots and sticks equally to both. Currently, this is not the case. The US is on the side of the zionist entity and its interests.
The US isn’t interested in a peaceful resolution of this conflict that is fair. This would require holding the zionists to account by cutting aid, and possibly enacting UN sanctions on the zionist entity, if it fails to comply with the law and end the occupation.
What the US and the zionists want is a resolution where they get everything they want, and where the Palestinians have to settle for only what the US and the zionists give them, no matter how flagrantly illegal, unfair, and insulting.
There is no peace process led by the US. What there is, is a US/zionist tag-team gang-up on the Palestinians, where criminal and disgusting demands and threats are delivered to the Palestinians from grinning US and zionist faces in an atmosphere of suffocating intimidation.
The US/zionist entity seek not a resolution to the conflict, but a permanent internationally rubber-stamped and mandated subjugation of the Palestinians to zionist whims and interests.
The zionists and the US aren’t interested in what the Palestinians want. They are not interested in ending the occupation until they get everything they want, and nothing less.
They aren’t interested in withdrawing to the pre-June 1967 borders. They aren’t interested in giving E. Jerusalem back to the Palestinians, or the fertile, arable land they stole. They don't want to dismantle the apartheid wall, which has been acting as the new de-facto border.
What the zionists, with full US backing, want is for the Palestinians to give up all of Jerusalem, and all of the West Bank land of worth that has been illegally occupied by the zionists up until today.
They will leave the Palestinians a bunch of parched scrub and desert, which may not even be contiguous territory. The Palestinian state will become a land-locked Bantustan, free of zionist terrorist armed forces on the inside, but surrounded by the zionist terrorist armed forces on the outside.
The Palestinians will not be allowed to have their own army, air force, and weaponry other than basic rifles. Zionistan will inspect and block any and all weapons shipment into the Palestinian state.
All points into the Palestinian state will be controlled by the zionist military, and they will still be able to say who and what is allowed to pass or not.
The airspace and territorial waters of the Palestinian state will still be under zionist surveillance, and they will reserve the right to enact a blockade for whatever reason.
The Palestinian foreign policy will be subject to US and zionist scrutiny and approval. The Palestinians will be prohibited, or at least punished, for having relations with countries that the zionists and US don’t like, i.e. Iran, North Korea, Cuba.
All goods coming into the Palestinian state will have to come through the zionist entity, which will charge high transit fees.
Palestinians will be kept dependent on zionist services in banking, telecommunications, and utilities to a large degree, whether they like it or not-under the excuse of ‘preventing Islamic terrorism.’
The zionists will want the authority to vet any and all Palestinian government officials to ensure that they are 'friendly' to the zionists.
Anything that the Palestinians do that the zionists and the US don't like, will be punishable by sanctions, huge fines, blockades, or worse.
The zionist goons will no longer patrol the streets, and the zionist entity may no longer be able to kill Palestinians with airstrikes whenever it likes, but the freedom and independence of a future Palestinian state will be, at best, severely limited. It will no longer be directly occupied, but will be dependent on, and subservient to the zionist entity for its existence. It will be limited in carrying on economic and political relations with the rest of the world.
The Palestinians will go from being occupied slaves to indentured servants and share-croppers.
The zionists and the US regime will seek to codify this new Palestinian State free-in-name-only with a binding UN resolution, to prevent anyone from demanding real independence for Palestinians later on.
This outcome, or something very close to it, is what the zionists no doubt desire and demand. This is not an outcome that the Palestinians should ever settle for, no matter what, and no one within the international community must ever allow such a fraud to be perpetrated upon the Palestinians.
The zionists, with US help, will certainly try to cajole, con, bribe and threaten the world into giving them what they want in Palestine. This must not be allowed.
After the shame the US and the zionist entity suffered in the UN a few weeks ago, it seems like there are still enough decent-minded people out there with the courage to do the right thing.
They have to stick to their conscience, and continue to deny the US and the zionists all that is unfair and illegal.
What every nation doesn't realize, is that they would be better off without the US (except for the zionist entity). The problem right now is that too many nations have been locked inside a US ideological cage of fear and dependence for so long, that they have grown used to the cage. Many at this point are actually afraid of being let out. It's sort of a twisted version of the Stockholm syndrome at work.
IRAN
The US is also at work to exploit some limited protests inside Iran for its own nefarious aims. The US wants to call an ‘emergency meeting’ at the UN to address the Iranian protests.
This is undoubtedly a tit-for-tat to punish the UN for rejecting the US recognition of Jerusalem as the capital of zionistan, and to create hype regarding these protests to force the Europeans to abandon the JCPOA and enact sanctions on Iran.
It is quite clear what the US regime is trying to do. It is trying to make much more of these protests what they really are, totally ignoring what they are about, twist the facts, feign ‘concern’ for the Iranian people, and manipulate public opinion to enact more sanctions to punish Iran (and by extent the very same people the US professes to be concerned about), all to further a regime change scenario.
It is a sick US side-show, and anyone who doesn’t see through the deception and the bullshit is either dumb, or a freak with no conscience in on the fraud.
The result of all this will be a loss for the US. No one will go along with them, at the UN or elsewhere.
These protests inside Iran are against certain economic problems, which ironically have been caused by US sanctions.
The vast majority of Iranians, whether they are protesting or not, don’t like the US and Trump. They realize that US sanctions are a major cause of Iran’s economic problems.
The protests seek to address poverty, unemployment, and price increases. These are bread-and-butter issues, and internal Iranian matters. But if the US thinks that such problems warrant violent protests and regime change, then the same should happen within the US, and certain other US vassal states. After all, the US is a land of 42 million people living in poverty, thousands of deaths per year due to lack of health insurance, police violence, random shootings, crumbling infrastructure, corruption, price increases, and much more.
And what about all the protests in the zionist entity lately against Trump’s buddy Netanyahoo, who has been accused of corruption?
Trump seems to only be concerned about problems in countries that don’t kiss US ass, but not those of his own country and his cohorts. He also seems to be fine with fake news, as long as it’s not directed at him.
Trump's anti-Iranian fetish is driven to a large extent by Netanyahoo's and zionist interests. Iran has been instrumental in defeating US and zionist-sponsored terrorists in Syria. Iran has helped prevent zionists' plans for Syria and the middle east from coming to fruition. Iran has established itself on Syrian soil, and is now better able to watch zionist activities and aid Hezbollah.
The zionists are furious at this, and are using their ever so faithful Shabbos Goy Trump to 'punish' Iran. The pathetic US wailing about the Iranian protests is part of that effort at punishment. But it will not work.
After the reckless and arrogant US behavior in front of the world a few weeks ago, the US has outed itself as a charlatan, and shed what remained of its credibility.
Trump’s knee-jerk behavior, and his ‘what I say goes’ attitude may have worked inside his company’s boardroom where he was king, but it won’t work in the public sphere.
He’s a part of an institution where people are chosen by popular consensus, not a corporate hierarchy where people are selected by him.
Trump must realize that he’s not part of a reality show where everything he says goes, and where he can treat people with disdain and be loved for it.
Arbitrarily deciding on something because he thinks it’s right, or just because he wants to do it, is junk diplomacy. It is ignorant. It is an act of a tyrant, not a responsible politician. Making up lies, and threatening people to get what he wants, no matter how ill-advised and disastrous, isn’t going to win him any victories.
With his behavior, Trump is exposing himself as the dotard that Kim Jong Un said he is.
Wednesday, January 3, 2018
Trump's Much Ado About Nothing
The recent protests in Iran have given the Trump regime and the neo-cons hard-ons.
Once again, we are seeing the US try to high-jack legitimate protests to cause chaos, violence, and regime change.
Trump has been issuing ignorant and pathetic tweets that impress and fool no one, except Netanyahoo and the idiots that support them both. He has been calling the Iranian government corrupt, and that it spends peoples’ money on supporting terrorism.
Surely Trump hasn’t looked into a mirror lately!
Also, why hasn’t Trump tweeted anything regarding the protests that are taking place in zionistan against his buddy Netanyahoo’s corruption? Has the cat got his forked tongue?
But Iran has had to put up with US abuse and subterfuge before, and knows how to effectively deal with any and all attempts of the US/CIA/Mossad at subversion.
Iran has been inoculated against these US plots since 1979. Also, the Iranians have been watching for years the abhorrent US behavior in the world, especially in Syria, Libya, Iraq and elsewhere, the killing of Iranian scientists most likely by CIA/Mossad agents, and continuous attempts at causing economic hardship by reneging on the JCPOA, and passing sanctions on Iran.
These actions have turned off most Iranians to the US. This is why any attempts to foment regime change in Iran are doomed to failure.
The US simply doesn’t have the assets and a base to succeed in Iran.
Watching previous US regime change operations, it is clear that they can only succeed in one of two ways. Through internal subversion, or direct/indirect military action.
INTERNAL SUBVERSION SCENARIO
For this method to succeed, there has to be a continuous, long-term, firmly-rooted presence of US agents and proxies on the ground in the country which the US wants to control.
This requires lots of money and effort. It’s done through the setting up of US/western-funded NGOs and other ‘civil society’ CIA front organizations, like USAid, in the target country.
These organizations recruit and educate (brainwash) naive elements within the host society who are receptive to US propaganda. These individuals are given lots of dollars, then organize all sorts of seminars, conferences, and other gatherings aimed at promoting feel-good, nice-sounding policies which are meant to benefit US political, military, economic and strategic interests.
The NGOs and various organization funded by the US, together with the US embassy in the target country then support and promote any and all politicians and individuals running for public office. In return for this financial and PR support, the candidates faithfully promote US interests, once elected.
When there are enough of these proxies and dupes trained well-enough, the US directs them to stage protests, unrest, and demand the resignation of any government officials who the US finds inconvenient, and who don't want to take orders from the US.
In the midst of seemingly legitimate protests, paid protesters flood the streets, and it becomes quite difficult to tell who, and what is real or not. If the protests are taking too long, or if the host nation’s government puts up firm resistance, agent-saboteurs are called in, and suddenly people are getting shot at from rooftops. The massacres are then blamed on the host nation’s government, and the US-controlled protesters demand that the government must leave. The protests get more violent, until the government relents.
This is the scenario that unfolded in Ukraine in 2014, but has also happened in certain ex-Soviet republics, like Georgia.
DIRECT/INDIRECT MILITARY ACTION
If a nation that the US targets for regime change doesn’t have a firmly-rooted presence of US/western-sponsored NGOs and other such organizations that can be used to subvert and destabilize from within, and a populace that is either hostile or indifferent to the US, then the US regime opts for military armed violence in order to overthrow a government it doesn’t like.
This will take the form of direct or indirect military action.
Direct military action will be used only if the target nation has been sufficiently softened up beforehand-usually with crippling sanctions and/or periodic military strikes, excused by a UN resolution-or a self-serving US interpretation of one. This is what happened with Iraq between 1991-2003.
Indirect military action is used if the target country hasn’t been adequately softened up, no US-sponsored NGOs have a presence, and the population is generally not supportive of US aims.
The US then trains and arms rebel groups, including known terrorists to infiltrate the target country. These rebels cause havoc and violence on a mass-scale. Once they dig in, they cause provocations and false flags to create an excuse for US intervention.
This tactic is preceded with lots of propaganda and disinformation about the rebels bringing ‘freedom and democracy’ to the target country. Lies are peddled about how the target nation’s government is massacring people, denying them food, bombing them from the air, or gassing them with chemical weapons. In this way, the target country’s government is made to look repressive and cruel, no longer 'legitimate' and a target for further, and more overt acts of US-sponsored violence.
Such scenarios unfolded in Libya and Syria. It succeeded in Libya, but was successfully countered in Syria.
So to recap, in order for any US regime change operation to succeed in Iran, the following will have to be present:
1. An operating US embassy
2. US-based NGOs and ‘civil society’ organizations
3. Dedicated dupes and proxies thoroughly indoctrinated with pro-US propaganda
4. US media organizations which support all three
These four entities act in tandem to manipulate local and global public opinion to go against the host nation’s government, and create a false image that the government is criminal and corrupt to such a degree that everyone wants it gone.
Even if the host government tries to address the demands of the rioters, the offers are rejected, and the protesters get even more violent, and demand even more. This is a sure sign that the so-called ‘revolution’ is a fake US-sponsored regime change operation, since legitimate protesters will disperse once their demands are met.
We saw this in Ukraine, when the previous government of Victor Yanukovych agreed to the protesters demands for early elections and promised to resign. Right after that, mysterious gunmen fired on people. This created the perfect excuse for the ‘opposition’ to take power by force, which is what the US wanted all along. Early elections would have meant that political parties and individuals not friendly to US interests would be left intact, and would have the chance to be elected, or re-elected at a later date.
The US didn’t want this. It wanted total control of Ukraine, and eliminate the possibility of any government coming to power ever again that wasn’t subservient to the US. This is why after the current pro-US Ukrainian junta came to power, there was a purge of politicians critical of the US/EU.
After Yuschenko, the US wanted to make sure that their next clown stays in place, for good.
The good news is that Iran contains virtually none of the four ingredients necessary for the US to successfully subvert the country from the inside. The most there is, are some western media organizations, but their propaganda and fake news has no sway without an army of well-organized agents and provocateurs on the ground.
Also, Iran has a huge number of backup forces like the Basij, and other pro-government volunteer militias that can be mobilized quickly, and which will snuff out any and all direct or indirect US attempts at subversion. We saw them in action in 2009.
Iranian intelligence is also quite adept at quickly sniffing out conspiracies. They had decades of practice.
Direct military option like the one in Iraq won’t succeed, and will invite harsh Iranian reprisals. Iran has enough deterrent power to cause much pain for the US and zionistan. Any attempt at direct invasion will most likely cause havoc on a mass scale throughout the region and maybe even beyond. It will cause a war.
The US doesn’t have the clout for such an action anyway. Iran is too formidable of an adversary.
Then there’s Russia and China. These two won’t just sit idly by, and most likely they’re providing some help to Iran against any and all outside saboteurs.
With all this being said, there is absolutely nothing wrong with the Iranian people legitimately protesting unfavorable economic conditions. The best thing for the Iranian government to do is to address them, and do so quickly.
Ironically what the Iranians are actually protesting are pro-capitalist, neo-liberal policies of reformist President Rouhani, policies which have been sneaking back into Iran in the last few years. The reformist government has cut aid for students, eliminated price controls and subsidies on certain goods. The reformists pro-capitalist policies have also raised unemployment.
The previous government of Mahmoud Ahmadinejiad actually instituted subsidies, price controls, help for students, and cut unemployment-all in the midst of sanctions that were worse than today.
So what is going on is that the Trump regime doesn’t understand the demands of the Iranian public. The protests are actually against policies that people like Trump would welcome.
The US is dusting off the old regime change script, complete with fake news, false accusations, doctored/incorrectly attributed photos, astro-turfing by dishonest protest-goers, and lots of slanted and twisted coverage by the MSM which, as always, gets it all wrong on-purpose.
Somehow Trump doesn’t mind ‘fake news’ when it’s not directed at him.
The US regime and the neo-cons won’t get their ‘Iranian revolution.’ No matter what the grievances of the Iranian public are, the majority abhors US policies and Trump’s off-the-wall, uninformed electronic rants and abuse of Iran.
The US has the biggest prison population in the world, 42 million people living in poverty, serious lack of health care insurance, daily shootings, crumbling infrastructure, depressed wages, eroding labor rights. It supports vile, despotic regimes in Saudi Arabia and zionistan, supports terrorism, and much more sins to atone for.
So Trump needs to leave Iran alone, and fix his own house before he shits in someone else’s.
Once again, we are seeing the US try to high-jack legitimate protests to cause chaos, violence, and regime change.
Trump has been issuing ignorant and pathetic tweets that impress and fool no one, except Netanyahoo and the idiots that support them both. He has been calling the Iranian government corrupt, and that it spends peoples’ money on supporting terrorism.
Surely Trump hasn’t looked into a mirror lately!
Also, why hasn’t Trump tweeted anything regarding the protests that are taking place in zionistan against his buddy Netanyahoo’s corruption? Has the cat got his forked tongue?
But Iran has had to put up with US abuse and subterfuge before, and knows how to effectively deal with any and all attempts of the US/CIA/Mossad at subversion.
Iran has been inoculated against these US plots since 1979. Also, the Iranians have been watching for years the abhorrent US behavior in the world, especially in Syria, Libya, Iraq and elsewhere, the killing of Iranian scientists most likely by CIA/Mossad agents, and continuous attempts at causing economic hardship by reneging on the JCPOA, and passing sanctions on Iran.
These actions have turned off most Iranians to the US. This is why any attempts to foment regime change in Iran are doomed to failure.
The US simply doesn’t have the assets and a base to succeed in Iran.
Watching previous US regime change operations, it is clear that they can only succeed in one of two ways. Through internal subversion, or direct/indirect military action.
INTERNAL SUBVERSION SCENARIO
For this method to succeed, there has to be a continuous, long-term, firmly-rooted presence of US agents and proxies on the ground in the country which the US wants to control.
This requires lots of money and effort. It’s done through the setting up of US/western-funded NGOs and other ‘civil society’ CIA front organizations, like USAid, in the target country.
These organizations recruit and educate (brainwash) naive elements within the host society who are receptive to US propaganda. These individuals are given lots of dollars, then organize all sorts of seminars, conferences, and other gatherings aimed at promoting feel-good, nice-sounding policies which are meant to benefit US political, military, economic and strategic interests.
The NGOs and various organization funded by the US, together with the US embassy in the target country then support and promote any and all politicians and individuals running for public office. In return for this financial and PR support, the candidates faithfully promote US interests, once elected.
When there are enough of these proxies and dupes trained well-enough, the US directs them to stage protests, unrest, and demand the resignation of any government officials who the US finds inconvenient, and who don't want to take orders from the US.
In the midst of seemingly legitimate protests, paid protesters flood the streets, and it becomes quite difficult to tell who, and what is real or not. If the protests are taking too long, or if the host nation’s government puts up firm resistance, agent-saboteurs are called in, and suddenly people are getting shot at from rooftops. The massacres are then blamed on the host nation’s government, and the US-controlled protesters demand that the government must leave. The protests get more violent, until the government relents.
This is the scenario that unfolded in Ukraine in 2014, but has also happened in certain ex-Soviet republics, like Georgia.
DIRECT/INDIRECT MILITARY ACTION
If a nation that the US targets for regime change doesn’t have a firmly-rooted presence of US/western-sponsored NGOs and other such organizations that can be used to subvert and destabilize from within, and a populace that is either hostile or indifferent to the US, then the US regime opts for military armed violence in order to overthrow a government it doesn’t like.
This will take the form of direct or indirect military action.
Direct military action will be used only if the target nation has been sufficiently softened up beforehand-usually with crippling sanctions and/or periodic military strikes, excused by a UN resolution-or a self-serving US interpretation of one. This is what happened with Iraq between 1991-2003.
Indirect military action is used if the target country hasn’t been adequately softened up, no US-sponsored NGOs have a presence, and the population is generally not supportive of US aims.
The US then trains and arms rebel groups, including known terrorists to infiltrate the target country. These rebels cause havoc and violence on a mass-scale. Once they dig in, they cause provocations and false flags to create an excuse for US intervention.
This tactic is preceded with lots of propaganda and disinformation about the rebels bringing ‘freedom and democracy’ to the target country. Lies are peddled about how the target nation’s government is massacring people, denying them food, bombing them from the air, or gassing them with chemical weapons. In this way, the target country’s government is made to look repressive and cruel, no longer 'legitimate' and a target for further, and more overt acts of US-sponsored violence.
Such scenarios unfolded in Libya and Syria. It succeeded in Libya, but was successfully countered in Syria.
So to recap, in order for any US regime change operation to succeed in Iran, the following will have to be present:
1. An operating US embassy
2. US-based NGOs and ‘civil society’ organizations
3. Dedicated dupes and proxies thoroughly indoctrinated with pro-US propaganda
4. US media organizations which support all three
These four entities act in tandem to manipulate local and global public opinion to go against the host nation’s government, and create a false image that the government is criminal and corrupt to such a degree that everyone wants it gone.
Even if the host government tries to address the demands of the rioters, the offers are rejected, and the protesters get even more violent, and demand even more. This is a sure sign that the so-called ‘revolution’ is a fake US-sponsored regime change operation, since legitimate protesters will disperse once their demands are met.
We saw this in Ukraine, when the previous government of Victor Yanukovych agreed to the protesters demands for early elections and promised to resign. Right after that, mysterious gunmen fired on people. This created the perfect excuse for the ‘opposition’ to take power by force, which is what the US wanted all along. Early elections would have meant that political parties and individuals not friendly to US interests would be left intact, and would have the chance to be elected, or re-elected at a later date.
The US didn’t want this. It wanted total control of Ukraine, and eliminate the possibility of any government coming to power ever again that wasn’t subservient to the US. This is why after the current pro-US Ukrainian junta came to power, there was a purge of politicians critical of the US/EU.
After Yuschenko, the US wanted to make sure that their next clown stays in place, for good.
The good news is that Iran contains virtually none of the four ingredients necessary for the US to successfully subvert the country from the inside. The most there is, are some western media organizations, but their propaganda and fake news has no sway without an army of well-organized agents and provocateurs on the ground.
Also, Iran has a huge number of backup forces like the Basij, and other pro-government volunteer militias that can be mobilized quickly, and which will snuff out any and all direct or indirect US attempts at subversion. We saw them in action in 2009.
Iranian intelligence is also quite adept at quickly sniffing out conspiracies. They had decades of practice.
Direct military option like the one in Iraq won’t succeed, and will invite harsh Iranian reprisals. Iran has enough deterrent power to cause much pain for the US and zionistan. Any attempt at direct invasion will most likely cause havoc on a mass scale throughout the region and maybe even beyond. It will cause a war.
The US doesn’t have the clout for such an action anyway. Iran is too formidable of an adversary.
Then there’s Russia and China. These two won’t just sit idly by, and most likely they’re providing some help to Iran against any and all outside saboteurs.
With all this being said, there is absolutely nothing wrong with the Iranian people legitimately protesting unfavorable economic conditions. The best thing for the Iranian government to do is to address them, and do so quickly.
Ironically what the Iranians are actually protesting are pro-capitalist, neo-liberal policies of reformist President Rouhani, policies which have been sneaking back into Iran in the last few years. The reformist government has cut aid for students, eliminated price controls and subsidies on certain goods. The reformists pro-capitalist policies have also raised unemployment.
The previous government of Mahmoud Ahmadinejiad actually instituted subsidies, price controls, help for students, and cut unemployment-all in the midst of sanctions that were worse than today.
So what is going on is that the Trump regime doesn’t understand the demands of the Iranian public. The protests are actually against policies that people like Trump would welcome.
The US is dusting off the old regime change script, complete with fake news, false accusations, doctored/incorrectly attributed photos, astro-turfing by dishonest protest-goers, and lots of slanted and twisted coverage by the MSM which, as always, gets it all wrong on-purpose.
Somehow Trump doesn’t mind ‘fake news’ when it’s not directed at him.
The US regime and the neo-cons won’t get their ‘Iranian revolution.’ No matter what the grievances of the Iranian public are, the majority abhors US policies and Trump’s off-the-wall, uninformed electronic rants and abuse of Iran.
The US has the biggest prison population in the world, 42 million people living in poverty, serious lack of health care insurance, daily shootings, crumbling infrastructure, depressed wages, eroding labor rights. It supports vile, despotic regimes in Saudi Arabia and zionistan, supports terrorism, and much more sins to atone for.
So Trump needs to leave Iran alone, and fix his own house before he shits in someone else’s.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)