Much has been made lately about the diplomatic flirting between the new Iranian president Rohani and his troubled US counterpart Barack Obama.
After their speeches at the UN and the phone-call Obama made to Rohani after the latter was leaving the US, people are starting to envision some great breakthrough and thaw in relations between the US and Iran. Some have even talked of a Nixon moment, where Obama will reopen relations with Iran and start on the way of cooperation and normalized relations.
While such a scenario would be great, and I personally think it is high time for it, I just cannot be optimistic about the future of Iranian-US relations.
Let’s not forget that the US and the west have been tormenting Iran for sixty years now.
First, Operation Ajax, which was a joint effort between Great Britain and the US to overthrow the Iranian Prime Minister Mossadegh in 1953, even though he was a democratically-elected leader.
Mossadegh’s overthrow cleared the way for US/western-supported autocrat Shah Reza Pahlavi to ascend to the leadership of Iran. This ushered in decades of political and social repression, torture, disappearance and hardship for Iranians.
The Shah’s notorious secret police, the SAVAK, whom the US and the zionist regimes trained, were responsible for rounding up and torture of anyone who was seen as a threat to the ruling western-supported dynasty.
In 1979, when the Iranians successfully overthrew the Shah and he was forced to flee, the US and the west started enacting sanctions to make life as hard as possible for Iran. This trend continues to this day.
The US also convinced Iraq to invade Iran in 1979. Throughout the war, the US and other western countries assisted Iraq with training, intelligence data and weapons sales. They also sold to Iraq chemical weapons which were then used on Iranians, with US knowledge and acquiescence.
Lately, the US and the west, together with their MEK terrorist allies and the zionist shit-pit have been launching cyber attacks against Iranian nuclear installations and hired murderers to kill Iranian nuclear scientists.
Let’s also not forget the broken-record talk from Obama and the rest of the pathetic gaggle of murderers on Capitol Hill about threatening Iran with military action.
So it is not hard to see why Iran may be just a tad bit distrustful of US words and intentions, even when the US establishment regime tries to change its rhetoric to one of peace and conciliation.
Barack Obama said during his first election campaign that if elected, he will talk with Iran and try to bridge their differences in a peaceful way.
But if Obama and the current US administration truly wanted to change their relations with Iran for the better, they would have started doing so on January 22, 2009-the day after Obama was sworn in as president for his first term.
But what Obama did was enact more sanctions, threats, launched computer viruses and assassinated Iranian scientists. These are not the acts of a president and a government that want peace with Iran. The US even enacted more sanctions right after Rohani was sworn in as president, and that was just last month!
What message does this send? I think that this phone call and the “thaw” rhetoric from Obama and his miserable regime are nothing but a ploy to prod Rohani and the new Iranian govt to see if they can be tricked and bought-off cheap into doing what the west and the zionist mafia-state wants.
If Rohani does not fall for the ruse and sticks to Iran's rights, it will be sanctions and threats all over again. There will be no changes in US policy towards Iran.
The US ruling regime is too morally and intellectually decrepit and incapable of acting in a normal, transparent and decent way.
The pro-zionist creatures embedded at all levels of the US government own US policy on the Mideast and Iran and they will do whatever they can to make sure there is no peace.
Too many careers and generous paychecks depend on perpetuating the fake Iranian threat. If Iran is no longer a threat, a lot of peoples’ careers and livelihoods and positions of power and authority will be gone. This is why the ruling US regime will not let this happen.
These freaks NEED Iran as an enemy because this stance justifies so many policies which benefit a lot of establishment figures and their pals.
There are only three options the ruling US fascist establishment will tolerate as far as Iran goes:
1. Keep Iran as it is and make people think it is a threat to be contained
2. Try to buy off its government
3. Overthrow it using subterfuge, fake western-funded and controlled pro-democracy groups, mass protests and/or military means
I personally think that Iran should stop trying to explain itself to the US and the west and build a nuclear deterrent. This is the only way Iran will ever be left alone and respected. It is, ironically, the only way towards any kind of genuine rapprochement with the west, since with nuclear weapons Iran’s strength will be right on par with world powers.
Furthermore, why should Iran listen to hypocritical lecturing and finger-pointing by the US or any other states who demand that Iran suspend its uranium enrichment and stop its nuclear work, when those nations’ arsenals bristle with thousands of nuclear weapons.
No country that currently possesses nuclear weapons has the right to accuse and condemn other nations for pursuing nuclear research and development!
Those nations who have nuclear weapons must first get rid of them, and only then can they lecture others and make demands. It is not surprising that Iran does not want to listen to the whining coming out of Washington and Brussels. It would show a serious lack of common sense for Iran to listen to anything the west demands.
The current animosity between Iran and the US has nothing to do with Iran’s nuclear program or any imaginary nuclear weapons the US says Iran possesses. This has always been a red herring.
It has to do with punishing Iran for the embarrassment, anger and resentment the US and the west feel for having been bested by the Iranians in 1979. It also has to do with the loss of control and profits from Iran’s oil resources.
All the rest is bullshit.
Sunday, September 29, 2013
Monday, September 16, 2013
O-Bomber's Hairy Kerry Part 2
It looks like the American population and Russia has put the warmongering creatures Obama and Kerry in their place.
Without proof and popular/international support their hasty plans for another illegal war based on lies went awry.
After Putin’s op-ed article in the NYT, Hairy Kerry, Obummer and other assorted and unrepentant congress critters have been hitting the airwaves trying to clean off some of the mud they were dragged through by Russia by whining and falsely accusing Russia of not pursuing the path to peace like the US wanted.
But if memory serves me correctly (and it does), I recall for two years now it was the US warmongers who were hell-bent on violence.
It was the US which from the beginning called for unilateral, unreasonable and illegal methods to end the Syrian crisis.
US UN ex-representative Susan Rice-now Samantha Power, Obummer, KILLary Clinton and now Kerry have from the beginning called for a UN resolution which puts all the blame for the violence and unrest in Syria on Bashar Al Assad, demanded military action, that Assad step down “immediately” and now accused the Syrian government of gassing its own people, without any evidence to back it up and against plain logic.
Add to that, the US has supported Al Qaeda-linked fanatic militants in Syria, both domestic and foreign, with weapons and training.
On the contrary, it was Russia which from the beginning has called for a negotiated solution to the crisis. It asked the Syrian government, rebels and the US to cease fighting and convene a conference to resolve the unrest through negotiations.
It was Russia who more than a year ago announced that it was ready to stop the sale of arms to Damascus, and back a total arms embargo on Syria at the UN, if the US and its allies stopped the flow of arms to the rebels, in order to force both sides to negotiate.
It was Russia who a week ago brokered a deal which would see Syria hand over and eliminate its CW stockpiles, while the rabid White House screamed for war.
So which side has been for peace and which for violence?
Furthermore, the argument that Russia is only looking out for its own interests in Syria as far as weapons sales and its Tartus naval base goes, and does not really care about the Syrian people, is not credible, as any so-called argument coming out of Washington against Syria has been.
Why? Because we are not seeing Russia exploiting the unrest in US-backed autocracies in Saudi Arabia, Bahrain and Qatar to form and arm rebel movements which want to overthrown those governments and end up causing violence and death on a mass scale, in order to further Russian geopolitical interests and kick the US out of the Mideast as the US certainly plans to kick out Russia.
It is clear that those who are calling for an attack on Syria are genetically defective creatures. Such people are the main problem; such people are not capable of peaceful solutions whatsoever.
The US MUST be forced to do the right thing or else it will just keep on doing things the absolute wrong way. It seems that Russia understands this.
The UN investigators are due to present their findings about the August 21st chemical attack in Damascus today. Hopefully the report has not been doctored up to falsely implicate the Syrian government.
But one thing stands out about this chemical attack:
It is very suspect that from the beginning the US has put the blame for the CW attacks on the Syrian government.
The US purports to have "overwhelming" evidence to back up their accusations, but refuses to share it. Then the US turns around and tells the UN that the CW inspectors mandate must be limited only to determining if, and what type of chemical weapons were used, but not investigating WHO used them.
Surely if the US government is telling the truth and their evidence is full-proof, they would be very eager for the UN investigators to find out WHO used them.
But Bashar Al Assad and the Syrian government are to blame for one thing.
A year or more ago, the US decided to use any use of CW by Syria as a “red line,” that if crossed, would invite a military response.
At around the same time, the rebels said they have access to chemical weapons and threatened to use them.
The Syrian government should have immediately seen the writing on the wall and quickly moved to get rid of these chemical weapons with Russian and UN cooperation, before their presence in Syrian arsenals was exploited by the rebels and their sponsors to launch false-flag attacks.
The Syrian authorities should of realized back then that if any chemical weapons went off, Syria would be blamed, and calls for military intervention would follow from the US and their cohorts.
Plus, since the Syrian military has been able to beat back the rebels using conventional means, the chemical weapons were an unnecessary political and strategic liability.
It is therefore imperative that Russia not let the US and its allies use any pending UN resolution as an excuse for war.
Threats of military force must not be allowed in any UN resolutions or else the US and their pals will seek to corrupt and ruin the disarmament process in order to create an excuse to attack Syria.
Syria’s CW disarmament process cannot be turned into another never-ending Iraq inspections fiasco which only serves the interests of the CIA and Mossad and in the end is used as a catalyst for war by the criminal US regime.
Without proof and popular/international support their hasty plans for another illegal war based on lies went awry.
After Putin’s op-ed article in the NYT, Hairy Kerry, Obummer and other assorted and unrepentant congress critters have been hitting the airwaves trying to clean off some of the mud they were dragged through by Russia by whining and falsely accusing Russia of not pursuing the path to peace like the US wanted.
But if memory serves me correctly (and it does), I recall for two years now it was the US warmongers who were hell-bent on violence.
It was the US which from the beginning called for unilateral, unreasonable and illegal methods to end the Syrian crisis.
US UN ex-representative Susan Rice-now Samantha Power, Obummer, KILLary Clinton and now Kerry have from the beginning called for a UN resolution which puts all the blame for the violence and unrest in Syria on Bashar Al Assad, demanded military action, that Assad step down “immediately” and now accused the Syrian government of gassing its own people, without any evidence to back it up and against plain logic.
Add to that, the US has supported Al Qaeda-linked fanatic militants in Syria, both domestic and foreign, with weapons and training.
On the contrary, it was Russia which from the beginning has called for a negotiated solution to the crisis. It asked the Syrian government, rebels and the US to cease fighting and convene a conference to resolve the unrest through negotiations.
It was Russia who more than a year ago announced that it was ready to stop the sale of arms to Damascus, and back a total arms embargo on Syria at the UN, if the US and its allies stopped the flow of arms to the rebels, in order to force both sides to negotiate.
It was Russia who a week ago brokered a deal which would see Syria hand over and eliminate its CW stockpiles, while the rabid White House screamed for war.
So which side has been for peace and which for violence?
Furthermore, the argument that Russia is only looking out for its own interests in Syria as far as weapons sales and its Tartus naval base goes, and does not really care about the Syrian people, is not credible, as any so-called argument coming out of Washington against Syria has been.
Why? Because we are not seeing Russia exploiting the unrest in US-backed autocracies in Saudi Arabia, Bahrain and Qatar to form and arm rebel movements which want to overthrown those governments and end up causing violence and death on a mass scale, in order to further Russian geopolitical interests and kick the US out of the Mideast as the US certainly plans to kick out Russia.
It is clear that those who are calling for an attack on Syria are genetically defective creatures. Such people are the main problem; such people are not capable of peaceful solutions whatsoever.
The US MUST be forced to do the right thing or else it will just keep on doing things the absolute wrong way. It seems that Russia understands this.
The UN investigators are due to present their findings about the August 21st chemical attack in Damascus today. Hopefully the report has not been doctored up to falsely implicate the Syrian government.
But one thing stands out about this chemical attack:
It is very suspect that from the beginning the US has put the blame for the CW attacks on the Syrian government.
The US purports to have "overwhelming" evidence to back up their accusations, but refuses to share it. Then the US turns around and tells the UN that the CW inspectors mandate must be limited only to determining if, and what type of chemical weapons were used, but not investigating WHO used them.
Surely if the US government is telling the truth and their evidence is full-proof, they would be very eager for the UN investigators to find out WHO used them.
But Bashar Al Assad and the Syrian government are to blame for one thing.
A year or more ago, the US decided to use any use of CW by Syria as a “red line,” that if crossed, would invite a military response.
At around the same time, the rebels said they have access to chemical weapons and threatened to use them.
The Syrian government should have immediately seen the writing on the wall and quickly moved to get rid of these chemical weapons with Russian and UN cooperation, before their presence in Syrian arsenals was exploited by the rebels and their sponsors to launch false-flag attacks.
The Syrian authorities should of realized back then that if any chemical weapons went off, Syria would be blamed, and calls for military intervention would follow from the US and their cohorts.
Plus, since the Syrian military has been able to beat back the rebels using conventional means, the chemical weapons were an unnecessary political and strategic liability.
It is therefore imperative that Russia not let the US and its allies use any pending UN resolution as an excuse for war.
Threats of military force must not be allowed in any UN resolutions or else the US and their pals will seek to corrupt and ruin the disarmament process in order to create an excuse to attack Syria.
Syria’s CW disarmament process cannot be turned into another never-ending Iraq inspections fiasco which only serves the interests of the CIA and Mossad and in the end is used as a catalyst for war by the criminal US regime.
Wednesday, September 11, 2013
O-Bomber's Hairy Kerry
It seems Team Obummer just does not want peace. They keep on coming up with all sorts of absurd reasons for war with Syria. They talk about no boots on the ground, limited and small bombing campaigns, threats to national security, anything to please their swollen and itchy trigger finger.
I swear any minute now Obummer and Company are just going to come out in front of the cameras and state they are going to attack Syria just because they can, or maybe because it will be good for economic recovery.
One of the latest farcical excuses Obomber and Company have concocted to justify military intervention in Syria, is the presence of Islamic extremists in Syria.
Yes, that’s right. The same Islamic extremists the US together with their European and Arab autocrat poodles sent, armed, trained and are supporting against the Syrian government.
This is got to be the most cruel hoax Obomber and his warmongering sycophants could ever give to excuse a war. It is a stab in the back to the very foundation of the concepts of logic and integrity.
This is basically what the US is doing:
1. US foments a fake rebellion in order to overthrow Assad
2. US and its allies train and arm militants who are allied with Al Qaeda, sends them into Syria, where they end up causing mayhem and massacres and launch chemical weapons
3. Then the US uses the presence of these fanatics in Syria as a reason for intervention to prevent these people from someday being a "security threat" to the US (a threat the US created in the first place)
4. But, get this, IF the US attacks Syria, it won’t be attacking those Al Qaeda-linked militants; it will attack the government forces of Bashar Al Assad, the secular leader who is fighting the very same terrorists the US sees as a threat to the US!
Obummer is playing a sick and cruel joke on the world. This can be plainly seen.
The mumbling and stumbling Obummer and his pal Hairy Kerry have been suffering setback after setback in their lie-ridden drive to war. Their so-called evidence is nothing but a feces pile of cherry-picked and hyped-up assumptions and insinuations. Add to this, Syria has called team Obummer’s bluff and agreed to the Russian proposal to mothball its chemical weapons.
This has taken the wind out of Obummer’s sails and he was forced to call off his attack dogs.
But it is evident that Russia has used its power to put the US in its place. Russia’s efforts thwarted a looming illegal war of aggression and have thrown enough wildcards into the mix that prevents Obummer from doing anything stupid, lest he wants to go down in history as worse than Bush, which once was though impossible.
Russia should use this momentum wisely.
A UN resolution is now in the works which will govern the Syrian CW disarmament process. Russia should use this as an opportunity to end this crisis once and for all and prevent the US from sabotaging the inspections process.
Among some things, the resolution must demand that ALL sides stop the stockpiling and use of chemical weapons.
Also, Russia must demand that this resolution is contingent on the US calling off its threats of war and promising to pursue a peaceful path to resolving the Syrian crisis.
And finally, if the US demands that the UN resolution contains a clause that either blames the CW attack of August 21 on the Syrian government or a threat of military action for Syrian non-compliance with its disarmament obligations, Russia must demand that the condition for signing on to this is contingent on US unconditionally handing over ALL evidence it has to back up their accusations that the Syrian government was responsible for launching the CW attacks last month to whoever wants it, including Syria. Russia’s agreement to the two clauses mentioned above must also be contingent on the evidence the US provides being genuine and solid after it is thoroughly fact-checked and all points investigated as true.
Anything less that is unacceptable.
P.S.-Obama’s speech on Tuesday night was filled with hyperbole and hypocrisy. He foolishly compared Assad to Hitler, called anyone using chemical weapons a criminal tyrant and tried to convince people that such tyrants must be stopped.
But Obummer omitted certain unpleasant and embarrassing facts in his speech: The use of Agent Orange in Vietnam which has caused birth defects in children up until today; the US and European sale of chemical weapons material to Iraq which was used by Saddam Hussein against the Iranians and the Kurds in the 1980s, with US help and blessing; Israel’s stockpiling of WMD and use against Palestinians in 2009 during the attack on Gaza Strip; US use of depleted uranium and white phosphorus on the battlefield, and as recent as Iraq, and of course, the biggest omission of all-the US use of the atomic bomb on Japan. The US is the ONLY country to do so to this day; not to mention the use of chemical weapons by dear ally Great Britain throughout history-in fact none other than Winston Churchill praised and encourage the use of chemical weapons on Palestinians and Afghans during Britain’s occupation of those lands.
With his speech, Obama has truly solidified his position as not only a liar but as a hypocrite and as one of the most warmongering neo-cons to have ever slithered out of the sewer.
I swear any minute now Obummer and Company are just going to come out in front of the cameras and state they are going to attack Syria just because they can, or maybe because it will be good for economic recovery.
One of the latest farcical excuses Obomber and Company have concocted to justify military intervention in Syria, is the presence of Islamic extremists in Syria.
Yes, that’s right. The same Islamic extremists the US together with their European and Arab autocrat poodles sent, armed, trained and are supporting against the Syrian government.
This is got to be the most cruel hoax Obomber and his warmongering sycophants could ever give to excuse a war. It is a stab in the back to the very foundation of the concepts of logic and integrity.
This is basically what the US is doing:
1. US foments a fake rebellion in order to overthrow Assad
2. US and its allies train and arm militants who are allied with Al Qaeda, sends them into Syria, where they end up causing mayhem and massacres and launch chemical weapons
3. Then the US uses the presence of these fanatics in Syria as a reason for intervention to prevent these people from someday being a "security threat" to the US (a threat the US created in the first place)
4. But, get this, IF the US attacks Syria, it won’t be attacking those Al Qaeda-linked militants; it will attack the government forces of Bashar Al Assad, the secular leader who is fighting the very same terrorists the US sees as a threat to the US!
Obummer is playing a sick and cruel joke on the world. This can be plainly seen.
The mumbling and stumbling Obummer and his pal Hairy Kerry have been suffering setback after setback in their lie-ridden drive to war. Their so-called evidence is nothing but a feces pile of cherry-picked and hyped-up assumptions and insinuations. Add to this, Syria has called team Obummer’s bluff and agreed to the Russian proposal to mothball its chemical weapons.
This has taken the wind out of Obummer’s sails and he was forced to call off his attack dogs.
But it is evident that Russia has used its power to put the US in its place. Russia’s efforts thwarted a looming illegal war of aggression and have thrown enough wildcards into the mix that prevents Obummer from doing anything stupid, lest he wants to go down in history as worse than Bush, which once was though impossible.
Russia should use this momentum wisely.
A UN resolution is now in the works which will govern the Syrian CW disarmament process. Russia should use this as an opportunity to end this crisis once and for all and prevent the US from sabotaging the inspections process.
Among some things, the resolution must demand that ALL sides stop the stockpiling and use of chemical weapons.
Also, Russia must demand that this resolution is contingent on the US calling off its threats of war and promising to pursue a peaceful path to resolving the Syrian crisis.
And finally, if the US demands that the UN resolution contains a clause that either blames the CW attack of August 21 on the Syrian government or a threat of military action for Syrian non-compliance with its disarmament obligations, Russia must demand that the condition for signing on to this is contingent on US unconditionally handing over ALL evidence it has to back up their accusations that the Syrian government was responsible for launching the CW attacks last month to whoever wants it, including Syria. Russia’s agreement to the two clauses mentioned above must also be contingent on the evidence the US provides being genuine and solid after it is thoroughly fact-checked and all points investigated as true.
Anything less that is unacceptable.
P.S.-Obama’s speech on Tuesday night was filled with hyperbole and hypocrisy. He foolishly compared Assad to Hitler, called anyone using chemical weapons a criminal tyrant and tried to convince people that such tyrants must be stopped.
But Obummer omitted certain unpleasant and embarrassing facts in his speech: The use of Agent Orange in Vietnam which has caused birth defects in children up until today; the US and European sale of chemical weapons material to Iraq which was used by Saddam Hussein against the Iranians and the Kurds in the 1980s, with US help and blessing; Israel’s stockpiling of WMD and use against Palestinians in 2009 during the attack on Gaza Strip; US use of depleted uranium and white phosphorus on the battlefield, and as recent as Iraq, and of course, the biggest omission of all-the US use of the atomic bomb on Japan. The US is the ONLY country to do so to this day; not to mention the use of chemical weapons by dear ally Great Britain throughout history-in fact none other than Winston Churchill praised and encourage the use of chemical weapons on Palestinians and Afghans during Britain’s occupation of those lands.
With his speech, Obama has truly solidified his position as not only a liar but as a hypocrite and as one of the most warmongering neo-cons to have ever slithered out of the sewer.
Tuesday, September 10, 2013
Obama's War Circus Clowns
Obama , Kerry and the rest of the nutcases in the US government have been falling over themselves to lie and manipulate the public into supporting another war based on false accusations and lies.
After being told by the American people and the world that a military attack is unacceptable, Obama’s scummy handlers trotted out atrocity propaganda videos of the aftermath of the supposed chemical attack on August 21st. The attack showed dead children lying next to each other.
The pictures and videos came out just a few hours after the attack, which begs the question: how could these videos and pictures proliferate so quickly and so soon after the initial attacks? Most likely they were faked beforehand and quickly published. There are other such anomalies if one cares to examine this chemical attack “evidence” carefully.
The pathetic US mainstream media have on cue been acting as the White House cheerleaders, swallowing whatever garbage is fed to them by Obummer and his cohorts.
This is the same servile behavior we saw in the run-up to the Iraq debacle. The US media, after what happened in Iraq, still refuses to do their job. They refuse to question, to doubt, to analyze, to investigate. They just take Obama and Kerry's bullshit on faith.
But once again they are embarrassing themselves by providing a pulpit to degenerate liars and despicable warmongers and they will pay the price sooner or later.
The desperate Obama, isolated and ridiculed with no credible evidence to show, has been scraping the bottom of the barrel for any and all support from anyone to be a part of his coalition of the killing.
Just the other day he boasted that the number of countries support him is in the double digits. But a closer examination shows that these countries are either a)majority NATO members b)Arab states who support the Syrian militants already c)poor nations most likely coerced into this so-called coalition by bribery and/or threats of economic and diplomatic reprisals.
But the reality is that Obama has no true support, as most if not all people in those countries are against any attack on Syria. All that Obama has is a bunch of miserable and cowardly politicians who sell themselves out for cheap. Obama does not have these countries support; he has the subservience of their ruling political class.
With each passing day, the US case for war grows more shaky and ridiculous. To counter this, the Obama team has been screaming out their lies louder and louder, no doubt to cover up the ugly truth as to WHO were the real culprits behind this CW attack.
This has been followed up by discredited and outright lies by Mr. Kerry, such as that the rebels do not have chemical weapons or rockets. There is a lot of documented proof, from the militants themselves, that they have rockets.
Furthermore, what about the FACT that in the spring of 2013 Carla Del Ponte, the UN Human Rights Council chair reached the conclusion that rebels were most likely behind chemical attacks in Syria earlier this spring?
What about the FACT that rebels were arrested by Turkish police inside Turkey, with chemical weapon compounds in their apartment?
What about the FACT that some rebels have accidentally killed themselves inside tunnels by coming into contact with improperly stored barrels of chemical compounds used to make weapons?
Of course, Team Obama has chosen to ignore such evidence.
Obama has stressed that the US government has evidence supporting their view that the Syrian government is responsible for launching.
But the US refuses to share this so-called evidence and will not open this evidence up to closer scrutiny, citing “national security.”
Now, let’s look at this with logic.
If someone has solid and irrefutable evidence of wrongdoing against a criminal, and that person is called a liar and no one believes them, that person would naturally be throwing this evidence in the face of everyone they can find to prove that they are right and honest. They would definitely not keep it secret and make themselves look like lying fools.
But Team Obomber is doing just that. This is the number-one sign that they are lying and that the evidence they have is not worth used toilet paper.
Perhaps they are worried what would happen if the provenance of this so-called intelligence is found: rebel propaganda, made-up CIA fairytales, and Israeli deceptions like we saw regarding Iraq in 2003. I doubt there’s anything more to it than that.
Recently, Russian president Vladimir Putin has thrown a wildcard into the ring by suggesting that Syria scrap its chemical weapons in return for US agreeing to stop all war preparations. Syrian has shown support for this plan and is ready to cooperate.
This is a very shrewd move and it says some important things:
1. Syrian government is innocent of the accusations made against it because they would not allow anyone near their chemical weapons if they were guilty. Those CW could then be matched up with whatever the UN found in Ghouta, if the Syrian military launched them.
2. Syrian government gives a damn about its people since they are ready to give up a powerful deterrent in the name of preventing the loss of more Syrian lives to foreign warmongers
3. By giving up its chemical weapons stockpiles, the Syrians and Russians are also depriving the rebels of these weapons as well. If Syria scraps them, the rebels can no longer use them to stage false flag attacks and the US can no longer blame the Syrian government of using CW they no longer have. This takes a major benefit away from the US side, since all other excuses for intervention have failed and been worn out.
Of course, the US may exploit this agreement to enact never-ending/open-ended intrusive inspections, Iraq-style, with moving goalposts in order to prevent giving Syria a clean bill of health.
There is a lot of opportunity for the US regime to use any inspection process which may follow to torment and undermine Syria and demand that the agreement authorized military action should Syria fail to comply.
Then the US and the Zionist mafia-state would do everything in their power to make sure these inspections fail and never reach a peaceful conclusion.
Thankfully, after more than twenty years of US deception and duplicity in Iraq and elsewhere, Russia will keep a close eye on any future disarmament efforts in Syria and will not allow it to degenerate into one big US-led provocation for another illegal war.
As things stand, Obama and his administration are liars. They have no credible evidence, they have no case. Whether Obama gets his votes or not from congress, he will be committing an illegal act of aggression against Syria if he attacks.
Obama has painted himself into a tight corner with his lies. His rhetoric is becoming more ridiculous and incoherent every the day. He lies to cover up his own responsibility for the chemical attack in Syria and to protect the Al-Qaeda-linked militants the US and some European countries support.
Add to that the fact that the majority of the American public does not support him, the UN has turned its back as has NATO and his so-called allies.
Obama now stands alone.
Putin has just thrown him a lifeline.
Does Obama have enough decency and intelligence to take it?
We shall judge Obama’s true intentions by the choice he makes.
Is he a Nobel Peace Prize winner or a miserable Dubya wannabe warmonger?
After being told by the American people and the world that a military attack is unacceptable, Obama’s scummy handlers trotted out atrocity propaganda videos of the aftermath of the supposed chemical attack on August 21st. The attack showed dead children lying next to each other.
The pictures and videos came out just a few hours after the attack, which begs the question: how could these videos and pictures proliferate so quickly and so soon after the initial attacks? Most likely they were faked beforehand and quickly published. There are other such anomalies if one cares to examine this chemical attack “evidence” carefully.
The pathetic US mainstream media have on cue been acting as the White House cheerleaders, swallowing whatever garbage is fed to them by Obummer and his cohorts.
This is the same servile behavior we saw in the run-up to the Iraq debacle. The US media, after what happened in Iraq, still refuses to do their job. They refuse to question, to doubt, to analyze, to investigate. They just take Obama and Kerry's bullshit on faith.
But once again they are embarrassing themselves by providing a pulpit to degenerate liars and despicable warmongers and they will pay the price sooner or later.
The desperate Obama, isolated and ridiculed with no credible evidence to show, has been scraping the bottom of the barrel for any and all support from anyone to be a part of his coalition of the killing.
Just the other day he boasted that the number of countries support him is in the double digits. But a closer examination shows that these countries are either a)majority NATO members b)Arab states who support the Syrian militants already c)poor nations most likely coerced into this so-called coalition by bribery and/or threats of economic and diplomatic reprisals.
But the reality is that Obama has no true support, as most if not all people in those countries are against any attack on Syria. All that Obama has is a bunch of miserable and cowardly politicians who sell themselves out for cheap. Obama does not have these countries support; he has the subservience of their ruling political class.
With each passing day, the US case for war grows more shaky and ridiculous. To counter this, the Obama team has been screaming out their lies louder and louder, no doubt to cover up the ugly truth as to WHO were the real culprits behind this CW attack.
This has been followed up by discredited and outright lies by Mr. Kerry, such as that the rebels do not have chemical weapons or rockets. There is a lot of documented proof, from the militants themselves, that they have rockets.
Furthermore, what about the FACT that in the spring of 2013 Carla Del Ponte, the UN Human Rights Council chair reached the conclusion that rebels were most likely behind chemical attacks in Syria earlier this spring?
What about the FACT that rebels were arrested by Turkish police inside Turkey, with chemical weapon compounds in their apartment?
What about the FACT that some rebels have accidentally killed themselves inside tunnels by coming into contact with improperly stored barrels of chemical compounds used to make weapons?
Of course, Team Obama has chosen to ignore such evidence.
Obama has stressed that the US government has evidence supporting their view that the Syrian government is responsible for launching.
But the US refuses to share this so-called evidence and will not open this evidence up to closer scrutiny, citing “national security.”
Now, let’s look at this with logic.
If someone has solid and irrefutable evidence of wrongdoing against a criminal, and that person is called a liar and no one believes them, that person would naturally be throwing this evidence in the face of everyone they can find to prove that they are right and honest. They would definitely not keep it secret and make themselves look like lying fools.
But Team Obomber is doing just that. This is the number-one sign that they are lying and that the evidence they have is not worth used toilet paper.
Perhaps they are worried what would happen if the provenance of this so-called intelligence is found: rebel propaganda, made-up CIA fairytales, and Israeli deceptions like we saw regarding Iraq in 2003. I doubt there’s anything more to it than that.
Recently, Russian president Vladimir Putin has thrown a wildcard into the ring by suggesting that Syria scrap its chemical weapons in return for US agreeing to stop all war preparations. Syrian has shown support for this plan and is ready to cooperate.
This is a very shrewd move and it says some important things:
1. Syrian government is innocent of the accusations made against it because they would not allow anyone near their chemical weapons if they were guilty. Those CW could then be matched up with whatever the UN found in Ghouta, if the Syrian military launched them.
2. Syrian government gives a damn about its people since they are ready to give up a powerful deterrent in the name of preventing the loss of more Syrian lives to foreign warmongers
3. By giving up its chemical weapons stockpiles, the Syrians and Russians are also depriving the rebels of these weapons as well. If Syria scraps them, the rebels can no longer use them to stage false flag attacks and the US can no longer blame the Syrian government of using CW they no longer have. This takes a major benefit away from the US side, since all other excuses for intervention have failed and been worn out.
Of course, the US may exploit this agreement to enact never-ending/open-ended intrusive inspections, Iraq-style, with moving goalposts in order to prevent giving Syria a clean bill of health.
There is a lot of opportunity for the US regime to use any inspection process which may follow to torment and undermine Syria and demand that the agreement authorized military action should Syria fail to comply.
Then the US and the Zionist mafia-state would do everything in their power to make sure these inspections fail and never reach a peaceful conclusion.
Thankfully, after more than twenty years of US deception and duplicity in Iraq and elsewhere, Russia will keep a close eye on any future disarmament efforts in Syria and will not allow it to degenerate into one big US-led provocation for another illegal war.
As things stand, Obama and his administration are liars. They have no credible evidence, they have no case. Whether Obama gets his votes or not from congress, he will be committing an illegal act of aggression against Syria if he attacks.
Obama has painted himself into a tight corner with his lies. His rhetoric is becoming more ridiculous and incoherent every the day. He lies to cover up his own responsibility for the chemical attack in Syria and to protect the Al-Qaeda-linked militants the US and some European countries support.
Add to that the fact that the majority of the American public does not support him, the UN has turned its back as has NATO and his so-called allies.
Obama now stands alone.
Putin has just thrown him a lifeline.
Does Obama have enough decency and intelligence to take it?
We shall judge Obama’s true intentions by the choice he makes.
Is he a Nobel Peace Prize winner or a miserable Dubya wannabe warmonger?
Sunday, September 1, 2013
The Syrian Saga Continues...
The Syrian saga continues with the warmonger-in-chief Obama announcing that he will seek congressional approval from Congress for a military strike on Syria to punish it for launching chemical weapons. If he does not get it, he will act on his own, in true dictator fashion.
But Obama has come under increasing pressure and isolation from allies as well as public opinion, domestic and foreign. The UN has shot his war-dementia down as well.
People just don’t buy his fact-free rhetoric about the Syrian government being responsible for launching chemical weapons. Indeed, some US government officials as well as foreign leaders have stated that there is no proof which implicates Syria.
Earlier this week, Mr. Obama suffered a black eye (no pun intended) when the British government voted down PM David Cameron’s drive to war. Russian President Vladimir Putin has demanded that Obama show Russia and the UN the evidence he supposedly has which points to Syrian government responsibility for the CW attack.
But for course, Mr. Obama does not care. In his desperation, he has launched a publicity campaign to make a fraudulent case for war, and on a Saturday during Labor Day weekend.
But his so-called evidence is just a pile of trash, ala Iraq, cobbled up from rebel You Tube videos, rebel testimony, classified intelligence which cannot be shared because of national security concerns, and a bunch of talking points and heart-rending stories meant to mislead and manipulate the public.
Any intelligent person with an ounce of integrity can clearly see that Obama is lying. His attempts at blocking the work of UN investigators, disregarding their work and any evidence they may have, and his quick rush to war shows that this miserable bastard is trying to hide something.
A few days ago I caught a snippet of a TV program featuring Hal Lindsey, the fundamentalist Christian end-times preacher. He cast doubt on whether attacking Syria is a good idea and whether the Syrian government is responsible for the CW attacks.
Now if Hal Lindsey gets it, WTF is wrong with people who believe Obummer?
Of course, Obama says that any attack will be limited and meant to just send a message to Assad.
But Obama is lying, just as he lied about Libya.
A limited strike will not be all that he will do.
If Obama succeeds in attacking Syria, even on his own without congressional approval, he will set a convenient precedent for himself.
There may be another chemical attack a week or so after the 1st bombing which will again be blamed on Syria, and again Obama will order a limited strike. And this fraudulent scenario will be repeated over and over until Obama whittles away at so much of Syrian strength that regime change will be inevitable, because regime change is the desired end-result of all this.
It will be either this or a fierce counterattack by Syria and its allies against US bases and interests and against the Zionist mafia-state. If this happens, the results are just too horrible to imagine.
Obama has also been trying to con the public into accepting an intervention by saying that it will be limited to just a few hours and will not involve any US troops. As if this makes everything alright!
Obama may also be using the limited strike lie to provoke Syria into a retaliation that could cause major damage for the US military, such as sinking a ship or shooting down its aircraft.
This in turn would create a great excuse for Obama to call for an all-out attack on Syria by using Syria’s legitimate right to defend itself as some great act of treachery against the US. This would rally public opinion in the US to Obama’s side and he could then escalate the war, bringing in hesitant allies.
But as things stand, Obama has no evidence to back up his accusations against Syria, regardless of the hype he has been spreading.
Obama stands isolated and alone. The American public does not support him; the world does not support him; the UN is not on-board as isn’t NATO or any allied government. Even some in the US congress are squeamish. Protests against any intervention in Syria are already occurring.
Bottom line is that Obama has no case to make without solid and credible proof that the Syrian government ordered the launch of CW. Syria is not a threat to the US. He has no UN mandate and hopefully congress votes him down.
Obama does not give a damn about the Syrian people. If he did, he would not have helped fuel a fake rebellion for over two years which has devastated Syria and killed so many of its people. He would also not train Al Qaeda-linked rebels to launch false-flag chemical attacks, blame it on someone else, and then state that he will help the Syrian people by launching more bombs which will end up killing even more of those people he professes to care so much about.
The US objective in Syria is to overthrow its government, install a puppet regime, and hit back against Russia, Iran and Hezbollah who support Assad and his government.
This has to do with furthering US strategic and economic interests, not helping the Syrian people.
Obama wants to punish Assad not for launching chemical attacks.
He wants to punish Assad for daring to successfully defy and resist the US Empire and its scummy proxy militants.
It is up to everyone to demand that Obama not be given any aid or authority to launch any wars of aggression or any limited strikes. Without solid evidence, all these moves will be illegal, regardless of whether congress gives him a green light or not.
People worldwide, especially Americans, must make clear to Obama that if he launches another war based on lies and fake evidence that he will be the one who will face punishment, including impeachment.
We are seeing the same lies and manipulation which were employed ten years ago against Iraq. These lies and false accusations are also being regurgitated by some of the same criminals who gave a nod to the illegal invasion of Iraq back then.
Hopefully this time people notice and will not allow another obscenity to become reality.
But Obama has come under increasing pressure and isolation from allies as well as public opinion, domestic and foreign. The UN has shot his war-dementia down as well.
People just don’t buy his fact-free rhetoric about the Syrian government being responsible for launching chemical weapons. Indeed, some US government officials as well as foreign leaders have stated that there is no proof which implicates Syria.
Earlier this week, Mr. Obama suffered a black eye (no pun intended) when the British government voted down PM David Cameron’s drive to war. Russian President Vladimir Putin has demanded that Obama show Russia and the UN the evidence he supposedly has which points to Syrian government responsibility for the CW attack.
But for course, Mr. Obama does not care. In his desperation, he has launched a publicity campaign to make a fraudulent case for war, and on a Saturday during Labor Day weekend.
But his so-called evidence is just a pile of trash, ala Iraq, cobbled up from rebel You Tube videos, rebel testimony, classified intelligence which cannot be shared because of national security concerns, and a bunch of talking points and heart-rending stories meant to mislead and manipulate the public.
Any intelligent person with an ounce of integrity can clearly see that Obama is lying. His attempts at blocking the work of UN investigators, disregarding their work and any evidence they may have, and his quick rush to war shows that this miserable bastard is trying to hide something.
A few days ago I caught a snippet of a TV program featuring Hal Lindsey, the fundamentalist Christian end-times preacher. He cast doubt on whether attacking Syria is a good idea and whether the Syrian government is responsible for the CW attacks.
Now if Hal Lindsey gets it, WTF is wrong with people who believe Obummer?
Of course, Obama says that any attack will be limited and meant to just send a message to Assad.
But Obama is lying, just as he lied about Libya.
A limited strike will not be all that he will do.
If Obama succeeds in attacking Syria, even on his own without congressional approval, he will set a convenient precedent for himself.
There may be another chemical attack a week or so after the 1st bombing which will again be blamed on Syria, and again Obama will order a limited strike. And this fraudulent scenario will be repeated over and over until Obama whittles away at so much of Syrian strength that regime change will be inevitable, because regime change is the desired end-result of all this.
It will be either this or a fierce counterattack by Syria and its allies against US bases and interests and against the Zionist mafia-state. If this happens, the results are just too horrible to imagine.
Obama has also been trying to con the public into accepting an intervention by saying that it will be limited to just a few hours and will not involve any US troops. As if this makes everything alright!
Obama may also be using the limited strike lie to provoke Syria into a retaliation that could cause major damage for the US military, such as sinking a ship or shooting down its aircraft.
This in turn would create a great excuse for Obama to call for an all-out attack on Syria by using Syria’s legitimate right to defend itself as some great act of treachery against the US. This would rally public opinion in the US to Obama’s side and he could then escalate the war, bringing in hesitant allies.
But as things stand, Obama has no evidence to back up his accusations against Syria, regardless of the hype he has been spreading.
Obama stands isolated and alone. The American public does not support him; the world does not support him; the UN is not on-board as isn’t NATO or any allied government. Even some in the US congress are squeamish. Protests against any intervention in Syria are already occurring.
Bottom line is that Obama has no case to make without solid and credible proof that the Syrian government ordered the launch of CW. Syria is not a threat to the US. He has no UN mandate and hopefully congress votes him down.
Obama does not give a damn about the Syrian people. If he did, he would not have helped fuel a fake rebellion for over two years which has devastated Syria and killed so many of its people. He would also not train Al Qaeda-linked rebels to launch false-flag chemical attacks, blame it on someone else, and then state that he will help the Syrian people by launching more bombs which will end up killing even more of those people he professes to care so much about.
The US objective in Syria is to overthrow its government, install a puppet regime, and hit back against Russia, Iran and Hezbollah who support Assad and his government.
This has to do with furthering US strategic and economic interests, not helping the Syrian people.
Obama wants to punish Assad not for launching chemical attacks.
He wants to punish Assad for daring to successfully defy and resist the US Empire and its scummy proxy militants.
It is up to everyone to demand that Obama not be given any aid or authority to launch any wars of aggression or any limited strikes. Without solid evidence, all these moves will be illegal, regardless of whether congress gives him a green light or not.
People worldwide, especially Americans, must make clear to Obama that if he launches another war based on lies and fake evidence that he will be the one who will face punishment, including impeachment.
We are seeing the same lies and manipulation which were employed ten years ago against Iraq. These lies and false accusations are also being regurgitated by some of the same criminals who gave a nod to the illegal invasion of Iraq back then.
Hopefully this time people notice and will not allow another obscenity to become reality.